Management and results of early-onset scoliosis with dual magnetically controlled growing rods: Additional preliminary results of spinal fusion surgery

Does bilateral rib augmentation with lamina bands enhance cranial anchoring in magnetically controlled growing rod treatment? Evaluation of complication rate

Background

Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) presents a challenging condition often associated with severe health implications if left untreated. Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGR) have revolutionized EOS management, offering less-invasive spinal correction and growth preservation. Despite these advancements, high complication rates (21 %-66 % in MCGR-treated patients), particularly cranial screw loosening, remain a concern.

Objective

This study evaluates the complication rates associated with MCGR implantation in EOS and investigates the impact of bilateral rib augmentation with lamina bands on cranial anchoring stability.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on 62 EOS patients treated with MCGR between 2013 and 2022. Clinical and radiographic data, including Cobb angles, sagittal alignment, and complication profiles, were analyzed. Patients with and without bilateral lamina band augmentation were compared to assess its impact on cranial screw loosening. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

The cohort included 36 idiopathic (58 %) and 26 neuromuscular (42 %) scoliosis cases, with a mean age of 11.1 ± 2.4 years. Postoperative analysis demonstrated significant improvement in Cobb angle and apex deviation (p < 0.05). 13 of 62 patients (21 %) required an unplanned revision. Cranial screw loosening was reported in 13 cases (21 %), with 6 (10 %) of these requiring unplanned surgical revision. Bilateral rib augmentation with lamina bands showed a reduced rate of cranial screw loosening from 50 % to 10.9 % (OR = 8.2, p < 0.05). Thoracic kyphosis flattening post-implantation was linked to higher rates of cranial anchorage failure.

Conclusion

MCGR treatment effectively corrects deformities and preserves spinal growth in EOS, but complications such as cranial screw loosening highlight the need for enhanced anchoring techniques. Rib augmentation with lamina bands significantly improves cranial stability and may reduce mechanical complications. Further research for optimizing surgical techniques and understanding biomechanical factors is crucial to improve outcomes.

Increased lengthening frequency does not adversely affect the EOSQ scores in magnetically controlled growing rod surgeries in 133 subjects followed to final fusion

PURPOSE

Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) allows frequent outpatient rod lengthening when treating Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) patients. But there is lack of expert consensus on the optimal MCGR lengthening interval. EOS 24-Item Questionnaire (EOSQ) is validated for assessing health-related quality of life (HrQOL), family burden, and satisfaction. This is the first study assessing how MCGR lengthening intervals affects patient-perceived outcomes.

METHODS

This is a multicentred cohort study with subjects recruited from 2012 to 2018 and followed till fusion. EOS subjects who underwent MCGR surgeries were grouped into high, medium or low lengthening interval subgroups based on 16 and 20 week cut-offs. Repeated measure analysis was performed on EOSQ's specified 12 domains. EOSQ results were taken: before index surgery, after index surgery, and prior to definitive treatment. Demographic, clinical and radiographic data were included in model adjustment.

RESULTS

133 subjects with mean follow-up of 3.5 (± 1.3) years were included, with 60 males and 73 females; 45 idiopathic, 23 congenital, 38 neuromuscular, and 27 syndromic patients. Mean Cobb angle at surgery was 67° (± 22°) with mean age of 8.3 (± 2.5) years. Between groups, clinical and radiographic parameters were comparable. Higher EOSQ scores in medium lengthening interval subgroup was present in fatigue (p = 0.019), emotion (p = 0.001), and parental impact (p = 0.049) domains, and overall score (p = 0.046). Trendline contrast between subgroups were present in general health (p = 0.006) and physical function (p = 0.025) domains.

CONCLUSION

Patient-perceived outcome improvements appear similar between lengthening interval subgroups. All MCGR lengthening intervals were tolerated by patients and family, with no negative impact observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

Is posterior vertebral arthrodesis at the end of the electromagnetic rod lengthening program necessary for all patients? Comparative analysis of sixty six patients who underwent definitive spinal arthrodesis and twenty four patients with in situ lengthening rods

PURPOSE

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) should be removed or changed at most two years after their implantation in the treatment of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) (Safety notice July 2021). However, in the face of patients at high risk of intraoperative complications and relying on the principle of auto-fusion of the spine, some surgeons would prefer a more wait-and-see attitude. The aim of this study was to report on patients who did not undergo final fusion at the end of the lengthening program with MCGR and to compare them with those who did.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study with ten centres. We collected all graduate patients with EOS who had received MCGR between 2011 and 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients had final fusion at the end of the lengthening program and 24 patients kept MCGRs in situ. The mean total follow-up time was 66 months (range, 25.3-109), and the mean follow-up time after final lengthening was 24.9 months (range, 3-67.7). Regarding the main curve and thoracic height, there was no significant difference in the percentage of correction over the whole follow-up between the two groups (p = 0.099, p = 0.176) although there was a significant difference between the end of lengthening and the last follow-up (p < 0.001). After completion of the lengthening program, 18 patients who had final fusion developed 24 of the 26 recorded complications (92.3%).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the manufacturer's published safety notice, not all patients systematically benefited from the removal of the MCGRs. Although arthrodesis significantly improved the scoliotic deformity, no significant difference was found in terms of radiographic outcome between patients who underwent spinal fusion and those who kept the MCGRs in situ.

Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.

METHODS

This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.

CONCLUSION

Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Less-Invasive Approach to Early-Onset Scoliosis—Surgical Technique for Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) Based on Treatment of 2-Year-Old Child with Severe Scoliosis

Background: Spinal deformities in children can be caused by various etiologies, such as congenital, syndromic, neuromuscular, or idiopathic. Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is diagnosed before the age of ten years, and when the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. Initial minimally invasive surgery and the implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allows for the noninvasive distraction of the spine, growing, and avoids multiple operations associated with the classic distractions of standard growing rods. Case presentation: A 2-year-old girl was admitted to our clinic with rapidly progressive thoracic scoliosis. The major curve of the thoracic spine Cobb angle was 122° at 30 months. No congenital deformities were detected. The surgical technique was the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MCGRs, without long incisions on the back and the non-invasive ambulatory lengthening of her spine over the next 4 years. Conclusions: MCGR is a safe procedure for EOS patients. It is extremely effective at correcting spinal deformity; controlling the growth and curvature of the spine as the child develops during growth; reducing the number of hospitalizations and anesthesia; and minimizing the physical and mental burden of young patients, parents, and their families.