Lightbulb technique for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Hip joint-preserving strategies for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head: From nonoperative to operative procedures

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) has an exceedingly high prevalence and disability rate, causing a tremendous socioeconomic burden. The prevalence of ONFH is increasing, while the population of the patients with ONFH is becoming younger. Once the femoral head collapses, treatment becomes difficult and often requires a hip joint replacement, which is not favorable for young patients. Therefore, hip joint-preserving treatments at an early stage of ONFH are particularly important. This study provides a comprehensive review on hip-preserving strategies for treating ONFH, including nonoperative treatments (e.g., protective weight bearing, hyperbaric oxygen, pulsed electromagnetic, extracorporeal shockwave, bisphosphonate, anticoagulants, hypolipidemics, vasodilators, and traditional Chinese medicine) and operative treatments (e.g., core decompression, osteotomy, bone grafting, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, tantalum rods, and tissue engineering). Nonoperative treatments aim to slow down the progression of the disease and delay the need for joint replacement; however, they usually cannot effectively prevent the progression of the disease, except in cases of small necrosis areas (<10 %). Additionally, nonoperative treatments have unclear mechanisms that require further investigation. In contrast, operative treatments may stop the negative outcomes of necrosis and therefore appear to be more promising. Currently, an emerging area in operative treatments is regenerative medicine, which could promote the generation of bone tissues and blood vessels and restore hip joint function to pre-necrotic levels as much as possible. This review seeks to not only provide an important reference for clinicians when choosing appropriate strategies for treating ONFH but also offer certain guidance for future basic research in developing ONFH treatments.

The translational potential of this article

The incidence of ONFH is increasing, and patients are becoming younger on average. Therefore, the development of hip joint-preserving strategies to treat ONFH at earlier stages is urgently needed, particularly for young patients. However, a comprehensive review is lacking regarding the currently-available hip joint-preserving strategies and their effectiveness. This study is motivated to fill this gap and serve as an important reference for clinicians in choosing appropriate strategies to treat ONFH.

Jack Surgery: Reconstructing Collapsed Femoral Head in Association Research Circulation Osseous Stage III Osteonecrosis: A Series of 13 Cases

OBJECTIVE

According to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging, patients with ARCO III osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) have joint pain and dysfunction due to the collapse of femoral head. Current hip preservation surgeries are not satisfying in the treatment of ARCO III ONFH according to the long-term follow-up. In our practice, we focused on reconstructing femoral head by restoring the round shape of femoral head and subsequently preventing the development of hip arthritis. To lift the collapsed femoral head and postpone the potential total hip arthroplasty, we practiced Jack surgery, combining surgical hip dislocation, removal of necrotic bone, impaction bone grafting, and lifting the cartilage of femoral head.

METHODS

From February 2019 to July 2022, 13 patients (15 hips) who received Jack surgery in the research center were included in this retrospective study. Follow-up was conducted every 3 months after surgery for imaging and clinical evaluation. The differences between visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HSS) before and after surgery were compared to observe whether the femoral head collapsed and whether osteotomy healed after surgery. Severe collapse of the femoral head ( > 2 mm) or receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) was defined as failure of hip preservation therapy. An Independent sample t-test was used to compare the data, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data.

RESULTS

All the 13 patients successfully completed the surgery and were followed up. The average time of follow-up was 36.46 ± 16.87 months (ranging from 14 to 66 months). HSS was assessed 12 months after surgery: excellent in 1 patient with 1 hip; good in 9 patients with 11 hips; modest in 3 patients with 3 hips. To the last follow-up, the VAS scores decreased from 6.17 ± 1.02 to 2.08 ± 0.90 (p < 0.001), HSS increased from 46.69 ± 4.15 to 89.77 ± 2.86 (p < 0.001). No deep infection, fracture, osteotomy nonunion, nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

For young patients with ONFH of ACRO III, this surgical technique can effectively restore the original shape of the femoral head and achieve satisfactory hip function in the short term. The mechanism is similar to jacking the roof of a house; thus, we named it "Jack surgery".

Systematic analysis of hip-preserving treatment for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head from the perspective of bibliometrics (2010-2023)

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a serious condition that causes bone tissue death, femoral head collapse, and hip joint destruction. Early intervention through hip-preserving treatment is crucial to slow down disease progression, preserve hip joint function, and improve the quality of life of patients. We analyzed the knowledge map, research gaps, and future research directions in the field of hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH.

METHODS

All publications related to hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH published between 2010 and 2023 were identified from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using VOSviewer 1.6.19, CiteSpace 6.2.R2, and Scimago Graphica 1.0.35.

RESULTS

In total, 234 articles were analyzed. The results showed an exponential growth trend in the number of publications related to hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH in the past decade. China and the USA were the main contributors. International Orthopaedics published the most papers in this field, whereas Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume had the highest average citation count per article. Several stable research topics were noted in this field, including core decompression (CD), osteotomy, bone transplantation in hip-preserving surgery, and cell therapy, which have become research hotspots in hip-preserving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH has received increasing attention, and research in this field is expected to grow. Stable research topics include core decompression (CD), osteotomy, bone transplantation, and cell therapy. Future research is predicted to focus on cell therapy and combination therapy, resulting in an increasing number of publications on hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH.

Reconstructing avascular necrotic femoral head through a bioactive β-TCP system: From design to application

A variety of techniques have been used for treating avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH), but have frequently failed. In this study, we proposed a β-TCP system for the treatment of ANFH by boosting revascularization and bone regeneration. The angio-conductive properties and concurrent osteogenesis of the highly interconnected porous β-TCP scaffold were revealed and quantified through an in vivo model that simulated the ischemic environment of ANFH. Mechanical test and finite element analysis showed that the mechanical loss caused by tissue necrosis and surgery was immediately partially compensated after implantation, and the strength of the operated femoral head was adaptively increased and eventually returned to normal bone, along with continuous material degradation and bone regeneration. For translational application, we further conducted a multi-center open-label clinical trial to assess the efficacy of the β-TCP system in treating ANFH. Two hundred fourteen patients with 246 hips were enrolled for evaluation, and 82.1% of the operated hips survived at a 42.79-month median follow-up. The imaging results, hip function, and pain scores were dramatically improved compared to preoperative levels. ARCO stage Ⅱ disease outperformed stage Ⅲ in terms of clinical effectiveness. Thus, bio-adaptive reconstruction using the β-TCP system is a promising hip-preserving strategy for the treatment of ANFH.

Prognostic factors in the management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several hip preserving techniques have been described for the management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This systematic review identified prognostic factors in the treatment of ONFH that are associated with treatment failure and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in November 2021. All clinical trials comparing two or more treatments for femoral head osteonecrosis were accessed. A multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association between baseline characteristics and the surgical outcome. A multiple linear model regression analysis through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used.

RESULTS

Data from 88 articles (6112 procedures) were retrieved. Female gender was associated with increased time to THA (P = 0.03) and reduced rate of THA (P = 0.03). Longer symptom duration before treatment was associated with shorter time to failure (P = 0.03). Increased pre-treatment VAS was associated with reduced time to failure (P = 0.03) and time to THA (P = 0.04). Reduced pre-treatment hip function was associated with increased rate of THA (P = 0.02) and failure (P = 0.005). Patient age and BMI, aetiology, time from surgery to full weight bearing and the side did not show evidence of a statistically significant association with the surgical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Male gender, longer symptom duration before treatment, higher VAS scores, and lower HHS scores were negative prognostic factors after treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Optimal drilling at femoral head-neck junction for treatment of the femoral head necrosis: Experimental and numerical evaluation

BACKGROUND

Advanced core decompression (ACD) is a relative new technique for treatment of early stages of avascular femoral head necrosis. Although it is a promising treatment option, there is a need to modify this technique for achieving higher hip survival rates. An idea was to combine this technique with the lightbulb procedure in order to get a complete removal of the necrosis. This study aimed at evaluating the fracture risk of the femora treated by the combined Lightbulb-ACD technique as the basis for clinical application.

METHODS

Subject-specific models were generated from CT scan data of five intact femora. Several treated models were then created from each intact bone and simulated during normal walking activity. Biomechanical testing was additionally performed on 12 pairs of cadaver femora to confirm the simulation results.

FINDINGS

The finite element results revealed that the risk factor of the treated models with a 8 mm-drill increased, but was not significantly greater than that of their corresponding intact models. However, for the femur treated with a 10 mm-drill, the risk factor increased significantly. Fracture always initiated on the femoral neck, i.e. it was either subcapital or transcervical fracture. Our biomechanical testing results correlated well with the simulation data which confirmed the usefulness and effectiveness of the bone models.

INTERPRETATION

The combined Lightbulb-ACD technique using a 10 mm drill increased the fracture risk of femur postoperatively. A drill of up to 8 mm at the anterior head-neck junction did not however lead to the weakening of the femur so that full load bearing may be possible.

One in five patients require conversion to arthroplasty after non-vascularized bone grafts in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Non-vascularized bone grafting (NVBG) has demonstrated to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). There are a number of articles updating the use of NVBG to treat the ONFH, but the percentage of patients subsequently undergoing a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is controversial.

METHODS

Several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, were searched to find studies using NVBG to treat ONFH. The pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the conversion rate to THA after NVBG. In addition, we performed subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies describing 2599 hips were included. The mean weighted follow-up time was 50.5 months and the mean age at surgery was 36.3 years. The conversion rate to THA after NVBG was 21% (95%CI: 17% to 25%), and subgroup analyzes indicated lightbulb, trapdoor and Phemister techniques incidences with THA of 15%, 19%, and 24%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study preliminarily obtained the general trend of the survival rate of NVBG patients, but these results should be interpreted cautiously. Pooled results from 2599 hips and of these nearly 80% with early stage of osteonecrosis, showed that approximately 21% of patients underwent a THA following NVBG. NVBG treatment for patient with ONFH appears to defer or at least delay the need for THA.

Development of a Practical Model to Predict Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Non-Vascularized Bone Grafting

Objective

To identify risk factors of failure after Non-Vascularized Bone Grafting (NVBG) in osteonecrosis patients, establish and validate a nomogram predictive model of hip survival after NVBG.

Methods

Data on ONFH patients undergoing NVBG at our institution between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Preoperative risk factors potentially associated with failure after NVBG were assessed by univariate Cox regression analyses. A predictive nomogram was developed based on multivariate Cox regression model. The performance of the nomogram model was evaluated by C statistic. Subjects were stratified according to total points calculated from the nomogram and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to further evaluate the discrimination of the model. The model was also internally validated through calibration curves.

Results

The overall 2-year and 5-year hip survival percentages were 91.8 and 84.6%, respectively. Age, etiology, Association Research Circulation Osseous stage and range of necrotic lesion were independent risk factors of failure after NVBG. The C statistic of the nomogram model established with these predictors was 0.77 and Kaplan-Meier curves of the tertiles showed satisfactory discrimination of the model. Internal validation by calibration curves indicated favorable consistency between actual and predicted hip survival rate.

Conclusion

This predictive model may be a practical tool for patient selection of NVBG. However, future studies are still needed to externally validate this model.

Core decompression and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injection for Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Various joint preserving treatments are available for use in Avascular Necrosis of the femoral head. Most of these are effective in the pre-collapse stage of the disease. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of core decompression and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in various stages of AVN, in modifying the progression of the disease and the need for hip replacement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines were followed. The literature search was conducted from inception till 2nd May 2021, on the PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar search engines, using "bone marrow aspirate concentrate osteonecrosis femur" and "bmac osteonecrosis femur" as the keywords. In all these studies, Core Decompression with Bone marrow Aspirate concentrate was performed. The evaluation was done based on the progression of osteonecrosis, improvement in functional outcomes and the conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

RESULTS

We have analyzed 612 hips from11 studies, based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 38.27 years. There was a predominance of males. The grade of AVN ranged from grade 1 to 4. The average follow-up period of the cases ranged from 2 to 12 years (average: 4.38 years). The functional scores were improved in the majority of cases. Radiographic progression occurred in 23.5% of hips, and the Total Hip Arthroplasty was performed in 14.9% of hips.

CONCLUSIONS

Core decompression with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in pre-collapse stages of the disease is beneficial in improving the functions scores and for reducing the radiological progression of the disease and need for total hip arthroplasty, in the majority of cases.

Avascular necrosis after femoral neck fracture in children and adolescents: poor prognosis and risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Avascular necrosis (AVN) after femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a rare and severe paediatric condition, but only few studies described its prognosis and risk factors. The present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and independent factors for poor prognosis of AVN after FNF in children and adolescents.

METHOD

This retrospective study included children and adolescents with AVN after FNF who received conservative treatment (CT group) or non-vascularized bone grafting (NVBG group) between 2000 and 2018. The primary outcomes were the risk of hip arthritis (Tönnis grade) and hip deformity risk (Stulberg classification). All patients were followed for at least two years to assess AVN progression.

RESULTS

Study included 81 patients. In the CT group, 23/43 patients (53.4%) developed hip arthritis, and 24/43 patients (55.8%) showed hip deformity. In the NVBG group, 23/38 patients (60.5%) developed hip arthritis, and 34/38 patients (89.5%) had a hip deformity. The multivariable analysis indicated that NVBG surgery had no significant effect on the outcomes. Post-treatment femoral head collapse (P = 0.05, OR = 3.80, 95% CI = 1.01-14.29) and post-treatment hip subluxation (P = 0.01, OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 2.31-129.56) were independent risk factors for severe hip arthritis. Post-treatment femoral head collapse (P < 0.01, OR = 7.64, 95% CI = 3.23-18.04) and pre-treatment hip subluxation (P = 0.02, OR = 7.33, 95% CI = 1.44-37.41) were independent risk factors for severe hip deformity.

CONCLUSION

Neither CT nor NVBG have demonstrated superiority regarding long-term outcomes in patients with AVN after FNF. Upon the disease progression to severe collapse with subluxation and severe arthritis, further hip preservation attempts could be futile.

Treatment of pre-collapse non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head through Orthopdische Chirurgie München approach combined with autologous bone mixed with β-tricalcium phosphate porous bioceramic bone graft: a retrospective study of mid-term results

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of femoral head and neck fenestration combined with autologous bone mixed with β-tricalcium phosphate porous bioceramic bone (light bulb procedure) through Orthopdische Chirurgie München approach (OCM approach) for pre-collapse non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head(ONFH).

Methods

The clinical data of 47 patients (47 hips) with ONFH were retrospectively reviewed. The Harris hip score (HHS) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Imaging was assessed by X-ray. Clinical failure was defined as postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) or the HHS was poor (< 70). The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to conduct a univariate analysis of risk factors. The analysis factors included gender, age, International Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage, etiology, body mass index (BMI), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide (CTX). The COX multivariate risk model was used to analyze the risk factors.

Results

All the 47 hips were followed up for 24–58 months, with an average of 45 months. The Harris score (76.29 ± 10.38) at the last follow-up was significantly higher than the preoperative HHS (64.45 ± 2.93) (P < 0.05). The postoperative HHS was excellent with a success rate of 36.17%. Postoperative imaging evaluation showed that 9 hips improved, 28 hips stabilized, and 10 hips progressed. Moreover, 17 out of 47 hips were defined as a postoperative clinical failure and the success rate was 63.83%. 25(OH)D and preoperative ARCO stage were risk factors for postoperative clinical failure (P < 0.05). The COX multivariate risk model analysis showed that IIIA stage was an independent risk factor for postoperative clinical failure (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The head and neck fenestration and bone grafting via the OCM approach in the treatment of non-traumatic ONFH in the pre-collapse stage can achieve good clinical outcomes. 25(OH)D deficient patients and ARCO IIIA patients had a higher failure rate of bone graft using this approach.

Treatment of Femoral Head Osteonecrosis (Stages 2B, 3 Ficat) Through Open Direct Core Decompression by Allograft Impaction and Light Bulb Technique

Background

Femoral head avascular necrosis is the cause of paralyzing status of youth population. Initial diagnosis is the main element in treating the disease. Bone grafting and core decompression are the approved cures at the early steps of the disease. Hip replacement in a total manner is the common cure in the final stages. The optimal treatment in the intermediate stages is partially disputable. We investigated several patients with femoral head osteonecrosis cured with impacted cancellous allograft and open core decompression using the lightbulb technique.

Methods

A total of 46 patients (58 hips) suffering from femoral head osteonecrosis were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. Patients were classified into two groups: A (stage 2B Ficat) and B (stage 3 Ficat) to be treated with the impaction of cancellous allograft and by open core decompression. Radiographic results, demographic data, and range of hip joint motions were recorded. The patients were assessed through employing the Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) index prior to operation and over five years following surgery. We also studied radiographic alterations of femoral head.

Results

The means of HHS and VAS were developed following the operation. Radiographic outcomes promoted in both groups, however, it was better in group A. 12 (40%) and six (22%) hips (40%) in groups A and B, respectively displayed developed stages following the operation. The hip ROM was enhanced with the mean of 15-20 degrees (P<0.005).

Conclusion

Open core decompression combined with allograft impaction sounds to be influential in the developing steps of femoral head necrosis and leads to joint discomfort and diminished pain improving ROM of the hip joint and meanwhile procrastinating the worsening of the disease.

Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update

➢. Clinicians should exercise a high level of suspicion in at-risk patients (those who use corticosteroids, consume excessive alcohol, have sickle cell disease, etc.) in order to diagnose osteonecrosis of the femoral head in its earliest stage. ➢. Nonoperative treatment modalities have generally been ineffective at halting progression. Thus, nonoperative treatment is not appropriate in early stages when one is attempting to preserve the native joint, except potentially on rare occasions for small-sized, medially located lesions, which may heal without surgery. ➢. Joint-preserving procedures should be attempted in early-stage lesions to save the femoral head. ➢. Cell-based augmentation of joint-preserving procedures continues to show promising results, and thus should be considered as an ancillary treatment method that may improve clinical outcomes. ➢. The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in the setting of osteonecrosis are excellent, with results similar to those in patients who have an underlying diagnosis of osteoarthritis.