Comparison between MIPO and the deltopectoral approach with allogenous fibular bone graft in proximal humeral fractures

Bone grafting augmentation choices in complex proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review

Objective

To systematically identify and evaluate different bone graft augmentation techniques in the operative treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures.

Methods

Four databases were searched from 1970 to February 2023 for Level I to IV English studies that investigated outcomes of different bone augments in the primary surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. The JBI critical appraisal checklist, methodological index for non-randomized studies and cochrane risk of bias tool were used to assess study quality. Descriptive statistics including weighted means are presented where applicable.

Methods

Thirty-three articles including 964 patients met the inclusion. Seven bone augments were identified, including fibular strut allograft (693 patients across 21 studies), femoral head allograft (84 patients across 4 studies), iliac crest allograft (54 patients across 3 studies), iliac crest autograft (94 patients across 5 studies), humeral endosteal allograft (6 patients in 1 single study), unspecified cancellous allograft (28 patients in 1 single study) and distal clavicle autograft (3 patients in 1 single study). Mean patient age was 67.1 years, with female patients comprising 65.2 %. Fracture union rates were similar between groups, with an average of 99.6 %. The average Constant Murley Score (CMS) was not reported in the humeral endosteal allograft or the distal clavicle autograft group but was 81.8 (fibular strut allograft), 79.1 (femoral head allograft), 76.8 (iliac crest allograft), 77.7 (iliac crest autograft), and 81.5 (unspecified cancellous allograft) in the remaining groups. Revision surgery was required in 16.7 % of patients receiving humeral endosteal allograft, 7 % of patients with femoral head allograft, 2 % of iliac crest autografts and 1.9 % in the fibular allograft group. Reported complications included avascular necrosis, hardware complications and loss of reduction.

Conclusion

Bone graft augmentation is an effective adjunct to open reduction internal fixation of complex proximal humerus fractures. Fibular strut allograft is the most common bone graft augment used. Majority of patients treated with bone graft augmentation achieved bony union (83%-100 %) and average CMS scores at final follow-up were similar between graft types (76-82). However, no conclusive data suggests superiority of one bone graft type over another. Future studies should aim to compare the outcomes amongst graft types.

Novel Use of a Fibular Strut Allograft with Fibular Head in an Elderly Patient with Proximal Humeral Fracture and Severe Metaphyseal Comminution: An Alternative to Shoulder Arthroplasty

Treatment of a comminuted proximal humerus fracture (PHF) in elderly patients with severe osteoporosis is challenging, often leading to arthroplasty (such as hemiarthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty) as the treatment of choice. However, arthroplasty does not always guarantee favorable outcomes. In contrast, the use of intramedullary fibular strut allografts provides additional reduction stability during locking plate fixation; however, to our knowledge, there is limited literature on the use of fibular strut allografts, including the fibular head. Here we aim to report the advantages of using a fibular strut containing the fibular head in severe osteoporotic PHFs. We present the case of an 88-year-old female patient with severe osteoporosis diagnosed with a left PHF accompanied by severe metaphyseal comminution following a fall from a chair. Rather than shoulder arthroplasty, we performed osteosynthesis using a fibular strut allograft containing the fibular head. At the one-year follow-up after surgery, we observed excellent bony union and a favorable functional outcome without major complications, such as reduction loss. The novel use of a fibular strut allograft containing the fibular head could be promising for PHFs with severe metaphyseal comminution, potentially avoiding the need for arthroplasty.

Effectiveness of locking compression plate for proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients without structural bone grafting: age group of 65-79 compared to 80 and above

PURPOSE

This study shows the effectiveness of locking compression plate for proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients over 80 years old without structural bone grafting compared age group of 65-79 (Group 1) with 80 and above (Group 2).

METHODS

This study included sixty-one patients who underwent using locking compression plate for proximal humeral fractures between April 2016 and November 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. The neck shaft angle (NSA) was checked at immediately after surgery, at 1 month and the final follow-up visit. The NSA changes in the two groups were compared using the independent t-test. In addition, multiple regression analysis was used to find out which factors affect NSA changes.

RESULTS

In group 1, the mean difference between NSA immediately after surgery and 1 month after surgery was 2.74°, and group 2 was 2.89°. In group 1, the mean difference in NSA for 1 month after surgery and at the last follow-up was 1.43°, and group 2 was 1.75°. No significant difference was observed in the NSA changes between two groups (p = 0.59, 0.173). Bone marrow density and four-part fracture type were significant difference in NSA changes (p = 0.003, 0.035). The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scale (DASH scale), age, medical support, diabetes and three-part fracture type were no significant in NSA changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Using locking compression plate without structural bone grafting is a good option in elderly patients over 80 years old and can help achieve radiological results similar to patients which age group of 67-79.

An updated systematic review and meta‑analysis comparing deltoid‑split approach with deltopectoral approach for proximal humerus fractures

The present review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the currently available data and to compare the important clinical and functional outcomes in patients with proximal humerus fractures who were treated using deltoid split (DS) or deltopectoral (DP) surgical approaches. The PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that reported functional outcome data of patients with fracture of proximal humerus who were surgically treated using DS and DP approaches. A total of 14 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The duration of surgery [min; weighted mean difference (WMD), -16.44; 95% CI, -(25.25-7.63)], amount of blood loss [ml; WMD, -57.99; 95% CI, -(102.74-13.23)] and time to bone union [weeks WMD, -1.66; 95% CI, -(2.30-1.02)] was comparatively lower in patients that underwent DS. There were no statistically significant differences in the pain and quality of life scores, range of movement and risk of complications between the DS and the DP groups. Patients in the DS group had improved shoulder function and constant shoulder score (CSS) at 3 months post-surgery (WMD, 6.36; 95% CI, 1.06-11.65). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of CSS and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores at 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The activity of daily living (ADL) score was significantly improved in the DS group at 3 (WMD, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.40-2.06), 6 (WMD, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.25) and 12 months (WMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.18-1.47) after the surgery. The present results suggested that DS and DP surgical approaches were associated with similar clinical outcomes. The DS approach was associated with certain perioperative benefits, as well as reduced time to bone union, improved shoulder function in the early postoperative period and improved ADL scores. These benefits may be considered while choosing between these two surgical approaches.

Effect of Fibular Allograft Augmentation in Medial Column Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies and meta-analyses have recommended augmentation with a fibular allograft (FA) during the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with locking plates (LPs). However, to our knowledge, randomized controlled trials comparing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with and without FA have not been performed to date.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled trial in which adults with a medial column comminuted proximal humeral fracture were randomly allocated to undergo ORIF with an LP (the LP group) or with an LP augmented with an FA (the FA group). Patients were followed for 24 months. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months after the surgical procedure. The secondary outcomes included the DASH score at other time points, shoulder function, pain score, satisfaction, complications, and changes in neck-shaft angle and humeral head height.

RESULTS

From October 20, 2016, to December 24, 2019, 80 patients were randomized. There were 52 women (65%), and the mean patient age (and standard deviation) was 65 ± 14 years. Of the 80 patients, 39 were allocated to the FA group and 41 were allocated to the LP group. At the primary time point (12 months), the unadjusted mean between-group difference in DASH score was -1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.3 to 5.0; p = 0.71) favoring the FA group, and, with adjustment for smoking, alcohol drinking, and diabetes, the between-group difference was -1.4 (95% CI, -7.7 to 5.0; p = 0.67) favoring FA. No significant differences between the 2 groups were found among the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

No additional benefit was found for FA augmentation in treating medial column comminuted proximal humeral fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effects of fibular strut augmentation for the open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is still a lack of remarkable consensus regarding the clinical efficacy of the application of fibular strut augmentation (FSA) combined with a locking plate for proximal humeral fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of the use of FSAs in open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures was conducted.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science Core Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify trials that compared the clinical outcomes of proximal humeral fractures treated using a locking plate with or without FSA. The primary outcome measures were postoperative complications, radiographical findings, functional recovery scores, and postoperative range of motion (ROM). Data were pooled and analysed using a random-effects model based on the Der Simonian and Laird method.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 596 participants were included for further analysis. Compared with using a locking plate independently, the additional application of FSA was associated with the likelihood of lower risk of overall complications (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.65; I² = 12.22%; 95% PI 0.14-0.98) and the rate of patients with orthopaedic complications (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.25-0.92; I² = 7.52%; 95% PI 0.16-1.45), less changes in postoperative humeral head height (MD - 2.40; 95% CI - 2.49 to - 2.31; I² = 0.00%; 95% PI - 2.61 to - 2.20) and the neck-shaft angle (MD - 6.30; 95% CI - 7.23 to - 5.36; I² = 79.32%; 95% PI - 10.06 to - 2.53), superior functional outcomes (Constant-Murley score: MD 5.07; 95% CI 3.40 to 6.74; I² = 0.00%; 95% PI 2.361-7.78; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score: MD 5.08; 95% CI 3.67 to 6.49; I² = 0.00%; 95% PI 1.98-8.18), and better postoperative ROM in terms of forward elevation and external rotation. However, the evidence regarding postoperative abduction was insufficient.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analytic pooling of current evidence showed a significant association between the application of FSAs and favourable clinical outcomes in terms of postoperative complications, radiographical findings, functional recovery, and postoperative elevation and external rotation.

Displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with ORIF via the deltoid interfascicular approach vs the deltopectoral approach: A prospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of displaced proximal humeral fractures treated with proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate fixation via a deltoid interfascicular (DI) vs a deltopectoral (DP) approach.

METHODS

This prospective case-control study was conducted with patients admitted to our hospital from May 2015 to June 2018 who suffered from unilateral displaced proximal humerus fractures. Patients were treated with PHILOS plate fixation via a DI (DI group) or DP approach (DP group). The clinical outcomes and complication data were collected for comparison between the 2 groups. The patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months; and every 6 months thereafter. The patients' functional recoveries were evaluated according to the normalized Constant-Murley score, range of motion of the shoulder (flexion, abduction, external/internal rotation) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients, followed for an average of 15 ± 2.2months (range, 12-21), were enrolled (36 in DI group and 41 in DP group) for final analysis. No significant differences in age, sex, affected side, fracture type, injury mechanism or time from injury to operation were found between the 2 groups (all P > .05). The incision length, intra-operative blood loss, and duration of operation in the DI group were significantly less than those in the DP group, respectively (all P < .05). The functional outcomes assessed by the normalized Constant-Murley score and range of motion of flexion and internal rotation in the DI group were superior to those in the DP group at 3 and 6months after the operation (P < .05); however, no significant differences were observed at the 12-month and subsequent follow-ups (all P > .05). There was no significant difference in the range of shoulder external rotation and abduction during the postoperative follow-ups (P > .05). At the last follow-up, the mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score was 14.0 (6.6) points in the DI group and 14.4 (6.9) points in the DP group (P = .793). Complications occurred in 1 patient in the DI group and 8 patients in the DP group (P = .049).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates that DI approach is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment displaced proximal humerus fractures. The DI approach rather than DP approach was recommended when lateral and posterior exposure of the proximal humerus is required, especially when fixed with PHILOS plate.

Improved outcomes for proximal humerus fracture open reduction internal fixation augmented with a fibular allograft in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, no meta-analysis has been performed on the efficacy of fibular allograft augmentation for the management of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking compression plate (LCP) with or without fibular allograft augmentation.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were queried in June of 2021 for literature comparing the radiographic and clinical outcomes for patients with proximal humerus fractures that were treated with an LCP only or an LCP augmented with a fibular allograft. Data describing study design, level of evidence, demographic information, final follow-up, radiographic changes in humeral head height (HHH), radiographic changes in neck shaft angle (NSA), final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, final Constant-Murley scores, and major complications were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A meta-analysis was performed using pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) to compare changes in HHH, NSA, final ASES and final Constant-Murley scores between the 2 groups; a pooled odds ratio (OR) was used to compare complications between the groups.

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 802 patients were identified. There was a significant difference that favored patients augmented with a fibular allograft for change in HHH (WMD = -2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.49 to -2.31; P < .00001), change in NSA (WMD = -5.71; 95% CI, -6.69 to -4.72; P < .00001), final ASES scores (WMD = 5.08; 95% CI, 3.69-6.48; P < .00001), and OR for developing a major complication (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.59; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in final Constant-Murley scores (WMD = 3.36; 95% CI, -0.21 to 6.93; P = .06) or revision surgery rate (P = .182) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The pooled WMD and prediction interval suggest that 95% of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with an LCP augmented with a fibular allograft will have improved radiographic outcomes, improved ASES clinical outcome scores, and decreased odds of a major complication when compared with patients treated with an LCP alone. Limitations of this study include a relatively short average final follow-up time (<2 years) and a potential lack of standardization for radiographic outcomes among included studies.

Is Device Removal Necessary after Fixed-Angle Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Proximal Humerus Fractures?

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether device removal in symptomatic patients following locking plate osteosynthesis of a proximal humerus fracture improves the clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Seventy-one patients who underwent fixed-angle locking plate osteosynthesis of a proximal humerus fracture were included. Thirty-three patients underwent device removal at a mean time of 10.4 months after index surgery (removal group). Thirty-eight patients who retained the device after index surgery (retention group) were included in the control group. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Results: At the final follow-up, mean UCLA score, ASES score, and all ROMs were significantly higher in the removal group compared to the retention group (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in mean VAS pain score was observed between the two groups. Comparison of the clinical outcomes before and after device removal surgery showed significant improvement in all clinical scores and ROMs after device removal (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Device removal surgery in symptomatic patients following locking plate osteosynthesis of a proximal humerus fracture can result in significant improvement in functional outcomes.

[Application of "door-shaft method" in limited open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate for two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of limited open reduction via "door-shaft method" and internal fixation with locking plate for two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Methods

The clinical data of 64 patients with proximal humeral fractures who were admitted between January 2013 and December 2016 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 males and 41 females, with an average age of 68.0 years (range, 50-89 years). The injuries were caused by falling in 57 cases, traffic accident in 5 cases, and falling from height in 2 cases. The interval between injury and operation was 1-7 days (mean, 2.1 days). According to Neer classification, there were 28 cases of two-part fractures and 36 cases of three-part fractures. According to the angulation direction of the proximal humeral neck shaft angle, there were 21 cases of adduction fractures and 43 cases of abduction fractures. The fractures were treated with limited open reduction via "door-shaft method" and proximal humerus internal locking systems for internal fixation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopy, hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The fracture healing was reviewed by X-ray film and the healing time was recorded. The shoulder joint function was evaluated by Neer score standard.

Results

The operation time was 45-127 minutes, with an average of 82.3 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 30-125 mL, with an average of 62.7 mL. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed 30-69 times, with an average of 37.0 times. The hospital stay was 6-23 days, with an average of 10.3 days. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-37 months, with an average of 18.3 months. X-ray film re-examination showed that all fractures healed, the healing time was 12-21 weeks, with an average of 14.3 weeks. After operation, 3 cases had shoulder stiffness and 1 case had fracture malunion. At last follow-up, the Neer score of shoulder joint function was 49-97, with an average of 83.1. Among them, 38 cases were excellent, 13 cases were good, 10 cases were fair, and 3 cases were poor. The excellent and good rate was 79.7%. The excellent and good rate of patients with two-part fractures was 82.1% (23/28), and the excellent and good rate of patients with three-part fractures was 77.8% (28/36).

Conclusion

The "door-shaft method" not only reduces the difficulty of the Joystick technique in the reduction of proximal humerus fractures, but also provides auxiliary stability. It is used for limited open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate to treat the two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus, which can achieve good effectiveness.