A novel approach for a toxicity prediction model of environmental pollutants by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship method based on toxicogenomics

In Silico Models for Predicting Acute Systemic Toxicity

In this chapter, we give a brief overview of the regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity information in the European Union, and we review structure-based computational models that are available and potentially useful in the assessment of acute systemic toxicity. Emphasis is placed on quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models implemented by means of a range of software tools. The most recently published literature models for acute systemic toxicity are also discussed, and perspectives for future developments in this field are offered.

In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: Current status and future needs for predicting heart, kidney and lung toxicities

The kidneys, heart and lungs are vital organ systems evaluated as part of acute or chronic toxicity assessments. New methodologies are being developed to predict these adverse effects based on in vitro and in silico approaches. This paper reviews the current state of the art in predicting these organ toxicities. It outlines the biological basis, processes and endpoints for kidney toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, respiratory irritation and sensitization as well as functional and structural cardiac toxicities. The review also covers current experimental approaches, including off-target panels from secondary pharmacology batteries. Current in silico approaches for prediction of these effects and mechanisms are described as well as obstacles to the use of in silico methods. Ultimately, a commonly accepted protocol for performing such assessment would be a valuable resource to expand the use of such approaches across different regulatory and industrial applications. However, a number of factors impede their widespread deployment including a lack of a comprehensive mechanistic understanding, limited in vitro testing approaches and limited in vivo databases suitable for modeling, a limited understanding of how to incorporate absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) considerations into the overall process, a lack of in silico models designed to predict a safe dose and an accepted framework for organizing the key characteristics of these organ toxicants.

In Silico Models for Acute Systemic Toxicity

In this chapter, we give an overview of the regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity information in the European Union, and we review the availability of structure-based computational models that are available and potentially useful in the assessment of acute systemic toxicity. The most recently published literature models for acute systemic toxicity are also discussed, and perspectives for future developments in this field are offered.

Estimating sensory irritation potency of volatile organic chemicals using QSARs based on decision tree methods for regulatory purpose

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are among the priority atmospheric pollutants that have high indoor and outdoor exposure potential. The toxicity assessment of VOCs to living ecosystems has received considerable attention in recent years. Development of computational methods for safety assessment of chemicals has been advocated by various regulatory agencies. The paper proposes robust and reliable quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estimating the sensory irritation potency and screening of the VOCs. Here, decision tree (DT) based classification and regression QSARs models, such as single DT, decision tree forest (DTF), and decision tree boost (DTB) were developed using the sensory irritation data on VOCs in mice following the OECD principles. Structural diversity and nonlinearity in the data were evaluated through the Euclidean distance and Brock-Dechert-Scheinkman statistics. The constructed QSAR models were validated with external test data and the predictive performance of these models was established through a set of coefficients recommended in QSAR literature. The performance of all three classification and regression QSAR models was satisfactory, but DTF and DTB performed relatively better. The classification and regression QSAR models (DTF, DTB) rendered classification accuracies of 98.59 and 100 %, and yielded correlations (R(2)) of 0.950 and 0.971, respectively in complete data. The lipoaffinity index and SwHBa were identified as the most influential descriptors in proposed QSARs. The developed QSARs performed better than the previous studies. The developed models exhibited high statistical confidence and identified the structural properties of the VOCs responsible for their sensory irritation, and hence could be useful tools in screening of chemicals for regulatory purpose.