Mid-term Patient-reported Outcomes of Hip Arthroplasty After Previous Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Case-control Study With a Minimum 5-year Follow-up

Risk Factors and Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Worsening after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

The rising demand for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the United States has led to high 1-year patient satisfaction rates. However, some patients experience substantial declines in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively, which we refer to as "minimal clinically important difference for worsening" (MCID-W). We sought to define MCID-W values for specific PROMs and identify risk factors associated with PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF-10a) declines after UKA. We conducted a retrospective study of 760 patients undergoing UKA at our institution between 2016 and 2023. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS PF-10a, PROMIS global physical, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (KOOS-PS) scores were collected. Patients were stratified upon reaching minimal clinically importance difference for improvement (MCID-I), MCID-W, or "no significant change" (score between MCID-W and MCID-I). MCID-W and MCID-I values were determined using a distribution-based method. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for scoring below MCID-W. We established the following MCID-I and MCID-W thresholds: PROMIS PF-10a (+3.00 and -1.64), KOOS-PS (+6.25 and -3.42), and PROMIS Global-Physical (+2.72 and -1.55). Bivariate analysis revealed differences in terms of revision (p = 0.02), reoperation (p = 0.03), postoperative complications (p = 0.002), deep venous thrombosis (DVT; p < 0.001), and pneumonia (p = 0.01) between cohorts. Body mass index >35 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49), postoperative complications (OR = 5.09), pneumonia (OR = 22.39), DVT (OR = 9.27), and preoperative PROMIS PF-10a scores (OR = 1.07) were risk factors for scoring below the MCID-W threshold, whereas age > 80 (OR = 2.89) and preoperative PROMIS PF-10a scores (OR = 1.05) were risk factors for failing to achieve MCID-I. Our study established MCID-W values for pivotal PROMs after primary UKAs. We found that 8.8% of patients scored below MCID-W, highlighting the need to improve patient selection and perioperative care in UKA.

Prior hip arthroscopy increases the risk of dislocation, reoperation, and revision after hip arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The indications for hip arthroscopy have been increasing, as have been the number of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthroscopy. Several matched cohort studies have assessed the impact of prior hip arthroscopy on THA, but conflicting results have been observed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of prior arthroscopy on subsequent THA.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. Dichotomous variables were summarized qualitatively as a meta-analysis of pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous variables were summarized as standardized mean differences and 95% CIs. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The risk of bias was evaluated for each study, as was publication bias.

RESULTS

In patients who underwent hip arthroscopy prior to THA, the ORs for dislocation, reoperation, and revision were 2.02 (P = 0.01), 1.66 (P = 0.01), and 2.15 (P = 0.001), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in the Harris Hip Score (HHS; P = 0.40), WOMAC (P = 0.069), FJS-12 (P = 0.77), estimated blood loss (P = 0.48), and surgical time (P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior hip arthroscopy is a risk for postoperative dislocation, reoperation, or revision after conversion THA. However, prior hip arthroscopy has no effect on patient-reported outcomes, or operative factors such as surgical time and blood loss.

A Matched Comparison of the Rates of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often lower following conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) compared to matched primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) controls. However, the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for any PROMs are yet to be analyzed for cTHA. This study aimed to (1) determine if patients undergoing cTHA achieve primary THA-specific 1-year PROM MCIDs at comparable rates to matched controls undergoing primary THA and (2) establish 1-year MCID values for specific PROMs following cTHA.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted using 148 cases of cTHA which were matched 1:2 to 296 primary THA patients. Previously defined anchor values for 2 PROM measures in primary THA were used to compare cTHA to primary THA, while novel cTHA-specific MCID values for 2 PROMs were calculated through a distribution method. Predictors of achieving the MCID of PROMs were analyzed through multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Conversion THA was associated with decreased odds of achieving the primary THA-specific 1-year Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement PROM (Odds Ratio: 0.319, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.182-0.560, P < .001) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short-Form-10a PROM (Odds Ratio: 0.531, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.313-0.900, P = .019) MCIDs in reference to matched primary THA patients. Less than 60% of cTHA patients achieved an MCID. The 1-year MCID of the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short-Form-10a specific to cTHA were +10.71 and +4.68, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While cTHA is within the same diagnosis-related group as primary THA, patients undergoing cTHA have decreased odds of achieving 1-year MCIDs of primary THA-specific PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Lateral to Medial Joint Space Ratio is Predictive of Survivorship After Primary Hip Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

To assess whether preoperative joint space measures would be predictive of survivorship in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

METHODS

Data on consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. To be eligible for final analysis, patients were required to have preoperative radiographs for joint space measurements and data indicating conversion to a total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip resurfacing, or neither; at a minimum of 2 years after primary hip arthroscopy. Survivorship following HA was defined as remaining conversion free and served as the primary outcome. A multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operator curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the correlation between joint space measurements and survivorship following HA.

RESULTS

A total of 1,885 primary arthroscopy cases were included in this study. The multivariate regression analysis found preoperative lateral-to-medial joint space ratio (L/M ratio) to be the strongest predictive factor of survivorship after primary hip arthroscopy (OR = 2.084, CI_95% = 1.239-3.503; P = .006). The ROC curve for the model demonstrated acceptable discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792. Patients with an L/M ratio ≥0.75 had a survivorship rate of 91.7% compared to a rate of 75% for patients with an L/M ratio <0.75 (OR: 3.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that, of the factors evaluated in this study, the most significant factor in predicting survivorship at 2 years after undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was a larger lateral-to-medial joint space ratio. This may suggest an initiation of primary arthritis at the edge-loading area of the lateral acetabulum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative observation study.

The influence of prior arthroscopy on outcomes of primary total lower extremity arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of prior arthroscopy on postoperative revisions, complications, and other clinical outcomes after conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar electronic databases from inception to June 02, 2021. We identified cohort trials that compared the outcomes of patients who underwent primary THA or TKA in the prior arthroscopy or control groups. The primary outcome was revision, and secondary outcomes included reoperation, patient-reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. A modified version of the Downs and Black tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the non-randomized cohort studies.

RESULTS

Of the 23 included studies with 319946 cases, 18 were matched retrospectively and five were non-matched retrospectively. Methodological quality was high in ten studies and moderate in thirteen studies. Our analysis demonstrated that TKA or THA patients with prior arthroscopy were associated with an increased risk of revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in periprosthetic fracture, range of motion, Harris Hip Score, or Knee Society Score.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopy performed before total lower extremity arthroplasty substantially increased the revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening rates. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Patients should be counseled on the potential increased risks associated with conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty after prior arthroscopy. Further research is needed to better characterize these findings.

Prior hip arthroscopy does not affect 1-year patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched case-control study of 675 patients

Background and purpose - Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a common cause of hip pain and may contribute to the development of osteoarthritis. We investigated whether a prior hip arthroscopy affects the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of a later total hip arthroplasty (THA).Patients and methods - Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a hip arthroscopy register and linked to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). A propensity-score matched control group without a prior hip arthroscopy, based on demographic data and preoperative score from the EuroQoL visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) and hip pain score, was identified from SHAR. The group with a hip arthroscopy (treated group) consisted of 135 patients and the matched control group comprised 540 patients. The included PROMs were EQ-5D and EQ VAS of the EuroQoL group, and a questionnaire regarding hip pain and another addressing satisfaction. Rate of reoperation was collected from the SHAR. The follow-up period was 1 year.Results - The mean interval from arthroscopy to THA was 27 months (SD 19). The EQ-5D was 0.81 and 0.82, and EQ VAS was 78 and 79 in the treated group and the matched control group respectively. There were no differences in hip pain, and reported satisfaction was similar with 87% in the treated group and 86% in the matched control group.Interpretation - These results offer reassurance that a prior hip arthroscopy for FAIS does not appear to affect the short-term patient-reported outcomes of a future THA and indicate that patients undergoing an intervention are not at risk of inferior results due to their prior hip arthroscopy.

Hip arthroscopy versus total hip arthroplasty in patients above 40 differences: outcome and residual complain

This study aimed to compare patient outcomes and residual complains after hip arthroscopy (HAS) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve patient counseling. It includes 140 hips/129 HAS-patients and 77 hips/62 THA-patients aged 40 to 55 years with a BMI under 30. All patients underwent primary HAS or primary THA in our hospital from 2007 until 2014. Exclusion criteria were a history of prior hip surgery or suffering sequels of childhood's hip disease, systemic inflammatory disease or avascular hip osteonecrosis. Outcome measures were WOMAC, subjective hip value, residual complains, the need of infiltrations and the complication and conversion rate. Patient data and scores were collected pre-operative, after one year and at the last follow-up. Scores indicated significant patient benefits in both groups (p < 0.0001). Variability of outcome was significantly higher and less predictable in the HAS group (HAS: 1.9 vs. THA: 0.9). While THA showed significant improvement mainly after one year, HAS showed significant improvements after one year and the latest follow-up. Residual complains were more frequent after HAS (p = 0.026). Groin pain was the main complain after HAS, limping and disturbing leg length discrepancy after THA. THA more predictably improves patient's outcome with shorter recovery time. Limping and leg length discrepancy are predominant after THA.