1
|
Nam Y, Kim SY, Kim KA, Kwon E, Lee YH, Jang J, Lee MK, Kim J, Choi Y. Development and Validation of Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Lymphoma for Treatment Response Assessment: A Bi-institutional Feasibility Study. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024; 37:734-743. [PMID: 38316667 PMCID: PMC11031526 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-00966-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
The purpose is to train and evaluate a deep learning (DL) model for the accurate detection and segmentation of abnormal cervical lymph nodes (LN) on head and neck contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients diagnosed with lymphoma and evaluate the clinical utility of the DL model in response assessment. This retrospective study included patients who underwent CT for abnormal cervical LN and lymphoma assessment between January 2021 and July 2022. Patients were grouped into the development (n = 76), internal test 1 (n = 27), internal test 2 (n = 87), and external test (n = 26) cohorts. A 3D SegResNet model was used to train the CT images. The volume change rates of cervical LN across longitudinal CT scans were compared among patients with different treatment outcomes (stable, response, and progression). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the model's segmentation performance and reliability, respectively. No significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics were found across cohorts (age, P = 0.55; sex, P = 0.13; diagnoses, P = 0.06). The mean DSC was 0.39 ± 0.2 with a precision and recall of 60.9% and 57.0%, respectively. Most LN volumes were within the limits of agreement on the Bland-Altman plot. The volume change rates among the three groups differed significantly (progression (n = 74), 342.2%; response (n = 8), - 79.2%; stable (n = 5), - 8.1%; all P < 0.01). Our proposed DL segmentation model showed modest performance in quantifying the cervical LN burden on CT in patients with lymphoma. Longitudinal changes in cervical LN volume, as predicted by the DL model, were useful for treatment response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoonho Nam
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Su-Youn Kim
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-Ah Kim
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Euna Kwon
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo Hyun Lee
- College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhee Jang
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Kyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiwoong Kim
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yangsean Choi
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Centre, 43 Olympic-Ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Öztürk Ç, Velleman T, Bongaerts AHH, Bergman LM, van Ginkel RJ, Gietema JA, Hoekstra HJ. Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0168977. [PMID: 28081195 PMCID: PMC5230761 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria. METHODS 21 TC patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer were studied with a CT scan of chest and abdomen before and after cisplatin based chemotherapy. Three readers, a surgical resident, a radiological technician and a radiologist, assessed tumor response independently using computerized volumetric analysis with Vitrea software® and manual measurement according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Intra- and inter-rater variability were evaluated with intra class correlations and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS Assessment of intra observer and inter observer variance proved non-significant in both measurement modalities. In particularly all intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the volumetric analysis were > .99 per observer and between observers. There was minimal bias in agreement for manual as well as volumetric analysis. CONCLUSION In this study volumetric measurement using Vitrea software® appears to be a reliable, reproducible method to measure initial tumor volume of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Both measurement methods can be performed by experienced non-radiologists as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Çiğdem Öztürk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ton Velleman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Alphons H. H. Bongaerts
- Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - L. M. Bergman
- Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J. van Ginkel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jourik A. Gietema
- Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harald J. Hoekstra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|