Kidney transplantation in obese patients

Combined Body Mass Index and Body Surface Area to Predict Post Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Patients With Obesity

Background

The prevalence of obesity is increasing in both the general and kidney failure populations. Severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m2) is considered by many centers to be a barrier to kidney transplantation (KT). Obesity is typically defined using BMI. Body surface area (BSA) is not considered, though may also be important.

Methods

We examined post-KT adverse outcomes associated with obesity defined using combined BMI-BSA parameters in a cohort of adult KT recipients (living/deceased donor) across the United States (Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: 2000-2017). Recipient obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2, or BSA ≥1.94 m2 in women and ≥2.17 m2 in men. We used multivariable cox proportional hazards or logistic regression models as appropriate to assess the association between BMI-BSA-defined obesity with death-censored graft loss, all-cause graft loss, and delayed graft function.

Results

The final study included 242 432 patients; 77 556 (32.0%) had obesity based on BMI and 67 312 (28.6%) had obesity based on BSA. Compared to patients with a nonobese BMI and BSA, the adjusted risk of death-censored graft loss, all-cause graft loss, and delayed graft function was greatest when both BMI and BSA indicated obesity (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-1.27, adjusted hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI: 1.07-1.11, adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% CI: 1.53-1.63, respectively); a significantly greater risk than when BMI and BSA were discordant.

Conclusions

Currently only BMI is considered when evaluating obesity-related KT risk; however, combined BMI-BSA obesity may better identify individuals at high risk of poor outcomes posttransplant than BMI alone.

Long-term outcomes in rapamycin on renal allograft function: a 30-year follow-up from a single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term renal graft prognosis and the role of rapamycin from a single-center in China over a 30-year follow-up.

METHODS

This study enrolled a total of 654 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1989 and 2020. The basic characteristics of the included patients were collected. Graft survival was described and compared using Kaplan-Meier curves (K-M curves). Both continuous and categorical variables were included in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model. Patients were divided into rapamycin-based quadruple immunosuppression regimen group (rapa group, n = 41) and conventional tacrolimus-based triple immunosuppression regimen group (control group, n = 218). The indication biopsy results of the two groups were further reviewed to compare the incidence of rejection, acute rejection, and banff score.

RESULTS

The overall 5, 10, 15, 20-year graft survival rate of our center is 87.5%, 62.4%, 46.4% and 20.9%, respectively. The median survival time after surgery is 14 years. Multiple Cox regression analysis identified BMI (p = 0.035), dialysis type (p < 0.001), immunosuppressants (p < 0.01), urine albumen (p < 0.001), globulin (p = 0.041), and blood glucose (p = 0.002) as risk factors. The 20-year, 10-year and 5-year AUC is 0.78, 0.75 and 0.75. The combination of FK506 and rapamycin was further suggested by the model to effectively improve the graft prognosis (p < 0.01, HR = 0.763). The K-M curve showed that the long-term survival rate of renal grafts in the rapa group was significantly better than that in the conventional group (p < 0.001). In addition, indication biopsy records revealed a lower possibility of immune rejection in the rapa group than that in the conventional group (p < 0.001). Banff score indicated that rapa group had less vascular inflammation in the transplanted kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a 30-year follow-up was performed in a single center, and a total graft 20-year survival rate of 20.9% was reported. The prognostic model and subgroup analysis suggested that FK506 combined with rapamycin could effectively improve the prognosis of renal transplantation, which could be explained by reduced acute rejection and less vascular inflammation.

Retrospective evaluation of LCP-tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) dosing in de novo kidney transplant

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus is known to exhibit significant inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability regarding therapeutic response. LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT-Envarsus XR) was approved in 2018 for use as a de novo immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplants, but there is limited evidence to guide de novo dosing of LCPT in patients with obesity. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of different calculated weight-based de novo LCPT dosing on early transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) who received a kidney transplant at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health System (UIH), between March 2019 and March 2021. Subjects were included if were age 18 years or older and received de novo LCPT throughout index hospitalization. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare correlations between the first tacrolimus trough level and dosing weight strategy (e.g., TBW, AdjBW, IBW).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant, though modest, correlation between all three dosing strategies and the first tacrolimus trough level (TBW correlation coefficient = .431, p < .001; AdjBW correlation coefficient = .455, p < .001; IBW correlation coefficient = .465; p < .001). In regression modeling for supratherapeutic levels each additional .01 mg/kg increase in dose by TBW, AdjBW, and IBW increased the odds of a supratherapeutic level by 1.46, 1.34, and 1.24, respectively (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LCPT in kidney transplant recipients with obesity dosed using TBW demonstrated the strongest correlation with initial supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels. Larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the further impact of body weight on dosing regimens in the obese population.

Post-kidney transplant body mass index trajectories are associated with graft loss and mortality

BACKGROUND

Early post-kidney transplantation (KT) changes in physiology, medications, and health stressors likely impact body mass index (BMI) and likely impact all-cause graft loss and mortality.

METHODS

We estimated 5-year post-KT (n = 151 170; SRTR) BMI trajectories using an adjusted mixed effects model. We estimated long-term mortality and graft loss risks by 1-year BMI change quartile (decrease [1st quartile]: change < -.07 kg/m2 /month; stable [2nd quartile]: -.07 ≤ change ≤ .09 kg/m2 /month; increase [3rd, 4th quartile]: change > .09 kg/m2 /month) using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

BMI increased in the 3 years post-KT (.64 kg/m2 /year, 95% CI: .63, .64) and decreased in years 3-5 (-.24 kg/m2 /year, 95% CI: -.26, -.22). 1-year post-KT BMI decrease was associated with elevated risks of all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.10-1.16), all-cause graft loss (aHR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.10-1.15), death-censored graft loss (aHR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11-1.19), and mortality with functioning graft (aHR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08-1.14). Among recipients with obesity (pre-KT BMI≥30 kg/m2 ), BMI increase was associated with higher all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.14), all-cause graft loss (aHR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09), and mortality with functioning graft (aHR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.15) risks, but not death-censored graft loss risks, relative to stable weight. Among individuals without obesity, BMI increase was associated with lower all-cause graft loss (aHR = .97, 95% CI: .95-.99) and death-censored graft loss (aHR = .93, 95% CI: .90-.96) risks, but not all-cause mortality or mortality with functioning graft risks.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI increases in the 3 years post-KT, then decreases in years 3-5. BMI loss in all adult KT recipients and BMI gain in those with obesity should be carefully monitored post-KT.

Outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who underwent pre-transplant bariatric surgery for severe obesity: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the preferred therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While a major cause for ESRD, obesity is also a key obstacle to candidacy for KT. Bariatric surgery, particularly sleeve gastrectomy (SG), is increasingly used to improve access to KT in patients with obesity, but the literature especially on outcomes post-KT remains lacking. We aimed to provide a long-term follow-up analysis of efficacy and outcomes of a previously described cohort of patients with obesity, who had SG as a means for access to KT.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective follow-up study of 32 patients with advanced chronic kidney disease or ESRD, who were referred and underwent SG between 2013 and 2018 as an access strategy to KT. The primary outcome was successful KT. Ninety-day outcomes, long-term graft function, and changes in weight and obesity-related comorbidities after KT were assessed. Descriptive statistics are presented as count (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

At baseline, 18 (56%) were male with a median age and BMI of 51 (11) years and 42.3 (5.2) kg/m², respectively. Median follow-up time post-SG was 53 (58) months. At last follow-up, 23 (72%) patients received KT. Median time to KT was 16 (20) months and BMI was 34.0 (5.1) kg/m² at time of transplant. At KT, 13 (57%) and 20 (87%) had diabetes and hypertension, respectively. Median follow-up post-KT was 16 (47) months. There was one graft loss requiring return to dialysis. At 5-year post-KT, median serum creatinine was 136 (66) µmol/l. At last follow-up post-KT, median BMI remained at 33.7 (7.6) kg/m². Among patients with diabetes and hypertension, 7/13 (54%) and 5/20 (25%) had either improvement or remission of their comorbidities, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SG is an effective strategy to improve access to KT in patients with severe obesity. Transplant recipients also continue to benefit from sustained weight loss and improved related comorbidities that may positively impact their graft function after KT.

Obesity and renal disease: Benefits of bariatric surgery

The prevalence of obesity, a preventable and reversible condition with a high impact on health, continues to rise, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Severe overweight is well recognized as a risk factor for diabetes and hypertension, among other conditions, that may increase cardiovascular risk. Obesity has grown simultaneously with a rise in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease, and a pathophysiological link has been established, which explains its role in generating the conditions to facilitate the emergence and maximize the impact of the risk factors of chronic kidney disease and its progression to more advanced stages. Knowing the mechanisms involved and having different tools to reverse the overweight and its consequences, bariatric surgery has arisen as a useful and efficient method, complementary or alternative to others, such as lifestyle changes and/or pharmacotherapy. In a detailed review, the mechanisms involved in the renal consequences of obesity, the impact on risk factors, and the potential benefit of bariatric surgery at different stages of the disease and its progression are exposed and analyzed. Although the observational evidence supports the value of bariatric surgery as a renoprotective measure in individuals with obesity, diabetic or not, randomized studies are expected to establish evidence-based recommendations that demonstrate its positive risk-benefit balance as a complementary or alternative therapeutic tool.

Pretransplant BMI Significantly Affects Perioperative Course and Graft Survival after Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis

Background. The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with overweight and obesity is increasing. It was shown that obesity is related to inferior patient and graft survival. We aimed to analyze intraoperative parameters and postoperative short and long-term course of kidney transplantation (KT) in body mass index (BMI)-stratified cohorts of KTRs. Methods. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively built database of 433 KTRs from 2014 to 2017 from a single transplant center was performed. The objective of the study was to analyze the association between BMI at the time of transplantation with intraoperative parameters, adverse events in early postoperative course, and the overall mortality and graft loss in BMI-stratified cohorts: normal (18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25−29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). Results. Obesity was related to longer total procedure time (p = 0.0025) and longer warm ischemia time (p = 0.0003). The postoperative course in obese patients was complicated by higher incidence of DGF (delayed graft function), early surgical complications (defined as surgical complications <30 days from KT), reoperation rate, vascular complications, incidence of lymphocele and wound dehiscence. There was no difference between the normal weight and overweight KTRs. The one-month kidney function (p = 0.0001) and allograft survival (p = 0.029) were significantly inferior in obese patients with no difference between normal weight and overweight patients. One-year death-censored graft survival was better in patients with BMI < 30 (88.6 vs. 94.8% p = 0.05). BMI was a significant predictor of graft loss in univariate (p = 0.04) but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.09). Conclusion. Pretransplant obesity significantly affects the intraoperative and postoperative course of kidney transplantation and graft function and survival. The course of transplantation of overweight is comparable to normal BMI KTRs, and presumably pretransplant weight reduction to the BMI < 30 kg/m2 may improve the short-term postoperative course of transplantation as well as may improve graft survival. Thus, pretransplant weight reduction in obese KTRs may significantly improve the results of kidney transplantation. Metabolic surgery may play a role in improving results of KT.

Balancing Equity and Efficiency in Kidney Allocation: An Overview

Organs for transplantation are a scarce resource. Markedly, the transplant community's primary challenge is the stark disparity between the number of patients awaiting deceased donor organ transplants and the rate at which organs become available. However, the allocation of a limited number of organs poses another constant challenge: maintaining an equilibrium between renal transplant utility and equity, that is, striking a balance between the utilitarian argument of medical efficiency and the principle of equity. In this comprehensive overview, the authors delve into the challenge of maintaining an acceptable balance between equity and efficiency and elaborate on some of the factors that might inform a decisionmaker's evaluation of the extent to which a given allocation scheme is efficient or equitable.

Kidney Transplantation in Patients After Bariatric Surgery: High-Volume Bariatric and Transplant Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the best type of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Unfortunately, obesity may be a contraindication for transplantation. Our study aimed to evaluate the results of KTx in patients who had bariatric surgery (BS) prior to transplantation.

METHODS

A single center, with experience in bariatric and transplant surgery, presents a retrospective study of 13 patients who received a kidney transplant after a gastric bypass (GB) operation between 2012 and 2019.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients, who were potential candidates for KTx, were previously qualified for BS because of a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m². Additionally, all patients had arterial hypertension, 60% of patients had diabetes, and 30% of patients had coronary artery disease. Patients were activated on the waiting list when their BMI was < 35 kg/m². KTx was performed between 5 and 29 months after BS. One patient needed reoperation due to a urinary leak and another patient needed reoperation because of a high-pressure lymphocele. We diagnosed 2 delayed graft functions (DGFs) and 1 acute rejection. One patient died for reasons independent of surgery. The KTx observation period ranged from 3 to 8 years. Currently, 11 patients has stable renal function: creatinine concentration is 0.8-1.8 mg/dL and BMI is between 23 and 35 kg/m².

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the small group of patients, we can assume that kidney transplantation can be safely performed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have previously undergone gastric bypass (GB) as a graft bridging procedure. In some cases, BS may be the only chance of getting an organ.

Body Mass Index Thresholds and the Use of Bariatric Surgery in the Field of Kidney Transplantation in Germany

Background

Obesity in the recipient is linked to inferior transplant outcome. Consequently, access to kidney transplantation (KT) is often restricted by body mass index (BMI) thresholds. Bariatric surgery (BS) has been established as a superior treatment for obesity compared to conservative measures, but it is unclear whether it is beneficial for patients on the waiting list.

Methods

A national survey consisting of 16 questions was sent to all heads of German KT centers. Current situation of KT candidates with obesity and the status of BS were queried.

Results

Center response rate was 100%. Obesity in KT candidates was considered an important issue (96.1%; n = 49/51) and 68.6% (n = 35/51) of departments responded to use absolute BMI thresholds for KT waiting list access with ≥ 35 kg/m² (45.1%; n = 23/51) as the most common threshold. BS was considered an appropriate weight loss therapy (92.2%; n = 47/51), in particular before KT (88.2%; n = 45/51). Sleeve gastrectomy was the most favored procedure (77.1%; n = 37/51). Twenty-one (41.2%) departments responded to evaluate KT candidates with obesity by default but only 11 (21.6%) had experience with ≥ n = 5 transplants after BS. Concerns against BS were malabsorption of immunosuppressive therapy (39.2%; n = 20/51), perioperative morbidity (17.6%; n = 9/51), and malnutrition (13.7%; n = 7/51).

Conclusions

Obesity is potentially limiting access for KT. Despite commonly used BMI limits, only few German centers consider BS for obesity treatment in KT candidates by default. A national multicenter study is desired by nearly all heads of German transplant centers to prospectively assess the potentials, risks, and safety of BS in KT waitlisted patients.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-06000-4.

DO THE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS AFFECT THE HYPOTHALAMIC NUCLEI INVOLVED IN THE REGULATION OF FOOD INTAKE? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

PURPOSE

Immunosuppressive drugs are essential for reducing the rejection risk in post-transplant patients, which is commonly associated with this procedure. However, side effects of those drugs on the hypothalamic nuclei involved in the food intake regulation, excessive weight gain, and also associated comorbidities are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze possible changes in the neuronal morphology and cell density in the paraventricular nuclei, lateral hypothalamic area, dorsomedial nuclei, and ventromedial and arcuate nuclei in Wistar rats submitted to immunosuppressive treatment with tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

METHODS

Adult male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to the following groups according to the oral treatment administered for 14 weeks: control, sham (placebo), TAC (1 mg/kg of weight), and MMF (30 mg/kg of weight). After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and their brains fixed for later histological staining. Subsequently, the slides were photodocumented for stereological analysis of the hypothalamic nuclei.

RESULTS

All experimental groups showed a weight gain throughout the study. There was no significant difference in neuronal density/number of cells in the hypothalamic nuclei between groups. Morphological changes were not detected in the hypothalamic neurons.

CONCLUSION

Treatments with immunosuppressants could not modify the morphological and cell density aspects of the hypothalamic nuclei during this supplementation period.

Bipolar vessel sealing system versus silk ligation of lymphatic vessels in renal transplant recipient lymphatic complications: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to compare lymphatic complications of bipolar vessel sealing system with silk ligation of lymphatic vessels among renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial done among 68 patients undergoing renal transplantation in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. They were randomly assigned to either silk ligation or Enseal bipolar vessel sealing lymphatic dissection. Postoperative drain volume and duration of drain placement were measured in all patients. Ultrasound was used to find lymphocele formation in six and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Total of 30 patients in silk ligation group and 28 patients in bipolar vessel sealing group were analyzed. The baseline characteristics of the patients in each group were similar. Overall, lymphatic complications (either lymphorrhea or lymphocele formation) were in 16 cases (27.58%), 7 (25%) in the bipolar group, and 9 (30%) in the silk ligation group (p = 0.67). A total of 13 patients (22.41%) had lymphorrhea, 6 (21.4%) patients in the bipolar group, and 7 (23.3%) patients in the silk ligation group. Median drain volume was 415 ml (Q1 275 ml, Q3 675 ml) in the bipolar group and 542 ml (Q1 290, Q3 775) in silk group (p = 0.72). Median drain removal day was 5 in each bipolar and silk group with Q1 and Q3 being 5 days in each arm (p = 0.95). A total of five patients (8.62%) developed symptomatic lymphocele, two (7.1%) in the bipolar group, and three (10%) in the silk ligation group, but the difference was not statistically significant. In univariate analysis, double renal arteries in the donor's kidney (p = 0.03) and graft rejection (p = 0.04) were risk factors for the development of lymphatic complications. However, in multivariable analysis, these factors were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find any significant differences in lymphatic complications between bipolar vessel sealing system and silk ligation. However, large sample multi-centric studies should be done to add evidences on lymphatic complications differences between these two techniques.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000039354, Date of registration-2020, Feb 01.

Tacrolimus Exposure in Obese Patients: and A Case-Control Study in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in obese (Ob) patients has been poorly studied. In this article, the authors explored the impact of obesity on tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and estimated a more suitable initial dosage in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, monocentric case-control study was performed in obese KTRs (BMI > 30 kg/m2) who received tacrolimus between 2013 and 2017 (initial dose: 0.15 mg/kg/d) (actual weight). Nonobese (Nob) controls (BMI <30 kg/m2) were matched for age and sex. Weekly centralized monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels was performed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry until the third month (M3). Target trough levels were set between 8 and 10 ng/mL. All patients received antilymphocyte globulin, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil.

RESULTS

Of the 541 KTRs, 28 tacrolimus-treated Ob patients were included and compared with 28 NOb-matched controls. With a mean of 22 assays/patient, tacrolimus trough levels were higher in Ob patients (mean 9.9 versus 8.7 ng/mL; P = 0.008); the weight-related dose of Tac was lower at M3 (mean 0.10 versus 0.13 mg/kg/d, P < 0.0001). The tacrolimus concentration to dose (C0/D) was higher in the Ob cohort [mean 116 versus 76 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg/d); P = 0.001]. In Ob patients, a mean decrease of -4.6 mg/d in the 3 months after tacrolimus initiation was required (versus -1.12 in NOb; P = 0.001) to remain within the therapeutic range. Obesity, high mycophenolate mofetil daily dose at M3, and CYP3A5 expression were independently associated with higher tacrolimus exposure. Four dose-adaptation strategies were simulated and compared with the study results.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial dose calculation based on either ideal or lean body weight may allow for faster achievement of tacrolimus trough level targets in Ob KTRs, who are at risk of overexposure when tacrolimus is initiated at 0.15 mg/kg/d. A prospective study is required to validate alternative dose calculation strategies in these patients.

Factors Influencing Emergency Department Utilization and Hospital Re-Admissions in a Predominantly Obese, Racially Diverse Urban Renal Transplant Population

INTRODUCTION

Early emergency department and hospital re-admissions are common in renal transplant recipients, but data are lacking in unique populations. Study Aim: The purpose of this study was to identify patient risk factors for multiple acute care utilization events within the first year of renal transplantation.

DESIGN

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult renal transplant recipients between 9/2013-9/2016. Patients were compared across number of emergency department visits and by hospital re-admissions. Diagnoses were categorized. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess risk for multiple acute care utilization events within the first 12 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients were analyzed and were on average 50.5 (SD 13.9) years old, redominantly Black (49.77%) with an average body mass index of 33.33 (9.8) and were recipients of deceased donor renal transplants (61.11%). A total of 105 (48.6%) patients visited the emergency epartment and 119 (55.1%) patients had a hospital readmission. Patients having a body mass index >35 kg/m2 did not differ across emergency department visit or hospitalization groups. Delayed graft function (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.07-7.65) and previous renal transplant (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.04-7.39) were significantly associated with multiple acute care utilizations.

DISCUSSION

Acute care utilization following renal transplantation was similar to previously reported experiences. Obesity did not impact use of acute care resources or patient outcomes. Strategies addressing potential preventable emergency visits and hospital re-dmissions should be promoted.

Obesity: An Independent Predictor of Morbidity and Graft Loss after Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting information on current medical and surgical complications associated with high body mass index (BMI) after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In a single-center observational study, we analyzed the 5-year outcomes of all consecutive primary kidney transplant recipients between 2010 and 2015 based on BMI at the time of transplant.

RESULTS

There were 1,467 patients included in this study, distributed in the following groups based on BMI: underweight (n = 32, 2.2%), normal (n = 407, 27.7%), overweight (n = 477, 32.5%), grade I obesity (n = 387, 26.4%), grade II obesity (n = 155, 10.6%), and grade III obesity (n = 9, 0.6%). Obesity was associated with an increased incidence of delayed graft function (p = 0.008), length of stay (LOS, p = 0.03), 30-day surgical re-exploration (p = 0.02), and hospital readmission (p < 0.0001). Obesity was also associated with higher 1-year serum creatinine (p = 0.03) and increased 5-year incidence of cardiac events (p < 0.0001) and congestive heart failure (p < 0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses determined grade III obesity (HR = 5.84, 95% CI: 1.40-24.36, p = 0.01), LOS >4 days (HR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.19-3.18, p = 0.008), hospital readmission (HR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.20-4.22, p = 0.01), 1-year serum creatinine >1.5 (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.20-3.18, p = 0.007), and proteinuria (UPC) >1 g/g (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.06-3.24, p = 0.03) as independent predictors of death-censored graft failure.

CONCLUSION

In the current era of renal transplant care, obesity is common, and high BMI remains associated with significant medical and surgical complications after transplant.

Robotic pancreas transplantation: the state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotic pancreas transplantation is a novel procedure that aims to reduce surgical invasiveness, and thereby limit complications related to the surgical access. Given that few centers are providing robotic transplantation, this review serves as a state of the science article to outline early experiences and highlight areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreas transplantation results in relatively high rates of wound and other surgical complications that are known to deleteriously impact outcomes. The minimally invasive, robotic-assisted approach decreases wound complications. Because of the obesity epidemic, overweight and obese status is encountered in an increasing number of transplant candidates. These candidates are subject to increased wound-related complications and most benefit from a robotic approach. The first clinical reports on laparoscopic, robotic-assisted kidney and pancreas transplantation indicate a significant decrease in wound complications and excellent outcomes in obese patients otherwise denied access to transplantation.

SUMMARY

With excellent results achieved in surgically challenging patients and further accumulation of experience, laparoscopic, robotic-assisted pancreas and kidney transplantation may evolve to a new standard approach.

The Evolution of Kidney Transplantation Surgery Into the Robotic Era and Its Prospects for Obese Recipients

Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) represents the most recent innovation in the evolution of kidney transplantation surgery. Vascular techniques enabling kidney transplantation have existed since the early 20th century and contributed to the first successful open kidney transplant procedure in 1954. Technical advances have since facilitated minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic techniques in live-donor surgery, and subsequently for the recipient procedure. This review follows the development of surgical techniques for kidney transplantation, with a special focus on the advent of robotic-assisted transplantation because of its potential to facilitate transplantation of those deemed previously too obese to transplant by standard means. The different techniques, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of this approach will be explored in detail. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation may become the preferred means of transplanting morbidly obese recipients, although its availability to such recipients remains extremely limited and strategies targeting weight loss pretransplantation should never be abandoned in favor of a "RAKT-first" approach.

Weight management strategies for those with chronic kidney disease: A consensus report from the Asia Pacific Society of Nephrology and Australia and New Zealand Society of Nephrology 2016 renal dietitians meeting

AIM

The aim of the present study was to develop a consensus report to guide dietetic management of overweight or obese individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Six statements relating to weight management in CKD guided a comprehensive review of the literature. A summary of the evidence was then presented at the renal nutrition meeting of the 2016 Asia Pacific Society of Nephrology and Australia and New Zealand Society of Nephrology. Majority agreement was defined as group agreement on a statement of between 50-74%, and consensus was considered ≥75% agreement. The recommendations were developed via a mini Delphi process.

RESULTS

Two statements achieved group consensus: the current guidelines used by dietitians to estimate energy requirements for overweight and obese people with CKD are not relevant and weight loss medications may be unsafe or ineffective in isolation for those with CKD. One statement achieved group agreement: Meal replacement formulas are safe and efficacious in those with CKD. No agreement was achieved on the statements of whether there is strong evidence of benefit for weight loss prior to kidney transplantation; whether traditional weight loss strategies can be used in those with CKD and if bariatric surgery in those with end stage kidney disease is feasible and effective.

CONCLUSION

There is a limited evidence base to guide the dietetic management of overweight and obese individuals with CKD. Medical or surgical strategies to facilitate weight loss are not recommended in isolation and require a multidisciplinary approach with the involvement of a skilled renal dietitian.

Renal Transplant in Obese Patients and Impact of Weight Loss Before Surgery on Surgical and Medical Outcomes: A Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have linked obesity to poor outcomes in renal transplant recipients, prompting many transplant centers to encourage weight loss pretransplant in obese patients. Here, we performed a single-center retrospective study to assess the effects of weight loss on graft and patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 893 renal transplant recipients at our center from 2007 to 2011 were analyzed. First, renal transplant recipients with a history of obesity before transplant (42%) were compared with nonobese patients. Second, in the obese group, renal transplant recipients with significant weight loss (> 10%) before transplant were compared with other obese renal transplant recipients without significant weight loss.

RESULTS

Renal transplant recipients were predominantly white, with 74% having undergone living-donor transplant. Obese patients were older (56.6 vs 46.7 y old) and had more comorbidities and more surgical complications, in particular wound complications and incisional hernias, posttransplant than nonobese patients (14.7 vs 5.5%, respectively). Patient and graft survival rates were similar to those in nonobese patients. In the obese group, patient characteristics and medical or surgical complications after transplant did not differ between those with or without significant weight loss. However, obese patient and graft survival rates were lower in patients with weight loss than in obese patients without weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, weight loss before transplant surgery in obese patients had no influence on surgical outcomes but was associated with a higher mortality rate. A prospective assessment of the impact of weight loss before surgery is needed to establish its usefulness.

Patients receiving dialysis do not have increased energy needs compared with healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving dialysis are thought to have increased energy needs due to stress from the dialysis process or uraemic toxins. However, certain conditions may induce hypometabolic states potentially leading to unwanted weight gains when increased calorie intake is recommended.

OBJECTIVES

Since there is conflicting research, this study aims to assess total energy expenditure (TEE) of patients receiving dialysis through analysis of resting energy expenditure (REE) and physical activity levels.

DESIGN

Comprehensive review of the current literature on REE and physical activity levels.

METHODS

Two electronic databases (PubMed and CINAHL) were searched using keywords to find papers published within the last 10 years for physical activity studies and within the last five years for REE.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Adults undergoing long-term dialysis treatments who do not have comorbidities that influence energy expenditure such as inflammation, hyperthyroidism or cancers. Participants were also required to ambulate without assistance.

RESULTS

Only seven of the 325 studies found were included in this review. Most studies were controlled trials with one being a prospective study. Patients receiving dialysis had rest energy expenditures comparable to healthy adults. There was not a consensus between studies as to which predictive energy equation produced accurate energy recommendations. Overall, patients receiving dialysis were significantly less active compared with healthy adults and this related to muscle mass.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving dialysis tend to be sedentary or lightly active and do not have increased energy expenditure compared with healthy adults. Therefore, stable patients should not be prescribed increased calorie intake.

Immunologic and endocrine functions of adipose tissue: implications for kidney disease

Excess adiposity can induce adverse sequelae in multiple cell types and organ systems. The transition from the lean to the obese state is characterized by fundamental cellular changes at the level of the adipocyte. These changes affect the local microenvironment within the respective adipose tissue but can also affect nonadipose systems. Adipocytes within fat pads respond to chronic nutrient excess through hyperplasia or hypertrophy, which can differentially affect interorgan crosstalk between various adipose depots and other organs. This crosstalk is dependent on the unique ability of the adipocyte to coordinate metabolic adjustments throughout the body and to integrate responses to maintain metabolic homeostasis. These actions occur through the release of free fatty acids and metabolites during times of energy need - a process that is altered in the obese state. In addition, adipocytes release a wide array of signalling molecules, such as sphingolipids, as well as inflammatory and hormonal factors (adipokines) that are critical for interorgan crosstalk. The interactions of adipose tissue with the kidney - referred to as the adipo-renal axis - are important for normal kidney function as well as the response of the kidney to injury. Here, we discuss the mechanistic basis of this interorgan crosstalk, which clearly has great therapeutic potential given the increasing rates of chronic kidney disease secondary to obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Weight Loss in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Should We Consider Individualised, Qualitative, ad Libitum Diets? A Narrative Review and Case Study

In advanced chronic kidney disease, obesity may bring a survival advantage, but many transplant centres demand weight loss before wait-listing for kidney graft. The case here described regards a 71-year-old man, with obesity-related glomerulopathy; referral data were: weight 110 kg, Body Mass Index (BMI) 37 kg/m², serum creatinine (sCr) 5 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 23 mL/min, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 75 mg/dL, proteinuria 2.3 g/day. A moderately restricted, low-protein diet allowed reduction in BUN (45–55 mg/dL) and good metabolic and kidney function stability, with a weight increase of 6 kg. Therefore, he asked to be enrolled in a weight-loss program to be wait-listed (the two nearest transplant centres required a BMI below 30 or 35 kg/m²). Since previous low-calorie diets were not successful and he was against a surgical approach, we chose a qualitative, ad libitum coach-assisted diet, freely available in our unit. In the first phase, the diet is dissociated; he lost 16 kg in 2 months, without need for dialysis. In the second maintenance phase, in which foods are progressively combined, he lost 4 kg in 5 months, allowing wait-listing. Dialysis started one year later, and was followed by weight gain of about 5 kg. He resumed the maintenance diet, and his current body weight, 35 months after the start of the diet, is 94 kg, with a BMI of 31.7 kg/m², without clinical or biochemical signs of malnutrition. This case suggests that our patients can benefit from the same options available to non-CKD (chronic kidney disease) individuals, provided that strict multidisciplinary surveillance is assured.

Obesity and listing for renal transplantation: weighing the evidence for a growing problem

A 56-year-old female patient was referred to the transplant assessment clinic in July 2016. She started haemodialysis in 2012 for renal failure due to urinary tract infections. She is doing very well on dialysis and has an excellent exercise tolerance without shortness of breath or angina. She has had no infections since starting dialysis and no other comorbidity, except well-controlled hypertension and hyperparathyroidism requiring treatment with cinacalcet. Clinical examination is essentially normal except for truncal obesity with height 167 cm and weight 121 kg, giving her a body mass index of 43.4. Can she be listed for a renal transplant? If not, which target weight should be given to the patient before she can be transplant listed? Which interventions, if any, should be recommended to achieve weight loss?

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: perspectives on patient selection in low- to middle-income countries

Chronic kidney disease is a major public health problem that continues to show an unrelenting global increase in prevalence. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease has been predicted to grow the fastest in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). There is evidence that people living in LMICs have the highest need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) despite the lowest access to various modalities of treatment. As continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) does not require advanced technologies, much infrastructure, or need for dialysis staff support, it should be an ideal form of RRT in LMICs, particularly for those living in remote areas. However, CAPD is scarcely available in many LMICs, and even where available, there are several hurdles to be confronted regarding patient selection for this modality. High cost of CAPD due to unavailability of fluids, low patient education and motivation, low remuneration for nephrologists, lack of expertise/experience for catheter insertion and management of complications, presence of associated comorbid diseases, and various socio-demographic factors contribute significantly toward reduced patient selection for CAPD. Cost of CAPD fluids seems to be a major constraint given that many countries do not have the capacity to manufacture fluids but instead rely heavily on fluids imported from developed countries. There is need to invest in fluid manufacturing (either nationally or regionally) in LMICs to improve uptake of patients treated with CAPD. Workforce training and retraining will be necessary to ensure that there is coordination of CAPD programs and increase the use of protocols designed to improve CAPD outcomes such as insertion of catheters, treatment of peritonitis, and treatment of complications associated with CAPD. Training of nephrology workforce in CAPD will increase workforce experience and make CAPD a more acceptable RRT modality with improved outcomes.