Frequency of and Reasons for Unplanned Transfers From the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility in a Tertiary Hospital

Unplanned transfer to acute care during inpatient geriatric rehabilitation: incidence, risk factors, and associated short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Information is scarce on unplanned transfers from geriatric rehabilitation back to acute care despite their potential impact on patients' functional recovery. This study aimed 1) to determine the incidence rate and causes of unplanned transfers; 2) to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without unplanned transfer.

METHODS

Consecutive stays (n = 2375) in a tertiary geriatric rehabilitation unit were included. Unplanned transfers to acute care and their causes were analyzed from discharge summaries. Data on patients' socio-demographics, health, functional, and mental status; length of stay; discharge destination; and death, were extracted from the hospital database. Bi- and multi-variable analyses investigated the association between patients' characteristics and unplanned transfers.

RESULTS

One in six (16.7%) rehabilitation stays was interrupted by a transfer, most often secondary to infections (19.3%), cardiac (16.8%), abdominal (12.7%), trauma (12.2%), and neurological problems (9.4%). Older patients (AdjORage≥85: 0.70; 95%CI: 0. 53-0.94, P = .016), and those admitted for gait disorders (AdjOR: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.53-0.99, P = .046) had lower odds of transfer to acute care. In contrast, men (AdjOR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.29-2.26, P < .001), patients with more severe disease (AdjORCIRS: 1.05; 95%CI: 1.02-1.07, P < .001), functional impairment before (AdjOR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.05-2.70, P = .029) and at rehabilitation admission (AdjOR: 2.07; 95%CI: 1.56- 2.76, P < .001) had higher odds of transfer. Transferred patients were significantly more likely to die than those without transfer (AdjOR 13.78; 95%CI: 6.46-29.42, P < .001) during their stay, but those surviving had similar functional performance and rate of home discharge at the end of the stay.

CONCLUSION

A significant minority of patients experienced an unplanned transfer that potentially interfered with their rehabilitation and was associated with poorer outcomes. Men, patients with more severe disease and functional impairment appear at increased risk. Further studies should investigate whether interventions targeting these patients may prevent unplanned transfers and modify associated adverse outcomes.

Factors Associated with Unplanned Transfer of Patients with Brain Tumor from Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit to Primary Acute Care Units

Inpatient rehabilitation should be assessed to improve each functional domain in patients with brain tumor. However, no previous study has reported risk factors for unplanned transfer of this patient population to primary acute care units during a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation. The objective of this study was to investigate the percentage of unplanned transfer of brain tumor rehabilitation inpatients to primary acute care units compared with stroke patients and factors associated with such unplanned transfer. Data of 137 patients with brain tumor who were transferred to the department of physical and rehabilitation medicine were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, data of 438 patients with subacute stroke were also obtained. Included patients were divided into an unplanned transfer group and a control group based on whether they required a transfer to another department for acute care before completing their comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation. Reasons for unplanned transfers were classified based on medical or surgical conditions. The incidence of unplanned transfers to the medical or surgical department was significantly higher in patients with brain tumor (15.3%) than in stroke patients (7.1%) (p < 0.05). Most of unplanned transfers occurred within two weeks of the comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation for patients with brain tumor. There was a significantly higher incidence of unplanned transfers in patients with a primary tumor than in those with a metastatic tumor (15.9% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.05). In addition, the frequency of chemotherapy or radiotherapy was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the unplanned transfer group than in the control group. The most common cause of an unplanned transfer was a neurologic cause (90.0%) in patients with brain tumor and an infectious disease such as pneumonia (51.6%) in stroke patients. In conclusion, these results demonstrated a higher incidence of unplanned transfers in patients with brain tumor than in stroke patients during intensive inpatient rehabilitation. Proportions of those with neurological problems were relatively higher in patients with brain tumor than in patients with subacute stroke.

Frequency and Characteristics of Medical Complications in Rehabilitation Settings: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the available evidence on medical complications occurring in adult patients in subacute inpatient rehabilitation, and to describe the impact on subacute length of stay and readmission to acute care.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SUBJECTS

Adult patients, within the inpatient rehabilitation environment, who experienced medical complications, clinical deterioration and/or the requirement of transfer to acute care.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE and CINAHL electronic databases was undertaken to identify primary research studies published in English and French during the period 2000-2021. Study reporting followed the standards indicated by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR).

RESULTS

A total of 47 studies were identified for inclusion. Key results included differences in the type and frequency of complications according to admission type, the proportion of patients experiencing at least 1 complication, and complications associated with transfer to acute care.

CONCLUSION

Patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation are at high risk of medical complications and may not be medically stable during their admission, requiring care by clinicians with expertise in functional rehabilitation, and ongoing management by members of the multidisciplinary team with expertise in acute general medicine, infectious diseases and recognition and response to clinical deterioration.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Korean version of rehabilitation complexity scale for the measurement of complex rehabilitation needs

The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13 (RCS-E v13) to develop the Korean version of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (KRCS), and to explore its reliability, and concurrent and construct validity.This research was an observational study of a series of consecutive rehabilitation inpatients who were previously assessed with KRCS and grouped with the Korean rehabilitation patient group version 1.1 (KRPG v1.1). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the RCS-E v13 were implemented according to internationally recognized standards. Four hundred thirty inpatients diagnosed with complex neurological or musculoskeletal disabilities were enrolled. Physiatrists were asked to finish the KRCS at admission and to complete a second time with an interval of a minimum of 3 weeks to a maximum of 4 weeks for reliability evaluation. At discharge, the KRCS was completed a third time to explore constructive validity.The Cronbach-α was 0.63. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the total score, Medical, Nursing, Care, Therapy Disciplines, Therapy Intensity, and Especial Needs domains were 0.86, 0.69, 0.84, 0.83, 0.74, 0.74, and 0.79, respectively (P < .01). The scale was repeatable (Spearman rho 0.69-0.86) and correlated strongly with disability measures (Spearman rho 0.37-0.50). Exploratory factor analysis revealed 2 clear factors ("Medical/Nursing" and "Care/Therapy Disciplines/Therapy Intensity/Equipment"). The goodness-of-fit index in the confirmatory factor analysis was 0.87. The KRCS was associated with a higher explanatory power for rehabilitation resources and length of stay than the KRPG v1.1.Our data suggest that the KRCS is a feasible, reliable, and valid tool that is appropriate for the measurement of clinical complexity in Korean intensive rehabilitation units. Further, it may provide case-mix adjustment to improve the rehabilitation delivery system in Korea.