PROPIT: A PROspective comparative clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of PITavastatin in patients with metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Dyslipidaemia and central obesity are the major factors underlying the dramatic increase in metabolic syndrome (MS). We compared the effects of early combined therapy with pitavastatin and intensive lifestyle modification (LSM) on the amelioration of each component of MS with those of LSM only.

DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS/MEASUREMENTS

PROPIT (a PROspective comparative clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PITavastatin in patients with metabolic syndrome) was a prospective, randomized, multicenter open-label 48-week trial. We enrolled 187 patients with MS (central obesity and prediabetes) and randomized them into two treatment groups: 2 mg pitavastatin daily + intensive LSM or intensive LSM only. The primary outcome was the improvements in the components of MS and in the percentage of non-MS converters.

RESULTS

After 1 year treatment, the improvement of MS score was significantly higher in the pitavastatin + LSM group (P = 0·039). However, non-MS converters (MS score ≤2) did not differ between the groups. The secondary outcomes, namely lipid profiles, the Apo B/A1 ratio, visceral fat/subcutaneous fat ratio and the Framingham risk score, were significantly improved in the pitavastatin group. There was no deterioration in glucose metabolism after treatment with pitavastatin for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Early statin treatment can be an effective option in obese patients with MS, prediabetes and mild dyslipidaemia with further improvement of cardiovascular risk factors. We could not observe the increase rate of glucose intolerance in statin group. Future longitudinal studies are needed to test the benefits of early statin treatment compared with LSM.

IL-18 level in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery or valve replacement: which link with epicardial fat depot?

Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a member of the interleukin-1 family of cytokines produced constitutively by different cell types and by adipose tissue. Due to the link between obesity, inflammation and cardiovascular diseases, we aimed to measure IL-18 circulating level in patients undergoing open-heart surgery both for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or for valve replacement (VR), and we also evaluated whether epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) depot may be a potential source of IL-18. Circulating IL-18 protein was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IL-18, IL-18 receptor 1 (IL-18 R1) and IL-18 receptor accessory protein (IL-18-RAP) gene expression in EAT depot were evaluated by one colour microarray platform. EAT thickness was measured by echocardiography. In this study we found that all cardiovascular patients (CABG and VR) have increased circulating IL-18 level compared to healthy control subjects (p < 0.0001), but no statistical significant difference was observed between CABG and VR groups (p = 0.35). A great increase in the gene expression of IL-18 (p < 0.05), IL-18 R1 (p < 0.01) and IL-18 RAP (p < 0.001) was observed in EAT samples obtained from CABG vs VR patients. In conclusion, CABG and VR patients had similar increased level of circulating IL-18 protein, but in EAT depots isolated from CABG gene expression of IL-18, IL-18 R1 and IL-18-RAP resulted higher than in VR patients. Future investigation on local IL-18 protein production, its autocrine-paracrine effect and its correlation with plasmatic IL-18 level could give more information on the relationship between IL-18 and coronary artery disease.