Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Lymphedema Life Impact Scale

Evaluation of Elastographic Parameters in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Examination of Their Relationship with Clinical Data

Background: To evaluate the stiffness of the skin and subcutaneous tissues of the arm and forearm of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema using shear-wave elastography (SWE) and to investigate the relationship between the patients' symptoms. Methods and Results: Both lymphedematous and unaffected upper extremities of 72 patients (72 lymphedematous and 72 unaffected extremities) and 72 upper extremities of 36 controls (72 healthy extremities) were included in the study. The stiffness of the skin and subcutaneous tissues of all extremities was evaluated with SWE. The patients' pain, tension, weight, and stiffness symptoms associated with lymphedema were questioned using a numerical scale. The patients' functionality and participation in daily life activities were evaluated. The skin stiffness of the affected extremity was higher and the subcutaneous tissue stiffness was lower in patients than in controls (p < 0.05). The skin stiffness of the affected forearm was higher and the subcutaneous tissue stiffness of the affected arm and forearm was lower than their healthy extremities (p < 0.05). Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Life Impact Scale; were negatively correlated with arm and forearm subcutaneous tissue stiffness and positively correlated with forearm skin stiffness. The decrease in subcutaneous tissue stiffness of the arm was associated with heaviness sensation, the increase in skin stiffness of the forearm was associated with tightness, and the decrease in subcutaneous tissue stiffness of the forearm was associated with tightness, heaviness, and stiffness sensations. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that SWE measurements can be useful for diagnosis and follow-up of patients.

Measurement Properties and Determinants of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability and identify determinants of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with lower limb lymphedema (LLL). Methods and Results: The study included 28 patients with LLL and 28 healthy subjects. To investigate the convergent validity and determinants of the 6MWT, patients were assessed using the following measurements: circumference measurement for lymphedema severity, hand-held dynamometry for muscle strength, time up and go for functional mobility, five-time sit-to-stand test for functional lower extremity strength, Lower Extremity Functional Scale for lower extremity functionality, Lymphedema Life Impact Scale for quality of life, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form for physical activity level. The test-retest reliability of the 6MWT was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). 6MWT, a test-retest reliability analysis was carried out with 28 patients within 3-7 days. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to determine the cut-off point of 6MWT. The test-retest reliability of 6MWT was detected as excellent (ICC [95%] 0.93 [0.87-0.97]). Significant correlations were found between the 6MWT health-related and disease-specific parameters, indicating sufficient convergent validity (r ≥ 0.3). The ROC curve indicated a cut-off point of 504 meters (area under the curve [AUC] 0.712 [95%CI: 0.575-0.849]). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that lymphedema severity, hip abduction muscle strength, and lower limb functionality were the predictors of 6MWT. Conclusions: The 6MWT has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing the functional capacity of patients with LLL.

Evaluation of the Treatment Process with Home Exercise Program and Telerehabilitation in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Case-Control Study

Background: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation (TR) and home exercise program (HEP) in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema and the patients' compliance with these treatment processes. Methods and Results: 23 patients were prospectively included in the HEP group and 22 patients in the TR group, who were followed up in the Lymphedema Outpatient Clinic of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of a University Hospital. These patients were randomized. The volume difference between the extremities of the patients was calculated with the truncated cone formula, before and after treatment. The patients' pain, tightness, heaviness, and stiffness symptoms associated with lymphedema were questioned using a numerical scale. The patients' functionality and participation in daily life activities were evaluated with disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand Quick Questionnaire (Quick-DASH) and the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLIS). Patients' treatment satisfaction and compliance with treatment were questioned using Likert scales. A total of 45 patients were included in the study. The mean age and body mass index were similar between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). In the evaluations performed, no significant differences were observed within groups or between groups in terms of volume difference, quick DASH, pain, tightness, heaviness, stiffness, and LLIS scores (p ≥ 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the TR group (p ≤ 0.001). During treatment follow-up, only one person from the TR group missed the 5th-week checkup (4.5%), whereas five patients from the HEP missed the 5th-week checkup and three missed the 8th-week checkup. Overall, eight patients discontinued treatment (34%). Conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in clinical assessments between TR and HEP groups, patient satisfaction, and treatment adherence were significantly higher in the TR group.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Bahasa Malaysia Version of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most prevalent comorbidity that occurs following breast cancer treatments and has negative impact on the patients' quality of life (QoL). The Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL) is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing the QoL of patients with BCRL. However, the Bahasa Malaysia (BM) version is not available yet. This study aimed to translate the Lymph-ICF-UL into BM and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods and Results: A forward-backward translation was performed based on Sousa's guideline, and then, the face, content, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were tested. Face validity was assessed by five patients, and content validity was evaluated by six experts. Then, construct validity and internal validity were assessed in 107 patients. Finally, test-retest reliability was analyzed in 21 patients. Two items were eliminated following suggestions from the patients and experts. All patients found the scoring system and items clear and relevant. The results showed sufficient content validity index and modified kappa statistics value. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.67 to 0.95, intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, standard error measurement was 2.29-6.15, and the Bland-Altman plot showed an agreement between two test occasions. Conclusion: These results suggested that the Lymph-ICF-UL BM has good validity and reliability in evaluating the QoL of patients with BCRL in Malaysia.

Rasch validation and refinement of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale version 2 in an Italian cohort with secondary lymphedema

PURPOSE

To produce and validate an Italian version of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale version 2 (LLISv2-It), a tool measuring the impact of lymphedema on health-related quality of life, and investigate its main psychometric characteristics.

METHODS

After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the LLISv2, we administered it to 156 subjects with secondary lymphedema (upper or lower limb), together with (depending on the limb involved) either the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) or the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). We analyzed the performance of LLISv2-It using Classical Test Theory and Rasch methods.

RESULTS

Cronbach alpha was 0.89. Item fit statistics indicated that item #12 was underfitting (Infit MnSQ = 1.56; Outfit MnSq = 1.75). Test-retest reliability of the 17-item version (without item #18, not scored, according to the original authors) and of a 16-item version (without #12 and #18-a unidimensional item set) were both excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.93; 95%). The minimum detectable change was 8.9 points. The correlation of LLISv2-It with DASH and LEFS was r = 0.81 and -0.57, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the LLISv2 is reliable and valid. To make the tool more psychometrically sound, we recommend to not calculate items #12 and #18 in the total score.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLISv2) is particularly useful as a validated condition-specific health-related quality of life measure for patients with chronic edema/lymphedema. We have validated its Italian version (LLISv2-It).We also examined the psychometric properties of the LLISv2 in individuals with secondary lymphedema of either upper or lower limb, using both classical test theory and Rasch techniques, to provide insights for further refinement of the questionnaire.Based on our results, we recommend not to count item #12 in the total score (besides #18, as already suggested by the original authors). Moreover, we determined that the minimum detectable change of the LLISv2 was 9 points. This information is helpful in clinical practice to understand if the change in score is not due to chance (measurement error).Although further research is warranted, the present validation study of the LLISv2 increases the confidence in the metric quality and clinical utility of the scale to assess lymphedema-specific health-related quality of life in individuals with secondary lymphedema of either upper or lower limb.

Psychometric Properties of Quality of Life Questionnaires for Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review

Backgrounds: Assessing quality of life (QoL) using a well-developed and validated questionnaire is an essential part of a breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) treatment. However, a QoL questionnaire with the best psychometric properties is so far unknown. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaires measuring the QoL of patients with BCRL. Methods: A thorough search was performed to identify published studies in electronic databases such as Medline (via Ovid), EBSCOhost, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, on 8 February 2022, by using search terms as follows: ‘quality of life’; ‘breast cancer’; ‘upper limb’; ‘lymphedema’; ‘questionnaire’; and ‘measurement properties.’ Two reviewers conducted article selection, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. The third reviewer helped solve any possible disagreements between the two reviewers. The COSMIN checklist and manual were used to assess the quality of included studies. Results: A total of nineteen articles with nine questionnaires were included and assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Most studies only assessed content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity. Lymph-ICF-UL showed the most ‘sufficient’ and ‘high’ quality of evidence ratings for its measurement properties. Conclusion: The most appropriate questionnaire for use based on our assessment is Lymph-ICF-UL.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a chronic and debilitating condition that affects many cancer survivors. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can give valuable insight into the impact of lymphedema on a patient's quality of life and can play an essential role in treatment decisions. This study aims to (1) identify PROMs used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with lymphedema; and (2) assess the quality of the lymphedema-specific PROMs.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search to identify articles on lymphedema, quality of life, and PROMs. An overview was created of all PROMs used to assess HRQoL in patients with lymphedema. The methodological quality of the lymphedema-specific PROMs was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 235 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 200 described studies using one or more PROMs as an outcome measure in patients with lymphedema. The other 35 studies described the development and/or validation of a lymphedema-specific PROM. The COSMIN assessment demonstrated that none of these PROMs met all quality standards for development.

CONCLUSION

The use of PROMs in lymphedema is increasing; however, based on our findings, we cannot fully support the use of any of the existing instruments. A well-developed lymphedema-specific PROM, based on patient input, is needed to gain better insight into the impact of this condition, and can be used to measure the effect of possible medical and surgical treatments.

Self-reported questionnaires for lymphoedema: a systematic review of measurement properties using COSMIN framework

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoedema may develop as a result of numerous genetic and traumatic causes; however, treatment for cancer is the most common cause of its development in more economically developed nations. This systematic review critically appraised, compared and summarised the measurement properties of lymphoedema-specific self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) measuring various patient-reported outcomes including quality of life (QOL), function, morbidity, and symptoms.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched to identify studies of the measurement properties of SRQs. Two review teams independently evaluated the quality of the individual studies using the risk of bias tool from the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Measurement properties of the SRQs presented in the studies were then rated. Study level ratings were summarised for an SRQ if they were reported in multiple studies, and their overall quality of the evidence were then graded.

RESULTS

Forty articles, reporting on 19 SRQs were identified from 8615 records. The focus of the 19 SRQs included eight on QOL, four on symptoms, two on function, and two on impairment. The other three SRQs were on illness perception, self-efficacy, and patient-relevant treatment benefit, respectively. Eight and three SRQs were upper limb and lower limb-specific, respectively, whereas seven questionnaires were for both upper and lower limb lymphoedema. One SRQ was developed for head and neck lymphoedema. According to the COSMIN framework, none of the SRQs reviewed had sufficient evidence to support all nine measurement properties. In lower limb questionnaires, the LYMQOL-leg has sufficient content, structural, and construct validity as well as internal consistency and reliability. For upper limb lymphoedema questionnaires, the Lymph-ICF-UL had sufficient content and construct validity as well as reliability.

CONCLUSION

LYMQOL-leg SRQ is recommended with confidence for evaluation of QOL of people with lower limb lymphoedema while the Lymph-ICF-UL is recommended for evaluation of the QOL of the breast cancer-related lymphoedema with some confidence. In view of the high level of the indeterminate ratings of the measurement properties of the existing SRQs, further research is desirable.

Patient-reported outcomes following lymph reconstructive surgery in lower limb lymphedema: A systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE

Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive and burdensome disease that is known to have a substantial impact on quality of life (QOL). Hence, the assessment of QOL is an important aspect of any study which seeks to evaluate outcomes after lymph reconstructive surgery. We therefore aimed to analyze currently available patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMS) for patients with lower limb lymphedema (LLL) with regard to their psychometric properties. Furthermore, we intended to evaluate the change in QOL in patient undergoing lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) or vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT).

METHODS

A literature research of four databases on studies that included PROMS for LLL was conducted. All selected studies were assessed for validity according Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments. Studies that used the Lymph Quality of Life Measure for Limb Lymphedema (LYMQOL) after LVA and/or VLNT were included for quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 988 studies were screened, of which 30 studies were included in this review. We identified six validated PROMS to assess LLL. Of those, the LYMQOL was the most commonly used questionnaire. Based on the LYMQOL, a significant improvement of QOL in LLL was noted in all studies after reconstructive lymph surgery (LVA/VLNT) regardless of lymphedema etiology, stage, or time since diagnosis. On the basis of the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments criteria, the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema seems to be superior in terms of its psychometric properties.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant improvement in the QOL in patients with LLL after reconstructive lymph surgery can be observed. Future studies on reconstructive lymph surgery need to include both objective and congruent volume measurements, as well as data on QOL based a well-validated PROM such as the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema.