Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis

Prediction of live birth - selection of embryos using morphokinetic parameters

BACKROUND

The goal of assisted reproduction is for a couple treated with IVF techniques to end the treatment by giving birth to a healthy baby. A neccessary presumption for success is the identification of the best embryo with high implantation and developmental potential. One option is to select an euploid embryo by invasive preimplantaion genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) or it is possible to select the best embryo by non-invasive time-lapse monitoring (TLM), specifically based on morphokinetic parameters and morphological markers that are able to identify an embryo with high developmental potential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved a total of 1060 embryos (585 euploid and 475 aneuploid embryos after PGT-A) with good morphology from 329 patients in the period 01/2016-10/2021. All embryos were cultured in a time-lapse incubator, trophectoderm (TE) cells biopsies for PGT-A examination were performed on day 5 (D5) or day 6 (D6) of culture. During the study period, 225 frozen embryo transfers (FET) of one euploid embryo were performed. Based on the treatment outcome, the embryos were divided into 2 groups - euploid embryos, which led to the birth of a healthy child, and euploid embryos that did not show fetal heartbeat (FHB) after FET.

RESULTS

Based on the statistical analysis of the embryos without implantation and the embryos with live birth, it is clear that the morphokinetic parameters t5 (time of division into 5 cells) and tSB (time of start of blastulation) are significantly different.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that of the morphokinetic parameters tSB and t5 are predictive indicators for selecting an embryo with high developmental potential and with a high probability of achieving the birth of a healthy child.

Non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality for the selection of transferable embryos in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

The ultimate goal of human assisted reproductive technology is to achieve a healthy pregnancy and birth, ideally from the selection and transfer of a single competent embryo. Recently, techniques for efficiently evaluating the state and quality of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse imaging systems have been applied. Artificial intelligence programs based on deep learning technology and big data analysis of time-lapse monitoring system during in vitro culture of preimplantation embryos have also been rapidly developed. In addition, several molecular markers of the secretome have been successfully analyzed in spent embryo culture media, which could easily be obtained during in vitro embryo culture. It is also possible to analyze small amounts of cell-free nucleic acids, mitochondrial nucleic acids, miRNA, and long non-coding RNA derived from embryos using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or digital PCR, as well as next-generation sequencing. Various efforts are being made to use non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality (NiEEQ) to select the embryo with the best developmental competence. However, each NiEEQ method has some limitations that should be evaluated case by case. Therefore, an integrated analysis strategy fusing several NiEEQ methods should be urgently developed and confirmed by proper clinical trials.

Noninvasive embryo evaluation and selection by time-lapse monitoring vs. conventional morphologic assessment in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a single-center randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether time-lapse monitoring (TLM) for cleavage-stage embryo selection improves reproductive outcomes in comparison with conventional morphological assessment (CMA) selection.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single academic center.

PATIENTS

We randomly assigned 139 women who were undergoing their first in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle to undergo either fresh embryo transfer or first frozen embryo transfer (FET). Only 1 cleavage-stage embryo was transferred to each participant.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomly assigned to either the CMA or the TLM group. In the CMA group, day 2 and day 3 embryos were observed. A good-quality cleavage-stage embryo was selected for transfer or freezing in both groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary and secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and the live birth rate (LBR), respectively, after the first embryo transfer (fresh embryo transfer or FET).

RESULTS

The CPR and LBR were significantly lower in the TLM group than in the CMA group (CPR: 49.18% vs. 70.42%; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.94; LBR: 45.90% vs. 64.79%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.98). The CPR with fresh embryo transfer or FET did not significantly differ between the TLM and the CMA groups (fresh embryo transfer: 44.44% vs. 70.0%, relative risk, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.39-1.03; FET: 52.94% vs. 70.73%, relative risk, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.52-1.09). There was a significant difference in the LBR with fresh embryo transfer between the TLM and the CMA groups (40.74% vs. 66.67%; relative risk, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.03). The LBRs with FET were similar in the TLM and the CMA groups (50.0% vs. 63.41%; relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.52-1.19). The rates of early spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy did not differ between the TLM and the CMA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer with TLM-based selection did not have any advantages over CMA when day 2 and day 3 embryo morphology was combined in young women with a good ovarian reserve. Because of these results, we conclude that TLM remains an investigational procedure for in vitro fertilization practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900021981.

An expert commentary on essential equipment, supplies and culture media in the ART laboratory

The ART laboratory is a complex system designed to sustain the fertilization, survival, and culture of the preimplantation embryo to the blastocyst stage. ART outcomes depend on numerous factors, among which are the equipment, supplies and culture media used. The number and type of incubators also may affect ART results. While large incubators may be more suitable for media equilibration, bench-top incubators may provide better embryo culture conditions in separate or smaller chambers and may be coupled with time-lapse systems that allow continuous embryo monitoring. Microscopes are essential for observation, assessment, and micromanipulation. Workstations provide a controlled environment for gamete and embryo handling and their quantity should be adjusted according to the number of ART cycles treated in order to provide a steady and efficient workflow. Continuous maintenance, quality control and monitoring of equipment is essential and quality control devices such as the thermometer, and pH-meter are necessary to maintain optimal culture conditions. Tracking, appropriate delivery and storage conditions, and quality control of all consumables is recommended so that the adequate quantity and quality is available for use. Embryo culture media have evolved: preimplantation embryos are cultured either by sequential media or single-step media that can be used for interrupted or uninterrupted culture. There is currently no sufficient evidence that any individual commercially-available culture system is better than others in terms of embryo viability. In this review, we aim to analyse the various parameters that should be taken into account when choosing the essential equipment, consumables and culture media systems that will create optimal culture conditions and provide the most effective patient treatment.