Leading Change in Academic Pharmacy: Report of the 2018-2019 AACP Academic Affairs Committee

The Influence of Academic Affairs on PIF

Referencing literature and professional experiences of multiple academic affairs deans in Doctor of Pharmacy degree granting programs, this commentary examines the ways offices of academic affairs (OAAs) play an integral part in the professional identity formation (PIF) of students, faculty, preceptors, and staff. The overlapping roles of academic affairs and other program and university offices are examined with a focus on approaches that impact student PIF. Although size, organizational structure, and roles or responsibilities can vary among OAAs within pharmacy education, 5 focus areas are identified as opportunities where most, if not all, OAAs can positively impact PIF for students. These 5 areas include curriculum design, delivery, and operations; leadership; professional development; student support and progression; and accreditation. OAAs can help to shape PIF within pharmacy education in a variety of ways. Identifying and reflecting upon the 5 focus areas described in this paper may help individuals within OAA units to recognize where PIF efforts may be developed, refined, or assessed within their program. By intentionally layering PIF strategies across these 5 focus areas, OAA personnel and those from other units within and outside of the university system may thoughtfully work together to develop graduates who have increased self-awareness, confidence, and the ability to lead within the profession of pharmacy.

Evaluating the Strengths and Barriers of Competency-Based Education in the Health Professions

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to define competency-based education (CBE) for pharmacy education and describe how strengths and barriers of CBE can support or hinder implementation.

FINDINGS

Sixty-five studies were included from a variety of health professions in order to define competency based pharmacy education (CBPE) and identify barriers and benefits from the learner, faculty, institution, and society perspectives. From the 7 identified thematic categories, a CBPE definition was developed: "Competency-based pharmacy education is an outcomes-based curricular model of an organized framework of competencies (knowledge, skills, attitudes) for pharmacists to meet health care and societal needs. This learner-centered curricular model aligns authentic teaching and learning strategies and assessment (emphasizing workplace assessment and quality feedback) while deemphasizing time."

SUMMARY

This article provides a definition of CBE for its application within pharmacy education. The strengths and barriers for CBE were elucidated from other health professions' education literature. Identified implementation strengths and barriers aid in the discussions on what will support or hinder the implementation of CBE in pharmacy education.

A Qualitative Analysis of Student and Preceptor Resiliency Discussions During Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this qualitative study was to describe key themes discussed by student pharmacists and preceptors related to recognizing burnout and maintaining wellbeing during an experiential assignment.

METHODS

This qualitative study used directed content analysis to examine themes that emerged from discussions between student pharmacists and preceptors as part of a required lifelong learning interview during Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences that took place between August 2019 and May 2020. Iterative axial coding was used to develop and redefine codes systematically until consensus was reached and a final codebook was established. All responses were coded using the consensus categories.

RESULTS

From the 228 interviews analyzed, 3 overarching themes emerged: causes of burnout, manifestations or symptoms of burnout, and strategies to manage stress and burnout. Preceptors identified the mechanics of the job and feeling extreme pressure or worry as 2 major causes of burnout, which manifest as physical exhaustion, mental exhaustion, and poor work performance. To manage stress, preceptors reported using personal and work-positive coping strategies.

CONCLUSION

The major themes derived from the analysis-causes of burnout, manifestations of burnout, and strategies to manage stress-align with what is already known about health care provider wellbeing. Although it remains unknown if this type of wellness intervention is effective at changing student stress management habits, results indicate that the intervention sparked conversations that could assist students in establishing a baseline of knowledge on the topic and supply students with a toolkit of resiliency strategies.

A Scoping Review of Well-being Assessment and Interventions in Student Pharmacists

Objective. To review the literature assessing student pharmacist well-being and the impact of well-being-associated interventions.Findings. Of the 15 studies included, six assessed student pharmacist well-being while nine evaluated the impact of a well-being intervention. While various approaches exist to assessing student pharmacist well-being, the body of literature suggests, overall, that student pharmacist well-being is poor. Since well-being is multifaceted and individualized, some pharmacy schools have identified various ways to incorporate tailored well-being activities, including mindfulness, into required, elective, and cocurricular experiences within the Doctor of Pharmacy program, with varying outcomes.Summary. This review highlights the limited and variable information available on the assessment of student pharmacist well-being as well as unique strategies to incorporate well-being initiatives into Doctor of Pharmacy curricula. Schools of pharmacy should identify the well-being needs of student pharmacists through a standardized well-being assessment instrument and provide meaningful well-being resources and interventions within the curriculum. There is a growing need for faculty to invest in student pharmacist mental wellness in addition to academic success. Future accreditation standards will inform the Academy on how to advance well-being initiatives.

Pharmacy-faculty work-life balance and career satisfaction: Comparison of national survey results from 2012 and 2018

Background

Changes in demographics and composition of pharmacy faculty, along with faculty perceived stress, work-life balance and career satisfaction have yet to be fully documented.

Objective

To compare recent results from a national survey of work-life balance and career satisfaction of United States (U.S.) pharmacy faculty with results obtained from a similar survey from 2012.

Methods

A 46-item anonymous survey administered via Qualtrics (Provo, UT) was sent to members of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) in 2018. Information regarding demographics, stress, work-life balance, career satisfaction and intent to leave academia was collected. Although not part of the previous survey, participant information related to bullying and abuse in the pharmacy academic work was also gathered. While actual p-values are reported for all comparisons, a more conservative p-value of 0.01 was chosen a priori to indicate significance as multiple comparisons were made.

Results

A total of 1090 pharmacy faculty completed the survey, comparable to the number obtained in 2012 (n = 811). Overall response rates were similar for both years. The majority of pharmacy faculty in 2018 were female, white, married or with partner, worked in a pharmacy practice department and for a public institution. Notable differences between surveys included an increase in females, more associate professors and an increase in non-white faculty in 2018, relative to 2012. Stress, as measured by mean Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) scores was also significantly higher in 2018 (16.0 ± 6.6 vs. 13.5 ± 6.7, p < 0.01) relative to 2012. Faculty from 2018 were significantly less likely to report an intention to remain in academia (61.8% vs 86.3%, p < 0.01), relative to 2012. A sizable number of pharmacy faculty surveyed in 2018 also reported observing or experiencing hostility in the workplace, which included either bullying or verbal or physical abuse.

Conclusions

The makeup of pharmacy educators has evolved quickly over the last several years to comprise more female and associate professors who work within a pharmacy practice department. Also noteworthy is the significant increase in self-reported stress over the six-year timeframe. The direct implications of these findings are unknown but suggest that pharmacy academia is maturing in rank and changing to reflect the current pharmacy workforce (i.e., more females and additional clinical practice roles). Increases in responsibility likely accompany these maturing roles and may, along with other factors, contribute to the observed changes in the reported stress levels among faculty. Further research is called for regarding the reported hostility in pharmacy academic workplace and dovetails with concurrent work being done on citizenship and organizational citizenship behavior among pharmacy faculty. Findings of the study may aid pharmacy school administrators and stakeholders with plans to recruit, develop and retain faculty.

•

Pharmacy faculty report frequent hostility and bullying in their workplace.

•

Composition of pharmacy faculty is rapidly changing to include more females working in pharmacy practice departments.

•

Pharmacy faculty report increased stress levels relative to a previous survey from 2012.

Facilitating Wellbeing in a Turbulent Time

The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the way we live, work, and study. As faculty members, staff members, and students attempt to create and maintain a new normal because of this pandemic, the preservation of wellbeing becomes the responsibility of each and every one of us. The pandemic has taught us not to presume the importance of wellbeing and has allowed us time to reflect on establishing new assumptions and beliefs about how and when we work and study; how to be more efficient in our work and home responsibilities; and above all, what is most important. We must support ourselves and our students by maintaining a routine, modifying work and coursework expectations, and seeking psychosocial support if needed. Focusing on promoting wellbeing through leadership will move our institutions forward to a brighter future beyond COVID-19.

Improving and Restoring the Well-being and Resilience of Pharmacy Students during a Pandemic

During times of stress, such as those experienced during the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, pharmacy students handle the experience differently. For some, the experience may negatively impact their sense of well-being; for others, being at home with family could actually improve their well-being. While students are completing academic work at home and after they finally return to campus, pharmacy schools need to be keenly aware of students' experiences and implement strategies to build their resilience and improve their well-being. One approach will not meet the needs of all students. Many of the challenges that pharmacy students have faced or will face when they return to the classroom are discussed along with some programs and activities that have proven successful.