Problems associated with survival after pig-liver perfusion

Analysis of allogeneic versus xenogeneic auxiliary organ perfusion in liver failure reveals superior efficacy of human livers

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of allogeneic and xenogeneic extracorporeal liver perfusion (ECLP).

METHODS

An Internet-based keyword search was performed in the established online databases. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance (general linear method) were performed.

RESULTS

Data from 198 patients were included in the statistical analysis, 142 of whom were treated by ECLP using porcine livers. Baboon livers were used in 29 patients, human livers in 14, and other or mixed species in 13 patients. Pig liver perfusions resulted in a 20% long-term-survival whereas the use of human livers was significantly more successful (survival rate (SVR) 43%, p<0.05). Baboon livers also revealed superior success (41%; p<0.05). Twenty-three patients were treated after 1991, 12 surviving long-term (52%). The latter all belonged to a group of 14 patients who received combined treatment consisting of ECLP and LTx (SVR-86% in this subgroup).

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic ECLP was accompanied by significantly improved outcome compared with discordant xenogeneic ECLP. The role of hyperacute rejection in acute liver failure with reduced complement levels remains controversial. Physiologic disparity between pig and man may be the even more decisive determinant of outcome.

Extracorporeal liver perfusion as hepatic assist in acute liver failure: a review of world experience

BACKGROUND

There are almost no prospective, controlled and randomized clinical trials comparing different approaches towards hepatic assist. In order to create a basis for comparing the value of the existing different hepatic assist methods this article offers a systematic review of the world experience with allogeneic or xenogeneic extracorporeal liver perfusion (ECLP).

METHODS

An Internet-assisted search was conducted in the international literature published from 1964 to 2000. Only articles with a clear description of methodology and outcome of patients were included. For multivariate analysis of variance the general linear method (GLM) procedure was used. Differences within the groups were analyzed by chi-square test. Data of 198 patients were included into the statistical analysis for systematic review.

RESULTS

The long-term survival rate (SVR) of these patients was 26%, thus not exceeding published data concerning SVR under standard intensive care. Age below 40 years (P<0.029), coma stage lower than III-IV (P<0.003), total perfusion time over 10 hours (P<0.024), hepatitis B as cause for acute liver failure (ALF) (P<0.05) as well as use of baboon and human livers (P<0.02) were identified as independent positive prognostic markers for improved survival. ECLP as bridging therapy to liver transplantation was successful in 12 of 14 patients.

CONCLUSION

ECLP using pig livers did not surpass the success of conventional intensive care treatment. An additional effect of transgenic expression of human regulators of complement regulation in porcine livers has not yet been proven. ECLP with human livers not suitable for liver transplantation might prove effective and practicable for temporary hepatic support. Bridging to liver transplantation by long-term ECLP using porcine and human livers appears to have comparable efficacy as bioartificial support methods.