Histopathology of serrated adenoma, its variants, and differentiation from conventional adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps

Optimizing colorectal cancer segmentation with MobileViT-UNet and multi-criteria decision analysis

Colorectal cancer represents a significant health challenge as one of the deadliest forms of malignancy. Manual examination methods are subjective, leading to inconsistent interpretations among different examiners and compromising reliability. Additionally, process is time-consuming and labor-intensive, necessitating the development of computer-aided diagnostic systems. This study investigates the segmentation of colorectal cancer regions of normal tissue, polyps, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma, and serrated Adenoma, using proposed segmentation models: VGG16-UNet, ResNet50-UNet, MobileNet-UNet, and MobileViT-UNet. This is the first study to integrate MobileViT as a UNet encoder. Each model was trained with two distinct loss functions, binary cross-entropy and dice loss, and evaluated using metrics including Dice ratio, Jaccard index, precision, and recall. The MobileViT-UNet+Dice loss emerged as the leading model in colorectal histopathology segmentation, consistently achieving high scores across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, it achieved a Dice ratio of 0.944 ± 0.030 and a Jaccard index of 0.897 ± 0.049, with precision at 0.955 ± 0.046 and Recall at 0.939 ± 0.038 across all classes. To further obtain the best performing model, we employed multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This analysis revealed that the MobileViT-UNet+Dice model achieved the highest TOPSIS scores of 1, thereby attaining the highest ranking among all models. Our comparative analysis includes benchmarking with existing works, the results highlight that our best-performing model (MobileViT-UNet+Dice) significantly outperforms existing models, showcasing its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of colorectal cancer segmentation.

EBHI-Seg: A novel enteroscope biopsy histopathological hematoxylin and eosin image dataset for image segmentation tasks

Background and purpose

Colorectal cancer is a common fatal malignancy, the fourth most common cancer in men, and the third most common cancer in women worldwide. Timely detection of cancer in its early stages is essential for treating the disease. Currently, there is a lack of datasets for histopathological image segmentation of colorectal cancer, which often hampers the assessment accuracy when computer technology is used to aid in diagnosis.

Methods

This present study provided a new publicly available Enteroscope Biopsy Histopathological Hematoxylin and Eosin Image Dataset for Image Segmentation Tasks (EBHI-Seg). To demonstrate the validity and extensiveness of EBHI-Seg, the experimental results for EBHI-Seg are evaluated using classical machine learning methods and deep learning methods.

Results

The experimental results showed that deep learning methods had a better image segmentation performance when utilizing EBHI-Seg. The maximum accuracy of the Dice evaluation metric for the classical machine learning method is 0.948, while the Dice evaluation metric for the deep learning method is 0.965.

Conclusion

This publicly available dataset contained 4,456 images of six types of tumor differentiation stages and the corresponding ground truth images. The dataset can provide researchers with new segmentation algorithms for medical diagnosis of colorectal cancer, which can be used in the clinical setting to help doctors and patients. EBHI-Seg is publicly available at: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/EBHI-SEG/21540159/1.

Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Molecularly Defined Subtypes and Tumor Location

BACKGROUND

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. As CRC is a heterogeneous disease, we evaluated whether the association of HT and CRC differs across etiologically relevant, molecularly defined tumor subtypes and tumor location.

METHODS

We pooled data on tumor subtypes (microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, pathway: adenoma-carcinoma, alternate, serrated), tumor location (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), and HT use among 8220 postmenopausal women (3898 CRC cases and 4322 controls) from 8 observational studies. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of ever vs never HT use with each tumor subtype compared with controls. Models were adjusted for study, age, body mass index, smoking status, and CRC family history. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Among postmenopausal women, ever HT use was associated with a 38% reduction in overall CRC risk (OR =0.62, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69). This association was similar according to microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype and BRAF or KRAS status. However, the association was attenuated for tumors arising through the serrated pathway (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.01) compared with the adenoma-carcinoma pathway (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.73; P het =.04) and alternate pathway (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.72). Additionally, proximal colon tumors had a weaker association (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.80) compared with rectal (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.63) and distal colon (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.66; P het =.01) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a strong inverse association between HT use and overall CRC risk, which may predominantly reflect a benefit of HT use for tumors arising through the adenoma-carcinoma and alternate pathways as well as distal colon and rectal tumors.

Colorectal sessile serrated lesion with large size or synchronous neoplasm: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal sessile serrated lesion (SSL) with synchronous neoplasm or large size are linked to higher risk of cancer, but their characteristics are unclear.

METHODS

We prospectively included consecutive colorectal hyperplasic polyp and SSL collected at our institution from August 2011 to August 2012. The following data were collected and analyzed: age, gender, polyp site, aggregated polyp size, history of polyp, and synchronous neoplasm.

RESULTS

We collected 437 specimens including 353 (80.8%) hyperplasic polyp and 84 (19.2%) SSL. Compared with hyperplasic polyp, SSL was independently associated with proximal colon [odds ratio (OR) 3.61, P< 0.001], larger size (OR 3.98, P< 0.001), but not history of polyp, age or gender. Large SSL (≥1 vs <1 cm) was associated with polyp site (P= 0.035) and synchronous advanced adenoma and cancer (P< 0.001). SSL with synchronous adenoma and cancer were more likely found in males (OR 1.91, P= 0.001), elderly (OR 1.02, P= 0.033), and patients with the index polyp in proximal colon (OR 1.32, P= 0.022), but not related to history of adenoma and cancer. Moreover, synchronous adenoma, SSL and cancer were independently associated with male gender (OR 1.90, P< 0.001), but surprisingly not older age, histology of index polyp (SSL vs hyperplasic polyp), index-polyp site or history of adenoma and cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study shows male gender is associated with both synchronous adenoma and cancer, and synchronous adenoma, SSL and cancer, while index polyp site is associated with synchronous adenoma and cancer.

Identification of risk factors for sessile and traditional serrated adenomas of the colon by using big data analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Little is known about the risk factors associated with serrated polyps, because the early studies, which occurred before the new World Health Organization classification was introduced, included mixtures of serrated polyps. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the presence of sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) using big data analytics.

METHODS

Using a case-control design, we evaluated the risk factors associated with the presence of SSAs and TSAs. Subjects who underwent colonoscopies from 2002 to 2012 as part of the comprehensive health screening programs undertaken at the Samsung Medical Center, Korea, participated in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 48 677 individuals who underwent colonoscopies, 183 (0.4%) had SSAs and 212 (0.4%) had TSAs. The multivariate analysis determined that being aged ≥ 50 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.27-2.90, P = 0.002) and a history of colorectal cancer among first-degree relatives (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.57-6.27, P = 0.001) were significant risk factors associated with the presence of SSAs and that being aged ≥ 50 years (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.79-3.80, P < 0.001), obesity (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12-2.36, P = 0.010), and a higher triglyceride level (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12-2.36, P = 0.010) were independent risk factors associated with the presence of TSAs.

CONCLUSIONS

We used big data analytics to determine the risk factors associated with the presence of specific polyp subgroups, and individuals who have these risk factors should be carefully scrutinized for the presence of SSAs or TSAs during screening colonoscopies.

Clinicopathological features of advanced colorectal serrated lesions: A single-center study in China

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of evidence indicates that patients with colorectal serrated lesions, especially advanced serrated lesions (ASLs), are at risk of subsequent malignancy. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of ASLs and the association between ASLs and synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (sACN) in a single center of China.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive symptomatic patients and healthy individuals who underwent colonoscopy between January 2010 and March 2016 was performed. Clinicopathological characteritics of the patients with ASLs were documented from the colonoscopy database.

RESULTS

Colorectal serrated lesions were pathologically confirmed in 277 (N = 38 981, 0.7%) cases. Among them, 156 (56.3%) were found to have ASLs, with a total of 161 lesions including 71 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) and 90 traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). There were no differences in age and gender between the ASL and non-ASL patients. Among the 161 ASLs, 29 (18.0%) were ≥10 mm in diameter. Compared with non-ASLs, ASLs appeared more in the proximal colon (P = 0.007). Flat and subpedunculated lesions were more commonly found in the ASL group compared with the non-ASL group. Nearly all ASLs (160/161) had dysplasia. Moreover, 16 sACN lesions were found in 156 ASL patients, and large diameter (≥10 mm) might be a significant risk factor for sACN (odds ratio 4.35, 95% confidence interval 1.467-12.894, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ASLs are more likely to occur in the proximal colon, and mainly present as flat and sub-pedunculated types. Large ASLs are significantly associated with sACN.

Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection

BACKGROUND

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P) are an under-recognized disease with a unique malignant pathway. Improved endoscopic recognition and pathological interpretation is needed.

AIMS

To determine whether an educational intervention that improved adenoma detection rate (ADR) could improve SSA/P detection rate after reclassification of previously termed "hyperplastic" polyps.

METHODS

We reanalyzed data from a prospective randomized trial of an educational intervention aimed at increasing ADR. All hyperplastic polyps ≥6 mm reported in a previously published study were rereviewed and reclassified using standardized criteria for serrated lesions. Detection rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and other clinically relevant serrated polyps were calculated in the baseline and post-training phases of the original study.

RESULTS

Of 263 available for rereview, 33 (12.5%) were reclassified as SSA/P (N = 32) or traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) (N = 1). Reclassification was more common in the right colon (18 vs. 8%, p = 0.02). Baseline SSA/P detection rate was 0.7% in the untrained group and 1.3% in the trained group. Post-training, the SSA/P detection rate increased to 2.1 and 1.5%, respectively. The clinically relevant serrated polyp detection rate at baseline was 14.2% in the untrained group and 11.3% in the trained group. After the educational intervention, the clinically relevant serrated polyp detection rates increased to 16.5 and 14.8% in the untrained and trained groups, respectively. The estimated odds of an endoscopist detecting either a SSA/P or other clinically relevant serrated polyp during colonoscopy increased by only 3% with the educational intervention (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.61-1.74, p = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological re-interpretation of larger serrated polyps resulted in the reclassification of 12.5% of lesions. Quality improvement methods focused on adenoma detection did not impact SSA/P detection, and thus specific methods for serrated polyp detection are needed.

Sessile Serrated Polyps and Colon Cancer Prevention

Evidence suggests that up to one fifth of colorectal carcinomas develop from serrated polyps, named for their pattern of colonic crypts, and include the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) that has malignant potential. SSA/Ps are typically located in the proximal colon and have molecular features of hypermethylation of CpG islands in gene promoters and activating point mutations (V600E) in the BRAF oncogene. Both of these features are seen in sporadic colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI) which is potentially consistent with an origin of these cancers from precursor SSA/Ps. Dysplasia is detected in a subset of SSA/Ps with a high risk of progression to carcinoma. An uncommon serrated polyp is the traditional serrated adenoma that is typically found in the left colon, has a tubulovillous architecture, and frequently harbors mutant KRAS To date, the epidemiology of these serrated lesions is poorly understood, and limited observational data suggest a potential chemopreventive benefit of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The current primary strategy to reduce the risk of colorectal carcinoma from serrated polyps is to enhance their detection at colonoscopy and to ensure their complete removal. This review provides insight into the epidemiologic, clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features of serrated polyps and includes data on their endoscopic detection and chemoprevention. Cancer Prev Res; 10(5); 270-8. ©2017 AACR.

The clinical impact of serrated colorectal polyps

Serrated polyps (SPs) of the colorectum pose a novel challenge to practicing gastroenterologists. Previously thought benign and unimportant, there is now compelling evidence that SPs are responsible for a significant percentage of incident colorectal cancer worldwide. In contrast to conventional adenomas, which tend to be slow growing and polypoid, SPs have unique features that undermine current screening and surveillance practices. For example, sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are flat, predominately right-sided, and thought to have the potential for rapid growth. Moreover, SSPs are subject to wide variations in endoscopic detection and pathologic interpretation. Unfortunately, little is known about the natural history of SPs, and current guidelines are based largely on expert opinion. In this review, we outline the current taxonomy, epidemiology, and management of SPs with an emphasis on the clinical and public health impact of these lesions.

Human intestinal spirochetosis: right-side preference in the large intestine

Human intestinal spirochetosis (HIS) is a colorectal bacterial infection, and its clinicopathologic features remain unclear. The aim of this study was to examine its characteristics. We histologically reviewed paraffin-embedded section slides made in 2001, 2006, and 2011 at a single institution in Japan. Cases histologically exhibiting a distinct fringe formation were considered to have HIS. Information was obtained from pathology request forms. We identified 85 HIS cases among 4930 patients (7 cases [0.5%) in 2001, 29 [1.7%] in 2006, and 49 [2.8%] in 2011]. Gastrointestinal symptoms were observed in 7.1% of HIS cases. Human intestinal spirochetosis was more frequent in the right-side large intestine than in the left side. Among 224 samples from HIS cases, conventional (tubular, tubulovillous, and villous) adenomas were found in 148 samples. These adenomas were more frequent in the right side than in the left side, although neither their size nor morphology differed between the sides. Histopathologic evaluation suggested a year-upon-year increasing prevalence of HIS in Japan. A small number exhibited gastrointestinal symptoms. Both histologic sign of HIS and conventional adenomas were more frequent in the right-side large intestine. Therefore, a right-side preference may be a characteristic of HIS.

Molecular phenotypes of colorectal cancer and potential clinical applications

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease, arising from many possible etiological pathways. This heterogeneity can have important implications for CRC prognosis and clinical management. Epidemiological studies of CRC risk and prognosis—as well as clinical trials for the treatment of CRC—must therefore be sensitive to the molecular phenotype of colorectal tumors in patients under study. In this review, we describe four tumor markers that have been widely studied as reflections of CRC heterogeneity: (i) microsatellite instability (MSI) or DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, (ii) the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and somatic mutations in (iii) BRAF and (iv) KRAS. These tumor markers have been used to better characterize CRC epidemiology and, increasingly, may be used to guide clinical decision-making. Going beyond these traditional tumor markers, we also briefly review some more novel markers likely to be of clinical significance. Lastly, recognizing that none of these individual tumor markers are isolated attributes but, rather, a reflection of broader tumor phenotypes, we review some of the hypothesized etiological pathways of CRC development and their associated clinical differences.

Serrated neoplasia of the colon: what do we really know?

Colonoscopy offers incomplete protection from colorectal cancer, particularly in the right colon. Part of this inadequacy may be related to serrated neoplasia. Serrated polyps of the colorectum are now understood to be a heterogeneous group of polyps, some of which are cancer precursors, such as the sessile serrated adenoma (SSA) and the traditional serrated adenoma (TSA). In contrast to conventional adenomas, there is limited published literature on the epidemiology and natural history of these lesions. Furthermore, existing guidelines regarding screening and surveillance practices for these polyps are based largely on expert opinion without firm evidence. In this review, we describe the current understanding of the molecular biology, histopathology, and endoscopic features of serrated neoplasia of the colorectum, with an emphasis on aspects relevant to the practicing gastroenterologist.

Metachronous serrated neoplasia is uncommon after right colectomy in patients with methylator colon cancers with a high degree of microsatellite instability

BACKGROUND

Right-sided serrated polyps are precursors to sporadic microsatellite unstable colon cancers via the methylator pathway and have a high rate of synchronous and metachronous lesions. Serrated polyps also occur in Lynch syndrome, where right-sided microsatellite unstable cancers arise from germline mutations in mismatch repair genes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare serrated neoplasia in patients with sporadic and hereditary microsatellite unstable colon cancer and to examine the effect of right colectomy on the risk of metachronous polyps and cancers.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective, descriptive, cohort study from database and chart review.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital with a center for hereditary colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS

Patients who had colon cancers with a high degree of microsatellite instability, methylator cancers, and Lynch syndrome cancers, were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions included colectomy, surveillance colonoscopy, and polypectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the incidence and location of metachronous polyps and cancers.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included: 47 with methylator cancers and 38 with Lynch syndrome. Median ages at surgery were 75 years (range, 41-90) and 48 years (range, 27-77), p < 0.0001. Forty-six (98%) patients with methylator cancers and 17 (45%) patients with Lynch syndrome underwent a right colectomy, p < 0.0001. Metachronous cancers occurred in 19/60 (32%) of patients with Lynch syndrome and no patients with methylator cancers, p < 0.0001. Thirty-four patients with methylator cancers had colonoscopic follow-up, with a median of 2 colonoscopies per patient over a 32-month follow-up (range, 1-136). Sixty-three percent of patients with Lynch syndrome had colonoscopic follow-up, median of 4 colonoscopies per patient over 102 months (range, 1-462), p < 0.0001. Four (9%) patients with methylator cancers each had 1 metachronous serrated polyp, compared with 10/37 (27%) patients with Lynch syndrome (p = 0.049), whose median number of polyps was 2 (range, 1-8). Characteristics of other associated polyps were similar between cohorts.

LIMITATIONS

This study is somewhat limited by potential inherent bias from its retrospective design. Also, a high number of deaths in the CIMP+ cohort could have contributed to the low number of serrated polyps detected on colonoscopy surveillance, but given current understanding of serrated polyp growth, this may truly represent the left colon's tendency not to develop serrated polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancers with a high degree of microsatellite instability arise through 2 different molecular mechanisms. Metachronous serrated neoplasia, benign and malignant, following right colectomy in patients with the CpG-island methylator phenotype of colorectal cancer is uncommon. However, the colons of patients with Lynch syndrome are at high risk after segmental colectomy.

Optical biopsy of sessile serrated adenomas: do these lesions resemble hyperplastic polyps under narrow-band imaging?

BACKGROUND

Serrated colorectal lesions include hyperplastic polyps (HPs) and sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs). Optical biopsy could misclassify SSAs as unimportant if they resemble HPs.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the narrow-band imaging (NBI) features of SSAs. We hypothesized that SSAs resemble HPs under NBI.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data from our prospective study of NBI in routine practice.

SETTING

Single specialty group.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION

Colonoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Polyp histology prediction by community gastroenterologists. Features of SSAs versus HPs and adenomas by using the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) Classification.

RESULTS

Among 2388 lesions, 141 were diagnosed on pathology as SSAs, 465 as HPs, and 1546 as adenomas. Each individual NICE feature of HPs was found in 38% to 42% of SSAs, 66% to 67% of HPs, and 15% to 20% of adenomas (P < .001 for each). Each individual NICE feature of adenomas was found in 57% to 62% of SSAs, 33% to 34% of HPs, and 80% to 84% of adenomas (P < .001 for each). Compared with HPs, SSAs were less likely (odds ratio [OR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.79) and adenomas were even less likely (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59-0.64) to have all 3 NICE features of HPs. SSAs >5 mm were more likely than smaller SSAs to have all 3 NICE features of adenomas. SSA location did not predict NBI features. Analyses restricted to high-confidence lesions showed similar results.

LIMITATIONS

The endoscopists were not NBI experts.

CONCLUSION

Community gastroenterologists observed a profile of NICE features among SSAs that was intermediate to the profiles observed for HPs and adenomas. These results require confirmation by NBI experts.

Serrated colon polyps as precursors to colorectal cancer

Identification of the serrated neoplasia pathway has improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Insights include an increased recognition of the malignant potential of different types of serrated polyps such as sessile and traditional serrated adenomas. Sessile serrated adenomas share molecular features with colon tumors that have microsatellite instability and a methylator phenotype, indicating that these lesions are precursors that progress via the serrated neoplasia pathway. These data have important implications for clinical practice and CRC prevention, because hyperplastic polyps were previously regarded as having no malignant potential. There is also evidence that the serrated pathway contributes to interval or missed cancers. Endoscopic detection of serrated polyps is a challenge because they are often inconspicuous with indistinct margins and are frequently covered by adherent mucus. It is important for gastroenterologists to recognize the subtle endoscopic features of serrated polyps to facilitate their detection and removal, and thereby ensure a high-quality colonoscopic examination. Recognition of the role of serrated polyps in colon carcinogenesis has led to the inclusion of these lesions in postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines. However, an enhanced effort is needed to identify and completely remove serrated adenomas, with the goal of increasing the effectiveness of colonoscopy to reduce CRC incidence.

Serrated polyps: new classifications highlight clinical importance

AIM

Many lesions previously classified as hyperplastic polyps and therefore thought to be innocuous have been reclassified as sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), establishing their place in the serrated pathway and underscoring their malignant potential. The clinical relevance of this new nomenclature is incompletely defined. This study examines the incidence and characteristics of colorectal SSA/Ps and describes other associated colorectal neoplasia.

METHOD

A single institution pathology database was searched for the diagnosis of SSA/Ps between January 2004 and October 2007. SSA/Ps found by colonoscopy were included. Patient demographics, SSA/P characteristics and associated colonoscopic findings were retrospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 585 SSA/Ps were removed during 519 colonoscopies in 483 patients performed by 64 different endoscopists. This represented an overall incidence of SSA/Ps per colonoscopy of 2.1% in the 28,054 colonoscopies performed during the study period. The median SSA/P size was 0.8 cm (range 0.2-4.5) and 188 (69%) were ≥ 1.0 cm. Of the 585 SSA/Ps, 366 (63%) were right-sided, 129 (22%) were in the left colon and 90 (15%) were in the rectum. Also, 439 synchronous polyps of other histology (mainly adenomas and hyperplastic polyps) were found during the same 519 colonoscopies.

CONCLUSION

SSA/Ps are rare lesions found during colonoscopy that may coexist with small hyperplastic polyps. Because SSA/Ps are part of the serrated oncogenic pathway, all, even those appearing to be hyperplastic, should be removed or biopsied for diagnosis. Careful review of historical lesions with application of new definitions may redefine risk for malignancy.

Serrated polyps of the colon: how reproducible is their classification?

For several years, the lack of consensus on definition, nomenclature, natural history, and biology of serrated polyps (SPs) of the colon has created considerable confusion among pathologists. According to the latest WHO classification, the family of SPs comprises hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). The term SSA/P with dysplasia has replaced the category of mixed hyperplastic/adenomatous polyps (MPs). The present study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of the diagnosis of SPs based on currently available diagnostic criteria and interactive consensus development. In an initial round, H&E slides of 70 cases of SPs were circulated among participating pathologists across Europe. This round was followed by a consensus discussion on diagnostic criteria. A second round was performed on the same 70 cases using the revised criteria and definitions according to the recent WHO classification. Data were evaluated for inter-observer agreement using Kappa statistics. In the initial round, for the total of 70 cases, a fair overall kappa value of 0.318 was reached, while in the second round overall kappa value improved to moderate (kappa = 0.557; p < 0.001). Overall kappa values for each diagnostic category also significantly improved in the final round, reaching 0.977 for HP, 0.912 for SSA/P, and 0.845 for TSA (p < 0.001). The diagnostic reproducibility of SPs improves when strictly defined, standardized diagnostic criteria adopted by consensus are applied.

Serrated polyps: critical precursors to colorectal cancer

Colorectal polyps have been traditionally classified as either hyperplastic or adenomatous, with only the latter progressing to carcinoma. However, it is now recognized that certain subtypes of serrated polyps have a risk of malignant transformation via a serrated neoplasia pathway. Serrated polyps are a heterogeneous group of lesions with distinct morphologic, histologic and molecular genetics profiles. Based on available evidence, there are reasons to suspect that this pathway may contribute to interval or missed cancers because serrated lesions are more likely than conventional adenomas to be missed on colonoscopy, and the progression of serrated polyps to cancer may be more rapid. Therefore, it is paramount that physicians recognize the importance of serrated polyps and are aware of the latest surveillance guidelines.

Endoscopic and surgical management of serrated colonic polyps

BACKGROUND

Serrated polyps are an inhomogeneous group of lesions that harbour precursors of colorectal cancer. Current research has been directed at further defining the histopathological characteristics of these lesions, but definitive treatment recommendations are unclear. The aim was to review the current literature regarding classification, molecular genetics and natural history of these lesions in order to propose a treatment algorithm for surgeons to consider.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched using the following search terms: serrated polyp, serrated adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, hyperplastic polyposis, adenoma, endoscopy, surgery, guidelines. Papers published between 1980 and 2010 were selected.

RESULTS

Sixty papers met the selection criteria. Most authors agree that recommendations regarding endoscopic or surgical management should be based on the polyp's neoplastic potential. Polyps greater than 5 mm should be biopsied to determine their histology so that intervention can be directed accurately. Narrow-band imaging or chromoendoscopy may facilitate the detection and assessment of extent of lesions. Complete endoscopic removal of sessile serrated adenomas in the left or right colon is recommended. Follow-up colonoscopy is recommended in 2-6 months if endoscopic removal is incomplete. If the lesion cannot be entirely removed endoscopically, segmental colectomy is strongly recommended owing to the malignant potential of these polyps. Left-sided lesions are more likely to be pedunculated, making them more amenable to successful endoscopic removal.

CONCLUSION

Even though the neoplastic potential of certain subtypes of serrated polyp is heavily supported, further studies are needed to make definitive endoscopic and surgical recommendations.

Adenocarcinoma arising in a traditional serrated adenoma of the rectosigmoid colon with osseous metaplasia

Within the gastrointestinal tract, osseous metaplasia is an extremely rare phenomenon. It has only recently been described within a traditional serrated adenoma. Serrated colorectal carcinoma is the end point of the serrated neoplasia pathway. Left sided lesions typically arise from traditional serrated adenomas and represent only 8% of colorectal carcinomas. Herein reported is a case of colorectal adenocarcinoma arising from a traditional serrated adenoma with the rare occurrence of osseous metaplasia within the adenoma. The significance of the finding is discussed.

The clinical significance of serrated polyps

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disorder than arises via multiple distinct pathways, such as the serrated pathway, in which serrated polyps (including variants of hyperplastic polyps) are the precursor lesions. Approximately 15-20% of all CRCs arise via the serrated pathway, and these serrated carcinomas are clinically, morphologically, and molecularly distinct from conventional CRCs. The prevention of serrated carcinomas represents an important clinical challenge. Gastroenterologists need to recognize and remove potential precursor lesions and implement a post-polypectomy surveillance program when appropriate. This article focuses on the characteristics and significance of clinically relevant serrated polyps and addresses implications for CRC prevention practices.

Differential expression of p53 and p504s in hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma and traditional serrated adenoma

AIMS

Known collectively as serrated polyps, hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated adenomas (SSA/SSP) and traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) may represent a spectrum of increasing malignant potential with characteristic immunological markers. There is increasing evidence that HP, SSA/SSP and TSA are biologically different and are likely to represent a spectrum along the serrated polyp pathway. Although there is general consensus about the diagnostic features of serrated polyps, the morphological differences between the categories are often subtle. This study compares the expression of p53 and P504S among serrated polyps. Sixty seven randomly selected biopsies (n = 59) and resection specimens (n = 8) histologically diagnosed for SSA/SSP, TSA and HP (19, 30 and 18 specimens, respectively) were obtained.

METHODS AND RESULTS

There was a significant difference in p53 (P < 0.001) and P504S (P < 0.001) immunopositivity and distribution among the serrated polyps. In particular, there is diffuse expression p53 and P504S in TSA compared to HP and SSA/SSP where p53 and P504S expression was more frequently confined to the lower 1/3 of the crypts. In addition, percentage of cells expressing p53 and p504S expression was higher in TSA than those of HP and SSA/SSP.

CONCLUSION

Immunostains, p53 and P504S, may be useful adjuncts to morphological diagnosis of serrated polyps.

Serrated adenomas

Serrated adenomas are categorized as sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). SSAs are more prevalent in the proximal colon and lack classic dysplasia, whereas TSAs are more prevalent in the rectosigmoid and have cytologic dysplasia. Serrated adenomas may progress to colorectal adenocarcinoma through diverse molecular alterations. Colonoscopy is the only test for the early detection of serrated adenomas that allows inspection of the entire colon and same-session biopsy sampling or polypectomy, if necessary. If an endoscopic biopsy at the right colon reveals SSA without cytologic dysplasia or biopsy at the rectosigmoid reveals SSA or TSA, those polyps should be excised or surgically resected as necessary. Postpolypectomy surveillance for removed SSAs without dysplasia and TSAs must be performed at 5- and 3-year intervals, respectively, with colonoscopy to prevent recurrence and progression to colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Serrated colonic polyps in a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia: prevalence and review of classification

BACKGROUND/AIM

To determine the prevalence of serrated colorectal polyps in the King AbdulAziz University Hospital population and to review the current classification of colorectal serrated polyps with emphasis on morphological features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study used cases diagnosed with serrated colorectal polyps at the histopathology laboratory of King AbdulAziz University Hospital during last five years (2004-2008). The slides were reexamined microscopically and the lesions were renamed according to the terminology discussed in this article.

RESULTS

Diagnosed hyperplastic polyps represented 12.3% of all colorectal polyps submitted to our laboratory during the study period. However, the false positive rate was found to be 42.5%. Of the truly diagnosed serrated polyps, the most common subtype is the microvesicular serrated polyps. The majority of the serrated colorectal polyps was found in males, with a wide age range.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of serrated colorectal polyps in our geographic area seems to be similar to that in western populations.

Identification of the methylator (serrated) colorectal cancer phenotype through precursor serrated polyps

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancers arise via cumulative genetic and molecular changes that cause mucosal instability, premalignant polyps, and malignant transformation. Distinct neoplastic pathways characterized by chromosomal instability, genetic mutation, and epigenetic methylation have been described, but their associated precursor polyps have not. This study analyzes characteristics of precursor polyps occurring within different molecular subtypes of sporadic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Colorectal cancers from a prospectively maintained frozen tissue bank were analyzed for microsatellite stability and promoter methylation, defined by the CpG island methylator phenotype. Patients with tumors meeting the following criteria were included: microsatellite stable and methylator-negative; microsatellite stable and methylator-positive; and microsatellite unstable and methylator-positive. Hereditary cancers were excluded. Patient demographics, colonoscopic and histologic polyp characteristics, operative reports, and pathology reports were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were included: 65, 20, and 22 patients in each group, respectively. The proportion of patients with synchronous polyps and polyp number, size, and location were similar. However, associated polyp histology varied according to tumor classification. Microsatellite stable tumors, regardless of methylator status, had a greater proportion of adenomas than microsatellite unstable tumors, which had an increased proportion of serrated polyps (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with microsatellite unstable colorectal cancers demonstrate an increased serrated polyp-to-adenoma ratio compared with microsatellite stable cancers regardless of methylator status. Loss of microsatellite stability appears to be a key event in serrated polyp and cancer formation. An increased proportion of serrated polyps to adenomas discovered in patients on colonoscopy should arouse suspicion that cancers arising in these patients are probably microsatellite unstable.

Significance of serrated polyps of the colon

The fundamental view that colon adenocarcinomas arise only from conventional adenomas has been challenged by the now recognized hyperplastic polyp-serrated adenoma-adenocarcinoma pathway. This article describes the history of the serrated adenoma (both the traditional serrated adenoma and the sessile serrated adenoma) as well as the histology and endoscopic appearance of these lesions in comparison with hyperplastic polyps and mixed polyps. Although the exact pathway is the subject of ongoing research, compelling histologic associations and molecular phenotypes that define the model of the serrated polyp-carcinoma sequence, including microsatellite instability, BRAF/KRAS mutations, and CpG island methylator phenotype, provide strong evidence that this is a genuine pathway. Management of serrated neoplasia of the colon includes careful colonoscopy, complete removal of colonic polyps, sampling fields of diminutive polyps of the rectosigmoid, and basing surveillance on histology of removed polyps.

Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers

BACKGROUND

Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasive option in screening for colorectal cancer. However, its accuracy as a screening tool in asymptomatic adults has not been well defined.

METHODS

We recruited 2600 asymptomatic study participants, 50 years of age or older, at 15 study centers. CT colonographic images were acquired with the use of standard bowel preparation, stool and fluid tagging, mechanical insufflation, and multidetector-row CT scanners (with 16 or more rows). Radiologists trained in CT colonography reported all lesions measuring 5 mm or more in diameter. Optical colonoscopy and histologic review were performed according to established clinical protocols at each center and served as the reference standard. The primary end point was detection by CT colonography of histologically confirmed large adenomas and adenocarcinomas (10 mm in diameter or larger) that had been detected by colonoscopy; detection of smaller colorectal lesions (6 to 9 mm in diameter) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 2531 participants (97%). For large adenomas and cancers, the mean (+/-SE) per-patient estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for CT colonography were 0.90+/-0.03, 0.86+/-0.02, 0.23+/-0.02, 0.99+/-<0.01, and 0.89+/-0.02, respectively. The sensitivity of 0.90 (i.e., 90%) indicates that CT colonography failed to detect a lesion measuring 10 mm or more in diameter in 10% of patients. The per-polyp sensitivity for large adenomas or cancers was 0.84+/-0.04. The per-patient sensitivity for detecting adenomas that were 6 mm or more in diameter was 0.78.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of asymptomatic adults, CT colonographic screening identified 90% of subjects with adenomas or cancers measuring 10 mm or more in diameter. These findings augment published data on the role of CT colonography in screening patients with an average risk of colorectal cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00084929; American College of Radiology Imaging Network [ACRIN] number, 6664.)

Every gastroenterologist deserves a gastrointestinal pathologist

This review evaluates the current evidence supporting the usefulness of gastrointestinal pathology specialists. Using the discovery of Helicobacter pylori as an example, we show that as new conditions are discovered and old ones are revisited and reclassified, an intimate alliance between clinicians, basic scientists, and pathologists is indispensable. Whilst specialised gastrointestinal pathologists (defined as someone who has received at least a year of training in a section of a pathology laboratory where only tissue from the alimentary tract and liver were examined, who has spent time in a clinical gastroenterology unit, and who has restricted his or her practice to such specimens) are usually well-represented in academic settings, their contribution is becoming increasingly recognised also in private practice. We contend that a more sophisticated or detailed diagnosis actually translate to better care, and provide numerous examples that show not only a clinical benefit to the patient and the gastroenterologist, but also a financial advantage for the payors (patients, insurances).

Heterogeneity of colorectal adenomas, the serrated adenoma, and implications for screening and surveillance

Current algorithms for screening and surveillance for colon cancer are valuable, but may be limited by the underlying nature of the targeted neoplastic lesions. Although part of the success of adenoma removal relates to interruption of so-called “adenoma-carcinoma sequence”, an alternate serrated pathway to colon cancer may pose difficulties with the ultimate results achieved by traditional colonoscopic methods. The endpoint carcinoma in this unique pathway may be derived from a dysplastic serrated adenoma. These tend to be located primarily in the right colon, especially in females, and are frequently associated with co-existent colon cancer. Unfortunately, however, there are few, if any, other identifiable risk factors, including age or family history of colon polyps or colon cancer. Moreover, this alternate serrated pathway may itself also be quite biologically heterogeneous as reflected in sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) with virtually exclusive molecular signatures defined by the presence of either BRAF or KRAS mutations. Screening algorithms in the future may need to be modified and individualized, depending on new information that likely will emerge on the natural history of these biologically heterogeneous lesions that differs from traditional adenomatous polyps.