Advances and residual knowledge gaps in the neck management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with advanced nodal disease undergoing definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for their primary

PURPOSE

Substantial changes have been made in the neck management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) in the past century. These have been fostered by changes in cancer epidemiology and technological progress in imaging, surgery, or radiotherapy, as well as disruptive concepts in oncology. We aimed to review changes in nodal management, with a focus on HNSCC patients with nodal involvement (cN+) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted to review current advances and address knowledge gaps in the multidisciplinary management of the cN+ neck in the context of (chemo)radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Metastatic neck nodes are associated with poorer prognosis and poorer response to radiotherapy, and have therefore been systematically treated by surgery. Radical neck dissection (ND) has gradually evolved toward more personalized and less morbid approaches, i.e., from functional to selective ND. Omission of ND has been made feasible by use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to monitor the radiation response in cN+ patients. Human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancers and their cystic nodes have shown dramatically better prognosis than tobacco-related cancers, justifying a specific prognostic classification (AJCC) creation. Finally, considering the role of lymph nodes in anti-tumor immunity, de-escalation of ND and prophylactic nodal irradiation in combination are intense areas of investigation. However, the management of bulky cN3 disease remains an issue, as aggressive multidisciplinary strategies or innovative combined treatments have not yet significantly improved their prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Personalized neck management is an increasingly important aspect of the overall therapeutic strategies in cN+ HNSCC.

Exploring the landscape of AI-assisted decision-making in head and neck cancer treatment: a comparative analysis of NCCN guidelines and ChatGPT responses

PURPOSE

Recent breakthroughs in natural language processing and machine learning, exemplified by ChatGPT, have spurred a paradigm shift in healthcare. Released by OpenAI in November 2022, ChatGPT rapidly gained global attention. Trained on massive text datasets, this large language model holds immense potential to revolutionize healthcare. However, existing literature often overlooks the need for rigorous validation and real-world applicability.

METHODS

This head-to-head comparative study assesses ChatGPT's capabilities in providing therapeutic recommendations for head and neck cancers. Simulating every NCCN Guidelines scenarios. ChatGPT is queried on primary treatments, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up, with responses compared to the NCCN Guidelines. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score, are employed for assessment.

RESULTS

The study includes 68 hypothetical cases and 204 clinical scenarios. ChatGPT exhibits promising capabilities in addressing NCCN-related queries, achieving high sensitivity and overall accuracy across primary treatment, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The study's metrics showcase robustness in providing relevant suggestions. However, a few inaccuracies are noted, especially in primary treatment scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the proficiency of ChatGPT in providing treatment suggestions. The model's alignment with the NCCN Guidelines sets the stage for a nuanced exploration of AI's evolving role in oncological decision support. However, challenges related to the interpretability of AI in clinical decision-making and the importance of clinicians understanding the underlying principles of AI models remain unexplored. As AI continues to advance, collaborative efforts between models and medical experts are deemed essential for unlocking new frontiers in personalized cancer care.

Extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: need for accurate pretherapeutic staging to select optimum treatment and minimize toxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2017, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the inclusion of extracapsular nodal extension (ENE) into the N staging of nonviral head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), while retaining the traditional N classification based on the number and sizes of metastatic nodes. The extent of ENE was further defined as microscopic ENE (ENEmi) and major ENE (ENEma) based on extent of disease beyond the nodal capsule (≤ or > 2 mm). This article reviews the evidence and progress made since these changes were introduced.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 'gold standard' for evaluation ENE is histopathologic examination, the current preferred primary treatment of patients with HNSCC is by radiation-based therapy ± chemotherapy or biotherapy. The current pretreatment staging is by imaging, which needs improved reliability of radiologic rENE assessment with reporting needs to consider both sensitivity and specificity (currently computed tomography images have high-specificity but low-sensitivity). Adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated for patients with ENEma to enhance disease control, whereas for patients with ENEmi, there is a need to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Evidence that the presence of pENE in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor and should be considered for inclusion in future AJCC editions has recently emerged.

SUMMARY

There remains a paucity of data on the reliability of imaging in the staging of rENE, more so the for the accurate assessment of ENEmi. Optimistic early results from use of artificial intelligence/deep learning demonstrate progress and may pave the way for better capabilities in tumor staging, treatment outcome prediction, resulting in improved survival outcomes.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in head and neck cancer: something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue and a sixpence in your shoe

A biomarker is a measurable indicator of biological or pathological processes or the response to an exposure or intervention and is used to guide management decisions. In head and neck pathology, biomarkers are assessed by histological criteria and immunohistochemical and molecular studies. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of management of many head and neck malignancies. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy may be administered depending on the presence of adverse prognostic factors identified on histopathological or immunohistochemical examination. In this review, we outline the clinically relevant prognostic and predictive factors in head and neck malignancies including conventionally recognised factors such as tumour size, depth of invasion, lymphovascular and perineural invasion and margin status as well as novel evolving factors such as recurrent genetic rearrangements and assessment of immune checkpoints. Practical issues are discussed to assist with recognising and reporting of these factors. A summary of useful tools such as structured pathology report formats is also included to assist with comprehensive reporting of all clinically relevant parameters, minimise risk and improve workflow efficiencies.

Improved intraoperative identification of close margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma resections using a dual aperture fluorescence ratio approach: first in-human results

Significance

Surgical excision is the main treatment for solid tumors in oral squamous cell carcinomas, where wide local excision (achieving a healthy tissue margin of > 5    mm around the excised tumor) is the goal as it results in reduced local recurrence rates and improved overall survival.

Aim

No clinical methods are available to assess the complete surgical margin intraoperatively while the patient is still on the operating table; and while recent intraoperative back-bench fluorescence-guided surgery approaches have shown promise for detecting "positive" inadequate margins (< 1    mm ), they have had limited success in the detection of "close" inadequate margins (1 to 5 mm). Here, a dual aperture fluorescence ratio (dAFR) approach was evaluated as a means of improving detection of close margins.

Approach

The approach was evaluated on surgical specimens from patients who were administered a tumor-specific fluorescent imaging agent (cetuximab-800CW) prior to surgery. The dAFR approach was compared directly against standard wide-field fluorescence imaging and pathology measurements of margin thickness in specimens from three patients and a total of 12 margin locations (1 positive, 5 close, and 6 clear margins).

Results

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, representing the ability to detect close compared to clear margins (> 5    mm ) was found to be 1.0 and 0.57 for dAFR and sAF, respectively. Improvements in dAFR were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.02 ).

Conclusions

These results provide evidence that the dAFR approach potentially improves detection of close surgical margins.

The Impact and Prognostic Significance of Extra-Nodal Extension in Clinically N0 Oral Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Study

Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) demonstrates a high propensity to metastasize to regional lymph nodes. Despite technological and scientific advances, identification of pathological adverse features preoperatively remains elusive. This study intended to identify the true occurrence of extra-nodal extension (ENE) in clinically and radiologically N0 OCSCC patients and to investigate its impact and prognostic significance. A prospective, single-centre, non-randomized study was conducted at a tertiary cancer centre in South India to include all untreated operable patients of OCSCC without clinical, radiological, or cytological evidence of nodal metastasis (cN0). All the patients underwent tumor resection surgery with neck dissection and received adjuvant therapy when indicated. Patients were followed up and neck dissection specimens were histopathologically analyzed. The primary outcome was to assess the presence of ENE in cN0 OCSCC patients and its extent. The secondary outcomes were 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and tumor characteristics. A total of 237 patients with operable OCSCC were evaluated. Out of these, 80 patients who were clinically and radiologically N0 were included in the study and they underwent tumor resection surgery and neck dissection. The final histopathological evaluation revealed that 21.25% of patients (n = 17) had metastatic neck disease and 7.5% of patients (n = 6) had ENE, and all were reported as microscopic ENE. Within the node-positive group, the 2-year DFS for patients with and without ENE were 50% and 90.9%, respectively (p = 0.0362). The results suggest that ENE remains a strong predictor of adverse outcomes, recurrence, and survival in oral cancer patients.

Extracapsular nodal extension and tumor deposits in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits (TDs) are an infrequently mentioned feature of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) that are currently grouped under extranodal extension (ENE) in the AJCC 8th edition of HNSCC TNM staging. The prognostic implication of TDs in comparison to ENE remains uncertain.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, non-randomized study evaluated patients with HNSCC who underwent initial surgical resection, with neck dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Clinical variables were considered, and statistical analyses were conducted to compare time progression and overall survival (OS) in patients with TDs against those with ENE.

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients included in the study, 50 were diagnosed with ENE (pN2a-ENE in 38 patients and pN3b-ENE in 12), while 21 had TDs ± ENE. The median time to progression was significantly different based on the presence of ENE or TDs (p = .002) and pN2a-ENE/pN3b-ENE or TDs (p = .007). The three-year OS was 55.7% for the entire group, 60.4% in ENE and 38.4% in TDs (p = .021). The OS difference between the pN2a-ENE, pN3b-ENE, and the TDs group was also significant (p = .05). The hazard ratio between ENE and TDs was Exp (B) 4.341 (p = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

TDs in HNSCC are associated with a lower OS than ENE, despite intensified adjuvant therapy. Our results confirm a better prognosis for pN2a-ENE vs. pN3b-ENE, and pN3b-ENE vs. TDs. TDs may serve as an indicator of poor prognosis and require separate TNM classification in HNSCC staging. Larger studies are needed to evaluate TDs impact on treatment strategies and outcomes.

Association of Core Biopsy With Extranodal Extension in Surgically Treated Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Importance

Extranodal extension (ENE) is an adverse feature in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and is an indication for adjuvant treatment escalation. Preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) may cause lymph node capsule disruption related to ENE development; however, evidence regarding this association in OPSCC is lacking.

Objective

To assess whether preoperative nodal CNB is associated with presence of ENE in final pathology findings among patients with HPV-associated OPSCC targeted for primary surgical resection.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic tertiary care center from 2012 to 2022. All patients with OPSCC treated with transoral robotic surgery were assessed for eligibility, and primary surgical patients with HPV-associated OPSCC and node-positive disease confirmed on neck dissection were included in analyses. Data were analyzed from November 28, 2022, to May 21, 2023.

Exposure

Preoperative nodal CNB.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was presence of ENE in final pathology findings. Secondary outcomes included adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence rates. Outcomes of interest were investigated against patient demographic, clinical, and pathologic features.

Results

Of 106 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.2 [10.9] years; 99 [93.4%] men) included in analyses, 23 patients (21.7%) underwent CNB. Mean (range) preoperative node size was 3.0 (0.9-6.0) cm. Pathologic node class was pN1 in 97 patients (91.5%) and pN2 in 9 patients (8.5%). A total of 49 patients (46.2%) had ENE identified in final pathology analysis. Of 94 patients who received adjuvant therapy, 58 (61.7%) underwent radiation therapy and 36 (38.3%) underwent chemoradiation therapy. There were 9 recurrences (8.5%). In univariate analysis, CNB was associated with ENE (odds ratio [OR], 2.70; 95% CI, 1.03-7.08), but there was no association in a multivariable model including pN class and preoperative node size (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.97-7.27). Compared with pN1 class, pN2 class was associated with ENE (OR, 10.93; 95% CI, 1.32-90.80). There were no associations of ENE with preoperative node size, presence of cystic or necrotic nodes, fine needle aspiration, tobacco or alcohol exposure, pathologic T class, prior radiation, or age. Furthermore, use of CNB was not associated with macroscopic ENE, adjuvant chemotherapy, or recurrence.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study of patients with HPV-associated OPSCC found that preoperative nodal CNB was strongly associated with ENE in final pathology, supporting the possibility of an artifactual ENE component in this population.

Diagnostic challenges and prognostic implications of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: a state of the art review and gap analysis

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a pattern of cancer growth from within the lymph node (LN) outward into perinodal tissues, critically defined by disruption and penetration of the tumor through the entire thickness of the LN capsule. The presence of ENE is often associated with an aggressive cancer phenotype in various malignancies including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In HNSCC, ENE is associated with increased risk of distant metastasis and lower rates of locoregional control. ENE detected on histopathology (pathologic ENE; pENE) is now incorporated as a risk-stratification factor in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM classification. Although ENE was first described almost a century ago, several issues remain unresolved, including lack of consensus on definitions, terminology, and widely accepted assessment criteria and grading systems for both pENE and ENE detected on radiological imaging (imaging-detected ENE; iENE). Moreover, there is conflicting data on the prognostic significance of iENE and pENE, particularly in the context of HPV-associated HNSCC. Herein, we review the existing literature on ENE in HNSCC, highlighting areas of controversy and identifying critical gaps requiring concerted research efforts.

Tumor volume definitions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - Comparing PET/MRI and histopathology

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In cancer treatment precise definition of the tumor volume is essential, but despite development in imaging modalities, this remains a challenge. Here, pathological tumor volumes from the surgical specimens were obtained and compared to tumor volumes defined from modern PET/MRI hybrid imaging. The purpose is to evaluate mismatch between the volumes defined from imaging and pathology was estimated and potential clinical impact.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were scanned on an integrated PET/MRI system prior to surgery. Three gross tumor volumes (GTVs) from the primary tumor site were delineated defined from MRI (GTV_MRI), PET (GTV_PET) and one by utilizing both anatomical images and clinical information (GTV_ONCO). Twenty-five primary tumor specimens were extracted en bloc, scanned with PET/MRI and co-registered to the patient images. Each specimen was sectioned in blocks, sliced and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. All slices were digitalized and tumor delineated by a head and neck pathologist. The pathological tumor areas in all slices were interpolated yielding a pathological 3D tumor volume (GTV_PATO). GTV_PATOwas compared with the imaging GTV's and potential mismatch was estimated.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included. The mean volume of GTV_ONCOwas larger than the GTV's defined from PET or MRI. The mean mismatch of the GTV_PATOcompared to the GTV_PET, GTV_MRIand GTV_ONCOwas 31.9 %, 54.5 % and 27.9 % respectively, and the entire GTV_PATO was only fully encompassed in GTV_ONCO in 1 of 13 patients. However, after the addition of a clinical 5 mm margin the GTV_PATO was fully encompassed in GTV_ONCO in 11 out of 13 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite modern hybrid imaging modalities, a mismatch between imaging and pathological defined tumor volumes was observed in all patients.A 5 mm clinical margin was sufficient to ensure inclusion of the entire pathological volume in 11 out of 13 patients.

Prognostic significance of soft tissue deposits in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Soft tissue deposits, also known as tumour deposits (TDs), have not been studied well in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and are not included in any of the staging systems or treatment guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence and prognostic implications of TDs in patients with HNSCC. This systematic review of the literature was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus electronic databases were searched for relevant studies, from inception to August 2022. Although 14 studies qualified for inclusion, only eight were finally included in the review due to the considerable overlap of patients in several studies. Data from 7127 patients were analysed. The pooled prevalence of TDs was 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9-33%). The presence of TDs was adversely associated with overall survival and disease-free survival, with hazard ratios of 2.08 (95% CI 1.60-2.70) and 2.56 (95% CI 1.97-3.32), respectively. TDs are detected in a significant number of patients with HNSCC and adversely affect survival. Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of TDs in HNSCC for their potential role in cancer staging and adjuvant treatment planning.

Extranodal extension, an international survey on its evaluation and reporting in breast cancer patients

Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor for breast cancer patients. In addition to the number of nodes involved and the largest metastatic focus, extranodal extension (ENE) is also used to subclassify breast cancer patients into different risk groups. More recently, pathologists are required to report the size/extent of ENE per the new CAP guideline, as it seems to be associated with more axillary nodal burden and/or a worse prognosis. Although the definition of ENE is largely understood and agreed upon among pathologists around the world, evaluation and reporting for the size of ENE are not. To understand current practice, we conducted an international survey among pathologists who are interested in breast pathology. A total of 70 pathologists responded. The results showed that (1) 98% of the participants reported the presence or absence of ENE and 61% also reported the size of ENE in millimeter (mm). (2) There was no uniform method of measuring the size of ENE; 47% measured the largest dimension regardless of orientation, while 30% measured the largest perpendicular distance from the capsule. (3) The most common factors affecting the accuracy in diagnosis of ENE are the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lack of capsule integrity, and the presence of fatty hilar or fatty replacement of a lymph node. (4) 71% felt that the H&E stain is adequate to evaluate ENE, deeper levels and IHC analysis for vascular and cytokeratin markers can be helpful if needed. (5) 75% agreed that there is an urgent need to standardize the measurement and reporting for ENE. Our survey highlights the variation in ENE evaluation and the need for its standardization in breast cancer patients with axillary node metastasis.

Inter- and Intrarater Reliability and Agreement Among Danish Head and Neck Pathologists Assessing Extranodal Extension in Lymph Node Metastases from Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Extranodal extension (ENE) in lymph node metastases is one of the most important prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Studies have shown inconsistency among pathologists in the assessment of ENE. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement in the assessment of ENE among Danish pathologists and (2) to test if a standardized assessment method may increase interrater agreement.

METHODS

Four Danish head and neck pathologists assessed ENE presence or absence in 120 histological slides from lymph nodes with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma metastases (first round). Subsequently, guidelines were introduced to the pathologists and a new assessment was performed (second round). Finally, two of the pathologists assessed the slides to determine intrarater reliability and agreement (third round).

RESULTS

Interrater kappa coefficients varied between 0.57 and 0.67 in the first round and between 0.59 and 0.72 in the second round. The intrarater agreement between round 2 and 3 was 0.88 for pathologist 1 and 0.92 for pathologist 2 with resulting kappa coefficients of 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.88) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.74-0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found a moderate level of reliability and agreement among pathologists for ENE in lymph node metastases from oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. The intrarater reliability and agreement was generally higher than interrater measures. Interrater agreement was slightly improved by standardized assessment.

Radiologic-pathologic correlation of major versus minor extranodal extension in oral cavity cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in predicting major (>2 mm) and minor (≤2 mm) pathologic ENE (pENE).

METHODS

All oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent neck dissection with pathological nodal disease (pN+) between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed. Preoperative computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed by two head and neck neuroradiologists.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-four patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of rENE were 37% [95% CI 29-44] and 98% [95% CI 96-100], respectively. Sensitivity for pENE improved in the subset of patients with major ENE (48% [95% CI 38-57]). The presence of rENE was associated with inferior 3-year overall survival: 26% [95% CI 17-41] versus 60% [95% CI 54-67].

CONCLUSIONS

This large cohort study demonstrates high specificity, but low sensitivity for preoperative imaging in the detection of pENE in OCSCC. Patients with rENE demonstrated poor OS. pENE in the absence of rENE is still an adverse risk factor.

Differential expression of podoplanin in metastatic lymph node is associated with extranodal extension in oropharyngeal cancer

This study aimed to investigate the spatial distribution and clinical significance of podoplanin expression in the metastatic lymph nodes of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs). The immunohistochemical podoplanin expression in the metastatic lymph nodes was evaluated in the pathologic specimens of 47 consecutive OPSCC patients. Clinicopathologic factors, including podoplanin expression and extranodal extension (ENE) status, were analyzed. Podoplanin was significantly expressed in the perinodal stroma (p = 0.001), and the average score of podoplanin was higher (p = 0.008) in ENE-positive lymph nodes than ENE-negative lymph nodes, although intranodal podoplanin expression did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariable analysis revealed perinodal podoplanin expression as an independent marker of ENE in all the patients and the human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.018, respectively). Podoplanin is differentially expressed in the metastatic lymph nodes in OPSCC, and its expression in perinodal stroma is associated with ENE, suggesting that podoplanin can be used clinically as a diagnostic biomarker.

Determinants of prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasizing to a single cervical lymph node

OBJECTIVES

Metastasis in a single lymph node without adverse tumour factors and perineural invasion has been assigned to a lower risk category by the ASCO recommendations of 2019. We analyzed patients with a single positive node with a view to identifying high risk features and their impact on prognosis within this subgroup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed 707 patients with OSCC. Descriptive statistics were used to compare distribution of clinicopathologic risk features between 323 N0 and 121 single node positive (N_s) patients. The N_s group was further analyzed for the impact of clinicopathologic factors on disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS

The N_s group exhibited greater depth of invasion compared to the N0 group and significantly higher proportion of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI) and poorly differentiated tumors. Within the N_s group, primary tumor localised to the gingivobuccal subsite (HR 2.55, 1.18-5.52 95%CI, p = 0.02) and PNI (HR 2.55, 1.14-5.62, 95%CI p = 0.02) exhibited poor DFS. PNI also contributed to poor OS (HR 2.86, 1.27-6.47 95%CI, p = 0.01). Uninvolved margins (HR 0.46, 0.22-0.96 95%CI, p = 0.04) and chemoradiation (HR 0.18,0.05-0.68 95% CI, p = 0.01) improved OS.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences are noted in the prevalence of pathologic risk factors between the single node positive and node negative groups. Within the single node positive group, tumour factors like the gingivobuccal subsite, PNI and margin positivity impacted survival. Among nodal factors, deposit size of 12 mm or more and presence of ENE are pointers to poor prognosis. These patients would benefit from adjuvant treatment.

Microscopic Extranodal Extension in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiation

OBJECTIVE

Pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) is an important adverse feature for human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the prognostic significance of microscopic ENE (ENEmi) and role of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) for ENEmi remain unclear. This study evaluates (1) the prognostic significance of ENEmi in HPV-negative HNSCC and (2) whether adjuvant CRT is associated with improved overall survival (OS) for these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited facilities.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients in the National Cancer Database from 2009 to 2015 with pathologic node-positive (pN+) HPV-negative HNSCC with either pathologic ENEmi or no ENE who had undergone margin-negative surgery. The association of ENEmi with OS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Analyses were repeated in patients with ENEmi receiving adjuvant therapy to evaluate the association of adjuvant CRT with OS.

RESULTS

We included 5483 patients with pN+ HPV-negative HNSCC, of whom 24% had ENEmi. On multivariable analysis, ENEmi was associated with decreased OS relative to no ENE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.28-1.59). Among patients with ENEmi who received ≥60 Gy of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) (n = 617), adjuvant CRT was not associated with improved OS relative to RT (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27).

CONCLUSION

For patients with HPV-negative HNSCC, pN+ with ENEmi is associated with worse OS than pN+ without ENE. However, for patients with ENEmi, concurrent CRT is not associated with improved OS relative to RT. The optimal adjuvant paradigm for ENEmi requires additional investigation.

Extranodal Extension in Bilateral Cervical Metastases: A predictor of Undesirable Survival Outcomes despite Aggressive Salvage Treatment in Oral Cancer Patients

Objectives: Despite the inclusion of extranodal extension (ENE) in the recent staging system, the presence of ENE alone is not sufficient to depict all clinical situations, as ENE is frequently found in multiple nodes. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgery-based treatment outcomes and clinicopathological features of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) patients with ENE found in bilateral multiple cervical metastases.

Materials and methods: A retrospective single-institutional study of OCSCC patients with bilateral ENE nodes was performed from January 2011 to December 2018. OCSCC patients of different admission statuses (with primary lesions (PL), recurrent lesions (RL) and isolated neck metastases (INM)) were included for subgroup comparisons. All patients received surgical treatment with/without adjuvant therapies and had complete follow-up data. Disease-free survival (DFS) was regarded as the main outcome. Time-to-relapse data were also collected for comparison.

Results: A total of 128 patients were included, of whom 97 (75.8%) were male. The mean follow-up period reached 15 months. Among the patients, 85 (66.4%) were treated for PLs, followed by 26 (20.3%) treated for RLs after failed prior therapy and 17 (13.3%) treated for INMs (concurrent or sequential). The DFS rate was merely 35.2%. Treatment-related factors such as surgical margin (p=0.003), postoperative adjuvant therapy (p=0.014) and perioperative complications (p=0.036) were significantly associated with patient outcomes. In addition, oral lesion-related variables such as oral subsites (p=0.037), T classification (p=0.026) and skull base involvement (p=0.040) were indicators of a worse prognosis. For bilateral ENE features, ENE subclassification (p=0.036), maximum size of ENE nodes (p=0.039) and arterial nodal encasement (p=0.025) tended to predict the surgery-based treatment outcomes of these patients.

Conclusions: Bilateral cervical metastases with ENE features, though uncommon, are a serious regional burden, and these patients have lower-than-expected treatment outcomes, especially those with RLs or INMs. A fairly large number of OCSCC patients with advanced oral lesions gain little benefit from intensified salvage surgical treatment. Such treatment should instead be offered to select patients with smaller bilateral ENE nodes (<3 cm) and those with lower ENE subclassifications and no arterial nodal encasement.

Advances in Imaging for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: Applications to Radiation Oncology

While there has been an overall decline of tobacco and alcohol-related head and neck cancer in recent decades, there has been an increased incidence of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Recent research studies and clinical trials have revealed that the cancer biology and clinical progression of HPV-positive OPC is unique relative to its HPV-negative counterparts. HPV-positive OPC is associated with higher rates of disease control following definitive treatment when compared to HPV-negative OPC. Thus, these conditions should be considered unique diseases with regards to treatment strategies and survival. In order to sufficiently characterize HPV-positive OPC and guide treatment strategies, there has been a considerable effort to diagnose, prognose, and track the treatment response of HPV-associated OPC through advanced imaging research. Furthermore, HPV-positive OPC patients are prime candidates for radiation de-escalation protocols, which will ideally reduce toxicities associated with radiation therapy and has prompted additional imaging research to detect radiation-induced changes in organs at risk. This manuscript reviews the various imaging modalities and current strategies for tackling these challenges as well as provides commentary on the potential successes and suggested improvements for the optimal treatment of these tumors.

Clinician perspectives on the factors influencing prognostic stratification by the American Joint Commission on Cancer Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Staging

BACKGROUND

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual includes a staging system for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma for the first time. The pN categories for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and mucosal squamous cell carcinoma are identical, despite the vastly different biological behavior of these diseases. This study aimed to survey head and neck cancer specialists' views regarding the clinical utility of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and to identify avenues for improvement.

DESIGN

An electronic survey of 19 questions relating to the prognostic utility of the staging system was designed based on the findings of a literature review. The survey was distributed internationally to specialists managing head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

Literature review identified 9 articles describing primary research relevant to the performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, which recognized a lack of homogeneity, monotonicity, and distinctiveness in the pN staging system. One hundred and five survey responses were received: 71% indicated that mucosal and head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma require different nodal staging categories; 63% indicated that immunosuppression should be included in the staging system; 70% thought that soft tissue metastases portend a worse prognosis compared with extranodal extension; 38% almost never saw pN3a tumors; and 40% felt that the N stage is a poor predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

The views of head and neck cancer specialists across disciplines and countries align with evidence suggesting that head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma merits a staging system distinct from mucosal squamous cell carcinoma, that immunosuppression should be considered in prognostication, and that the use of extranodal extension should be modified.

Assessment Criteria and Clinical Implications of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer

Tumor breaching the capsule of a lymph node is termed extranodal extension (ENE). It reflects aggressiveness of a tumor, creates anatomic challenges for disease clearance, and increases the risk of distant metastasis. Extranodal extension can be assessed on a pathology specimen, by radiology studies, and by clinical examination. Presence of ENE in a pathology specimen has long been considered a high-risk feature of disease progression and would ordinarily benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy. Although the eighth edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer stage classification dichotomizes pathologic ENE according to its presence or absence, emerging evidence suggests that the extent of a pathologic ENE may provide additional value for risk stratification to guide adjuvant therapy. Recent data suggest that the prognostic importance of pathologic ENE is also applicable for HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, compelling data demonstrate that indisputable radiologic ENE is a powerful risk stratification tool to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure, especially distant metastasis, applicable for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the definition and taxonomy of radiologic ENE requires standardization. The goal of this review is to clarify the contemporary understanding of the prognostic implications of ENE in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, present the nuances of what is presently known and unknown, and elucidate how to classify ENE pathologically and radiologically with an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Finally, with the development of several risk stratification methods, the relative role of ENE and other prognostic schema will be explored.

Nodal staging convergence for HPV- and HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Modern disease staging systems have restructured human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative (HPV-) and HPV-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) into distinct pathologic nodal systems. Given that quantitative lymph node (LN) burden is the dominant prognostic factor in most head and neck cancers, we investigated whether HPV- and HPV+ OPC warrant divergent pathologic nodal classification.

METHODS

Multivariable Cox regression models of OPC surgical patients identified via U.S. cancer registry data were constructed to determine associations between survival and nodal characteristics. Nonlinear associations between metastatic LN number and survival were modeled with restricted cubic splines. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to derive unbiased nodal schema.

RESULTS

Mortality risk escalated continuously with each successive positive LN in both OPC subtypes, with analogous slope. Survival hazard increased by 18.5% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.16-1.21]; P < .001) and 19.1% (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.17-1.21]; P < .001), with each added positive LN for HPV- and HPV+ OPC, respectively, up to identical change points of 5 positive LNs. Extranodal extension (ENE) was an independent predictor of HPV- OPC (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.20-1.99]; P < .001) and HPV+ OPC (HR 1.73 [95% CI, 1.36-2.20]; P < .001) mortality. In RPA for both diseases, metastatic LN was the principal nodal covariate driving survival, with ENE as a secondary determinant. Given the similarities across analyses, we propose a concise, unifying HPV-/HPV+ OPC pathologic nodal classification schema: N1, 1-5 LN+/ENE-; N2, 1-5 LN+/ENE+; N3, >5 LN+.

CONCLUSION

HPV- and HPV+ OPC exhibit parallel relationships between nodal characteristics and relative mortality. In both diseases, metastatic LN number represents the principal nodal covariate governing survival, with ENE being an influential secondary element. A consolidated OPC pathologic nodal staging system that is based on these covariates may best convey prognosis.

LAY SUMMARY

The current nodal staging system for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) has divided human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative (HPV-) and HPV-positive (HPV+) OPC into distinct systems that rely upon criteria that establish them as separate entities, a complexity that may undermine the core objective of staging schema to clearly communicate prognosis. Our large-scale analysis revealed that HPV- and HPV+ pathologic nodal staging systems in fact mirror each other. Multiple analyses produced conspicuously similar nodal staging systems, with metastatic lymph node number and extranodal extension delineating the highest risk groups that shape prognosis. We propose unifying HPV- and HPV+ nodal systems to best streamline prognostication and maximize staging accuracy.

Nodal yield and topography of nodal metastases from oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma - An audit of 1004 cases undergoing primary surgical resection

OBJECTIVES

Nodal metastasis is an important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Detailed topographic study of metastasis can guide surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment protocols.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of distribution of nodal spread was done by auditing pathology records of 1004 patients who underwent primary surgical management at our center.

RESULTS

The median nodal yield was 41 (range of 9-166) nodes, per patient. Metastasis was present in 42.9% patients, of which 52.3% demonstrated extranodal extension. Reclassification by AJCC8 criteria resulted in up-staging in 35.6% patients (pN1, pN2a, pN2b, pN2c, pN3a and pN3b in 13.1%, 3.7%, 6.9%, 0.9%, 0%, 18.1% respectively). Ipsilateral levels Ib and IIa were involved in a quarter of patients each, while IIb, IV and V were involved in < 4%, 3% and 1% of patients, respectively. Contralateral nodal metastasis was present in 5.4%. Skip metastases to level IV were 2.2% and 1.2% for tongue and gingivobuccal primaries. Tongue primaries had a lower likelihood of involving level Ib, but higher of level IIa and III, compared to gingivobuccal primaries, and a lower likelihood of extranodal extension. Primary site did not influence nodal metastasis to levels IIb, IV or V, but other factors like lymphovascular invasion, pT stage and margin status had an influence.

CONCLUSION

This large series with high nodal yield, shows low level of metastasis to level IIb, IV and V, which can help modify future guidelines for extent of surgery and avoid targeted adjuvant radiation to specific levels.

FDG-PET/CT and Pathology in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer: ACRIN 6685 Trial, FDG-PET/CT cN0

OBJECTIVE

FDG-PET/CT (fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography) is effective to assess for occult neck nodal disease. We report risks and patterns of nodal disease based on primary site and nodal level from data on the dissected cN0 per the results from ACRIN 6685.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized enrollment included participants with first-time head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and at least 1 cN0 neck side to be dissected.

SETTING

Twenty-four ACRIN-certified centers internationally (American College of Radiology Imaging Network).

METHODS

A total of 287 participants were enrolled. Preoperative FDG-PET/CT findings were centrally reviewed and compared with pathology. Incidence, relative risk, pattern of lymph node involvement, and impact upon neck dissection were reported.

RESULTS

An overall 983 nodal levels were dissected (n = 261 necks, n = 203 participants). The highest percentages of ipsilateral positive nodes by primary location and nodal level were oral cavity (level I, 17/110, 15.5%), pharynx (level II, 6/30, 20.0%), and larynx (level VI, 1/3, 33.3%).

CONCLUSION

Levels at greatest risk for nodal disease in cN0 in terms of ipsilateral neck dissection are level I (oral cavity), II (pharynx), and VI (larynx). These data should be considered when treating patients presenting with cN0. This is the first study to comprehensively report the incidence, location, and risk of metastases in cN0 in the FDG-PET/CT era.

Lymph node characteristics and their prognostic significance in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of various histopathologic lymph node-based biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) needs further evaluation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 212 OSCC patients with regional metastasis to determine the association of extranodal extension (ENE), extent of ENE, size of metastatic deposit, lymph node yield (LNY), lymph node ratio (LNR), and topography of involvement with survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The presence of ENE, larger nodal deposit, higher pN stage, lymph nodes in the lower levels, and patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment had poor disease-free survival (DFS). In addition, more positive nodes and high LNR showed worse overall survival (OS). ENE beyond 5 mm resulted in poorer outcomes. Larger sizes of metastatic deposit predisposed to ENE. Multivariate analyses showed only lower level of neck involvement to affect both DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis to lower levels and other lymph node characteristics affect prognosis and must be considered in the evolution of staging systems for OSCC.

Nodal characteristics associated with adverse prognosis in oral cavity cancer are linked to host immune status

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nodal metastasis is one of the strongest predictors of outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). The aim was to analyze the interplay of nodal characteristics in OSCC prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study we included OSCC patients treated with primary surgery including neck dissection between 2005 and 2015 (n = 619). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was the primary endpoint. Optimal cutoffs were identified using recursive-partitioning analysis (RPA). A novel characteristic-metastatic focus-to-lymph node size ratio (MLR)-was introduced. We compared the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition (AJCC8) pN categories to a new categorization.

RESULTS

Patients with higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio had more adverse nodal characteristics. All nodal characteristics were significant predictors of DSS in univariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, only number of positive nodes and MLR remained significant. An RPA including all nodal covariates confirmed the results. Compared with AJCC8, our RPA categorization had better hazard discrimination (0.681 vs. 0.598), but poorer balance value (0.783 vs. 0.708).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio had more adverse nodal characteristics. Total number of metastatic lymph nodes is the strongest predictor of outcomes in OSCC. MLR is a more powerful predictor than metastatic lymph node size or metastatic focus size alone.

Extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell cancer: is there a role for further stratification?

To investigate the prognostic significance of the stratification of extranodal extension (ENE) into ENE minor (ENEmi, up to 2mm) and ENE major (ENEma, over 2mm) in non-HPV-related squamous cell cancers of the head and neck, we retrospectively reviewed microscopic slides from neck dissection specimens of ENE-positive patients and subcategorised them into ENEmi and ENEma. We then compared the two groups in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Forty-four patients with pathologically positive necks had ENE in the histological report. Twenty-six had ENEmi and 18 ENEma. The three-year OS was 46% in the ENEmi group and 38.9% in the ENEma group. DSS and DFS were 80.8% and 80.8%, respectively, in the ENEmi group and 61.1% and 77.8%, respectively, in the ENEma group. None of the comparisons revealed any statistically significant difference. The results of our survival analysis seem to show a trend towards better survival rates in the ENEmi group, particularly regarding OS. Nonetheless, extension of the tumour outside the lymph node capsule by more than 2mm was not found to be significantly associated with any of the explored survival outcomes.

Histopathological Definitions of Extranodal Extension: A Systematic Review

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a very strong prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, significant variance in reported incidence of ENE suggests discordance in perception of ENE among pathologists. This study aims to map the different definitions of histopathological ENE used in the literature. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Guided by the research question: "How is histopathological ENE defined?" the databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched. All retrieved studies were reviewed and qualitatively analyzed. Three categories of existing definitions were formed. The systematic literature search yielded 1786 studies after removal of duplicates. Nine hundred and thirty-four full text articles were assessed for inclusion and 44 unique ENE definitions were identified and categorized 1-3; (1) simple definitions only describing a breach in the capsule (48%), (2) definitions also including a description of the perinodal tissue (43%), and (3) definitions adding a description of a specific reaction in the perinodal structure (9%). No consensus definition of ENE exists, but based on the level of details in the identified definitions, three overall categories of ENE definitions were established.

Significance of Extranodal Extension in Surgically Treated HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Carcinomas

Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are the subject of numerous current studies, especially in view of the increasing incidence of tumors induced by human papillomavirus (HPV) and the latest changes to the TNM classification of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). In addition to HPV status, the presence of extranodal extension of lymph node metastases represents an important risk and prognostic factor, which has now been integrated into the staging algorithm of the eighth edition of TNM classification for HPV-negative OPSCC. In the past numerous studies had shown a lack of prognostic significance of extranodal extension in HPV-associated tumors. However, extranodal extension–as a possible risk factor even in HPV-positive OPSCC–remains an important subject of current studies, which are now particularly characterized by high numbers of cases. In this paper, diagnostic methods and the prognostic significance of extranodal extension in surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCC are presented and discussed based on relevant literature, and the results of current publications are summarized. Further development of diagnostic criteria and procedures as well as international standardization of clinical diagnostics of extranodal extension should be encouraged. Several studies demonstrate that extranodal extension results in worse survival outcomes even in HPV-positive tumors, in contrast to results of previous studies. Consequently, whether the prognostic significance of extranodal extension is not actually relevant to outcome and the staging algorithm of HPV-positive OPSCC should be questioned and further analyzed.

Outcome in patients with isolated regional recurrence after primary radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Isolated regional recurrences following head-neck squamous-cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are often accessible for curatively intended salvage treatment. Factors prognostic for outcome were investigated in a large cohort of HNSCC patients.

METHODS

In total, 1811 patients receiving curatively intended radiotherapy from 2007 to 2017 were reviewed and isolated cervical nodal recurrences were identified. Factors associated with survival and second recurrence were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Isolated regional recurrence was seen in 95/1811 (5.2%) patients. Eighty of 95 patients (84%) received salvage surgery. Two-year survival after isolated regional recurrence was 40%. Overall survival (OS) and time to second recurrence were associated with resection status of the salvage surgery and presence of extranodal spread (ENS), while p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma (OPSCC) was associated with better OS.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival after regional recurrence in HNSCC is possible. p16-positive OPSCC, complete salvage surgery, and lack of ENS are associated with better outcome.

Treatment implications of postoperative chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with minor and major extranodal extension

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with minor or major extranodal extension (ENE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgically resected OSCC with pathologically involved lymph node(s) (pN+) between 2006 and 2017. Sections of pN+ were re-reviewed and classified as no, minor (≤2 mm), or major (>2 mm) ENE. Patterns of failure and survival were compared between the groups and stratified by adjuvant treatment. Multivariable (MVA) analysis assessed the value of adjuvant treatment for minor and major ENE.

RESULTS

Total of 384 patients, 62 had minor and 114 had major ENE. Adjuvant CRT was delivered in 32(15%), 21(34%), and 45(39%) of patients with no, minor and major ENE, respectively. Patients with minor ENE had similar 5-year loco-regional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) but lower disease-free survival (DFS) (38% vs. 51%, p = 0·02) compared to patients with no ENE, while patients with major ENE had marginally lower LRC (59% vs 74%, p = 0·07), lower DC (58% vs 82%,p = 0·005) and DFS (13% vs. 38%, p=·001) compared to those with minor. On MVA, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS for major ENE (adjusted HR = 0·49; 95% CI 0·29-0·85, p = 0·01) but not for minor ENE after adjusting for age, ECOG status, T-, N-category, margin status, and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves outcomes in patients with major ENE, but the benefit is unclear in patients with minor ENE. Future trials should focus on intensification of treatment for patients with major ENE and alternative adjuvant strategies for patients with minor ENE.

The role of adjuvant (chemo-)radiotherapy in oral cancers in the contemporary era

Squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (OSCC) is predominantly managed with surgery. Post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) and chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) enhance disease control in OSCC patients with adverse anatomic and pathologic primary and nodal features. Knowledge about disease behavior, surgery and radiotherapy advances, and the emergence of new systemic agents prompt refinement of PORT volumes and POCRT regimens. Traditional and emerging prognostic models that include adverse histopathological features underpin such approaches. This review summarizes research over recent decades with emphasis on the 2015 to Feb 2019 period describing: (1) Indications for PORT and/or POCRT, addressing surgical "margin status" including the definition of a "clear" margin to permit withholding PORT/POCRT; these concepts include characterizing the specimen yielding these measurements, the optimal time point to assess these findings, and the putative value of a "revised margin" performed during the same operative procedure, (2) Emerging prognostic factors including nodal burden (total number of involved lymph nodes) and perineural invasion, (3) PORT volume design, dose/fractionation and optimal surgery-to-PORT interval, (4) Chemotherapy dose, schedule, and agents, and (5) On-going clinical trials involving systemic agents and combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy.

Data Set for the Reporting of Malignant Odontogenic Tumors: Explanations and Recommendations of the Guidelines From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting

A data set has been developed for the reporting of excisional biopsies and resection specimens for malignant odontogenic tumors by members of an expert panel working on behalf of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, an international organization established to unify and standardize reporting of cancers. Odontogenic tumors are rare, which limits evidence-based support for designing a scientifically sound data set for reporting them. Thus, the selection of reportable elements within the data set and considering them as either core or noncore is principally based on evidence from malignancies affecting other organ systems, limited case series, expert opinions, and/or anecdotal reports. Nevertheless, this data set serves as the initial step toward standardized reporting on malignant odontogenic tumors that should evolve over time as more evidence becomes available and functions as a prompt for further research to provide such evidence.

Data Set for the Reporting of Nodal Excisions and Neck Dissection Specimens for Head and Neck Tumors: Explanations and Recommendations of the Guidelines From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting

Standardized, synoptic pathologic reporting for tumors greatly improves communication among clinicians, patients, and researchers, supporting prognostication and comparison about patient outcomes across institutions and countries. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to develop evidence-based, universally available surgical pathology reporting data sets. Within the head and neck region, lymph node excisions and neck dissections are frequently performed as part of the management of head and neck cancers arising from the mucosal sites (sinonasal tract, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, oral cavity, and larynx) along with bone tumors, skin cancers, melanomas, and other tumor categories. The type of specimen, exact location (lymph node level), laterality, and orientation (by suture or diagram) are essential to accurate classification. There are significant staging differences for each anatomic site within the head and neck when lymph node sampling is considered, most importantly related to human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal carcinomas and mucosal melanomas. Number, size, and site of affected lymph nodes, including guidelines on determining the size of tumor deposits and the presence of extranodal extension and soft tissue metastasis, are presented in the context of prognostication. This review elaborates on each of the elements included in the data set for Nodal Excisions and Neck Dissection Specimens for Head & Neck Tumours.