Free flap thrombosis in patients with hypercoagulability: A systematic review

The use of dextran may not have positive effects on microvascular free flap reconstruction: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Dextran had been used in free flap reconstruction surgery to increase the patency of anastomotic vessels. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of perioperative and postoperative dextran in free flap surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study that enrolled 622 patients who received free flap surgery from 2016 to 2020. Propensity score matching was done to minimize the effect of covariance. The outcome included flap-related complications, hospital stay, and mortality. Differences in outcomes were compared between patients treated with dextran and those treated without dextran.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, a total of 378 cases of free flap surgery were included. No difference in total flap failure rate, partial flap failure rate, take-back rate, or major and minor complications were found between the 2 groups. Dextran did not increase the overall complication rate of free flap surgery. Vascular thrombosis remains the most common cause of take-back re-exploration reasons in both the dextran and non-dextran groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the use of dextran perioperatively combined with postoperative treatment in microvascular free flap reconstruction showed no statistical difference in flap survival rate and complication rate.

Optimizing Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: The Role of Hormonal Therapy Management

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer comprises diverse subtypes with prognostic and therapeutic implications. Hormone therapy plays a crucial role in managing tumors expressing hormonal receptors, but its impact on breast reconstruction outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the association between perioperative hormone therapy continuation and the incidence of postoperative complications following breast reconstruction (including autologous, prosthetic, and hybrid techniques), with a focus on identifying specific complication types to refine patient management strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Patients were categorized based on the appropriate discontinuation of hormonal therapy. Clinical data, including patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and complication occurrences, were registered and analyzed.

RESULTS

Inadequate suspension of hormonal therapy during the perioperative period was significantly associated with a higher rate of complications, particularly in the immediate and early phases. Complications such as skin alterations, flap failure, seroma development, and clinical infection showed significant associations with the continuation of hormone therapy (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings suggest a potential correlation between the continuation of hormone therapy during the perioperative phase and the development of complications following breast reconstruction.

Cumulative risk factors for flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma in free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer: a retrospective nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Free flap construction enhances the quality of life for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients; however, complications, such as thrombosis and hematoma, threaten flap survival. This study aimed to identify factors influencing flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma.

METHODS

A retrospective nested case-control study was conducted on HNC patients who underwent free flap reconstruction at a tertiary medical center between January 2019 and January 2022. All patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis consisting of prostaglandin E1, dextran, aspirin, and dipyridamole. Risk factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 548 flaps analyzed, flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma rates were 4.74%, 3.83%, and 9.65%, respectively. Risk factors for flap failure included thrombosis (OR 86.42, 95% CI 15.73-474.89), smoking (OR 49.44, 95% CI 1.28->1000), posteromedial thigh (PMT) flap usage (OR 14.05, 95% CI 2.48-79.54), hematoma (OR 9.68, 95% CI 2.35-39.79), and younger age (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99). Thrombosis risk factors included PMT usage (OR 11.45, 95% CI 2.60-50.38) and anastomosis with the superior thyroid vein (SThV) as the recipient vein after multiple reconstructions (OR 7.91, 95% CI 2.06-30.39). Hematoma risk factors included fibula osteocutaneous flap usage (OR 9.22, 95% CI 2.71-31.42), double-flap usage (OR 8.88, 95% CI 1.80-43.81), liver cirrhosis (OR 6.28, 95% CI 1.44-27.47), and post-surgery hypertension (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.39-5.50), whereas ipsilateral recurrence (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.73) and using the external jugular vein (EJV) as the recipient vein (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.61) were protective factors.

CONCLUSION

Thrombosis poses a greater risk than hematoma for flap failure. Utilization of the PMT flap and the SThV markedly increased the risk of thrombosis and flap failure. These findings highlight the importance of antithrombotic prophylaxis and the selection of flaps and recipient veins in recurrent HNC patients.

Free Flap Outcomes for Head and Neck Surgery in Patients with COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the vascular system, subjecting patients to a hypercoagulable state. This is of particular concern for the success of microvascular free flap reconstruction. This study aims to report head and neck free flap complications in patients with COVID-19 during the perioperative period. We believe these patients are more likely to experience flap complications given the hypercoagulable state.

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional retrospective case series of patients infected with COVID-19 during the perioperative period for head and neck free flap reconstruction from March 2020 to January 2022.

RESULTS

Data was collected on 40 patients from 14 institutions. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) had a positive COVID-19 test within 10 days before surgery and 7 days after surgery. The remaining patients had a positive test earlier than 10 days before surgery. A positive test caused a delay in surgery for 16 patients (40.0%) with an average delay of 44.7 days (9-198 days). Two free flap complications (5.0%) occurred with no free flap deaths. Four patients (10.0%) had surgical complications and 10 patients had medical complications (25.0%). Five patients (12.5%) suffered from postoperative COVID-19 pneumonia. Three deaths were COVID-19-related and one from cancer recurrence during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Despite the heightened risk of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients, head and neck free flap reconstructions in patients with COVID-19 are not at higher risk for free flap complications. However, these patients are at increased risk of medical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:4521-4526, 2024.

Staphylococcus Scalded Skin Syndrome-Induced Thrombosis Leading to Free Flap Complications: A Case Report and Review

Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) is a clinical term used for a spectrum of blistering skin conditions induced by the epidermolytic toxins of the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. The complications of SSSS include thrombosis; however, the pathophysiology of this is still poorly understood. We present a case of free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap failure in a patient as a result of widespread flap thrombosis associated with staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS). This is the first reported case of free flap failure associated with SSSS. Free flap failure due to acquired prothrombotic conditions, such as infection, is a rare and potentially under-reported phenomenon. This article aims to further explore the role of both thrombophilias and provoked thrombotic events in free flap failure. A review of the literature will also be presented, and cases of free flap failure in patients with infection-induced vascular complications will be summarised.

Outcomes of Head and Neck Free Tissue Transfer in Renal Failure Patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess if there is increased risk of free flap failure in renal failure patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. We seek to primarily assess free flap outcomes based on stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and secondarily determine increased risk for postoperative complications.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed at five tertiary care centers. Patients were identified that had undergone microvascular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck with diagnosis of renal failure, classified as Stage 3 CKD or higher. Demographic data was collected. Outcomes in the postoperative period were examined.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients met inclusion criteria. The average patient age was 69 years with a male predominance (n = 48). The majority of patients had CKD Stage 3 (n = 52). Overall flap failure rate was 12.33% (n = 9, CKD stage 3 = 7.69%, CKD stage 4 = 30%, CKD stage 5 = 18%). There was an increased risk of flap failure on multivariate analysis for CKD stage 4/5 patients when compared to CKD 3 patients (p = 0.0095). When compared to matched controls, there was an increased risk of flap failure in CKD patients (p = 0.01) as well as an increased risk of overall complications (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD undergoing head and neck reconstruction are at a higher risk of flap failure and overall complications. When comparing CKD stages there may be increased risk of flap failure in later stages of CKD compared to CKD 3. Appropriate patient counseling is recommended pre-operatively in this patient population with consideration for regional flaps in the appropriate patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:688-694, 2024.

Microsurgical breast reconstruction and primary hypercoagulable disorders

BACKGROUND

Primary hypercoagulable disorders pose a significant challenge to microsurgeons and have traditionally been regarded as a relative contraindication to free tissue transfer. Since free flaps offer numerous advantages in breast reconstruction, there is an effort to expand the population to whom these operations can be safely offered. The purpose of this study is to describe our chemoprophylaxis regimen in cases of primary hypercoagulability, as well as to compare flap outcomes and complications between women with and without hypercoagulability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single institution retrospective review identified 15 patients (25 flaps) with known primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from 2010 through 2020. There were 785 patients (1268 flaps) without primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction, including 40 patients (73 flaps) with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), evaluated for comparison. Patient characteristics, thromboprophylaxis regimen, and surgical outcomes were collected. In carrying out this cohort study, we have adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with primary hypercoagulability were identified, including heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (n = 12), protein S deficiency (n = 1), prothrombin mutation (n = 1), and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 1). Thirteen of these (87%) were discharged with an extended LMWH course. There was no postoperative VTE or mortality in this cohort, and no significant difference in hematoma or transfusion compared with the control group (p = .31, p = .87, respectively). The flap loss rate was 4% in the hypercoagulable group compared with 0.92% in the control group (p = .15). The salvage for arterial or venous compromise in the hypercoagulable group was poor (0% vs. 52%, p = .3).

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical breast reconstruction in women with primary hypercoagulability disorders is feasible with acceptable risk of flap loss but poor salvage potential. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis with extended prophylactic LMWH in this population appears to be a safe regimen.

Hand Reconstruction Using Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap by Terminal Perforator-to-Digital Artery Anastomosis: Retrospective Analysis

This study aimed to analyze cases of anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap used for hand reconstruction with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis. Patients who underwent ALT free flap placement with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis for hand reconstruction between January 2011 and August 2021 were included. The number, length, and diameter of the perforators and veins, flap size, and operative time were investigated through a retrospective review of charts and photographs. The occurrences of arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, arterial spasm, and flap necrosis were analyzed. In total, 50 patients were included in this study. The mean diameter and length of the perforators were 0.68 mm and 3.25 cm, respectively, and the mean number of veins anastomosed was 1.88, with a mean diameter of 0.54 mm. Complications included four cases of arterial thrombosis, one case of venous thrombosis, seven cases of partial necrosis, and one case of total flap failure. Regression analysis showed that a longer perforator was associated with arterial thrombosis whereas larger flap size and number of anastomosed veins were associated with partial necrosis ( p  < 0.05). The terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis offers advantages in using compact free flaps with short pedicle lengths to cover small hand defects.

From Risk Assessment to Intervention: A Systematic Review of Thrombosis in Plastic Surgery

Thromboembolism is a feared complication in plastic surgery and is linked to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite extensive research, there is a lack of consistency between recommendations and clinical protocols to be implemented pre and post-surgery to reduce the incidence of thromboembolism. A systematic literature review was conducted using Pubmed and Scopus databases to determine the risk factors, screening methods, and existing treatment models for thromboembolism prevention. Articles in non-English languages were excluded. Analysis indicated that predominant risk factors include age (>35), elevated body mass index, coagulation disorders, smoking, estrogen therapies, genetic predisposition, vascular endothelium damage, stasis, and use of general anesthesia in patients with a history of cancer. Implementation of a proper prophylactic protocol is dependent on understanding the interplay between the aforementioned risk factors and the utilization of well-defined, evidence-based guidelines, such as the 2005 Caprini Risk Assessment Model and ultrasound surveillance. The literature review revealed that mechanical prophylaxis is the primary prevention method, followed by thromboprophylaxis for patients with higher Caprini scores. Plastic surgeons often underestimate the present risk stratification tools available for the prophylactic intervention of thromboembolism due to the fear of bleeding or hematoma complications postoperatively. In summary, this literature review emphasizes the importance of plastic surgeons selecting protocols that is inclusive of the patient's risk profile to yield a reduced risk of thromboembolism.

Chemoprophylaxis and Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Microvascular Surgery

This review aims to highlight the common pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions utilized for thromboprophylaxis as well as flap salvage in microsurgery. A literature review was conducted in PubMed/National Center for Biotechnology Information, Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases. Articles with a focus on thromboprophylaxis in microsurgical procedures spanning head and neck surgery, breast and extremity microvascular reconstruction, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus in microvascular surgery, and flap thrombosis and salvage were included in this review. The majority of available evidence supports mechanical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in all patients undergoing microsurgery given the presence of multiple risk factors for VTE within this particular patient population. Based on the literature review, addition of VTE chemoprophylactic agents is beneficial and an algorithmic approach to thromboprophylaxis in microsurgery patients and management of patients with thrombosis based on literature review and senior authors' experience is recommended and outlined.

Surgical and demographic predictors of free flap salvage after takeback: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical free tissue transfer (FTT) is a widely employed surgical modality utilized for reconstruction of a broad range of defects, including head and neck, extremity, and breast. Flap survival is reported to be 90%-95%. When FTT fails, salvage procedures aim at establishing reperfusion while limiting ischemia time-with salvage rates between 22% and 67%. There are limited data-driven predictors of successful salvage present in the literature. This systematic review aims to identify predictors of flap salvage.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Articles included in the final analysis were limited to those investigating FTT salvage procedures and included factors impacting outcomes. Cohort and case series (>5 flaps) studies up until March 2021 were included. Chi-square tests and linear regression modeling was completed for analysis.

RESULTS

The patient-specific factors significantly associated with salvage included the absence of hypercoagulability (p < .00001) and no previous salvage attempts (p < .00001). Case-specific factors significantly associated with salvage included trunk/breast flaps (p < .00001), fasciocutaneous/osteocutaneous flaps (p = .006), venous compromise (p < .00001), and shorter time from index procedure to salvage attempt (R = .746). Radiation in the head and neck population was significantly associated with flap salvage failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the complexity and challenges surrounding free flap salvage procedures, the goal of this manuscript was to present data helping guide surgical decision-making. Based on our findings, patients without documented hypercoagulability, no previous salvage attempts, fasciocutaneous/osteocutaneous flaps, trunk/breast flaps, and a shorter time interval post-index operation are the best candidates for a salvage attempt.

Analysis of Factors Determining Patient Survival after Receiving Free-Flap Reconstruction at a Single Center-A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical tissue transfer revolutionized reconstructive surgery after extensive trauma, oncological resections, and severe infections. Complex soft tissue reconstructions are increasingly performed in multimorbid and elderly patients. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate whether these patients benefit from these complex procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome for multimorbid patients who underwent microsurgical soft tissue reconstruction and to identify potential risk factors that may increase mortality.

METHODS

This single-center study retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of patients receiving free gracilis (GM) or latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) flap reconstruction between September 2017 and December 2021. Cases were divided into two groups (dead vs. alive), depending on patient survival. Patient demographics, comorbidities and medication, perioperative details, free flap outcome, as well as microcirculation were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 151 flaps (LDM, n = 67; GM, n = 84) performed in 147 patients with a mean age of 61.15 ± 17.5 (range 19-94) years were included. A total of 33 patients (22.45%) passed away during the study period. Deceased patients were significantly older (Alive: 58.28 ± 17.91 vs. Dead: 71.39 ± 11.13; p = 0.001), were hospitalized significantly longer (Alive: 29.66 ± 26.97 vs. Dead: 36.88 ± 15.04 days; p = 0.046) and suffered from cardiovascular (Alive: 36.40% vs. Dead: 66.70%; p = 0.002) and metabolic diseases (Alive: 33.90% vs. Dead: 54.50%; p = 0.031) more frequently, which corresponded to a significantly higher ASA Score (p = 0.004). Revision rates (Alive: 11.00% vs. Dead: 18.20%; p = 0.371) and flap loss (Alive: 3.39% vs. Dead: 12.12%; p = 0.069) were higher in patients that died by the end of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Free flap transfer is safe and effective, even in multimorbid patients. However, patient age, comorbidities, preoperative ASA status, and medication significantly impact postoperative patient survival in the short- and mid-term and must, therefore, be taken into account in preoperative decision-making and informed consent.

Enhancing Anticoagulation Monitoring and Therapy in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Reconstruction in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Prospective Observational Trial

Background: In reconstructive surgery, loss of a microvascular free flap due to perfusion disorders, especially thrombosis, is a serious complication. In recent years, viscoelastic testing (VET) has become increasingly important in point-of-care (POC) anticoagulation monitoring. This paper describes a protocol for enhanced anticoagulation monitoring during maxillofacial flap surgery. Objective: The aim of the study will be to evaluate, in a controlled setting, the predictive value of POC devices for the type of flap perfusion disorders due to thrombosis or bleeding. VET, Platelet monitoring (PM) and standard laboratory tests (SLT) are comparatively examined. Methods/Design: This study is an investigator-initiated prospective trial in 100 patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. Patients who undergo reconstructive surgery using microvascular-free flaps will be consecutively enrolled in the study. All patients provide blood samples for VET, PM and SLT at defined time points. The primary outcome is defined as free flap loss during the hospital stay. Statistical analyses will be performed using t-tests, including the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. Discussion: This study will help clarify whether VET can improve individualized patient care in reconstruction surgery. A better understanding of coagulation in relation to flap perfusion disorders may allow real-time adaption of antithrombotic strategies and potentially prevent flap complications.

Safe perioperative tamoxifen use in autologous breast free flap reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative tamoxifen remains a valuable therapeutic modality for breast cancer patients. Studies in the existing literature have suggested a potential increased risk of thrombotic complications in autologous breast free flap reconstruction patients exposed to tamoxifen perioperatively. However, several recent publications have questioned the validity of these associations. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic appraisal of the existing literature to determine if perioperative tamoxifen exposure increases the risk of flap complications in autologous breast-free flap reconstruction patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, EBSCOHost, ClinicalTrials.gov, and TRIP databases from their inception up to April 2021. Articles analyzing the impact of perioperative tamoxifen in autologous breast free flap patients were included. The outcomes assessed were total flap loss, overall flap complications, thrombotic flap complications, which was defined as the sum of arterial and venous flap thrombi, and systemic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Pooled estimates and relative risk were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

9294 Articles were screened and 7 were selected for analysis, which included 3669 flaps in 2759 patients. Compared to patients who did not receive tamoxifen perioperatively, those who received tamoxifen did not have an increased risk of thrombotic flap complications (pooled RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.61-1.84), total flap loss (pooled RR 2.17; 95% CI 0.79-5.95), overall flap complications (pooled RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.76-1.41), or systemic VTE (pooled RR 1.93; 95% CI 0.72-5.13). The heterogeneity of the studies was not significant for any of the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this study was to update the current understanding of the impact of perioperative tamoxifen on autologous breast free flap reconstruction outcomes. The existing literature supports that the perioperative continuation of tamoxifen in breast free flap patients is not associated with an increased risk of thrombotic flap complications, total flap loss, overall flap complications, or systemic VTE.

Overcoming severe calcified lower extremity artery in lower limb salvage operation by using the Fogarty catheter and vein graft

BACKGROUND

With severe vascular calcifications, vascular clamp application and utilizing the vessel for free flap recipient vessel becomes impossible. These obstacles can be overcome with the Fogarty catheter and vein graft.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

When unclampable artery was encountered intraoperatively, a vein graft was used to make a clampable recipient site for six diabetic foot patients (ages from 42 to 80). The end of the Fogarty catheter was inserted into the proximal end of the vein graft and the transected calcified vessel in sequence, and the balloon of the catheter was used as an intraluminal tourniquet. The remaining end of the vein graft was connected to the distal vessel with a vascular clamp.

RESULTS

Five short vein graft revascularization for segmental arterial occlusion, one long vein graft for recipient artery elongation was done (lengths from 2 to 13.8 cm). Three delayed, and two immediate anterolateral thigh flaps (sizes from 15 to 150 cm² ) were performed, and one patient received vein graft revascularization surgery only. Postoperative vascular sonography of all six patients showed well-maintained patency. Minor flap marginal disruption occurred at two patients but healed with conservative care. Postoperative follow-up was done for 1-18 months (average 7.17). Limb salvage was achieved for five patients and all five free flaps survived. However, for one patient, arterial restenosis at popliteal artery a month later lead to major amputation.

CONCLUSION

Using a Fogarty catheter and a vein graft may obtain perfect hemostasis during micro-anastomosis and achieve successful microvascular reconstruction in patients with severely calcified vessels.

Maxillofacial and oral surgery in patients with thrombophilia: safe territory for the oral surgeon? A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze patients with thrombophilia who underwent oral and/or maxillofacial surgery at our center.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with hereditary or acquired thrombophilia who had undergone oral/maxillofacial surgery between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019. Data regarding demographic and patient characteristics, surgical treatment modalities, antithrombotic therapies, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 76 eligible patients (26 male, 50 female) were included in this study, with a mean follow-up period of 3.8 months (range, 0-51 months). The mean age at time of surgery was 44.7 ± 19.4 years. Seven different hereditary and acquired thrombophilia were identified: factor V Leiden (n = 31; 40.8%), prothrombin G20210A mutation (n = 5; 6.6%), protein C deficiency (n = 4; 5.3%), protein S deficiency (n = 11; 14.5%), antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 10; 13.2%), hyperhomocysteinemia (n = 8; 10.5%), and elevated factor VIII (n = 2; 2.6%). Complications occurred in 9 patients (11.8%) and included postoperative infections (n = 6; 7.9%) and postoperative bleeding (n = 3; 3.9%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that oral and/or maxillofacial surgery in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of thrombophilia is not associated with a burden of thrombosis or high complication rates. Furthermore, we formulated a guideline for preoperative antithrombotic therapy for patients with thrombophilia undergoing oral and/or maxillofacial surgery.

Surgical treatment of pressure ulcer: various flaps and other surgical methods

Pressure ulcers remain a common health problem, particularly among physically limited or bedridden older adults, and they can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Conservative management is ineffective for stage III or IV pressure ulcers, and surgery to create flap coverage becomes inevitable. Basic surgical principles for the treatment of pressure ulcers include complete excision of the ulcer, surrounding scar, underlying bursa, and soft tissue calcification; radical removal of underlying bone and any heterotropic ossification; padding of bone stumps and filling dead space; resurfacing with large regional pedicled flaps; and grafting the donor site of the flap, if necessary. For effective edge resection, all the flaps should be designed to be as large as possible, placing the suture line away from the area of direct pressure, and the flap design should also not violate adjacent flap territories to preserve all options for coverage if a breakdown or recurrence dictates further reconstruction. There are surgical methods for stage III or IV wide range pressure ulcers: reconstruction surgery using a skin flap, muscle flap, fascia-skin flap, or free flap. The skin graft is not generally recommended as a surgical procedure for stage III or IV pressure ulcers because it cannot provide enough strength to cover the wound. This review presents various surgical treatments of pressure ulcers including muscle, musculocutaneous, perforator-based, and free flap.