Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines

Palliative biliodigestive bypass for unresectable pancreatic malignancy at Kilimanjaro Christian medical centre: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is a common and deadly cancer, ranking as the 14th most common cancer worldwide and the 7th leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Advanced pancreatic malignancy frequently presents with biliary and gastric outlet obstruction and palliative open interventions are often required, especially in low-income countries where endoscopic surgical bypass methods are often unavailable. This study aimed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing biliodigestive bypass for pancreatic malignancy.

METHODS

This was a hospital-based retrospective observational study at the tertiary hospital in northern Tanzania. We included 53 patients who underwent double or triple bypass surgery for pancreatic malignancy between January 2019 to December 2022 at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), Tanzania. Data was collected from medical records, analyzing demographics, comorbidities, pre-surgery and surgery details, and post-surgery outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize continuous variables as mean with standard deviation and categorical variables as percentages.

RESULTS

53 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 63.2 years and a male to female ratio of 1.03:1. Jaundice was the most common presentation (77.4%). Of the patients, 74.5% had comorbidities, and the majority (81.1%) were uninsured. 50.9% of patients had a length of hospital stay shorter than 5 days, and 88.3% resumed normal oral intake. Palliation failure was observed in 22.6% of patients. The median survival time for the entire cohort of patients was 65 days. Patients with palliation failure had a significantly shorter mean survival time than those without complications (14.17 vs. 90 days, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Bypass surgery remains a treatment of choice for palliating symptoms in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This study highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, especially in low-income countries, to achieve better outcomes.

Study protocol: multi-centre, randomised controlled clinical trial exploring stromal targeting in locally advanced pancreatic cancer; STARPAC2

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the commonest form), a lethal disease, is best treated with surgical excision but is feasible in less than a fifth of patients. Around a third of patients presentlocally advanced, inoperable, non-metastatic (laPDAC), whose stadrd of care is palliative chemotherapy; a small minority are down-sized sufficiently to enable surgical excision. We propose a phase II clinical trial to test whether a combination of standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine & nab-Paclitaxel: GEM-NABP) and repurposing All Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) to target the stroma may extend progression-free survival and enable successful surgical resection for patients with laPDAC, since data from phase IB clinical trial demonstrate safety of GEM-NABP-ATRA combination to patients with advanced PDAC with potential therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

Patients with laPDAC will receive at least six cycles of GEM-NABP with 1:1 randomisation to receive this with or without ATRA to assess response, until progression or intolerance. Those with stable/responding disease may undergo surgical resection. Primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of first documented tumour progression (response evaluation criteria in solid tumours [RECIST] v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability, surgical resection rate, R0 surgical resection rate and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) as measured by questionnaire EQ-5D-5L. Exploratory endpoints include a decrease or increase in CA19-9 and serum Vitamin A over time correlated with ORR, PFS, and OS.

DISCUSSION

STARPAC2 aims to assess the role of stromal targeting in laPDAC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2019-004231-23; NCT04241276; ISRCTN11503604.

Ongoing Failure to Deliver Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

(1) Background: Comprehensive evaluation of guideline-concordant care (GCC) across all PDAC stages has yet to be thoroughly conducted. This study aimed to characterize treatment patterns and assess factors associated with receiving GCC among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in California. (2) Methods: Data on adult patients with PDAC were extracted from the California Cancer Registry (2004-2020). GCC is defined according to the recommendations provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with receiving GCC. A Cox model was used to examine the association of GCC with overall survival. (3) Results: A total of 50,346 PDAC patients were included (stage 1: 10%; stage 2: 25%; stage 3: 11%; stage 4: 54%). Only 46.7% of all patients received GCC (stage 1: 20%; stage 2: 40%; stage 3: 69%; stage 4: 50%). Only 31% of stage 1 patients underwent surgery. Factors inversely associated with receiving GCC were Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.78; p < 0.001), Black race (OR 0.74; p < 0.001), having no insurance (OR 0.40; p < 0.001]), and a Charlson-Deyo score of ≥2 (OR 0.68; p < 0.001). Adherence to GCC was associated with improved survival (Hazard Ratio 0.39; p < 0.001). Notably, patients with stage 1 PDAC who received GCC had a median survival of 47 months vs. 8 months for those who did not. (4) Conclusions: Although stage 1 PDAC patients have the greatest potential for survival with GCC, only 20% of patients received such treatment. Thus, it is crucial to identify and address the modifiable factors contributing to these suboptimal care patterns.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a malignancy that arises in the cells of the pancreas, is a devastating disease with unclear etiology and often poor prognosis. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a stage where the tumor has grown significantly but has not yet spread to distant organs, presents unique challenges in treatment. This article aims to discuss the current strategies, challenges, and future directions in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).

AIM

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LAPC.

METHODS

Eligible patients had LAPC, an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow functions, and no prior anticancer therapy. In the observation group, participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg once every 3 wk, and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50.4 Gy and gross tumor volume 60 Gy in 28 fractions and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-d cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity). In the control group, participants only received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From April 2020 to November 2021, 64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy, while 32 (94.1%) received sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 2 patients discontinuing sintilimab in the observation group. Thirty patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy in the control group. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, the analysis of the observation group revealed that a partial response was observed in 11 patients (32.4%), stable disease was evident in 19 patients (55.9%), and 4 patients (11.8%) experienced progressive disease; a partial response was observed in 6 (20.0%) patients, stable disease in 18 (60%), and progressive disease in 6 (20%) in the control group. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and nausea. The incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) was 26.5% (9/34) in the observation group and 23.3% (7/30) in the control group. There were no treatment-related deaths. The observation group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (22.1 mo compared to 15.8 mo) (P < 0.05) and progression-free survival (12.2 mo vs 10.1 mo) (P < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients, and warrants further investigation.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Is More Better?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.

Pathological Complete Response in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Preoperative Chemotherapy

IMPORTANCE

Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy is increasingly used in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, leading to pathological complete response (pCR) in a small subset of patients. However, multicenter studies with in-depth data about pCR are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence, outcome, and risk factors of pCR after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This observational, international, multicenter cohort study assessed all consecutive patients with pathology-proven localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) in 19 centers from 8 countries (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018). Data collection was performed from February 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, and analyses from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Median follow-up was 19 months.

EXPOSURES

Preoperative chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) followed by resection.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The incidence of pCR (defined as absence of vital tumor cells in the sampled pancreas specimen after resection), its association with OS from surgery, and factors associated with pCR. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and pCR were investigated with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 1758 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; 879 [50.0%] male) were studied. The rate of pCR was 4.8% (n = 85), and pCR was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.83). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95%, 82%, and 63% in patients with pCR vs 80%, 46%, and 30% in patients without pCR, respectively (P < .001). Factors associated with pCR included preoperative multiagent chemotherapy other than (m)FOLFIRINOX ([modified] leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.87), preoperative conventional radiotherapy (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.00-4.10), preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (OR, 8.91; 95% CI, 4.17-19.05), radiologic response (OR, 13.00; 95% CI, 7.02-24.08), and normal(ized) serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after preoperative therapy (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.79-7.89).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This international, retrospective cohort study found that pCR occurred in 4.8% of patients with resected localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Although pCR does not reflect cure, it is associated with improved OS, with a doubled 5-year OS of 63% compared with 30% in patients without pCR. Factors associated with pCR related to preoperative chemo(radio)therapy regimens and anatomical and biological disease response features may have implications for treatment strategies that require validation in prospective studies because they may not universally apply to all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

In this perspective, we present our assessment of all of the known accumulated evidence on the role of neoadjuvant therapy in the management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer highlighting the gaps in the data, the current regimens used and providing a brief insight into the way forward.

A Simple Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment for Clinical Oncologists

Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive solid tumors and is showing increasing incidence. The aim of our review is to provide practical help for all clinical oncologists and to summarize the current management of PDAC using a simple "ABC method" (A-anatomical resectability, B-biological resectability and C-clinical conditions). For anatomically resectable PDAC without any high-risk factors (biological or conditional), the actual standard of care is represented by surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The remaining PDAC patients should all be treated with initial systemic therapy, though the intent for each is different: for borderline resectable patients, the intent is neoadjuvant; for locally advanced patients, the intent is conversion; and for metastatic PDAC patients, the intent remains just palliative. The actual standard of care in first-line therapy is represented by two regimens: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Recently, NALIRIFOX showed positive results over gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. There are limited data for maintenance therapy after first-line treatment, though 5-FU or FOLFIRI after initial FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine, after initial gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, might be considered. We also dedicate space to special rare conditions, such as PDAC with germline BRCA mutations, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas, with few clinically relevant remarks.

Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Is Effective but Rarely Feasible in Real Life: Is Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX a Better Option?

BACKGROUND

The recommended treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is resection followed by adjuvant FOLFIRINOX. We assessed the proportion of patients that managed to complete the 12 courses of adjuvant FOLFIRINOX and compared their outcome with that of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of all PC patients who underwent resection with (2/2015-12/2021) or without (1/2018-12/2021) neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients underwent upfront resection, and 51 patients with BRPC received neoadjuvant treatment. Only 46 resection patients started adjuvant FOLFIRINOX, and only 23 completed 12 courses. The main reasons for not starting/completing adjuvant therapy were poor tolerance and rapid recurrence. Significantly more patients in the neoadjuvant group received at least six FOLFIRINOX courses (80.4% vs. 31%, p < 0.001). Patients who completed at least 6 courses, either pre- or postoperatively, had better overall survival (p = 0.025) than those who did not. In spite of having more advanced disease, the neoadjuvant group had comparable overall survival (p = 0.062) regardless of the number of treatment courses.

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of patients (23%) undergoing upfront pancreatic resection completed the planned 12 courses of FOLFIRINOX. Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment were significantly more likely to receive at least six treatment courses. Patients receiving at least six courses had better overall survival than those who received fewer than six courses, regardless of the timing of treatment relative to surgery. Potential ways to increase chemotherapy adherence, such as administering treatment before surgery, should be considered.

Outcomes of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 and radiation therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment, including neoadjuvant treatment, in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) remains unclear. We assessed the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and tegafu/gimearcil/oteracil (S-1) for BRPC.

METHODS

In a single center, nonrandomized prospective study, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) with gemcitabine plus S-1 was administered for BRPC (no. B090312028) in 122 patients enrolled between 2009 and 2015. Gemcitabine plus S-1 comprised gemcitabine on days 8 and 15, and daily S-1 on days 1-14. After two courses of gemcitabine plus S-1, 30 Gy radiotherapy was administered in 10 fractions with S-1.

RESULTS

Eighty-four and 38 patients had BR-PV and BR-A, respectively. No deaths occurred during NACRT. Ninety-four patients (77%) underwent resection with curative intent. R0 resection was performed in 91% of resected cases. Patients who underwent post-NACRT resection had better overall survival than did patients without resection (mean survival time [MST]: 24.7 vs 9.6 months, 5-year-survival rate (5 years): 30.3% vs 0%, P < .001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 73% of patients. MST and 5-year survival rate of the patients treated with NACRT followed by resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were 29.6 months and 34.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 can be safely administered in BRPC and may require adjuvant chemotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000006782.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes After Preoperative FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: An International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy is increasingly administered to patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) to improve overall survival (OS). Multicenter studies reporting on the impact from the number of preoperative cycles and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in relation to outcomes in this setting are lacking. This study aimed to assess the outcome of pancreatectomy after preoperative FOLFIRINOX, including predictors of OS.

METHODS

This international multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients from 31 centers in 19 European countries and the United States undergoing pancreatectomy after preoperative FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (2012-2016). The primary end point was OS from diagnosis. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.

RESULTS

The study included 423 patients who underwent pancreatectomy after a median of six (IQR 5-8) preoperative cycles of FOLFIRINOX. Postoperative major morbidity occurred for 88 (20.8%) patients and 90-day mortality for 12 (2.8%) patients. An R0 resection was achieved for 243 (57.4%) patients, and 259 (61.2%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median OS was 38 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 34-42 months) for BRPC and 33 months (95% CI 27-45 months) for LAPC. Overall survival was significantly associated with R0 resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63; 95% CI 1.20-2.20) and tumor differentiation (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.91). Neither the number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles nor the use adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This international multicenter study found that pancreatectomy after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy is associated with favorable outcomes for patients with BRPC and those with LAPC. Future studies should confirm that the number of neoadjuvant cycles and the use adjuvant chemotherapy have no relation to OS after resection.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

We aimed to compare resection and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and immediate surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Random effects modeling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Likelihood of type 1 or 2 errors in the meta-analysis model was assessed by trial sequential analysis. A total of 400 patients from four RCTs were included. When RPC and BRPC were analyzed together, neoadjuvant CRT resulted in a higher R0 resection rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.55, p = 0.004), longer overall survival (mean difference [MD]: 3.75 years, p = 0.009) but lower overall resection rate (RR: 0.83, p = 0.008) compared with immediate surgery. When RPC and BRPC were analyzed separately, neoadjuvant CRT improved R0 resection rate (RR: 3.72, p = 0.004) and overall survival (MD: 6.64, p = 0.004) of patients with BRPC. However, it did not improve R0 resection rate (RR: 1.18, p = 0.13) or overall survival (MD: 0.94, p = 0.57) of patients with RPC. Neoadjuvant CRT might be beneficial for patients with BRPC, but not for patients with RPC. Nevertheless, the best available evidence does not include contemporary chemotherapy regimens. Patients with RPC and those with BRPC should not be combined in the same cohort in future studies.

Analysis of KRAS Mutations in Gastrointestinal Tract Adenocarcinomas Reveals Site-Specific Mutational Signatures

Adenocarcinomas of the luminal gastrointestinal tract and pancreatobiliary system often show histologic and immunohistochemical overlap, making delineation of the primary site in a metastatic setting difficult. Previous studies have shown that site-specific missense mutations in the oncogene KRAS could be used in conjunction with immunohistochemistry to differentiate metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma from primary lung adenocarcinoma. In this study, we assessed the patterning of KRAS mutations across sites in the gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary system. By integrating sequencing data from 44 separate studies, we assessed 2523 KRAS mutations in 7382 distinct cases of adenocarcinoma, including those from the esophagus, stomach, ampulla, biliary system, pancreas, and colon. We found that gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas demonstrate a marked regional variation in the frequency of KRAS mutations, with the most frequent KRAS mutation observed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (up to 94.9%), whereas the frequency is much lower in adenocarcinomas from the esophagus and stomach (5.4% and 8.7%, respectively). Intriguingly, the pattern of missense mutations showed site specificity as well, with c.35G>T (p.G12V) and c.34G>C (p.G12R) mutations enriched in pancreatic primaries and codon 13 and non-codon 12/13 alterations enriched in gastric primaries (specificity of 98.9% and 93.2%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 93.6% and 92.93% against pancreatic adenocarcinoma). Furthermore, we found that esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas show an enrichment in transitional mutations, whereas other sites showed an equal distribution. Importantly, the examination of a validation cohort from our own institution revealed similar trends. These findings indicate that, in addition to providing therapeutic and diagnostic information, KRAS mutational analysis may also prove useful in delineating the site of origin in gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas that share morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap. Moreover, transitional mutations are more frequent in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas, reiterating the role of chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of foregut adenocarcinomas.

Risk Assessment and Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and it is responsible for a number of deaths almost equal to its incidence. The high mortality rate is correlated with several explanations; the main one is the late disease stage at which the majority of patients are diagnosed. Since surgical resection has been recognised as the only curative treatment, a PC diagnosis at the initial stage is believed the main tool to improve survival. Therefore, patient stratification according to familial and genetic risk and the creation of screening protocol by using minimally invasive diagnostic tools would be appropriate. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are subsets of lesions which deserve special management to avoid overtreatment. The current PC screening programs are based on the annual employment of magnetic resonance imaging with cholangiopancreatography sequences (MR/MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). For patients unfit for MRI, computed tomography (CT) could be proposed, although CT results in lower detection rates, compared to MRI, for small lesions. The actual major limit is the incapacity to detect and characterize the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) by EUS and MR/MRCP. The possibility of utilizing artificial intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favour the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the real utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these motives, it would be appropriate to realize screening programs in research settings.

Neo-adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgery and systemic therapy provide the best option for long-term cancer control in localized resectable pancreas cancer. The present study assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreas cancer (PDAC).

METHODS

This was a prospective noninterventional observational trial of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in BR and LA PDAC. The primary objective was the R0/R1 surgical resection rate. Secondary objectives included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), tolerability, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2019; the majority had LA disease (59.2%). Median age was 61 years, and median Ca 19-9 level pretreatment was 523.4 μmol/L. Following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, 11 patients (22.5%) underwent surgical resection, the majority of which were BR at diagnosis (72.7%). Median OS and PFS for the entire group were 25 (95% CI: 17.2-32.8) and 12 months (95% CI: 9.7-13.3), respectively. Median PFS in BR patients was 14 (95% CI: 10.5-17.5) compared to 12 months (95% CI: 5.2-18.8) in patients with LA patients. Median OS and PFS were not reached in patients who underwent surgical resection as compared to 22 (95% CI: 18.6-25.4) and 9 months (95% CI: 4.2-13.9) in those who did not, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea occurred in 6.3%, 2.1%, 10.4%, 4.2%, and 8.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX is an active regimen for patients with LA/BR PDAC with a resection rate of 22.5%. These results are in line with prior data.

Long-Term Outcomes of Venous Resections in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study

To investigate whether pancreatic resections (PR) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with worse survival when resection of the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) is required.

Background

PR for PDAC with resection of the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV, PR+V resection) may be associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared with PR without the need for SMV/PV resection (PR-V). We hypothesized that PR+V results in lower OS compared with PR-V.

Method

Retrospective study using data from the nationwide Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database from 2011 to 2020. Data on patients who underwent PR for PDAC were extracted. A group of PR patients found nonresectable on exploratory laparotomy (EXP) was also included. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for confounders (age, sex, R-resection level, chemotherapy, comorbidities, histology T and N classification, procedure subtype as well as tumor distance to the SMV/PV).

Results

Overall, 2403 patients were identified. Six hundred two underwent exploration only (EXP group), whereas 412 underwent pancreatic resection with (PR+V group) and 1389 (PR-V) without SMV/PV resection. Five-year OS for the PR+V group was lower (20% vs 30%) compared with PR-V, although multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling could not associate PR+V status with OS (Hazard ratio 1.11, P = 0.408).

Conclusion

When correcting for confounders, PR+V was not associated with lower OS compared with PR-V.

Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) was recently authorized in Japan for unresectable pancreatic cancer after disease progression following chemotherapy. Physicians now consider certain aspects of nal-IRI safety profile as slightly different from conventional irinotecan. This report aims to explore additional aspects of the nal-IRI safety in Japanese phase 2 study.

METHODS

We analyzed the incidence, time to first onset, and time to resolution for adverse events that require special attention and other selected toxicities in the nal-IRI combination group (n = 46).

RESULTS

Leukopenia/neutropenia (76.1%/71.7%), diarrhea (58.7%) and hepatic dysfunction (41.3%) were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events, with a median time to onset of 21.0 days (range: 8, 97), 9.0 days (1, 61) and 22.0 days (2, 325), respectively, and a median time to resolution of 8.0 days (95% confidence intervals: 8, 9), 4.0 days (4, 8) and 40.0 days (9, -), respectively. Eight patients experienced Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and their symptoms were well controlled by dose modification except one patient who had drug withdrawal. The median time to resolution for Grade ≥ 3 and Grade ≤ 2 diarrhea was 17.5 days (95% confidence intervals: 1, 31) and 4 days (3, 7), respectively. Anorexia occurred in 28/46 patients (60.9%) with a median time to onset of 4.0 days (range: 2, 132) and a median time to resolution of 12.0 days (95% confidence intervals: 6, 26).

CONCLUSIONS

We explored safety profile of nal-IRI combination regimen recognized as effective and tolerable treatment for Japanese unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. Although the treatment-emergent adverse events occurred were controllable, patients with prolonged toxicities should be closely managed.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict liver metastasis for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and externally validate a nomogram for predicting liver metastasis after radical resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

A total of 247 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively reviewed from January 2015 to March 2022 at Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital Eastern Section, and used as a training cohort to develop the nomogram. 83 PDAC patients from the Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital Xingning Section were enrolled as the validation cohort. The postoperative liver metastasis was recorded during the follow-up, and the liver metastasis-free survival was defined as the time from operation to the date of liver metastasis diagnosis or death. The nomogram was established based on independent prognostic factors selected by LASSO and multivariate Cox regression model. The performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to determine the clinical utility of the nomogram model.

RESULTS

From the training cohort of 247 patients, a total of 132 patients developed liver metastasis during the follow-up, the 1-, 2- and 3- year liver metastasis-free survival were 52.4%, 43.5% and 40% respectively. The LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that postoperative CA125 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.007, p <0.001), tumor differentiation (HR = 1.640, p = 0.010), tumor size (HR = 1.520, p = 0.029), lymph node ratio (HR = 1.897, p = 0.002) and portal/superior mesenteric/splenic vein invasion degree (PV/SMV/SV) (HR = 2.829, p <0.001) were the independent factors of liver metastasis. A nomogram with independent factors was developed and the C-index was 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.720-0.799) and 0.739 (95% CI, 0.669-0.810) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The areas under curve (AUC) of the nomogram at 1-, 2- and 3-year were 0.815, 0.803 and 0.773 in the training cohort, and 0.765, 0.879 and 0.908 in the validation cohort, respectively, higher than those in TNM stage. Decision curve analysis (DCA) analysis revealed that the nomogram model provided superior net benefit in clinical utility. Liver metastasis-free survival curves showed a significant discriminatory ability for liver metastasis risk based on the nomogram (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram showed high accuracy in predicting liver metastasis for PDAC after radical resection, and may serve as a clinical support tool to guide personalized and prescient intervention.

KRAS G12D Mutation Subtype in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Does It Influence Prognosis or Stage of Disease at Presentation?

Background: KRAS G12D mutation subtype is present in over 40% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), one of the leading global causes of cancer death. This retrospective cohort study aims to investigate whether detection of the KRAS G12D mutation subtype in PDAC patients is a determinant of prognosis across all stages of disease. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 231 patients presenting with PDAC at a large tertiary hospital, and compared survival using the Kaplan Meier, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: KRAS G12D mutation subtype was not significantly associated with poorer survival compared across the whole population of PDAC patients (p = 0.107; HR 1.293 95% CI (0.946-1.767)). However, KRAS G12D patients who were resectable had a shorter median survival time of 356 days compared to all other genotypes (median survival 810 days) (p = 0.019; HR 1.991 95% CI (1.121-3.537)). Conclusions: KRAS G12D patients who were resectable at diagnosis had shorter survival compared to all other PDAC patients. These data suggest that KRAS G12D may be a clinically useful prognostic biomarker of PDAC.

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a reliable contraindication to resection in the modern era?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to present radiologically designated LAPC found to be resectable upon surgical exploration and evaluate the outcomes of such resections.

METHODS

Sequential LAPC patients between 2013 and 2019 were staged and underwent resection were included in the analysis of both perioperative and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with radiologically-designated LAPC underwent surgical resection after chemotherapy with a median follow-up of 31.7 m,75% underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The margin positivity and local recurrence rates were 21.4% and 35.7%, respectively. When compared to the 30 BRPC controls, the LAPC group had a higher rates of an arterial resection (11vs.1; p = 0.002), but the groups were similar with regard to all other preoperative and intraoperative variables (p < 0.05). Perioperative morbidity rates were similar (25.9%vs21.4%; p = 0.53). The LAPC and BRPC groups were also equivalent with respect to median recurrence-free survival (9.0mo; 95%CI 6.3, 11.7vs.8.3mo; 95%CI 5.4, 11.2) and median overall survival (19.9mo; 95%CI 17.0, 22.7 vs. 19.9mo; 95%CI 14.8, 25.1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite a radiologic designation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, certain subtypes of LAPC warrant surgical exploration provided the operative surgeon is prepared for major arterial and/or venous resection. Pancreatectomy in these patients has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, similar to patients who are radiologically borderline resectable.

The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors

PURPOSE

To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience.

RESULTS

The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered.

CONCLUSIONS

ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Diagnostic Errors, Contributing Factors and Solutions

The purpose of this article is to review diagnostic errors in preoperative and post-operative imaging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), discuss contributing factors, and provide solutions that minimize errors. Accurate radiological staging and restaging of PDAC dictates surgical management and errors can have significant negative effects on patient care, such as missed vessel involvement or metastatic disease that would preclude surgery. Familiarity with these errors and their contributing factors improves diagnostic accuracy and ultimately leads to improved patient outcomes.

New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS)

The symposium "New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer" was held during the 33nd meeting of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) in 2021 to discuss the potential modifications that could be made in the current resectability classification. The meeting focused on setting the foundation for developing a new prognosis-based resectability classification that is based on the tumor biology and the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The symposium included selected experts from Western and Eastern high-volume centers who have discussed their concept of resectability status through published literature. During the symposium, presenters reported new resectability classifications from their respective institutions based on tumor biology, conditional status, pathology, and genetics, in addition to anatomical tumor involvement. Interestingly, experts from all the centers reached the agreement that anatomy alone is insufficient to define resectability in the current era of effective NAT. On behalf of the JSHBPS, we would like to summarize the content of the conference in this position paper. We also invite global experts as internal reviewers of this paper for intercontinental cooperation in creating an up-to-date, prognosis-based resectability classification that reflects the trends of contemporary clinical practice.

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and the second gastrointestinal cancer-related death in the United States. Early detection and accurate diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer are paramount in guiding treatment plans, as surgical resection can provide the only potential cure for this disease. The overall prognosis of pancreatic cancer is poor even in patients with resectable disease. The 5-year survival after surgical resection is ~10% in node-positive disease compared to ~30% in node-negative disease. The advancement of imaging studies and the multidisciplinary approach involving radiologists, gastroenterologists, advanced endoscopists, medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists have a major impact on the management of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasonography is essential in the diagnosis by obtaining tissue (FNA or FNB) and in the loco-regional staging of the disease. The advancement in EUS techniques has made this modality a critical adjunct in the management process of pancreatic cancer. In this review article, we provide an overall description of the role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Postoperative Refractory Diarrhea After Tailored Nerve Plexus Dissection Around the Major Visceral Arteries During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surgery, extended dissection of the nerve plexus (pl) around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or celiac artery (CA) is sometimes necessary. This consequently results in postoperative refractory diarrhea. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of extended nerve plexus dissection around major arteries on postoperative diarrhea.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. The frequency of diarrhea (defined as a condition requiring opioid antidiarrheal drug for at least 6 months after surgery) and its short- and long-term outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 200 consecutive patients who underwent PD, 78 (39.0%) developed postoperative refractory diarrhea (diarrhea group), and 73 of them (93.6%) underwent hemi-circumferential or more nerve dissection for SMA or CA; both plSMA and plCA dissection were associated with diarrhea. Borderline resectable artery (BR-A) PDAC was included more in the diarrhea group (32.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.001); however, the local recurrence rate in the diarrhea group was significantly lower than that in the non-diarrhea group (14.1% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.036). The completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. The pre-albumin level improved in 2 years, and 61.3% of patients with diarrhea could stop opioid antidiarrheal drugs within 3 years of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the frequency of diarrhea increased following nerve plexus dissection around arteries, diarrhea was controllable and resulted in a reduced local recurrence rate. Aggressive dissection of the nerve plexus may be justified for local disease control in BR-A PDAC.

Use of endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic cancer from 2000 to 2016

Background and study aims  Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Previous studies have suggested a survival benefit for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), an important tool for diagnosis and staging of PC. This study aims to describe EUS use over time and identify factors associated with EUS use and its impact on survival. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective review of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database linked with Medicare claims. EUS use, clinical and demographic characteristics were evaluated. Chi-squared analysis, Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and logistic regression were used to identify associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and EUS. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard ratios were used for survival analysis. Results  EUS use rose during the time period, from 7.4 % of patients in 2000 to 32.4 % in 2015. Patient diversity increased, with a rising share of older, non-White patients with higher Charlson comorbidity scores. Both clinical (receipt of other therapies, PC stage) and nonclinical factors (region of country, year of diagnosis) were associated with receipt of EUS. While EUS was associated with a survival improvement early in the study period, this effect did not persist for PC patients diagnosed in 2012 to 2015 (median survival 3 month ± standard deviation [SD] 9.8 months without vs. 4 months ± SD 8 months with EUS). Conclusions  Our data support previous studies, which suggest a survival benefit for EUS when it was infrequently used, but finds that benefit was attenuated as EUS became more widely available.

Development of a deep learning-based patient-specific target contour prediction model for markerless tumor positioning

PURPOSE

For pancreatic cancer patients, image guided radiation therapy and real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) techniques can deliver radiation to the target accurately. Currently, for the radiation therapy machine with kV X-ray imaging systems, internal markers must be implemented to facilitate tumor tracking. The purpose of this study was to develop a markerless deep learning-based pancreatic tumor positioning procedure for real-time tumor tracking with a kV X-ray imaging system.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fourteen pancreatic cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy from six fixed gantry angles with a gimbal-head radiotherapy system were included in this study. For a gimbal-head radiotherapy system, the three-dimensional (3D) intrafraction target position can be determined using an orthogonal kV X-ray imaging system. All patients underwent four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) simulations for treatment planning, which were divided into 10 respiratory phases. After a patient's 4DCT was acquired, for each X-ray tube angle, 10 digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) images were obtained. Then, a data augmentation procedure was conducted. The data augmentation procedure first rotated the CT volume around the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions from -3^° to 3^° in 1.5^° intervals. Then, the Super-SloMo model was adapted to interpolate 10 frames between respiratory phases. In total, the data augmentation procedure expanded the data scale 250-fold. In this study, for each patient, 12 datasets containing the DRR images from each specific X-ray tube angle based on the radiation therapy plan were obtained. The augmented dataset was randomly divided into training and testing datasets. The training dataset contained 2000 DRR images with clinical target volume (CTV) contours labeled for fine-tuning the pre-trained target contour prediction model. After the fine-tuning, the patient and X-ray tube angle-specific CTV contour prediction model was acquired. The testing dataset contained the remaining 500 images to evaluate the performance of the CTV contour prediction model. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between the area enclosed by the CTV contour and predicted contour was calculated to evaluate the model's contour prediction performance. The 3D position of the CTV was calculated based on the centroid of the contour in the orthogonal DRR images, and the 3D error of the prediction position was calculated to evaluate the CTV positioning performance. For each patient, the DSC results from 12 X-ray tube angles and 3D error from 6 gantry angles were calculated, representing the novelty of this study.

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviation (SD) of all patients' DSCs were 0.98 and 0.015, respectively. The mean and SD of the 3D error were 0.29 mm and 0.14 mm, respectively. The global maximum 3D error was 1.66 mm, and the global minimum DSC was 0.81. The mean calculation time for CTV contour prediction was 55 ms per image. This fulfills the requirement of RTTT.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the positioning accuracy and calculation efficiency, the presented procedure can provide a solution for markerless real-time tumor tracking for pancreatic cancer patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

SUMO Modification of PAF1/PD2 Enables PML Interaction and Promotes Radiation Resistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 (PAF1)/pancreatic differentiation 2 (PD2) is a core subunit of the human PAF1 complex (PAF1C) that regulates the RNA polymerase II function during transcriptional elongation. PAF1/PD2 has also been linked to the oncogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here, we report that PAF1/PD2 undergoes posttranslational modification (PTM) through SUMOylation, enhancing the radiation resistance of PDAC cells. We identified that PAF1/PD2 is preferentially modified by small ubiquitin-related modifier 1 (SUMO 1), and mutating the residues (K)-150 and 154 by site-directed mutagenesis reduces the SUMOylation. Interestingly, PAF1/PD2 was found to directly interact with the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein in response to radiation, and inhibition of PAF1/PD2 SUMOylation at K-150/154 affects its interaction with PML. Our results demonstrate that SUMOylation of PAF1/PD2 increased in the radiated pancreatic cancer cells. Furthermore, inhibition of SUMOylation or PML reduces the cell growth and proliferation of PDAC cells after radiation treatment. These results suggest that SUMOylation of PAF1/PD2 interacts with PTM for PDAC cell survival. Furthermore, abolishing the SUMOylation in PDAC cells enhances the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Overall, our results demonstrate a novel PTM and PAF1/PD2 interaction through SUMOylation, and inhibiting the SUMOylation of PAF1/PD2 enhance the therapeutic efficacy for PDAC.

Open radiofrequency ablation as upfront treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Requiem from a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Local ablation of pancreatic cancer has been suggested as an option to manage locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) although no robust evidence has been published to date to support its application. The aim of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) with patients receiving CHRT only.

METHODS

This is a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients with LAPC diagnosed by the Pancreas-Ablation-Team-Verona were randomly assigned to open RFA (Group A) or CHRT (Group B). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

One hundred LAPC patients were enrolled from January 2014 to August 2016. 33% of patients in Group A did not receive the designated procedure because of intraoperative findings of liver (18.7%) or peritoneal metastases (43.8%), or technical contraindications (37.5%). We did not observe any statistically significant survival benefit from RFA compared to CHRT, neither in terms of OS (medians of 14.2 months and 18.1 months, respectively, p = 0.639) nor PFS (medians of 8 months and 6 months respectively, p = 0.570). Mortality was nil and RFA-related morbidity was 15.6%. In 13% of subjects, conversion to surgery occurred (2 after RFA and 11 after CHRT).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first RCT evaluating the impact of upfront RFA in the multimodal treatment of LAPC. Compared to CHRT, RFA alone did not provide any advantage in terms of OS or PFS. It could be considered as a therapeutic option for LAPC within a multimodal context and after neoadjuvant therapies.

The clinical significance of esophagogastric varices in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of esophagogastric varices (EGV) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is not rare. However, its clinical significance has never been investigated. This study was aimed to explore the clinical implication and outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis comprising 224 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer managed from October 2012 to December 2019 at a tertiary medical center identified 35 patients who had presented with EGV. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed with special emphasis on comparison between patients with early-onset and late-onset EGV.

RESULTS

Patients with EGV had lower platelet count and a higher proportion of splenomegaly but no difference in overall survival in comparison to those without EGV. Patients with early-onset EGV had a poorer bleeding survival (hazard ratio, 8.347; CI, 2.509-27.772; p = 0.001) in comparison to those with late-onset EGV. On multivariate analysis, initial serum bilirubin, γ-Glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, cancer stage, and the response to cancer treatment determine the patient's survival. Patients with tumor invasion to superior mesenteric and portal vein are more likely to have esophageal varices (EV) (EV: 13/15 vs gastric varices [GV]: 4/20; p < 0.001); those with splenic vein invasion are more likely to have GV (EV: 4/15 vs GV: 20/20; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and early-onset EGV had poorer bleeding-free survival than those with late-onset EGV. Further studies are needed to clarify the benefits of the prophylactic intervention.

Pathological Features and Imaging Findings in Pancreatic Carcinoma In Situ

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the pathological features and imaging findings of pancreatic carcinoma in situ (PCIS).

METHODS

Twenty patients with PCIS were categorized as flat (F) (n = 6) and low papillary (LP) (n = 14) types.

RESULTS

None of F type and 8 (57%) of 14 with LP type lesions showed intraductal infiltrations of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) greater than 10 mm. None of F type and 3 (21%) of 14 with LP type lesions showed skip lesions in the MPD. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed irregular MPD stenoses in 5 (83%) of 6 with F and 13 (100%) of 13 with LP type lesions. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography determined that the median lengths of the irregular MPD stenoses were 3.6 mm for F, and 11.6 mm for LP type lesions. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography determined that the median lengths of the irregular MPD stenoses were 2.8 mm for F, and 14.3 mm for LP type lesions. Pancreatic cancer recurrences limited to the remnant pancreas occurred in 2 patients with LP type lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In LP type PCIS, intraductal infiltration of the MPD occurs frequently. There may be multiple lesions, and lesions may recur in the remnant pancreas. Long-term strict follow-up assessments should be implemented for LP type PCIS.

Essential updates 2019/2020: Multimodal treatment of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Current topics and updates in survival outcomes and prognostic factors

Overall survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is extremely poor. Therefore, the establishment of multimodal treatment strategies is indispensable for PDAC patients because surgical treatment alone could not contribute to the improvement of survival. In this review article, we focus on the current topics and advancement of the treatments for localized PDAC including resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC in accordance with the articles mainly published from 2019 to 2020. Reviewing the articles, the recent progress of multimodal treatments notably improves the prognosis of patients with localized PDAC. For resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemo or chemoradiation therapy, rather than upfront surgery, plays a key role, especially in patients with a large tumor, poor performance status, high tumor marker levels, peripancreatic lymph nodes metastasis, or neural invasion suspected on preoperative imaging. For borderline resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant treatments followed by surgery is a desirable approach, and maintenance of immunonutritional status during the treatments are also important. For locally advanced disease, conversion surgery has a central role in improving a survival outcome; however, its indication should be standardized.

A Prospective Multicenter Study of Partially Covered Metal Stents in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: BTS-NAC Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of partially covered self-expandable metallic stents (PCSEMS) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo(radio) therapy (NAC) for pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

This was a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCSEMS in patients receiving NAC for resectable and borderline resectable PC. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with PC (three with resectable PC and 23 with borderline resectable PC) who underwent NAC at seven Japanese centers were included in the analysis. Both the technical and functional success rates of PCSEMS placement were 100%. Early stent-related complications were observed in three patients (11.5%): mild pancreatitis (n=2) and mild liver abscess (n=1). The median time to surgery or palliation was 4.0 months. Surgical resection was eventually performed in 73.1% of patients, and stent removal during surgery was successful in all patients. RBO was observed in nine patients (34.6%): seven with stent occlusion, one with kinking and one with migration. The RBO rates in resected cases and nonresected cases were 36.8% and 28.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary drainage by PCSEMS was safe and feasible in patients undergoing NAC for resectable and borderline resectable PC.

MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The detection of liver metastases is important for pancreatic cancer curative treatment eligibility. The data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer liver metastases. However, MRI is not currently recommended in multiple published guidelines.

PURPOSE

To perform a comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CT and MRI for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and multiple radiology society meeting archives were searched until November 2018. Comparative design studies reporting on liver CT and MRI accuracy for detection of pancreatic cancer liver metastases in the same cohort were included.

FIELD STRENGTH

1.5T or 3.0T.

ASSESSMENT

Demographic, methodologic, and diagnostic test accuracy data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Accuracy metrics were obtained using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of different covariates on accuracy estimates was assessed using a meta-regression model. Covariates included modality, study design, tumor characteristics, risk of bias, and imaging protocols.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 987 patients with pancreatic cancer (205 with liver metastases) were included. Sensitivity for CT and MRI was 45% (confidence intervals [95% CI] 21-71%) and 83% (95% CI 74-88%), respectively. Specificity for CT and MRI was 94% (95% CI 84-98%) and 96% (95% CI 93-97%), respectively. The greater observed sensitivity of MRI was preserved in the meta-regression model (P = 0.01), while no difference in specificity was detected (P = 0.16). CT sensitivity was highest for triphasic and quadriphasic examinations compared to single phase or biphasic protocols (P = 0.03). Most studies were at high risk of bias.

DATA CONCLUSION

MRI is more sensitive than CT for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection, accounting for confounding variables. Consideration of this finding in clinical practice guidelines is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Diffuse Pancreatic Carcinoma with Hepatic Metastases

Pancreatic cancer is one of the seven leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Diffuse pancreatic carcinoma is very rare and underreported in the literature. Many advances have been made in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. However, most pancreatic cancer cases are detected at the terminal or metastatic stages. Therefore, timely diagnosis and therapeutic management are desirable goals for this disease. Although the proliferation of pancreatic cancer has been reduced by intervention, more work is needed to treat and prevent the disease. The purpose of this article is to present a case of a 54-year-old male with pancreatic cancer and to review the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of pancreatic tumors in general as well as pancreatic carcinoma in particular.

Conversion Therapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The Case Series and Literature Review

Background

Pancreatic cancer has a high incidence and mortality. Most patients are in an advanced stage at the time of initial diagnosis and cannot be cured by a single surgery. The ASCO clinical practice guideline emphasized the overall management and multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment which put forward the concept of conversion therapy. In this paper, the real-world observation and study were carried out to explore the conversion effect of chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and their long-term survival.

Methods

The subjects of this study are advanced pancreatic cancer patients who visited the oncology department of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital from 2015 to 2019. Collected and summarized the cases, and selected 5 representative patients for analysis, all of them received standard treatment (FOLFIRINOX, AS, AG, or GS). The progress, clinical evaluation, adverse reactions, and prognosis of these patients after conversion therapy were analyzed and discussed in conjunction with relevant literature.

Results

Five patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received conversion therapy with an average survival time of 29.8 months, two of them received surgical treatment, and postoperative evaluations were pathological complete response (pCR). The tolerance of chemotherapy was good in five patients, and no serious adverse reactions of grade 3 or 4 occurred.

Conclusion

Conversion therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer strives for surgical opportunities of radical resection, prolongs survival and improves quality of life.

Value of CT-Guided Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation Added to FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Post Hoc Comparison

PURPOSE

To compare survival after CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) and folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) chemotherapy versus FOLFIRINOX only in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A post hoc comparison was performed of data derived from a prospective IRE-FOLFIRINOX cohort and a retrospective FOLFIRINOX-only cohort. All patients received a minimum of 3 cycles of FOLFIRINOX for LAPC and were considered eligible for CT-guided percutaneous IRE. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local and distant progression-free survival, and time to progression (TTP) and were compared using stratified Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients who received > 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX before IRE and who had tumors > 6 cm in the FOLFIRINOX-only group were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 103 patients with a diagnosis of LAPC, 52 were deemed eligible (n = 30 IRE-FOLFIRINOX and n = 22 FOLFIRINOX-only). Patients in the FOLFIRINOX-only arm had larger tumors (53 mm ± 19 vs 38 mm ± 7, P = .340), had more locoregional lymph node metastases (23% vs 7%, P = .622), and more often received radiotherapy (7 patients vs 2 patients, P = .027); all other baseline characteristics were comparable. Median OS was 17.0 months (range, 5-35 mo; SD = 6) for IRE-FOLFIRINOX versus 12.4 months (range, 3-22 mo; SD = 6) for FOLFIRINOX-only (P = .038). After sensitivity analyses, median OS was 17.2 months (range, 6-27 mo; SD = 6) versus 12.4 months (range, 7-32 mo; SD = 10) (P = .05). Median TTP was longer in the IRE-FOLFIRINOX group: 14.2 months (range, 5-25 mo; SD = 4) versus 5.2 months (range, 2-22; SD = 6) (P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LAPC after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, CT-guided percutaneous IRE may improve OS and TTP. This study may facilitate the design of randomized controlled trials to compare survival after IRE-FOLRINOX versus FOLFIRINOX-only.

CT-determined resectability of borderline resectable and unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma following FOLFIRINOX therapy

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the ability of CT-determined resectability, as defined by a recent version of NCCN criteria, and associated CT findings to predict margin-negative (R0) resection in patients with PDAC after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients (36 men and 28 women; mean age, 58.8 years) with borderline resectable or unresectable PDAC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were evaluated retrospectively. CT findings were independently assessed by two abdominal radiologists according to NCCN criteria (version 3. 2019). Tumor resectability was classified as resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable, and change in resectability was classified as regression, stability, or progression. The associations of R0 resection rate with CT-determined resectability and change in resectability categories were evaluated, as were the sensitivity and specificity of NCCN criteria for R0 resection. Factors associated with R0 resection were identified by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

R0 resection rate did not differ significantly among the resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable PDAC (67-73%, p = 0.95) or among PDAC with regression, stability, or progression (56-77%, p = 0.39). The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were 67% and 37%, respectively, for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21%, respectively, for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with R0 resection (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CT-determined resectability after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy was relatively insensitive and non-specific for predicting R0 resection. Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery may increase the ability of CT to predict R0 resection.

KEY POINTS

• Margin-negative resection rate of pancreatic cancer following FOLFIRINOX therapy did not differ among each resectability (67-73%, p = 0.95) based on NCCN criteria or changes in resectability categories (56-77%, p = 0.39). • The sensitivity and specificity for margin-negative resection were 67% and 37% for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21% for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). • Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with margin-negative resection (p = 0.01).

Preoperative Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Various inflammatory markers have been investigated for a prognostic role in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. However, the value of preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of PLR as a preoperative prognostic factor for resectable pancreatic cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature search was conducted for studies assessing PLR influence as a preoperative prognostic factor in resectable pancreatic cancer patients. Random-effects model was applied for pooling hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Fourteen articles with 2,743 patients were included in the study. According to the analysis, high PLR had no correlation with decreased OS. Due to high heterogeneity among studies, subgroup analysis was performed. Better OS was associated with low PLR in Asian patients, patients with mixed type of operation performed, and patients with preoperative PLR ≤150. Low PLR was associated with significantly better DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

PLR is a predictive factor of better DFS in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. However, available evidence does not support PLR as a reliable prognostic factor for OS.

Recurrence Patterns for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma after Upfront Resection Versus Resection Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) represents a paradigm shift in the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with perceived benefits including a higher R0 rate. However, it is unclear whether NAT affects the sites and patterns of recurrence after surgery. This review seeks to compare sites and patterns of recurrence after resection between patients undergoing upfront surgery (US) or after NAT. Methods: The EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched to identify eligible studies that compare recurrence patterns between patients who had NAT (followed by resection) with those that had US. The primary outcome included site-specific recurrence. Results: 26 articles were identified including 4986 patients who underwent resection. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC, 47% 1074/2264) was the most common, followed by resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC 42%, 949/2264). The weighted overall recurrence rates were lower among the NAT group, 63.4% vs. 74% (US) (OR 0.67 (CI 0.52–0.87), p = 0.006). The overall weighted locoregional recurrence rate was lower amongst patients who received NAT when compared to US (12% vs. 27% OR 0.39 (CI 0.22–0.70), p = 0.004). In BRPC, locoregional recurrence rates improved with NAT (NAT 25.8% US 37.7% OR 0.62 (CI 0.44–0.87), p = 0.007). NAT was associated with a lower weighted liver recurrence rate (NAT 19.4% US 30.1% OR 0.55 (CI 0.34–0.89), p = 0.023). Lung and peritoneal recurrence rates did not differ between NAT and US cohorts (p = 0.705 and p = 0.549 respectively). NAT was associated with a significantly longer weighted mean time to first recurrence 18.8 months compared to US (15.7 months) (OR 0.18 (CI 0.05–0.32), p = 0.015). Conclusion: NAT was associated with lower overall recurrence rate and improved locoregional disease control particularly for those with BRPC. Although the burden of liver metastases was less, there was no overall effect upon distant metastatic disease.

Long-term survival after hepatectomy for metachronous liver metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a case report

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most aggressive malignancies. The prognosis for recurrence after surgery is extremely unfavorable, and liver metastasis of PDAC confers poor prognosis despite resection.

Case presentation

A 51-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for further examination and treatment, including surgery for a pancreatic tumor. On close inspection, he was suspected to have pancreatic head cancer without enlarged lymph nodes or distant metastasis, and pancreatoduodenectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed. A postoperative pathological examination revealed well-differentiated invasive ductal adenocarcinoma with lymph node metastasis (stage IIB; pT2N1M0). Postoperatively, he received adjuvant chemotherapy containing gemcitabine for 1 year. Eight years after the radical surgery, his serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was elevated, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed 10-mm mass in liver segment 5. Positron emission tomography/CT also revealed high fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake only in this hepatic tumor. Accordingly, the patient was diagnosed with a solitary liver metastasis of PDAC. As the liver metastasis was isolated and identified long after the initial surgery, we decided to resect it using laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of segment 5. Histopathological examination confirmed liver metastasis of PDAC and the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1. No evidence of recurrence has been seen for 11 years since the pancreatoduodenectomy and 3 years since the hepatic resection.

Conclusions

Cases of metachronous liver metastasis of PDAC after radical surgery, in which patients exhibit long-term survival without recurrence after hepatectomy, are extremely rare. Hepatectomy may confer long-term survival, and the time to postoperative recurrence and the number of liver metastases may be useful criteria for deciding whether to perform hepatic resection.

Surgical resection of metastatic pancreatic cancer: is it worth it?-a 15-year experience at a single Chinese center

Background

The significance of surgical resection in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently unclear. This study aimed to summarize and clarify the experience of surgical treatment of M1 PDAC in our center and evaluate whether it may offer benefits to some metastatic PDAC patients.

Methods

We analyzed the data of the patients with M1 PDAC who underwent synchronous tumor resection between 2003 and 2014 at Ruijin Hospital. Simultaneously, clinical data for M1 PDAC patients who underwent palliative bypass or exploratory laparotomy only was also collected during the same period as control. Every patient was followed up at least 3 years after hospitalization. The follow-up endpoint was December 31, 2017.

Results

A total of 36 patients underwent synchronous tumor resection; of them, 7 received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Their 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 27.3%, 21.2%, and 7.1%, respectively, and the overall survival was 7.9 months. The overall survival of the palliative bypass and exploratory laparotomy groups was only 4 and 3.7 months, respectively (P<0.05).

Conclusions

It is unclear whether synchronous tumor resection can benefit M1 PDAC patients due to tumor heterogeneity and differences in tumor burden. However, our current experience indicated that synchronous tumor resection can be safely performed and might be appropriate for some highly selected patients due to the relatively longer survival time. Combined (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy would further prolong overall survival in these patients.

Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

The 8th edition AJCC T stage criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are now size based. These criteria provide better prognostic stratification in patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Our aim was to determine if gross tumor size is prognostically significant using the 8th ed. staging criteria for neoadjuvant treated PDAC. The study included 289 patients who underwent resection for PDAC following neoadjuvant therapy. By AJCC 7th ed., there were 12 (4.2%) ypT0, 32 (11.1%) ypT1, 64 (22.1%) ypT2, and 181 (62.6%) ypT3 patients. By AJCC 8th ed., there were 12 (4.2%) ypT0, 74 (25.6%) ypT1 (6 ypT1a, 1 ypT1b, 67 ypT1c), 161 (55.7%) ypT2, and 42 (14.5%) ypT3 patients. 182 patients had negative lymph nodes and 107 had positive lymph nodes. 77 patients were ypN1 and 30 were ypN2 by 8th ed. criteria. 7th ed. T stage significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.048), while 8th ed. T stage did not correlate with OS (p = 0.13). In ypN0 patients, neither the 7th ed. or 8th ed. T stages significantly correlated with patient OS (p = 0.065 and 0.26, respectively). Higher 7th ed. T stage correlated with lymph node status (p ≤ 0.001) more strongly than 8th ed. T stage (p = 0.04). 7th ed. and 8th ed. N stage correlated with OS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). By 8th ed. AJCC staging criteria, gross tumor size does not provide good prognostic stratification in neoadjuvant therapy PDAC. Mapped grossing techniques combining gross and microscopic examination to determine tumor size may provide more accurate staging of neoadjuvant treated tumors.

Measurement of Pancreatic Fat Fraction by CT Histogram Analysis to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield unit histogram analysis (HUHA) in postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) prediction.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-four patients (33 males and 21 females; mean age, 65.6 years; age range, 37–89 years) who had undergone preoperative CT and pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists measured mean CT Hounsfield unit (CTHU) values by drawing regions of interest (ROIs) at the level of the pancreaticojejunostomy site on preoperative pre-contrast images. The HUHA values were arbitrarily divided into three categories, comprising HUHA-A ≤ 0 HU, 0 HU < HUHA-B < 30 HU, and HUHA-C ≥ 30 HU. Each HUHA value within the ROI was calculated as a percentage of the entire area using commercial 3-dimensional analysis software. Pancreas texture was evaluated as soft or hard by manual palpation.

Results

Fifteen patients (27.8%) had clinically relevant PFs. The PF group had significantly higher HUHA-A (p < 0.01) and significantly lower mean CTHU (p < 0.01) values than those of the non-PF group. The HUHA-A value had a moderately strong correlation with PF occurrence (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), whereas the mean CTHU had a weak negative correlation with PF occurrence (r = −0.27, p < 0.01). The HUHA-A and mean CTHU areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting PF occurrence were 0.86 and 0.65, respectively, with significant difference (p < 0.01). The HUHA-A and mean CTHU AUCs for predicting pancreatic softness were 0.86 and 0.64, respectively, with significant difference (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The HUHA-A values on preoperative pre-contrast CT images demonstrate a strong correlation with PF occurrence.

Is the involvement of the hepatic artery lymph node a poor prognostic factor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of hepatic artery lymph node (HALN) involvement on the survival of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study analyzing patients who underwent PD for PA. Patients were included if, during PD, the HALN was submitted for pathologic evaluation. Patients were stratified by node status: PPLN- (peripancreatic lymph node)/HALN-, PPLN+/HALN- and PPLN+/HALN+. Survival analysis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression was used for risk factors analyses.

RESULTS

Out of the 118 patients who underwent PD for PA, HALN status was analyzed in 64 patients. The median follow-up was 20months (r: 1-159months). HALN and PPLN were negative in 12patients (PPLN-/HALN-, 19%), PPLN was positive and HALN negative in 40patients (PPLN+/HALN-, 62%), PPLN and HALN were positive in 12 patients (PPLN+/HALN+, 19%) and PPLN was negative and HALN positive in 0 patients (PPLN-/HALN+, 0%). The overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates were statistically better in the PPLN-/HALN- group (82%, 72%, 54%) than in the PPLN+/HALN- group (68%, 29%, 21%) and the PPLN+/HALN+ group (72%, 9%, 9%, respectively) (P=.001 vs P=.007). The 1, 3 and 5-year probabilities of cumulative recurrence were also statistically better in the PPLN-/HALN- group (18%, 46%, 55%) than in the PPLN+/HALN- group (57%, 80%, 89%) and the PPLN+/HALN+ group (46%, 91%, 100%, respectively) (P=.006 vs P=.021). In the multivariate model, the main risk factor for overall survival and recurrence was lymphatic invasion, regardless of HALN status.

CONCLUSIONS

In pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with lymph node disease, survival after PD is comparable regardless of HALN status.