Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes

Clinical analysis of metaplastic breast carcinoma with distant metastases: A multi‑centre experience

Metaplastic breast cancer (BC-Mp), which includes a range of epithelial and mixed epithelial-mesenchymal tumours, are rare malignancies with an unfavourable prognosis. The limited literature on BC-Mp focuses mainly on retrospective data for radically treated patients. Notably absent are studies dedicated to the palliative treatment of BC-Mp with distant metastases. The present retrospective study investigated treatment modalities and prognosis in a multi-centre cohort of 31 female participants diagnosed with distant metastatic BC-Mp, including 7 patients with de novo metastatic disease. The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 33-87 years), with 38.7% presenting local lymph node involvement. Lungs were the most common site for the metastatic disease (61.3%). Median Ki-67 index was 50% (range, 35-70%), and 80.7% of cases were classified as grade 3. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ and estrogen receptor+ were detected in 12.9 and 6.5% of cases, respectively. A total of 62.4% of patients received first-line palliative systemic treatment. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) were 38.5 and 19.2%, respectively. Receiving ≥1 line of palliative treatment was significantly associated with improved OS (P<0.001). Factors such as age, Ki-67 index, HER2 or hormonal status, presence of specific epithelial or mesenchymal components, location of metastases or chemotherapy regimen type did not influence OS. The present study provided insights into the clinicopathological profile, systemic treatment experience, prognostic factors and OS data of BC-Mp with distant metastases, emphasizing the imperative for clinical trials in this population.

Starfysh integrates spatial transcriptomic and histologic data to reveal heterogeneous tumor-immune hubs

Spatially resolved gene expression profiling provides insight into tissue organization and cell-cell crosstalk; however, sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics (ST) lacks single-cell resolution. Current ST analysis methods require single-cell RNA sequencing data as a reference for rigorous interpretation of cell states, mostly do not use associated histology images and are not capable of inferring shared neighborhoods across multiple tissues. Here we present Starfysh, a computational toolbox using a deep generative model that incorporates archetypal analysis and any known cell type markers to characterize known or new tissue-specific cell states without a single-cell reference. Starfysh improves the characterization of spatial dynamics in complex tissues using histology images and enables the comparison of niches as spatial hubs across tissues. Integrative analysis of primary estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) tissues led to the identification of spatial hubs with patient- and disease-specific cell type compositions and revealed metabolic reprogramming shaping immunosuppressive hubs in aggressive MBC.

Chemotherapy is of prognostic significance to metaplastic breast cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the significance of chemotherapy (CT) among metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC), and to compare the survival outcomes between triple negative MpBC (MpBC-TNBC) and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC-TNBC). SEER database was indexed to identify female unilateral primary MpBC diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Patients were classified into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with response (NAC-response), NAC-no response, adjuvant chemotherapy, and no CT. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Cox regression was used to evaluate the independent prognostic factors. A 1:4 propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline differences. Altogether 1186 MpBC patients were enrolled, among them 181 received NAC, 647 received adjuvant CT and 358 did not receive any CT. Chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor. NAC-response and adjuvant CT had a significant or an obvious trend of survival improvement compared with NAC-no response or no CT. MpBC-TNBC was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor compared with IDC-TNBC. Among them, there was significant or trend of survival improvement among all TNBCs receiving NAC or adjuvant CT compared with no CT. Chemotherapy was of important significance to MpBC prognosis and should be integrated in comprehensive treatment for MpBC.

A Single-Center 18-Year Series of 73 Cases of Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast

Aim

To examine the clinical management of metaplastic breast cancer (MeBC), particularly the role of chemotherapy.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with MeBC (n = 73) from a tertiary breast cancer center: the "Centre des Maladies du Sein of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval." The specimens were reviewed by two pathologists. Patient and tumor characteristics, systemic therapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were recorded.

Results

The median follow-up was 57.2 months. The mean tumor size was 39.5 ± 32.1 (range, 1-200) mm. Most were in grade 3 (75.3%), without evidence of clinical nodal involvement (75.3%), and triple-negative (79.5%). Chemotherapy was given to 49 (67.1%) patients. Thirty-seven patients (50.7%) underwent a mastectomy, and 22/37 (59.5%) received radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 36 patients (49.3%), and nine (12.3%) patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 60.2% and 66.8%. Among the nine patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, three (33.3%) achieved a partial response, three (33.3%) had stable disease, and three (33.3%) had disease progression. The use of chemotherapy, especially in the adjuvant setting, had a significant positive effect on 5-year OS (P=0.003) and 5-year DFS (P=0.004). Nodal involvement was associated with worse OS (P=0.049) but similar DFS (P=0.157). Lumpectomy was associated with better 5-year OS (P < 0.0001) and DFS (P=0.0002) compared with mastectomy.

Conclusion

MeBC represents a rare heterogeneous group of malignancies with poor prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS and DFS. Patients should be carefully selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Sonographic and clinicopathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a comparative single-center cohort study

Background

The rarity of metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) has resulted in limited sonographic data. Given the inferior prognosis of MBC compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), accurate preoperative differentiation between the two is imperative for effective treatment planning and prognostic prediction. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MBC and differentiate it from IDC by analyzing sonographic and clinicopathologic features.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 197 women comprising 200 IDC lesions were enrolled between January 2012 and December 2021 and 20 women comprising 20 pure MBC lesions were enrolled between January 2019 and December 2019. A comparison was made between the sonographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of MBC and IDC.

Results

The results indicated that patients with MBC had a higher proportion of tumor grade 3 (95.0% vs. 32.5%; P<0.001), high Ki-67 expression (100.0% vs. 75.0%; P<0.001), and the triple-negative subtype (90.0% vs. 13.0%; P<0.001) as compared to those with IDC. On ultrasound (US) findings, MBC lesions tended to have a larger size (≥5 cm: 45.0% vs. 1.5%; P<0.001), regular shape (45.0% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001), circumscribed margin (40.0% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001), a complex cystic and solid echo pattern (50.0% vs. 3.5%; P<0.001), and posterior acoustic enhancement (95.0% vs. 14.5%; P<0.001). Additionally, MBC was more likely to be misinterpreted as a benign lesion by sonographers than was IDC (30.0% vs. 4.5%; P<0.001). Multilayer perceptron analysis revealed posterior acoustic enhancement, circumscribed margins, and size as distinguishing factors between these two tumor types. The estimated rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 5-year overall survival in 19 cases with MBC were found to be 10.5%, 31.6%, and 65.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

MBC typically presents as a large breast mass with more benign US features in older women, findings which may facilitate its accurate diagnosis and differentiation from other breast masses.

Outcomes of Metaplastic Breast Cancer Versus Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the survival outcomes of metaplastic breast cancer (MPBC) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and identify prognostic factors that influence the survival outcomes of MPBC patients and TNBC patients.

METHODS

Patients with nonmetastatic MPBC or TNBC were reviewed from our database. Patients' clinicopathologic and molecular features were analyzed with respect to outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) with a one-to-three matching between MPBC patients and TNBC patients was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 857 female patients (76 MPBC patients and 781 TNBC patients) were included in this study. A subgroup of triple-negative MPBC (n  =  60) was matched with TNBC (n  =  180) cases based on patient characteristics and treatments. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the MPBC group was associated with worse OS and DFS before (P  =  0.0046 both) and after (P  =  0.011 and P  =  0.0046, respectively) PSM. Multivariable analysis revealed that a higher T stage (T > 2) (P  =  0.032) and higher lymph node stage (N3 vs. N0-2, P  =  0.012) were associated with worse OS after PSM. For DFS, the MPBC group (P  =  0.012), higher T stage (T > 2) (P  =  0.032), and higher lymph node stage (N3 vs. N0-2, P  =  0.045) were associated with worse DFS. Among the 76 MPBC patients, a higher T stage and mesenchymal differentiation were associated with worse OS (pT1/2 vs. pT3/4 and mesenchymal differentiation vs. other subtypes, P  =  0.007 and P  =  0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TNBC, MPBC was associated with worse OS and DFS. Mesenchymal differentiation has a worse DFS than other subtypes of MPBC.

Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Current Understanding and Future Directions

Metaplastic breast cancers (MBC) encompass a group of highly heterogeneous tumors which share the ability to differentiate into squamous, mesenchymal or neuroectodermal components. While often termed rare breast tumors, given the relatively high prevalence of breast cancer, they are seen with some frequency. Depending upon the definition applied, MBC represents 0.2% to 1% of breast cancers diagnosed in the United States. Less is known about the epidemiology of MBC globally, though a growing number of reports are providing information on this. These tumors are often more advanced at presentation relative to breast cancer broadly. While more indolent subtypes exist, the majority of MBC subtypes are associated with inferior survival. MBC is most commonly of triple-negative phenotype. In less common hormone receptor positive MBCs, hormone receptor status appears not to be prognostic. In contrast, relatively rare HER2-positive MBCs are associated with superior outcomes. Multiple potentially targetable molecular features are overrepresented in MBC including DNA repair deficiency signatures and PIK3/AKT/mTOR and WNT pathways alterations. Data on the prevalence of targets for novel antibody-drug conjugates is also emerging. While chemotherapy appears to be less active in MBC than in other breast cancer subtypes, efficacy is seen in some MBCs. Disease-specific trials, as well as reports of exceptional responses, may provide clues for novel approaches to this often hard-to-treat breast cancer. Strategies which harness newer research tools, such as large data and artificial intelligence hold the promise of overcoming historic barriers to the study of uncommon tumors and could markedly advance disease-specific understanding in MBC.

Multimodal Imaging Features and Prognosis of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is an infrequent malignancy with an unfavorable prognosis, and there is a paucity of research on the multimodal imaging features of MBC. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the multimodal imaging features, clinicopathological characteristics, and prognosis of MBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 36 patients with histologically confirmed MBC from 2012 to 2021 were included in the study. We analyzed the pre-treatment multimodal imaging features, including mammography, ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as clinicopathology and prognosis of MBC. Follow-up data included local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS) rate.

RESULTS

MBC patients had a median age of 51 years at diagnosis. The most common histologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma, with 86.1% of MBC being histological grade 3 and triple negative. The most common mammographic findings were irregular shape, non-calcification, and high density. The predominant US findings included irregular shape, parallel orientation, posterior acoustic enhancement, and hypoecho. On MRI, most masses exhibited irregular shape, spiculate margin, heterogeneous enhancement, Type II time intensity curve, and diffusion restriction on diffusion weighted images determined by apparent diffusion coefficient. According to breast imaging reporting and data system, mammography suggested malignancy in 50% of cases, US indicated a moderate to high suspicion of malignancy in 77.8% of cases, MRI revealed malignancy in all cases. At a median follow-up time of 48 months (range, 8-122 months) for 35 MBC patients, the local recurrence, distant metastasis, and OS rates were 11.4%, 28.6%, and 67.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The benign features of MBC on mammography and US may cause misinterpretation. However, the inclusion of malignant features observed on MRI can improve diagnostic accuracy.

Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Axillary Breast With Heterologous Mesenchymal (Chondroid) Differentiation: A Difficult Case and Literature Review

Metaplastic breast carcinoma is an invasive carcinoma with a high differentiation rate of the neoplastic epithelium toward mesenchymal-like epithelium. It comprises of only less than 1% of all breast cancers. Although 80% to 90% of metaplastic breast carcinomas are triple-negative cancers, they usually have worse outcomes than other triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Metaplastic carcinoma is also often refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Here, we reported a case of a 61-year-old female patient, presenting with a solitary and pedunculated mass in the right axillary tail breast tissue, whose biopsy revealed metaplastic breast carcinoma with chondroid differentiation. She had failed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Although she received debulking surgery, the tumor regrew even faster before surgery. Despite receiving palliative chemotherapy, the patient died 11 weeks after surgery. This case draws attention to physicians that early recognition and surgery may be more beneficial than chemotherapy in combating metaplastic breast carcinoma.

Presentation and treatment of a rare case of metaplastic breast cancer: A case report

Breast carcinosarcoma, also known as metaplastic breast cancer, is one of the rarest types of breast cancer. It is an aggressive and poor prognostic breast cancer compared to triple-negative breast cancer. Due to the lack of specific and prescribed treatment, it could threaten patients' lives, especially women worldwide. There are various diagnostic methods, such as multiple imaging and pathology methods, to diagnose breast cancers. Still, considering the common appearance characteristic of this type of breast cancer with other types, histopathology is the most definitive way. There is no standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for this rare type of breast cancer. In this article, we reported the case of a 62-year-old female with a final diagnosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma and her surgical and medical treatment method.

Metaplastic breast cancer: an all-round multidisciplinary consensus

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare and aggressive histologic subtype of breast cancer (BC) characterized by the presence of at least two cellular types, commonly epithelial and mesenchymal components. Despite growing evidence that MpBC is a unique entity, it has long been treated as a variant of nonspecial type (NST) BC. MpBC typically shows the phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but compared to NST-TNBC, it is a relatively chemorefractory tumor associated with worse outcomes. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop management guidelines specifically for MpBC to improve the prognosis of patients with early MpBC. This expert consensus aims to guide diagnosis and standardize clinical management of early MpBC among treating physicians. We provide guidance on the challenging radiological and pathological diagnosis of MpBC. Evidence on the involvement of genetic predisposition in the development of MpBC is also explored. We emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of patients with early MpBC. The optimal surgery and radiotherapy approach is presented, as well as the opportunity offered by novel therapeutic approaches to increase treatment response in this chemoresistant subtype. Appropriate management of patients with MpBC is critical to reduce the high risk of local and distant recurrence that characterizes this disease.

The mixed subtype has a worse prognosis than other histological subtypes: a retrospective analysis of 217 patients with metaplastic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an aggressive subtype of all breast cancer. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features, treatments and prognoses of MpBC patients.

METHODS

We collected the data from MpBC patients diagnosed at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2017. Kaplan Meier curves and Cox regression model were used to evaluating clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. After removing baseline differences by propensity score matching (PSM), we analyzed the prognosis between MpBC patients and invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDC-NST) patients.

RESULTS

A total of 217 MpBC patients were subsumed. Of all histological subtypes, 45.1% were mixed subtypes, followed by with mesenchymal differentiation (27.2%), pure squamous (15.2%) and pure spindle (12.4%) subtypes. 69.6% of MpBC were triple-negative, 25.3% and 6.5% were HR-positive and HER2-positive. MpBC patients had worse survival compared to IDC-NST patients, with 5-year RFS of 73.8 and 83.6% (HR = 1.177 95%CI (1.171-2.676) P = 0.0068), and 5-year BCSS of 79.0% and 89.7% (HR = 2.187 95%CI (1.357-3.523) P = 0.0013). In the multivariate COX model, AJCC stage, mixed subtype and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Mixed MpBC is more aggressive than pure and with heterologous mesenchymal differentiation subtypes. And whether squamous or spindle MpBC, mixed forms have shorter outcomes than pure forms.

CONCLUSIONS

MpBCs are associated with poorer prognoses than IDC-NSTs. They are heterogeneous with different clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes between histological subtypes. Pure and with heterologous mesenchymal differentiation subtypes have more survival benefits than the mixed subtype.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Metaplastic Breast Cancer Compared with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an aggressive histologic type of breast cancer. Although MpBC has a poor prognosis and is responsible for a large proportion of breast cancer mortalities, the clinical features of MpBC compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) are not well known, and the optimal treatment has not been identified.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 155 MpBC patients and 16,251 IDC cases who underwent breast cancer surgery in a single institution between January 1994 and December 2019. The two groups were matched 1:4 by age, tumor size, nodal status, hormonal receptor status, and HER2 status using propensity-score matching (PSM). Finally, 120 MpBC patients were matched with 478 IDC patients. Disease-free survival and overall survival of MpBC and IDC patients both before and after PSM were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival, and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify variables affecting long-term prognosis.

RESULTS

The most common subtype of MpBC was triple-negative breast cancer, and nuclear and histologic grades were higher than those of IDC. Pathologic nodal staging of the metaplastic group was significantly lower than that of the ductal group, and more frequent adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in the metaplastic group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that MpBC was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (HR = 2.240; 95% CI, 1.476-3.399, p = 0.0002) and overall survival (HR = 1.969; 95% CI, 1.147-3.382, p = 0.0140). However, survival analysis revealed no significant difference between MpBC and IDC patients in disease-free survival (HR = 1.465; 95% CI, 0.882-2.432, p = 0.1398) or overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.542; 95% confidential interval (CI), 0.875-2.718, p = 0.1340) after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Although the MpBC histologic type had poor prognostic factors compared with IDC, it can be treated according to the same principles as aggressive IDC.

Mixed metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a case report

A 68 year-old woman with no significant medical history discovered a lump incidentally in her left breast. The patient's initial imaging revealed a 4.6-cm irregular mass at 11:00 categorized as a BI-RADS 5 as well as an enlarged axillary lymph node and an area of 2.5 cm of heterogeneous calcifications in the 3 o'clock position. The 4.6-cm lesion was revealed to be infiltrating ductal carcinoma with a squamous component, mixed metaplastic carcinoma, which was strongly ER (100+)/PR (100+) positive, HER-2/Neu negative on FISH. The 2.5-cm calcifications were ductal carcinoma in situ. The patient completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and had an excellent response. After further discussion, the patient elected for breast conservation therapy and underwent a left wireless localized partial mastectomy with a left axillary dissection. Surgical pathology revealed a near complete pathologic response with only 8-mm residual tumour as well as a negative conversion of the clipped axillary node.

Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer Successfully Treated with Adriamycin and Cisplatin

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is characterized by the histological presence of a mixture of epithelial and mesenchymal-like elements. However, MBC responds poorly to chemotherapy. Due to its rarity, there is no well-defined treatment for MBC. Herein, we report the case of a 56-year-old woman who underwent a mastectomy and was diagnosed with MBC with osseous differentiation classified as pT4N0M1. After the operation, she was treated with adriamycin and cisplatin, which are standard osteosarcoma treatments, resulting in a partial response. However, to determine the proper chemotherapy treatment, knowledge of the metaplastic elements of the tumor is required.

Metaplastic breast cancer: A review

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an uncommon aggressive malignancy that is associated with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, the relationships between the clinical and pathological features of MpBC, treatment approach, and clinical outcomes remain underexplored. In the following review article, we synthesize the existing data on the clinical, pathological and genomic features, management, and outcomes of MpBC. We also identify potential targets for future clinical trials.

Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Mesenchymal Subtype Has Worse Survival Outcomes

Background

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare type of breast cancer that accounts for 0.2-1% of all breast cancers. To date, there are only few institutional studies comparing survival rates between different subtypes. In this retrospective cohort study, we aim to evaluate factors effecting survival rates of different subtypes of MBC.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study observed 118 nonmetastatic MBC patient records extracted from 15,244 breast cancer cases between December 2000 and December 2020. In order to analyze factors effecting survival rates of mesenchymal subtype of MBC, all cases are classified as mesenchymal (n = 45) and other (n = 48). Twenty-five cases could not be sub-classified due to the missing data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to define factors associated with survival rates.

Results

Of the 15,244 cases, 118 (0.8%) were nonmetastatic MBC. 105 were triple negative and 12 were nonluminal HER2. There was no significant difference between mesenchymal and other subgroups for age, median tumor size, AJCC staging, and type of surgery. Of the five local recurrences with known subgroup, four of them had mesenchymal subtype. It is demonstrated that mesenchymal subtype was significantly associated with worse 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival (HR: 2.35 [1.01-5.48], p = 0.049, and HR: 3.16 [1.06-9.47], p = 0.040 with 95% CI, respectively).

Conclusion

This study is one of the few studies presenting the survival outcomes of subtypes of MBCs. Nonetheless, it is the only study demonstrating that mesenchymal subtype had worse survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the outcome of different subtypes of MBCs.

Metaplastic breast cancers and triple-negative breast cancers of no special type: are they prognostically different? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) and triple-negative (TN) BC of no special type are often confounded with each other in terms of survival and prognosis. In this systematic study and meta-analysis, we evaluated the prognosis of each of these two different diagnoses.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search and review using the MOOSE guidelines, through PUBMED database, the Ovid MEDLINE database, and the ISI Web of Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI Expanded). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the main outcomes considered.

RESULTS

Our review eventually selected six independent studies, with a total of more than 59 519 patients. MBC was found to associate with worse OS compared to TNBC of no special type, with a significant 40% increased risk of death [summary hazard ratio (SHR) = 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.50]. We found neither heterogeneity ( I2 = 0%) nor evidence of publication bias ( P = 0.82 and P = 0.49 by Begg's and Egger's test, respectively) between studies. No statistically significant difference was found between MBC and TNBC of no special type in terms of DFS (SHR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.80-1.71).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that TNBC of no special type and MBC have comparable DFS, although the latter presents a significantly worse prognosis in terms of OS. Despite DFS being similar in both subtypes, this did not result in significant OS benefits, with MBC score being the worse of the two diseases.

Differences of Clinicopathological Features between Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma and Nonspecific Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Prognostic Profile of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma

Introduction

Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare special type of breast cancer, which has distinguished clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with nonspecific invasive breast carcinoma and study the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma.

Methods

We reviewed metaplastic breast carcinoma cases (n = 37) from January 2000 to December 2021 and nonspecific invasive breast carcinoma cases (n = 433) from January 2019 to December 2020 extracted from our institution retrospectively. The following variables were recorded, including the patients' general information, complications, T stage, expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Ki-67, molecular subtyping, lymph node status, skin or chest wall involvement, vessel carcinoma embolus, therapy modality (surgical treatments, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), and survival.

Results

Patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma had more advanced disease than patients with nonspecific invasive breast carcinoma (T stage: P=0.0011). A greater proportion of metaplastic breast carcinoma presented with triple-negative breast cancer than nonspecific invasive breast carcinoma (79.41% vs. 12.47%, P ≤ 0.001). Our study showed that the skin or chest wall invasion was more frequent in metaplastic breast carcinoma patients (11.76% vs. 1.62%, P=0.005). The 5-year survival rate for metaplastic breast carcinoma patients was 57.66% (95% CI: 0.3195∼0.7667). No local recurrence was observed while distant metastasis occurred in 33.33% of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma. Death due to disease occurred in 24.24% of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma.

Conclusion

The majority of metaplastic breast carcinoma patients had more advanced disease and triple-negative disease than nonspecific invasive breast carcinoma patients. Also, metaplastic breast carcinoma patients had frequent skin or chest wall invasion and a high rate of distant metastasis and mortality.

Genomic characterization and tumor evolution in paired samples of metaplastic breast carcinoma

Metaplastic breast carcinomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors (0.5-2%). They are mainly triple negative tumors but they present poorer chemotherapy responses and worse prognosis than other triple negative tumors. The aim of our study was to characterize the molecular profile and tumor evolution in matched (primary-relapse) tumor samples from patients with early-stage metaplastic breast carcinomas who had disease recurrence/progression. We performed genomic profiling of tumor biopsies at least from two different time points of their tumor evolution. Tumor samples were analyzed by DNA-Next Generation Sequencing (Illumina 2 x 75bp) using the Action OncoKitDX panel (Imegen-Health in Code group), which includes point mutations in 50 genes, CNVs, and fusion genes. Only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were considered for analysis and they were categorized following the ComPerMed criteria. We analyzed 21 matched tumor samples (8 primary and 13 relapse/progression samples). Genomic profiling of matched tumor samples revealed that mutations present in primary tumors are generally maintained in the relapse/disease progression. We did not find a significant increase in point mutations between primary and relapse/progression samples, although gene amplifications were found more frequently in relapse/progression samples. Tumor samples harbored high frequency of TP53 (100%) and TERT promoter (29%) mutations, and of MYC amplifications (80% of which in relapse/progression samples). No PI3KCA mutations were found, but PTEN variations were enriched in 38% of samples (10% mutations and 28% deletions). FGFR1 amplifications were identified in 13% of samples (primary tumor only). Neither ERBB2 nor EGFR gene amplifications were detected. The most frequent pathogenic alterations occurred in cycle regulation's genes, including TP53 and TERT promoter mutations, and MYC amplifications. Relapse/progression samples were highly enriched for MYC amplification. Larger studies are required to better characterize these tumors, and identify new strategies to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Partial Response After Toripalimab Plus Anlotinib for Advanced Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A Case Report

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer, accounting for <1%. The clinical outcome is unknown due to the lack of treatment options. Here, we present the case of a 58-year-old woman with advanced MBC, in which standard adjuvant chemotherapy was unsuccessful. In the second-line therapy, she received anti-angiogenic(anlotinib) therapy plus chemotherapy. Finally, she was subsequently treated with immunotherapy (toripalimab) combined anlotinib and achieved partial response (PR); thus, immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic therapy might be a novel option for advanced MBC patients.

[Effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on survival outcomes of patients with metaplastic breast cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of patients with metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) in comparison with those of patients with invasive ductal breast carcinoma (IDC).

METHODS

We selected the patients with pathologically confirmed MpBC and IDC who either received PMRT or not from the archived cases (from January, 1998 to December, 2016) in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. In total, 31 982 patients were selected, including 308 patients with MpBC and PMRT, 629 with MpBC and PMRT, and 31 045 with IDC and PMRT. All the included patients were above 18 years of age without distant metastases or a second primary cancer and underwent radical surgery. Baseline characteristics of the patients were compared among the 3 subgroups, and multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed for analyzing the prognostic factors of MpBC, OS, and BCSS.

RESULTS

The majority (81.2%) of patients with MpBC were older than 50 years, had pathological grade III (68%), and were negative for ER (75.9%) and PR (79.8%) and in stage T2-3 (71.3%) and N0-1 (85.6%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age, T stage, N stage, PMRT, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with MpBC (P < 0.05), while pathological grade, ER status, or PR status did not significantly affect the prognosis (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the patients with MpBC and PMRT had better OS (HR=1.394, 95% CI: 1.125-1.727; P < 0.05) and BCSS (HR=1.390, 95% CI: 1.074-1.800; P < 0.05) than those with MpBC who did not receive PMRT; but after PMRT, the patients with MpBC had worse OS (HR=1.626, 95%CI: 1.386-1.908; P < 0.001) and BCSS (HR=1.710, 95% CI: 1.418-2.062; P < 0.001) as compared with those with IDC.

CONCLUSION

MpBC has unique clinicopathological features. In patients with MpBC, age, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are all the prognostic factors affecting the survival outcomes, and PMRT can improve the OS and BCSS of the patients.

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes with long-term follow up

Metaplastic breast carcinoma is an uncommon subtype of invasive ductal carcinoma with a tendency towards poorer clinical outcomes. Following ethical approval, the current study reviewed the institutional records of ~2,500 women with breast cancer. A total of 14 cases of metaplastic breast cancer were reviewed for management and treatment outcomes. The results demonstrated that patients had median follow up of 30 months, a 5-year disease-free survival of 57.1% and 5-year overall survival of 57.1%. The majority of patients had at least T2 disease and all tumours were high grade. Additionally, most patients were triple negative and nodal metastases were uncommon. Metaplastic breast cancer is an aggressive variant of invasive breast cancer. Most patients can be treated with breast conservation and survival parameters tend to be worse than more common breast cancer subtypes.

A Machine Learning Approach to Differentiate Two Specific Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Androgen Receptor Pathway Genes

Triple-negative breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular and histological subtypes. The Androgen receptor is expressed in a portion of triple-negative breast cancer cases and the activation of the androgen receptor pathway is thought to be a molecular subtyping signature as well as a therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer. Thus, identification of the androgen receptor pathway status is important for both molecular characterization andclinical management. In this study, we investigate the expression of the androgen receptor pathway in metaplastic breast cancer and luminal androgen receptor subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer and found that the androgen receptor pathway was downregulated in metaplastic breast cancer compared to luminal androgen receptor subtype. Using random forest, we found that the two subtypes of breast cancer can be molecularly classified with the gene expression of the androgen receptor pathway.

A Case Series of Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Therapy

Metaplastic breast cancer is a rare and often chemo-refractory subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Recent studies have reported overexpression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in metaplastic breast cancers, and there are several reports of anti-PD-1/L1 being potentially active in this disease. In this case series, we present 5 patients with metastatic metaplastic breast cancer treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy at a single center, with 3 of 5 cases demonstrating a response to therapy, and one of the responding cases being a metaplastic lobular carcinoma with low-level hormone receptor expression. Cases were evaluated for PD-L1 expression, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), DNA mutations, RNA sequencing, and T-cell receptor sequencing. Duration of the response in these cases was limited, in contrast to the more durable responses noted in other recently published reports.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A Competing Risk Analysis of the SEER Database

Purpose: Chemotherapy is the clinically recommended treatment for patients with operable metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC); however, its impact remains controversial. This study investigated the possible role of chemotherapy in the treatment of MBC.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify the operable MBC patients. The competing risk analysis along with the propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy. Moreover, a competing risk nomogram was built to identify prognosis in patients with MBC.

Results: Of the 1137 patients with MBC, 775 received chemotherapy and 362 did not receive chemotherapy. The 5-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) showed similar outcomes in both the Chemo and No-Chemo groups (21.1 vs. 24.3%, p = 0.57). Chemotherapy showed no apparent association with BCSD (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.72–1.60; p = 0.72), even after subgroup analysis or PSM. Race, tumor size, lymph node status, and radiation were identified as the significant factors for MBC after a penalized variable selection process. In addition, a competing risk nomogram showed relatively good accuracy of prediction with a C-index of 0.766 (95% CI, 0.700–0.824).

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that chemotherapy did not improve BCSD for operable MBC patients. Thus, it may indicate the need to reduce exposure to the current chemotherapy strategies for patients with resectable MBC. Additionally, some novel treatment strategies are required urgently to identify and target the potential biomarkers.

Prognostic Outcomes of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Breast

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell breast carcinoma (SRCBC) is a rare variant of invasive lobular carcinoma and there are no large series characterizing its long-term prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The NCDB was queried from 2004-2016 to identify SRCBC patients. Patients were excluded if they had non-invasive tumors, multiple malignancies, or incomplete surgical data. Univariate analysis was performed utilizing chi-squared and Fischer's Exact tests. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

324 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were mostly White (75.3%), ≥50 years of age (88.2%), female (98.5%), and had a low Charlson-Deyo score (82.7%). 34.5% had Stage IV disease and 78.1% had ER+ tumors. In patients with non-Stage IV disease, 91.5% received surgery: 49.5% had lumpectomy and 50.5% underwent mastectomy. Radiation therapy was used in 40.7% (71.4% with lumpectomy and 35.8% with mastectomy) and 50% received chemotherapy. Significant differences in unadjusted overall survival were seen at 5 and 10 years based on stage (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, ER+ patients showed an improved survival (HR 0.5, P < 0.01) but there was no difference in survival if ER+ patients received endocrine therapy (ET) (HR 0.9, P = 0.57). Non-metastatic patients who underwent surgery had improved overall survival compared to those that did not (HR 0.5, P = 0.02), but there was no survival difference based upon type of breast operation (P = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

SRCBC frequently presents at an advanced stage. While ER+ patients appear to have improved survival, there was no clear survival benefit to receiving ET in ER+ patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic marker of triple-negative breast cancer in older women

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks an effective treatment target and is usually treated with chemotherapy. Treatment of older patients with TNBC, however, should be decided carefully because of the side effects of chemotherapy in this population. Some forms of TNBC are associated with a favorable prognosis and do not require chemotherapy. To optimize the treatment of older patients with TNBC, it is important to know the clinicopathological characteristics and a prognostic marker. In this study, classic clinicopathological factors, immunohistochemical characteristics (androgen receptor [AR], cytokeratin 5/6 [CK5/6], epidermal growth factor receptor), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the clinical outcome based on the status of each biomarker were compared among a consecutive series of female patients with TNBC aged ≥75 years (n = 75) and among those aged 55-64 years matched for the pathological stage (n = 47) who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. TNBC with special histology (particularly apocrine carcinoma, pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma, and metaplastic carcinoma) was more frequent in the older group than in the younger group (35/75, 57% versus 11/47, 23%, P = 0.010). The AR positivity rate was higher in older patients than in younger patients, whereas TILs and CK5/6 exhibited the opposite results. In multivariate analyses, AR positivity was an independent predictor of a favorable outcome in older patients (lower recurrence rate), whereas the high level of TILs was favorable in younger patients (lower recurrence and mortality rates). AR positivity or apocrine morphology was frequent and predicts a favorable clinical outcome in older patients with TNBC, suggesting the importance of AR examination in this population.

Survival Outcomes for Metaplastic Breast Cancer Differ by Histologic Subtype

BACKGROUND

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare, aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with poorer overall survival than other triple-negative breast cancers. This study sought to compare survival outcomes among histologic subtypes of MBC with those of non-metaplastic triple-negative breast cancer.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic and treatment data for all patients with non-metastatic, pure MBC undergoing surgery from 1995 to 2017 and for a large cohort of patients with other types of triple-negative breast cancer during that period were collected from an institutional database. The MBC tumors were classified as having squamous, spindle, heterologous mesenchymal, or mixed histology. Survival outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 132 MBC patients, those with heterologous mesenchymal MBC (n = 45) had the best 5-year overall and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS, 88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.99), whereas those with squamous MBC had the worst survival (BCSS, 56%; 95% CI, 0.32-0.79). Overall survival, BCSS, and recurrence-free survival were worse for the patients with MBC than for the patients who had non-MBC triple-negative breast cancer, with a clinicopathologically adjusted recurrence hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.6-3.3; p < 0.001). Of the 10 MBC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 4 progressed while receiving treatment, and 3 had no response.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaplastic breast carcinoma is associated with worse survival than other triple-negative breast cancers. The heterologous mesenchymal subtype is associated with the best survival, whereas the squamous subtype is associated with the worst survival. These data call for research to identify therapies tailored to MBC's unique biology.

Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic considerations

INTRODUCTION

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition of breast tumor with different subtypes, considered a disease with worse prognosis; treatments and survival are often unclear and conflicting.

METHODS

We consecutively collected 153 primary MBCs of different subtypes. Breast surgery, neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, clinic-pathological factors, number and type of events during follow-up were considered to evaluate overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS).

RESULTS

The majority of MBC was triple-negative (TN) subtype (88.7%), G3 (95.3%), pN0 (70.6%), and with high levels of Ki-67 (93.5%). For OS and IDFS, no significant associations were seen between the different MBC subtypes. The matched triple-negative MBC (TNMBC) and ductal TNBC cohorts had similar prognosis both in terms of OS (p = .411) and IDFS (p = .981). We observed a positive trend for TNMBC patients treated in the adjuvant setting with the cyclofosfamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil protocol for better OS (p = .090) and IDFS (p = .087). A poor or absent response rate was observed in the neoadjuvant setting.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that metaplastic and ductal breast cancers with TN phenotype are similar in terms of overall and disease-free survival. Metaplastic cancers are poorly responsive to neoadjuvant treatment, and in the absence of novel targeted therapies, surgical treatment remains the first choice.