Histologic Lymph Nodes Regression after Preoperative Chemotherapy as Prognostic Factor in Non-metastatic Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Role of pathological tumor regression grade of lymph node metastasis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer

AIMS

To confirm whether the pathological response of lymph node metastasis (LNM) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) can predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A total of 979 patients with locally advanced GC were included. χ2 test was used to analyze the relationship between LNM TRG and clinicopathological factors. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the relationship between LNM TRG, clinicopathological factors, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 21,162 lymph nodes were evaluated, with 237 patients (35.4%) in the response group and 433 patients (64.6%) in the non-response group. The non-responsive group was strongly associated with higher ypT, ypN, ypTNM, primary tumor (PT) TRG (all p < 0.001), positive cancer nodules (p = 0.001), and more distant LNM location (p < 0.001). Patients with the same PT TRG but different LNM TRG had different prognosis. There was no difference in OS between the responding and non-responding groups of LNM at location 2, 3, and M. YpN, tumor location, and LNM location were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of LNM TRG and PT TRG could better predict patient prognosis. Lymph node dissection should be routinely performed after NCT to provide the reference of radical resection.

Lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

AIMS

Lymph node metastases (LNM) are one of the most important prognostic indicators in solid tumours and a major component of cancer staging. Neoadjuvant therapy might influence nodal status by induction of regression. Our aim is to determine the prevalence and role of regression of LNM on outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four independent study populations of rectal cancer patients treated with similar regimens of chemoradiotherapy were pooled together to obtain a total cohort of 469 patients. Post-treatment nodal status (ypN) and signs of tumour regression (Reg) were incorporated to form three-tiered (ypN- Reg+, ypN- Reg- and ypN+) and four-tiered (ypN- Reg+, ypN- Reg-, ypN+ Reg+ and ypN+ Reg-) classifications. In our cohort, 31% of patients presented with ypN+ rectal cancer. As expected, we found significantly worse overall survival (OS) in ypN+ patients compared to ypN- patients (P = 0.002). The percentage of ypN- patients with lymph nodes with complete regression was 20% in our cohort. While node-negative patients with and without regression had similar OS (P = 0.09), disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better in node-negative patients with regression (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Regression in lymph nodes is frequent, and node-negative patients with evidence of lymph node regression have better DFS compared to node-negative patients without such evidence.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Gastrectomy for Cytology-Positive Gastric Cancer without Any Other Non-Curative Factors in a Western Setting: An International Eastern European Cohort Study

The optimal approach for treating cytology-positive (Cy1) gastric cancer (GC) patients without additional non-curative factors remains uncertain. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy shows promise, its suitability for Western patients is not well supported by existing data. To address this knowledge gap, a cohort study was conducted across four major GC treatment centers in Lithuania, Estonia, and Ukraine. Forty-three consecutive Cy1 GC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2020 were enrolled. The study evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cytology status conversion, and major pathological response rates, along with the factors influencing these outcomes. All patients underwent surgery post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 53.5% experiencing cytological status conversion and 23.3% achieving a major pathological response. The median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI: 16-25) and 19 (95% CI: 11-20) months, respectively. Conversion to negative cytology significantly reduced the relative risk of peritoneal progression (RR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03-0.47, p = 0.002). The study suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy holds promise as a treatment option for Cy1 GC without additional non-curative factors, associating cytology status conversion with improved long-term outcomes and reduced peritoneal relapse risk.

The Role of Prehabilitation in Modern Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option for esophagogastric cancer. Although esophagectomy/gastrectomy remains associated with major surgical trauma and significant morbidity. Prehabilitation has emerged as a novel strategy to improve postoperative outcomes by preparing patients for a surgery-associated physiological challenge. We discuss current knowledge and the results of studies on the role of prehabilitation in esophagogastric cancer surgery.

Abstract

Esophagogastric cancer is among the most common malignancies worldwide. Surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy is the only potentially curative treatment option. Although esophagogastric resections remain associated with major surgical trauma and significant postoperative morbidity. Prehabilitation has emerged as a novel strategy to improve clinical outcomes by optimizing physical and psychological status before major surgery through exercise and nutritional and psychological interventions. Current prehabilitation programs may be unimodal, including only one intervention, or multimodal, combining the benefits of different types of interventions. However, it still is an investigational treatment option mostly limited to clinical trials. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current evidence for the role of prehabilitation in modern esophagogastric cancer surgery. The available studies are very heterogeneous in design, type of interventions, and measured outcomes. Yet, all of them confirm at least some positive effects of prehabilitation in terms of improved physical performance, nutritional status, quality of life, or even reduced postoperative morbidity. However, the optimal interventions for prehabilitation remain unclear; thus, they cannot be standardized and widely adopted. Future studies on multimodal prehabilitation are necessary to develop optimal programs for patients with esophagogastric cancer.

Can Gastric Cancer Patients with High Mandard Score Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

A high Mandard score may indicate the tumor is insensitive to chemotherapy. We analyzed tumor regression and lymph node response under different Mandard scores to assess the impact of Mandard score on prognosis. Methods. Mandard scores and ypN stage of postoperative pathological reports were recorded. The results were reviewed by a professional pathologist. The radiologist compared the tumor regression before and after chemotherapy by computed tomography (CT). The survival of all patients was obtained by telephone follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between overall risk of death and Mandard score, imaging evaluation, and ypN stage. Results. In the Mandard score (4-5) group, the median survival time for PR and ypN0 patients was 68.5 and 76.7 months. While in the Mandard score (1-2) group, the median survival time for PD and ypN3a patients was 15.6 and 14.5 months. Imaging evaluation of tumor regression (PR 68.5 months, SD 27.8 months, and PD 10.2 months) and lymph node remission (ypN0 76.7 months, ypN1 61.6 months, ypN2 18.0 months, ypN3a 18.7 months, and ypN3b 18.3 months) showed improved survival. Mandard score, imaging evaluation, and ypN stage are important prognostic factors affecting prognosis. Conclusion. A high Mandard score does not mean neoadjuvant chemotherapy is ineffective in gastric cancer. Patients with imaging evaluation of tumor regression and ypN stage reduction may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Era of Multimodal Treatment-Oncological and Surgical Perspective

Simple Summary

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the major oncological challenges on a global scale. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in GC is to downstage primary tumour, eliminate potential micrometastases, and increase the chance for radical resection. Although systemic treatment prolongs the survival in advanced GC, persistent lymph node (LN) metastases indicate poor prognosis. Therefore, further identification of prognostic factors after NAC is urgent and could positively influence clinical outcomes. This article aimed to review the actual trends and future perspectives in multimodal therapy of advanced GC, with a particular interest in the post-neoadjuvant pathological nodal stage. Since downstaged and primarily node-negative patients show a similar prognosis, the main target for NAC in advanced GC should be nodal clearance. Adequate staging and personalised perioperative therapy seem to be of great importance in the multimodal treatment of GC.

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the major oncological challenges on a global scale. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in GC is to downstage primary tumour, eliminate potential micrometastases, and increase the chance for radical resection. Although systemic treatment prolongs the survival in advanced GC, persistent lymph node (LN) metastases indicate poor prognosis. Further identification of prognostic factors after NAC is urgent and could positively influence clinical outcomes. This article aimed to review the actual trends and future perspectives in multimodal therapy of advanced GC, with a particular interest in the post-neoadjuvant pathological nodal stage. A favourable prognostic impact for ypN0 patients is observed, either due to truly negative LN before the start of therapy or because preoperative therapy achieved a pathologically complete nodal response. Ongoing trials investigating the extent of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant therapy will standardise the LN dissection from the multimodal therapy perspective. Since downstaged and primarily node-negative patients show a similar prognosis, the main target for NAC in advanced GC should be nodal clearance. Adequate staging and personalised perioperative therapy seem to be of great importance in the multimodal treatment of GC.