Assessing relapses and response to relapse treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis: a nursing perspective

Practical Clinical Guidelines for Natalizumab Treatment in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Natalizumab (TYSABRI®) was the first high-efficacy monoclonal antibody disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved as a monotherapy for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS, and active secondary progressive MS. Because natalizumab is administered by intravenous infusion, infusion nurses play a key role in the care of natalizumab-treated patients. In the 16 years since approval, substantial data have been gathered on the long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety of natalizumab. This article provides a synopsis of this data, as well as practical information for optimizing patient care. This includes information on strategies to mitigate the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated patients, natalizumab use during pregnancy, and use with vaccines. It also includes guidance on the preparation and administration of natalizumab and monitoring of natalizumab-treated patients.

The TRACK-MS Test Battery: A Very Brief Tool to Track Multiple Sclerosis-Related Cognitive Impairment

Tracking cognition in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is important for detection of disease progression but it is often not performed in routine settings due to time constraints. This exploratory cohort study aims to develop a very brief repeatable tracking tool with comparable test quality criteria to the current gold standard, the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). The study included 88 participants (22 healthy controls, 66 MS patients) who were examined at baseline and at one-year follow-up. As a validity criterion for the six administered cognitive tests, we assessed the difference between MS patients and HC, and the correlation with MS-related disability. Combining the two tests with the highest validity-the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test-yielded an administration time of 5 min. Comparing this new TRACK-MS test battery with the 15 min BICAMS indicated that TRACK-MS showed larger differences between MS patients and healthy controls, a higher correlation with MS-related disability, smaller practice effects, and a good test-retest reliability. We provide evidence that TRACK-MS, although faster to administer, showed at least comparable quality criteria as the BICAMS. As the study was exploratory, replication of these results is necessary.

The 27-Item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire: A New Brief Measure Including Treatment Burden and Work Life

Background: Treatment- and work-related aspects have been neglected in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to develop a brief instrument covering all important impairment-, activity-, participation-, and treatment-related aspects for use in research and practice.

Methods: The 27-item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MS-QLQ27) was developed using open item collection, a multidisciplinary expert panel, and cognitive pretesting. It was evaluated for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness with 100 patients presenting with relapse (84 at follow-up ~14 days later). Construct validity was analyzed by correlating the MS-QLQ27 with the disease-specific Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in MS (HAQUAMS) and generic HRQOL instuments. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was used to analyze known-groups validity. Responsiveness was determined as the correlation of changes in MS-QLQ27 scores with changes in validation criteria.

Results: Internal consistency was high (Cronbach α = 0.94 at baseline and 0.93 at follow-up). Convergent validity was supported by direction and magnitude of associations with disease-specific and generic instruments. Correlations with change in convergent criteria were strong, indicating responsiveness. The HAQUAMS showed the strongest associations with the MSQLQ27. The MS-QLQ27 showed the highest effect size compared with other patient-reported outcomes and the EDSS. It successfully distinguished between levels of disease severity.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the MS-QLQ27 is a reliable, valid, and highly responsive instrument for assessing HRQOL during relapse evolution in MS. Its advantages are that it is brief yet comprehensive, covering work- and treatment-related aspects not addressed in previous measures.

Patients' experiences of self-identification, seeking support, and anticipation of potential relapse in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses are associated with increased disability, reduced quality of life and negative psychosocial impacts. However, they often go unrecognised; people with MS (MSers) may face barriers to self-identification of relapses or seeking support for them. The charity Shift.ms sought to better understand 1) MSers' challenges in self-identifying potential relapses, 2) where MSers' seek support for potential relapses, and 3) the impact of the anticipation of relapses on MSers' wellbeing and daily living.

METHODS

Shift.ms developed a patient perspective 8-question pilot survey (included likert-style, multiple-choice, and optional free-text responses) and shared it with Shift.ms' international online community (n = 20,052). Descriptive quantitative analysis, and content analysis and thematic analysis of qualitative free-text responses were used.

RESULTS

1,737 MSers responded. Just under one third (29.9%) of MSers reported that it takes them 24 h or less to self-identify a potential relapse, while more than half (54.5%) reported that identification occurs within 48 h; 55% MSers felt that the "at least 24 h" clinical criterion of relapse classification was appropriate. Challenges to relapse self-identification included confounding background symptoms or infection, variability of relapse symptoms, and individualistic nature of MS. Fatigue was reported to be the most common symptom of relapse (75%), however fatigue was also the symptom most commonly mistaken for relapse (40%). Barriers to relapse self-identification were a shorter duration since MS diagnosis and a perceived lack of consensus around relapse classification. Respondents reported they most often seek relapse support/advice from healthcare professionals (HCPs) (37.1%), family/friends (32.1%), or not at all (16.9%). Rather than temporal criteria (i.e. the 24 h criterion), participants felt that severity of symptoms could play a more critical role in whether to seek support for a potential relapse. Barriers to seeking support/advice included variability in HCP advice and feelings of invalidation. Anticipation of relapses negatively impacted MSers wellbeing; led to reduced participation in activities, and the development of adjustment/coping strategies. Relapse triggers included stress, reduced self-care, infection/illness; 78.5% reported stress or anxiety had triggered relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight difficulties MSers face in self-identifying relapses, barriers to accessing support, and impact of anticipation of relapses. They also highlight opportunities for improved MSer and HCP communication, dialogue and two-way education to help optimise patient access to relapse support and intervention.

Efficacy and safety of oral prednisolone tapering following intravenous methyl prednisolone in patients with multiple sclerosis relapses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Relapse is one of the main features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Corticosteroids are the first line of management during MS relapse. Since tapering or non-tapering prednisolone after corticosteroid pulse has been a controversial issue, this clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the tapering regimen.

METHODS

Having been treated by intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse, sixty-six patients with MS-relapse were randomly assigned to receive oral prednisolone tapering (OPT) or placebo. The regimen was administered in line with the study protocol and the dose was tapered over 20 days. Demographics and symptoms, impact on activities of daily living (ADL), and management procedures were recorded according to Assessing Relapse in Multiple Sclerosis (ARMS) Questionnaire. The incidence of adverse events was assessed using the same questionnaire. Patients' disability improvement was assessed using the Extended Disability Scale (EDSS) during relapse, and over the first, third, sixth months following treatment.

RESULTS

As shown by the results of the questionnaire, 75% reported that their ADL was not or minimally affected by OPT and there was no significant difference in terms of ADL after treatment between the two groups (p=0.3). The effect of treatment on return to the previous state of health (RSH) showed that there were no differences between the two groups of the study (p=0.5). The improvement of disability in the two groups of oral prednisolone and placebo did not indicate a difference in terms of EDSS in the first and third and six months (p = 0.5, p = 0.9, p=0.3, respectively). Also, the occurrence of some side effects such as weight gain (p = 0.000) and increased appetite (p = 0.004) was higher in the OPT group.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study revealed that the efficacy of an OPT after a corticosteroid pulse is non-superior to IVMP plus only in case the safety and tolerability profile are comparable.

REFRESH protocol: a non-inferiority randomised clinical trial comparing internet and teleconference to in-person 'Managing Fatigue' interventions on the impact of fatigue among persons with multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. It is considered a major cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults. One of the most common and disabling symptoms of MS is fatigue. MS fatigue can impact all aspects of quality of life, including physical, mental and social function. Fortunately, fatigue self-management interventions, such as 'Managing Fatigue: A 6 week energy conservation course', can decrease the impact of fatigue and improve health-related quality of life. The purpose of this study is to compare three modes of delivering the Managing Fatigue intervention-two remote delivery formats (teleconference and internet) and one in-person format-on perceptions of fatigue and its impact on physical, mental and social function.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A non-inferiority randomised clinical trial is being conducted to compare the three delivery formats (1:1:1 allocation ratio) among 582 participants with MS living in the Midwestern and Northeastern United States. The hypothesis is that teleconference and internet versions of the intervention are non-inferior to the traditional mode of clinical service delivery (ie, one to one, in person) in terms of the primary outcome of self-reported fatigue impact (ie, Fatigue Impact Scale) and the secondary outcome of health-related quality of life (ie, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale). Outcomes are being measured at baseline, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months. The primary analysis tool will be linear mixed effects model. The prespecified inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 10 points. We will also examine whether baseline characteristics (eg, sociodemographic) moderate outcomes of the Managing Fatigue intervention and whether changes in self-efficacy and fatigue self-management behaviours mediate changes in outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol is approved centrally by the institutional review board at Case Western Reserve University. Eligible participants give consent before being enrolled and randomised into the study. The study results will be disseminated through relevant advocacy organisations, newsletters to participants, publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03550170; Pre-results.

Patient- versus physician-reported relapses in multiple sclerosis: insights from a large observational study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The patient's perspective is becoming increasingly important for endpoints in studies on multiple sclerosis. However, relapse data generated from the patient's perspective in combination with independent documentation by the physician are scarce. Our objective was to compare self-reported relapses by the patient to physician-documented relapses within a routine clinical practice setting of quarterly visits.

METHODS

Two-year data (n = 1921 patients) were extracted from two prospective, non-interventional, multicentre cohort studies in Germany. The number of relapses independently reported by patients and physicians was analysed. In addition, inter-rater reliability and measures of validity were evaluated. Patterns of associations were investigated in subgroup analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

Patients and physicians showed good overall agreement [κ = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.80]. Nevertheless, patients reported, on average, more relapses than physicians during follow-up (0.55 vs. 0.44; P < 0.001). Corresponding annualized relapse rates were 0.38 (95% CI 0.36-0.39) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.29-0.31), respectively. Differences between physicians and patients were particularly pronounced in patient groups with greater disability levels, decreased health-related quality of life or treatment satisfaction. The positive predictive value was 74.01% (95% CI 71.85-76.07), and the negative predictive value was 98.86% (95% CI 98.67-99.03).

CONCLUSION

Some disagreement on the occurrence of relapses appears in specific patient subgroups, where factors such as pseudo-relapses or confounding factors may have promoted over- or under-reporting.

Early initiation of fingolimod reduces the rate of severe relapses over the long term: Post hoc analysis from the FREEDOMS, FREEDOMS II, and TRANSFORMS studies

BACKGROUND

Relapse frequency is often correlated with the prognosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). In patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), relapses vary in severity and may affect activities of daily living, require steroid intervention, or hospitalization. Incomplete recovery from relapses results in increasing disability. In pivotal phase III studies of fingolimod (FREEDOMS, FREEDOMS II, and TRANSFORMS), the frequency of overall and severe relapses was significantly reduced in patients with RRMS treated with fingolimod compared with placebo or intramuscular interferon β-1a (IFN β-1a). The objective of this study was to report the effect of early initiation of fingolimod on relapse severity in patients with RRMS.

METHODS

This is a post hoc descriptive analysis of data from the pooled placebo-controlled FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II studies and from the active-comparator TRANSFORMS study. Patients were analyzed under 2 groups: patients initially randomized to receive fingolimod 0.5 mg during the core phase and continued fingolimod 0.5 mg in the extension phase (immediate fingolimod group), and patients initially randomized to placebo or IFN β-1a during the core phase and switched to fingolimod during the extension phase (delayed fingolimod group). Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was estimated for severe relapses (defined as Expanded Disability Status Scale increase of >1 point, or >2-point change in 1 or 2 Functional Systems, respectively, or >1-point change in >4 Functional Systems). ARR was also estimated for relapses that affected activities of daily living, required steroid use, or hospitalization.

RESULTS

In the pooled FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II extensions, the immediate fingolimod group showed sustained reductions in the proportion (core: 15.8% and extension: 9.3%) and in ARR over 4 years (0.032 and 0.015) for severe relapses, in relapses requiring steroids (0.149 and 0.123), hospitalization (0.049 and 0.039) and relapses affecting activities of daily living (0.155 and 0.112). In the TRANSFORMS extension, similar reductions were observed in the immedaite group for the proportion of severe relapses (core: 11.8% and extension: 9.8%). ARR remained low over 2 years for severe relapses (0.024 and 0.018), relapses affecting activities of daily living (0.112 and 0.109), relapses requiring steroids (0.156 and 0.161) and hospitalization (0.027 and 0.033). Results in the FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II and TRANSFORMS extensions for the delayed group were similar. In the TRANSFORMS extension, the proportion of severe relapses were 18.0% (core) and 11.1% (extension); there were significant reductions in ARR for severe relapses (core: 0.079 and extension: 0.029), relapses requiring steroids (0.366 and 0.232), hospitalization (0.092 and 0.055), and relapses affecting activities of daily living (0.285 and 0.144) (all p < 0.0001). Complete recovery was reported for the majority of relapses during the core and extension phases in both the immediate and delayed fingolimod groups (Pooled FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II: immediate group 59.7%-65.5% and delayed group 64.9%-67.7%; TRANSFORMS: 72.1%-80.0% and 65.4%-70.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RRMS, the frequency of severe relapses and relapse severity remained low in the immedaite fingolimod group over a period of 4 years. Reductions in the proportion of severe relapses post switch from IFN β-1a or placebo to fingolimod underscore the clinical benefit and the relevance of an early initiation of fingolimod.

Benefit evaluation in multiple sclerosis relapse treatment from the patients' perspective - Development and validation of a new questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Little is known on how to measure patient-relevant benefit of relapse treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a new method for monitoring recovery from MS relapses and patient-relevant treatment benefits.

METHODS

A 27-item questionnaire was developed using a multi-step approach comprising open item collection, multidisciplinary expert panel and cognitive debriefing. It was evaluated regarding psychometric properties and feasibility in a longitudinal validation study with 100 patients with MS undergoing relapse treatment. Construct validity was tested by correlations with patient and physician global impressions of change as well as disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures.

RESULTS

Results of the feasibility survey indicated high patient acceptance. Reliability was high (Cronbach's α = 0.90). While the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was not sensitive to change, Patient Benefit Index for Multiple Sclerosis (PBI-MS) showed a high correlation cross-sectionally with patient global impression of change (PaGIC) (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Significant moderate to high correlations were found with change in generic HRQoL (r = 0.55-0.61, p < 0.001) and lower correlations with change in disease-specific HRQoL (r = -0.36, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The PBI-MS is a reliable and valid instrument for ascertaining patient-relevant benefits of acute relapse treatment; it appears suited for use in routine care and in clinical or health care studies.

Understanding treatment decisions from the perspective of people with relapsing remitting multiple Sclerosis: A critical interpretive synthesis

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system that mainly affects young adults. While there is no cure for MS, disease modifying treatments (DMTs) reduce the relapse rate and partial accrual of disability. More effective DMTs may have higher risks including life-threatening infections or secondary autoimmunity. The complexity and novelty of available treatments cause challenges for clinicians when prescribing treatments and for people with MS (PwMS) when deciding what trade-offs they are willing and ready to make.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experience of people with relapsing remitting MS (PwRRMS) and their perspectives in choosing treatments.

METHODS

Critical interpretive synthesis was employed to review and synthesis the published literature. Eighty-three publications were selected in a multi-step systematic process.

RESULTS

Findings are presented in four interrelated areas: the influence of the clinical evidence-base in decision making; the meaning of DMT efficacy for PwRRMS; the influence of models of decision-making and information acquisition practices in PwRRMS; and the importance of psychosocial dimensions in DMT decision making. Synthesis of the findings revealed that alongside medical and individual reasoning, contextual circumstances play an important role in making treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

This review identifies and explains the importance of diverse contextual circumstances (clinical, social, psychological) that are important for PwRRMS when making treatment decisions. The findings demonstrate the importance of eliciting, understanding and addressing such contextual factors.

Multiple sclerosis relapse: Qualitative findings from clinician and patient interviews

BACKGROUND

In patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), relapses are often unrecognized. These missed relapses have broad implications for the conduct of clinical trials as well as for the care and prognosis of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). With the ultimate goal of developing new methods to identify relapse, the purpose of this qualitative research with patients and clinicians was to examine the definition, symptoms, and impact of relapse.

METHODS

This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with clinicians specializing in MS and people with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS. A brief literature review was conducted to inform the development of interview guides. Qualitative data were gathered from 10 clinicians in a series of individual interviews and one focus group, followed by a series of interviews with 20 patients. Thematic analysis was conducted using ATLAS.ti to identify concepts emerging from the interviews.

RESULTS

Both clinicians and people with MS tend to describe classic neurologic symptoms that are confirmable on exam as indicative of relapses (e.g., sensory changes, vision issues, and walking difficulties), while also acknowledging that several less quantifiable symptoms are common (e.g., fatigue, pain, and cognitive issues). Patients described far-reaching impacts of relapse beyond just the quantifiable manifestations of the disease evaluated by commonly-used measures of MS severity and disability.

CONCLUSION

MS relapses, which have substantial impact on patient functioning, appear to include symptoms beyond those in typical definitions of relapse. Incorporating such constructs into new measures of relapse could lead to improved recognition of relapse episodes.

Repository corticotropin injection in multiple sclerosis: an update

Relapse management is a crucial component of multiple sclerosis care. Acute relapses are defined as new neurological symptoms or worsening of existing symptoms persisting for >24 h that are not attributable to heat, overexertion, or infection. The most commonly used treatment for multiple sclerosis relapse is a 3-5-day course of corticosteroids, primarily intravenous methylprednisolone with or without oral steroid taper. Repository corticotropin injection is also the US FDA-approved option for managing acute relapse, particularly in the patients with inadequate response, intolerability or allergy to corticosteroid treatment; poor venous access; or limited ability to receive home or clinic infusions.

Emerging Approaches for Validating and Managing Multiple Sclerosis Relapse

The autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by relapses in the majority of patients. A definitive clinical diagnosis of relapse in MS can be complicated by the presence of an infection or comorbid disorder. In this mini-review, we describe efforts to develop enhanced imaging techniques and biomarker detection as future tools for relapse validation. There is emerging evidence of roles for meningeal inflammation, sex hormones, comorbid metabolic or mood disorders, and a dysregulated immune profile in the manifestation and severity of relapse. Specific subsets of immune cells likely drive the pathophysiology of relapse, and identification of a patient's unique immunological signature of relapse may help guide future diagnosis and treatment. Finally, these studies highlight the diversity in terms of relapse presentation, immunological signature, and response in patients with MS, indicating that going forward the best approach to assessment and treatment of relapse will be multifactorial and highly personalized.

Assessment and Treatment Strategies for a Multiple Sclerosis Relapse

Relapses are the hallmark features of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). True relapses may be challenging to accurately diagnose. A clinician must rely on a combination of history, exam findings, laboratory studies, and neuroimaging to decide whether or not to treat for a presumed relapse. Although many consider MRI as the gold standard diagnostic test, it may not be rapidly accessible and still could miss lesions. In light of this diagnostic complexity, future directions including development and validation of a scale to assess MS relapse probability and severity would be useful to multiple sclerosis specialists and practicing neurologists. Given the complex pathophysiology of MS, more research is needed to ascertain the validity of promising biomarkers for predicting relapse.

Multiple sclerosis: clinical profiling and data collection as prerequisite for personalized medicine approach

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous disease as it can present inter-individually as well as intra-individually, with different disease phenotypes emerging during different stages in the long-term disease course. In addition to advanced immunological, genetic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) profiling of the patient, the clinical profiling of MS patients needs to be widely implemented in clinical practice and improved by including a greater range of relevant parameters as patient-reported outcomes. It is crucial to implement a high standard of clinical characterization of individual patients as this is key to effective long-term observation and evaluation.

To generate reliable real-world data, individual clinical data should be collected in specific MS registries and/or using intelligent software instruments as the Multiple Sclerosis Documentation System 3D. Computational analysis of biological processes will play a key role in the transition to personalized MS treatment. Major breakthroughs in the areas of bioinformatics and computational systems biology will be required to process this complex information to enable improved personalization of treatment for MS patients.

Composite scores in comparative effectiveness research: counterbalancing parsimony and dimensionality in patient-reported outcomes

When planning a comparative effectiveness study comparing disease-modifying treatments, competing demands influence choice of outcomes. Current practice emphasizes parsimony, although understanding multidimensional treatment impact can help to personalize medical decision-making. We discuss both sides of this 'tug of war'. We discuss the assumptions, advantages and drawbacks of composite scores and multidimensional outcomes. We describe possible solutions to the multiple comparison problem, including conceptual hierarchy distinctions, statistical approaches, 'real-world' benchmarks of effectiveness and subgroup analysis. We conclude that comparative effectiveness research should consider multiple outcome dimensions and compare different approaches that fit the individual context of study objectives.

The Presence of Symptoms With Comorbid Conditions in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) may experience symptoms that impact comorbid conditions and quality of life (QOL). There is some evidence that symptom severity may vary in certain common health conditions in this population. We aimed to examine symptom severity in light of comorbid conditions commonly seen in individuals with MS (N = 339). Using a cross-sectional Internet survey, we found there was a significant increase in symptom severity of common symptoms of fatigue, imbalance, and weakness, specifically with presence or absence of certain comorbid conditions (depression, arthritis, migraine headaches, coronary artery disease [CAD]). These findings endorse the presence of more severe symptoms with certain comorbid conditions compared with individuals with MS who do not report having comorbid conditions. The findings support the importance of symptom management in individuals with MS who also have comorbid conditions.

Assessing relapse in multiple sclerosis questionnaire: results of a pilot study

There is need for a brief but comprehensive objective assessment tool to help clinicians evaluate relapse symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their impact on daily functioning, as well as response to treatment. The 2-part Assessing Relapse in Multiple Sclerosis (ARMS) questionnaire was developed to achieve these aims. Part 1 consists of 7 questions that evaluate relapse symptoms, impact on activities of daily living (ADL), overall functioning, and response to treatment for previous relapses. Part 2 consists of 7 questions that evaluate treatment response in terms of symptom relief, functioning, and tolerability. The ARMS questionnaire has been evaluated in 103 patients with MS. The most commonly reported relapse symptoms were numbness/tingling (67%), fatigue (58%), and leg/foot weakness (55%). Over half of patients reported that ADL or overall functioning were affected very much (47%) or severely (11%) by relapses. Prescribed treatments for relapses included intravenous and/or oral corticosteroids (87%) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (13%). Nearly half of patients reported that their symptoms were very much (33%) or completely resolved (16%) following treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events were sleep disturbance (45%), mood changes (33%), weight gain (29%), and increased appetite (26%). Systematic assessment of relapses and response to relapse treatment may help clinicians to optimize outcomes for MS patients.