An International Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Advocacy, Dissemination, and Implementation Strategies

Review of standard paediatric neuroradiology MRI protocols from 12 UK tertiary paediatric hospitals: is there much variation between centres?

AIM

To investigate how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations are protocolled in tertiary paediatric neuroradiology centres around the UK for some of the more common presentations encountered in paediatric neuroradiology, and to identify any variations of note.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 19 UK tertiary paediatric neuroradiology centres registered with the British Society of Neuroradiologists-Paediatric Group were contacted and asked if they could provide a copy of their standard MRI protocols. Twelve responded (63%) and 10 of the more common presentations were selected and the standard acquired sequences obtained at each participating centre were compared. Where available the collated protocols were also compared against current published guidance.

RESULTS

The basic sequences carried out by centres around the UK are similar; however, there are lots of variations overall. The only standardised protocol currently being implemented nationally in paediatric imaging is that for brain tumours. Otherwise, chosen protocols are generally dependent on the preferences and technical capabilities of individual centres. Suggested published protocols also exist for non-accidental injury (NAI), multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and head and neck imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in MRI protocolling depend in part on technical capabilities and in part on the experience and preferences of the paediatric neuroradiologists at each centre. For most presentations, there is no consensus as to what constitutes the perfect protocol. The present results will be useful for specialist centres who may wish to review their current protocols, and for more generalist centres to use as a reference to guide their MRI protocolling.

Co-registration with subtraction and color-coding or fusion improves the detection of new and growing lesions on follow-up MRI examination of patients with multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading methods in the follow-up of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with MS who underwent two brain follow-up MRI examinations with three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences between September 2016 and December 2019. Two neuroradiology residents independently reviewed FLAIR images using three post-processing methods including conventional reading (CR), co-registration fusion (CF), and co-registration subtraction with color-coding (CS), while being blinded to all data but FLAIR images. The presence and number of new, growing, or shrinking lesions were compared between reading methods. The reading time, reading confidence, and inter- and intra-observer agreements were also assessed. An expert neuroradiologist established the standard of reference. Statistical analyses were corrected for multiple testing.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients with MS were included. There were 130 women and 68 men, with a mean age of 41 ± 12 (standard deviation) years (age range: 21-79 years). Using CS and CF, more patients were detected with new lesions compared to CR (93/198 [47%] and 79/198 [40%] vs. 54/198 [27%], respectively; P < 0.01). The median number of new hyperintense FLAIR lesions detected was significantly greater using CS and CF compared to CR (2 [Q1, Q3: 0, 6] and 1 [Q1, Q3: 0, 3] vs. 0 [Q1, Q3: 0, 1], respectively; P < 0.001). The mean reading time was significantly shorter using CS and CF compared to CR (P < 0.001), with higher confidence in readings and higher inter- and intra-observer agreements.

CONCLUSION

Post-processing tools such as CS and CF substantially improve the accuracy of follow-up MRI examinations in patients with MS while reducing reading time and increasing readers' confidence and reproducibility.

Contrast-Enhanced 3D Spin Echo T1-Weighted Sequence Outperforms 3D Gradient Echo T1-Weighted Sequence for the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3.0 T Brain MRI

BACKGROUND

Using reliable contrast-enhanced T1 sequences is crucial to detect enhancing brain lesions for multiple sclerosis (MS) at the time of diagnosis and over follow-up. Contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) T1-weighted imaging (WI) and 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) T1-WI are both available for clinical practice and have never been compared within the context of this diagnosis.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced 3D GRE T1-WI and 3D TSE T1-WI for the detection of enhancing lesions in the brains of MS patients.

METHODS

This single-center prospective study enrolled patients with MS who underwent a 3.0 T brain MRI from August 2017 to April 2021 for follow-up. Contrast-enhanced 3D GRE T1-WI and 3D TSE T1-WI were acquired in randomized order. Two independent radiologists blinded to all data reported all contrast-enhanced lesions in each sequence. Their readings were compared with a reference standard established by a third expert neuroradiologist. Interobserver agreement, contrast ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated for both sequences.

RESULTS

A total of 158 MS patients were included (mean age, 40 ± 11 years; 95 women). Significantly more patients had at least 1 contrast-enhanced lesion on 3D TSE T1-WI than on 3D GRE T1-WI for both readers (61/158 [38.6%] vs 48/158 [30.4%] and 60/158 [38.6%] vs 47/158 [29.7%], P < 0.001). Significantly more contrast-enhanced lesions per patient were detected on 3D TSE T1-WI (mean 2.47 vs 1.56 and 2.56 vs 1.39, respectively, P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was excellent for both sequences, κ = 0.96 (confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.00) for 3D TSE T1-WI and 0.92 (CI, 0.86-0.99) for 3D GRE T1-WI. Contrast ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher on 3D TSE T1-WI (0.84 vs 0.53, P < 0.001, and 87.9 vs 57.8, P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

At 3.0 T, contrast-enhanced 3D TSE-T1-WI supports the detection of significantly more enhancing lesions than 3D GRE T1-WI and should therefore be used for MS patients requiring contrast-enhanced examination.

Decentralised clinical trials in multiple sclerosis research

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) play an important role in multiple sclerosis (MS) research, ensuring that new interventions are safe and efficacious before their introduction into clinical practice. Trials have been evolving to improve the robustness of their designs and the efficiency of their conduct. Advances in digital and mobile technologies in recent years have facilitated this process and the first RCTs with decentralised elements became possible. Decentralised clinical trials (DCTs) are conducted remotely, enabling participation of a more heterogeneous population who can participate in research activities from different locations and at their convenience. DCTs also rely on digital and mobile technologies which allows for more flexible and frequent assessments. While hospitals quickly adapted to e-health and telehealth assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic, the conduct of conventional RCTs was profoundly disrupted. In this paper, we review the existing evidence and gaps in knowledge in the design and conduct of DCTs in MS.

Levamisole-associated multifocal inflammatory encephalopathy: clinical and MRI characteristics, and diagnostic algorithm

Levamisole-associated multifocal inflammatory encephalopathy (LAMIE) is a devastating adverse effect of levamisole (LEV) treatment. In Russia, people often use LEV without a doctor's prescription for anthelmintic prophylaxis. LAMIE often misdiagnosed as the first episode of MS or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). The aim of our study was to describe clinical, laboratory and morphological characteristics of LAMIE, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns and create an algorithm for the differential diagnosis. This study was a prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of cases. It was performed at two hospitals with ambulatory service for MS. We included 43 patients with LAMIE with follow-up was from 1 year to 5 years. Age was 19-68 y.o. with female predominance. The most typical manifestations of LAMIE were cerebellar, pyramidal and cognitive symptoms, and majority of patients had biphasic course of the disease. Three main types of MRI patterns were described: ADEM-like, MS-like, atypical demyelination. About 40% of patients had CSF specific oligoclonal bands synthesis, but only 20 % of them converted to MS during the period from 1 month until 2 years. The CSF albumin levels and immunoglobulin G index were elevated in LAMIE patients compared to reference values. We described results of brain biopsy in two cases. Therefore LAMIE should be considered in patients with demyelinating or inflammatory conditions with biphasic onset of the disease and variable MRI presentation.

Economic impact of selective use of contrast for routine follow-up MRI of patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Imaging and autopsy studies show intracranial gadolinium deposition in patients who have undergone serial contrast-enhanced MRIs. This observation has raised concerns when using contrast administration in patients who receive frequent MRIs. To address this, we implemented a contrast-conditional protocol wherein gadolinium is administered only for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with imaging evidence of new disease activity on precontrast imaging. In this study, we explore the economic impact of our new MRI protocol.

METHODS

We compared scanner time and Medicare reimbursement using our contrast-conditional methodology versus that of prior protocols where all patients received gadolinium.

RESULTS

For 422 patients over 4 months, the contrast-conditional protocol amounted to 60% decrease in contrast injection and savings of approximately 20% of MRI scanner time. If the extra scanner time was used for performing MS follow-up MRIs in additional patients, the contrast-conditional protocol would amount to net revenue loss of $21,707 (∼3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a new protocol to limit contrast in MS follow-up MRIs led to a minimal decrease in revenue when controlled for scanner time utilized and is outweighed by other benefits, including substantial decreased gadolinium administration, increased patient comfort, and increased availability of scanner time, which depending on type of studies performed could result in additional financial benefit.

Diagnostic value of gadolinium contrast administration for spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis patients and correlative markers of lesion enhancement

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging is essential for monitoring people with multiple sclerosis, but the diagnostic value of gadolinium contrast administration in spine magnetic resonance imaging is unclear.

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of gadolinium contrast administration in spine magnetic resonance imaging follow-up examinations and identify imaging markers correlating with lesion enhancement.

Methods

A total of 65 multiple sclerosis patients with at least 2 spinal magnetic resonance imaging follow-up examinations were included. Spine magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 3 Tesla with a standardized protocol (sagittal and axial T2-weighted turbo spin echo and T1-weighted post-contrast sequences). T2 lesion load and enhancing lesions were assessed by two independent neuroradiologists for lesion size, localization, and T2 signal ratio (T2 signal_lesion/T2 signal_{normal appearing spinal cord}).

Results

A total of 68 new spinal T2 lesions and 20 new contrast-enhancing lesions developed during follow-up. All enhancing lesions had a discernable correlate as a new T2 lesion. Lesion enhancement correlated with a higher T2 signal ratio compared to non-enhancing lesions (T2 signal ratio: 2.0 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.2, ****p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed an optimal cutoff value of signal ratio 1.78 to predict lesion enhancement (82% sensitivity and 97% specificity).

Conclusion

Gadolinium contrast administration is dispensable in follow-up spine magnetic resonance imaging if no new T2 lesions are present. Probability of enhancement correlates with the T2 signal ratio.

The contemporary role of MRI in the monitoring and management of people with multiple sclerosis in the UK

BACKGROUND

Compare the contemporary use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the monitoring and management of people with MS in the UK to current consensus guidelines.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre audit of clinical practice gathered data on 2567 patients with MS from 25 MS centres across the UK.

RESULTS

Routine monitoring (44.7%), and recent clinical relapse (20.3%) were the most common scan indications. In routine monitoring, the addition of spinal imaging to brain showed no significant difference in disease modifying treatment (DMT) decision at subsequent clinical review. Approximately 1 in 5 gadolinium administered scans showed enhancement, and in 1 in 20 patients, gadolinium enhancement was the only evidence of radiological disease activity. Mean inter-scan intervals in relapsing-remitting MS for routine monitoring was 19.2 months (SD 20.7) with wide variation between centres. Only 53.8% of patients under progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) surveillance met the recommended scanning frequency. MRI protocols demonstrated heterogeneity in the sequences used for diagnostic, monitoring and PML surveillance scans.

CONCLUSIONS

MS centres across the UK demonstrate varied practice and protocols when using MRI to monitor people with MS. In this cohort, gadolinium use and spinal imaging demonstrates limited impact on subsequent DMT decisions.

Simultaneous T2 and T 2 ∗ mapping of multiple sclerosis lesions with radial RARE-EPI

PURPOSE

The characteristic MRI features of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions make it conceptually appealing to pursue parametric mapping techniques that support simultaneous generation of quantitative maps of 2 or more MR contrast mechanisms. We present a modular rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE)-EPI hybrid that facilitates simultaneous T₂ and T 2 ∗ mapping (2in1-RARE-EPI).

METHODS

In 2in1-RARE-EPI the first echoes in the echo train are acquired with a RARE module, later echoes are acquired with an EPI module. To define the fraction of echoes covered by the RARE and EPI module, an error analysis of T₂ and T 2 ∗ was conducted with Monte Carlo simulations. Radial k-space (under)sampling was implemented for acceleration (R = 2). The feasibility of 2in1-RARE-EPI for simultaneous T₂ and T 2 ∗ mapping was examined in a phantom study mimicking T₂ and T 2 ∗ relaxation times of the brain. For validation, 2in1-RARE-EPI was benchmarked versus multi spin-echo (MSE) and multi gradient-echo (MGRE) techniques. The clinical applicability of 2in1-RARE-EPI was demonstrated in healthy subjects and MS patients.

RESULTS

There was a good agreement between T₂ / T 2 ∗ values derived from 2in1-RARE-EPI and T₂ / T 2 ∗ reference values obtained from MSE and MGRE in both phantoms and healthy subjects. In patients, MS lesions in T₂ and T 2 ∗ maps deduced from 2in1-RARE-EPI could be just as clearly delineated as in reference maps calculated from MSE/MGRE.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates the feasibility of radially (under)sampled 2in1-RARE-EPI for simultaneous T₂ and T 2 ∗ mapping in MS patients.

Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis

An individualized innovative disease management is of great importance for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to cope with the complexity of this chronic, multidimensional disease. However, an individual state of the art strategy, with precise adjustment to the patient's characteristics, is still far from being part of the everyday care of pwMS. The development of digital twins could decisively advance the necessary implementation of an individualized innovative management of MS. Through artificial intelligence-based analysis of several disease parameters - including clinical and para-clinical outcomes, multi-omics, biomarkers, patient-related data, information about the patient's life circumstances and plans, and medical procedures - a digital twin paired to the patient's characteristic can be created, enabling healthcare professionals to handle large amounts of patient data. This can contribute to a more personalized and effective care by integrating data from multiple sources in a standardized manner, implementing individualized clinical pathways, supporting physician-patient communication and facilitating a shared decision-making. With a clear display of pre-analyzed patient data on a dashboard, patient participation and individualized clinical decisions as well as the prediction of disease progression and treatment simulation could become possible. In this review, we focus on the advantages, challenges and practical aspects of digital twins in the management of MS. We discuss the use of digital twins for MS as a revolutionary tool to improve diagnosis, monitoring and therapy refining patients' well-being, saving economic costs, and enabling prevention of disease progression. Digital twins will help make precision medicine and patient-centered care a reality in everyday life.

FLAIR-only joint volumetric analysis of brain lesions and atrophy in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of multiple sclerosis

Background

MRI assessment in multiple sclerosis (MS) focuses on the presence of typical white matter (WM) lesions. Neurodegeneration characterised by brain atrophy is recognised in the research field as an important prognostic factor. It is not routinely reported clinically, in part due to difficulty in achieving reproducible measurements. Automated MRI quantification of WM lesions and brain volume could provide important clinical monitoring data. In general, lesion quantification relies on both T1 and FLAIR input images, while tissue volumetry relies on T1. However, T1-weighted scans are not routinely included in the clinical MS protocol, limiting the utility of automated quantification.

Objectives

We address an aspect of this important translational challenge by assessing the performance of FLAIR-only lesion and brain segmentation, against a conventional approach requiring multi-contrast acquisition. We explore whether FLAIR-only grey matter (GM) segmentation yields more variability in performance compared with two-channel segmentation; whether this is related to field strength; and whether the results meet a level of clinical acceptability demonstrated by the ability to reproduce established biological associations.

Methods

We used a multicentre dataset of subjects with a CIS suggestive of MS scanned at 1.5T and 3T in the same week. WM lesions were manually segmented by two raters, ‘manual 1′ guided by consensus reading of CIS-specific lesions and ‘manual 2′ by any WM hyperintensity. An existing brain segmentation method was adapted for FLAIR-only input. Automated segmentation of WM hyperintensity and brain volumes were performed with conventional (T1/T1 + FLAIR) and FLAIR-only methods.

Results

WM lesion volumes were comparable at 1.5T between ‘manual 2′ and FLAIR-only methods and at 3T between ‘manual 2′, T1 + FLAIR and FLAIR-only methods. For cortical GM volume, linear regression measures between conventional and FLAIR-only segmentation were high (1.5T: α = 1.029, R² = 0.997, standard error (SE) = 0.007; 3T: α = 1.019, R² = 0.998, SE = 0.006). Age-associated change in cortical GM volume was a significant covariate in both T1 (p = 0.001) and FLAIR-only (p = 0.005) methods, confirming the expected relationship between age and GM volume for FLAIR-only segmentations.

Conclusions

FLAIR-only automated segmentation of WM lesions and brain volumes were consistent with results obtained through conventional methods and had the ability to demonstrate biological effects in our study population. Imaging protocol harmonisation and validation with other MS phenotypes could facilitate the integration of automated WM lesion volume and brain atrophy analysis as clinical tools in radiological MS reporting.