Impact of bilateral breast cancer on prognosis: synchronous versus metachronous tumors

Trends and survival benefits of bilateral breast-conserving surgery in patients with metachronous bilateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the temporal trends and survival outcomes of bilateral breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in women diagnosed with metachronous bilateral breast cancer (MBBC) in the USA from 2000 to 2019.

METHODS

Patients with stage T0-T3 and stage 0-III MBBC who underwent unilateral BCS on one side and different surgical procedures on the contralateral side from 2000 to 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Cochrane-Armitage test for trend was employed to assess the trends in contralateral breast surgical procedures, including BCS, mastectomy (M) and breast-reconstruction (BR). Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Since BR is typically performed following M, survival data for the BR and M groups were combined and collectively analyzed as the M group.

RESULTS

A total of 9571 patients with stage T0-T3 and stage 0-III who underwent unilateral BCS were included in this study, with 75.84% (n = 7,259) opting for BCS treatment. The proportion of BCS was decreased significantly from 90.79% in 2000 to 74.04% in 2019 (P < 0.0001). Older age was positively correlated with BCS, while recent diagnosis, late T stage, lymph node metastasis, invasive lobular carcinoma and chemotherapy were negatively correlated with BCS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that BCS patients had better OS (P < 0.001) and BCSS (P < 0.001) compared with patients receiving M. Univariate Cox analysis indicated that BCS showed significant statistical differences in both OS and BCSS. Specifically, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS and BCSS were 0.717 (95% CI 0.649-0.791, P < 0.001) and 0.484 (95% CI 0.422-0.556, P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that BCS was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.012, 95% CI 0.904-1.132, P > 0.05), suggesting no significant difference in OS between the BCS and M groups. Conversely, BCS was an independent favorable prognostic factor for BCSS (HR = 0.746, 95% CI 0.634, 0.877; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite the initial high utilization of BCS in MBBC patients, our study revealed a decline in its usage over the course of the study period. Importantly, this decrease did not impact OS, suggesting the safety of BCS for MBBC patients. In light of these findings, clinicians are encouraged to recommend BCS for eligible MBBC patients, emphasizing its viability as a treatment option.

Clinical Relevance of TP53 Mutation and Its Characteristics in Breast Cancer with Long-Term Follow-Up Date

BACKGROUND

The TP53 mutation is one of the most frequently identified mutations in human cancers and is typically associated with a poor prognosis. However, there are conflicting findings regarding its impact. We aimed to clarify the clinical relevance of TP53 mutations across all breast cancer subtypes and treatments utilizing long-term follow-up data.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified the data of breast cancer patients who underwent TP53 mutation testing. Stratified log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were performed to compare oncologic outcomes based on TP53 mutation status and the characteristics of these mutations, including types and locations. Mutations in exons 5-9 were identified using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (PCR-DHPLC) and direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Between January 2007 and December 2015, 650 breast cancer patients underwent TP53 mutation testing in Gangnam Severance Hospital. The TP53 mutations were identified in 172 patients (26.5%), with 34 (19.8%) exhibiting missense hotspot mutations. Patients with TP53 mutations (TP53-mutated group) had worse prognosis, demonstrated by a 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of 83.5% compared to 86.6% in patients without mutations (HR, 1.67; p = 0.026) and a 10-year overall survival (OS) rate of 88.1% versus 91.0% (HR, 3.02; p = 0.003). However, subgroup analyses within the TP53-mutated group did not reveal significant differences in oncologic outcomes based on mutation types and locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings establish that TP53 mutations are linked to poorer oncologic outcomes in breast cancer across all subtypes. Yet, within the TP53-mutated group, the specific characteristics of TP53 mutations do not influence oncologic outcomes.

Determining the Need for Metastatic Staging in Patients with Bilateral Breast Cancers

Introduction: Bilateral breast cancers (BBC) diagnosed at an interval apart are uncommon. While metastatic staging guidelines are established in patients with unilateral breast cancer, its role in BBC diagnosed at an interval apart is unclear. We aim to identify the subgroup who would benefit from metastatic staging at contralateral cancer diagnosis. Methods: Eligible patients were divided into three categories: (A) ipsilateral invasive cancer and contralateral ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), (B) bilateral invasive cancers and (C) ipsilateral DCIS and contralateral invasive cancer and reviewed retrospectively. We excluded patients with bilateral DCIS, synchronous BBC diagnosed within 6 months from first cancer, patients who were stage IV at first cancer diagnosis and patients with recurrence prior to contralateral cancer. Results: Of 4516 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, 79 patients were included. Systemic metastasis occurred in 15.6% of patients in Group B. Having nodal positivity of either cancer which were diagnosed ≤30 months apart and nodal positivity of only the contralateral cancer when diagnosed >30 months apart was significantly associated with systemic metastasis (p = 0.0322). Conclusions: Both the nodal status and a 30 months cut-off time interval between the two cancers can be used to identify patients who will benefit from metastatic staging. This finding requires validation in larger studies.

Expression of Senescence and Apoptosis Biomarkers in Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer: A Case Report

Background: Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) provides a special condition where two independent breast tumors are exposed to cancer pharmacotherapy within a uniform pharmacokinetic milieu. Both senescence and apoptosis are established responses to therapy; however, they have potentially variable contributions to the overall outcome of treatment, which are yet to be determined. Methods: In this report, we describe the clinicopathological picture of two SBBC cases that received standard anticancer treatment and assess their expression profile of several molecular hallmarks of senescence and apoptosis. Results: Our analysis identified that synchronous tumors have variable expression profiles of both senescence- and apoptosis-associated biomarkers, despite comparable pathological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and current survival rates. Conclusions: Our results highlight the variable expression of senescence- and apoptosis-associated markers in breast tumors (despite the shared somatic genetic background) and invites a large-scale assessment of both senescence and apoptosis in breast cancer tissue in vivo and their contribution to the pathological response and overall survival.

Bilateral breast cancer in China: A 10-year single-center retrospective study (2006-2016)

Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is an uncommon subset of breast cancer (BC), and it may present as synchronous bilateral breast cancer (sBBC) or metachronous bilateral breast cancer (mBBC). Through this study, we aimed to evaluate the proportion of BBC in BC and compare the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of sBBC and mBBC at an academic cancer center in China. Patients with BC consecutively treated between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with BBC were included. In total, 3924 patients with BC were analyzed and 127 patients with BBC (28 sBBC, 99 mBBC) with a median follow-up of 98 months were identified. The proportion of BBC was 3.2% (0.7%, sBBC; 2.5%, mBBC). The median age at the first diagnosis of mBBC was significantly younger than that at the first diagnosis of sBBC (p = 0.027). Patients diagnosed as having sBBC were more likely to have a positive family history (p = 0.047). The first tumors of mBBC were detected at a significantly earlier tumor stage compared with those of sBBC (p = 0.028). The concordance rates of histopathologic type in the first and second tumors were 60.7% and 58.0% in sBBC and mBBC, respectively. sBBC had a significantly poorer disease-free survival than mBBC did (p = 0.001). BBC is a rare disease affecting the Chinese population. sBBC is associated with a greater prevalence of a family history of breast cancer and poorer prognosis, compared with mBBC.

Clinicopathological Characteristics, Treatment and Outcome of 123 Patients with Synchronous or Metachronous Bilateral Breast Cancer in a Swiss Institutional Retrospective Series

Objective

To evaluate the prognosis, the patient and tumor characteristics, and the treatment of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) and to compare synchronous (sBBC) and metachronous BBC (mBBC).

Materials and Methods

For this retrospective study, data from 123 consecutive BBC patients (56 sBBC and 67 mBBC) that were presented at the Sion Hospital tumor board between 2007 and 2018 were collected retrospectively.

Results

Mean follow-up was 85 months. 2^nd tumors in both groups were more often diagnosed radiologically. Mean time interval between mBBC was 115 months. A shorter interval was positively correlated with a negative hormonal receptor (HR) status and higher grade for the 2^nd tumor. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) between sBBC and mBBC. OS was longer if both tumors were hormonal receptor (HR) positive. mBBC exhibited a higher local recurrence rate than sBBC (p=0.03).

Conclusion

sBBC and mBBC patients did not show any difference in OS or RFS, although mBBC patients were more prone to local relapses.

Worse characteristics can predict survival effectively in bilateral primary breast cancer: A competing risk nomogram using the SEER database

Objective

There is limited information from population‐based cancer registries regarding prognostic features of bilateral primary breast cancer (BPBC).

Methods

Female patients diagnosed with BPBC between 2004 and 2014 were randomly divided into training (n = 7740) and validation (n = 2579) cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. We proposed five various models. Multivariate Cox hazard regression and competing risk analysis were to explore prognosis factors in training cohort. Competing risk nomograms were constructed to combine significant prognostic factors to predict the 3‐year and the 5‐year survival of patients with BPBC. At last, in the validation cohort, the new score performance was evaluated with respect to the area under curve, concordance index, net reclassification index and calibration curve.

Results

We found out that age, interval time, lymph nodes invasion, tumor size, tumor grade and estrogen receptor status were independent prognostic factors in both multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis and competing risk analysis. Concordance index in the model of the worse characteristics was 0.816 (95% CI: 0.791‐0.840), of the bilateral tumors was 0.819 (95% CI: 0.793‐0.844), of the worse tumor was 0.807 (0.782‐0.832), of the first tumor was 0.744 (0.728‐0.763) and of the second tumor was 0.778 (0.762‐0.794). Net reclassification index of the 3‐year and the 5‐year between them was 2.7% and −1.0%. The calibration curves showed high concordance between the nomogram prediction and actual observation.

Conclusion

The prognosis of BPBC depended on bilateral tumors. The competing risk nomogram of the model of the worse characteristics may help clinicians predict survival simply and effectively. Metachronous bilateral breast cancer presented poorer survival than synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

Is contralateral breast ultrasound worthwhile in preoperative staging of breast cancer?

BACKGROUND

Women with invasive breast cancer are at higher risk of contralateral synchronous cancer. This study aimed at determining if contralateral breast ultrasound (CBUS) examination should be routinely performed in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of preoperative CBUS examinations performed between January 2012 and April 2015. The charts of patients presenting for biopsy of a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 5 lesion and who had undergone a concomitant contralateral breast US examination were reviewed. Index tumor, lymph node status, American College of Radiology (ACR) breast density on mammogram, total scanning time, and results of CBUS were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 3007 patients who underwent breast biopsies during the study period, 360 patients met the inclusion criteria. Index mass size was 19 ± 10 mm. CBUS examination led to 76 biopsies, of which 12 were positive in 11 patients. Detection rate for mammographically occult contralateral invasive cancers was 3.1% (11/360). Contralateral lesion size was 13 ± 10 mm. Breast density was rated ACR C/D for nine women and ACR B for two. In the ACR C/D subgroup (82%), the contralateral cancer detection rate was 4.1%. Average additional scanning time spent required to perform CBUS examination was 3.1 ± 4.9 min. Patients diagnosed with contralateral invasive breast cancer underwent surgery and/or chemotherapy. The treatment strategy was changed in all 11 patients after the detection of a second primary cancer.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CBUS is effective and most beneficial with women presenting ACR C/D breast density. Given its impact on decreasing future morbidity, its routine use should be considered to improve quality healthcare for women diagnosed with breast cancer.

The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta-analysis of studies from recent decade (2008-2018)

Background

The incidence of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is increasing nowadays comprising 2%‐11% of all breast cancer (BC). According to the interval time between the first and second cancer, BBC could be divided into synchronous (SBBC) and metachronous (MBBC). However, this interval time is quite different across studies. It remains controversial whether the survival of BBC, SBBC, and MBBC is similar or worse compared to that of unilateral breast cancer (UBC), and whether the survival of SBBC is similar or worse compared to MBBC. To better understand the survival of UBC, BBC, SBBC, and MBBC and how the interval time would influence the prognosis of SBBC and MBBC, we performed this meta‐analysis on studies from recent 10 years (2008‐2018).

Methods

Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies within recent 10 years. Hazard ratio (HR) was adopted to evaluate the difference of overall survival (OS) of UBC, BBC, SBBC, and MBBC. HR of OS comparisons were performed between BBC vs UBC, SBBC vs UBC, MBBC vs UBC, and SBBC vs MBBC with 3, 6, 12 months as the interval time, respectively.

Results

There were 15 studies of 72 302 UBC and 2912 BBC included in the meta‐analysis. The summary HR of OS comparison between BBC vs UBC was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.28‐2.20), SBBC vs UBC was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.14‐3.55), MBBC vs UBC was 3.22 (95% CI: 0.75‐13.78). When 3, 6, 12 months were used as the interval time, the summary HR of the OS comparison between of SBBC vs MBBC were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44‐0.94), 1.17 (95% CI: 0.84‐1.63) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.10‐1.92), respectively.

Conclusion

BBC and SBBC showed worse prognosis in terms of OS compared to UBC while MBBC manifested similar or non‐superior survival as UBC. The OS comparison between SBBC and MBBC changed with different interval time used. The longer the interval time used, the worse the survival of SBBC. SBBC with interval of 3‐12 months between the two cancers had the worst prognosis. When 6 months was used to differentiate SBBC from MBBC, these two clinical entities showed similar OS.

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Synchronous and Metachronous Contralateral Breast Cancer: A Study of the SEER Database

Purpose

Numerous previous studies have reported inconsistent results about the differences between synchronous contralateral breast cancer (sCBC) and metachronous contralateral breast cancer (mCBC). This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between sCBC and mCBC and determine predictive factors for the survival of sCBC and mCBC patients.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database, we identified sCBC or mCBC patients from 2000 to 2010. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to analyze overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates of sCBCs and mCBCs, respectively.

Results

Overall, 14,057 sCBC (n = 8,139, 57.9%) and mCBC (n = 5,918, 42.1%) patients were included. The first tumors of sCBC were more likely to have higher stage and more lymph and distant metastases, whereas those of mCBC were more often infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), had localized stage, were estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative, and had less axillary nodal involvement. The second tumors of mCBC tended to be IDC and have higher grade, adverse stage, ER and PR-negativity; and more axillary nodal involvement, compared to the second tumors of sCBC. mCBC patients had significantly favorable 5-year BCSS but worse long-term BCSS compared with sCBC patients. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference of BCSS between sCBC and mCBC among patients aged 18-60 years. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, grade, and stage of 2 tumors; surgery for second tumor; and ER status of the second tumor were independent prognostic factors for BCSS of contralateral breast cancer (CBC).

Conclusion

The characteristics and outcomes of sCBCs and mCBCs were substantially different. sCBC and mCBC patients may have different prognosis, and the prognosis of CBC depends on the first and second tumors.

Properties of Synchronous Versus Metachronous Bilateral Breast Carcinoma with Long Time Follow Up

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type among women with increasing incidence rates, improved prognosis and survival. According to the localization of the tumor, breast cancer is designated as unilateral (UBC) or bilateral (BBC). BBC can be classified as synchronous (SBBC) or metachronous (MBBC) based on the time interval between the diagnosis of the first and the secondary tumors. According to the guideline of WHO 2012, BBC is generally defined as SBBC when contralateral breast carcinoma is diagnosed within 3 months. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and patterns of metastasis of BBC patients with UBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 768 patients with breast cancer treated at the Turkish Ministry of Health-Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital between 1976 and 2012 were studied. Survival analysis was performed comparing UBC and BBC patients. In addition, evaluations were performed in patients with SBBC and MBBC sub-groups. We used a 3-months interval to distinguish metachronous from synchronous.

RESULTS

When clinical and histopathological parameters were statistically evaluated, ER status, event-free and overall survival were found to be significant between UBC and BBC patients. In comparison of SBBC and MBBC patients, age, histological type of tumor, event-free and overall survival were found to be significant.

CONCLUSIONS

BBC cases were found to show worse prognosis than UBC cases. Among BBC, SBBC had the worst prognosis based on overall survival rates.

Lung Cancer and Multiple Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis

Over the past 30 years there has been an increase in the survival of cancer patients resulting from the advances in cancer management and improved detection of cancer in its early stages. The aim of the study was to analyze the frequency of multiple malignancies in a sample of hospitalized patients in Poland. We analyzed retrospectively the records of 1112 cancer patients hospitalized in the period of January 2013 - August 2014. The criterion for inclusion into the group of multiple malignancy patients was the presence of at least two different malignancies. We found 52 cases in which lung cancer accompanied different malignancies and 4 cases where the multiple malignancy was not associated with the respiratory system. Lung cancer was chronologically the first malignancy unravelled in 11 patients, the second in 39, and the third in 2. Other malignancies chronologically being the first to be unravelled in patients included the following: colorectal cancer in 8 patients, prostatic cancer in 6, renal cell carcinoma 4, and the subsequent: prostate cancer 4, bladder cancer 3, hematopoietic malignancies 3, and breast cancer 2. We conclude that patients with multiple malignancy account for 5.0 % of lung cancer patients. Lung cancer is more frequent as a second malignancy developing in patients with multiple malignancy. Synchronous cancers become apparent at older age than metachronous cancers.