Histamine-2 receptor antagonists do not alter serum ethanol levels in fed, nonalcoholic men

Drug Interactions with Antiulcer Agents: Considerations in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

All of the antiulcer agents have been implicated in drug interactions. These agents generally influence the absorption, metabolism, or elimination of other medications. However, these interactions can lead to alterations in pharmacodynamic response. The mechanisms by which antiulcer agents produce drug interactions differ among the agents. It is beyond the scope of this article to review all of the drug interactions that have been reported with antiulcer agents. However, it is the intent to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which antiulcer agents may interact with other medications and to provide insight into factors that may influence the potential magnitude or clinical consequences of these interactions. An understanding of antiulcer drug interactions will aid pharmacists in assisting clinicians with drug selection and/or monitoring of drug interactions. Specifically, pharmacists can assist with the identification of potential antiulcer drug interactions and develop strategies designed to minimize adverse consequences of these interactions.

Alcoholic liver disease: a synopsis of the Charles Lieber's Memorial Symposia 2009-2012

This paper is based upon the 'Charles Lieber Satellite Symposia' organized by Manuela G. Neuman at each of the 2009-2012 Research Society on Alcoholism (RSA) Annual Meetings. The presentations represent a broad spectrum dealing with alcoholic liver disease (ALD). In addition, a literature search (2008-2013) in the discussed area was performed in order to obtain updated data. The presentations are focused on genetic polymorphisms of ethanol metabolizing enzymes and the role of cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) in ALD. In addition, alcohol-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis, immune response to alcohol and fibrogenesis in alcoholic hepatitis as well as its co-morbidities with chronic viral hepatitis infections in the presence or absence of human deficiency virus are discussed. Finally, emphasis was led on alcohol and drug interactions as well as liver transplantation for end-stage ALD.

Inhibition of human alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases by cimetidine and assessment of its effects on ethanol metabolism

Previous studies have reported that cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist used to treat gastric and duodenal ulcers, can inhibit alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) and ethanol metabolism. Human alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), the principal enzymes responsible for metabolism of ethanol, are complex enzyme families that exhibit functional polymorphisms among ethnic groups and distinct tissue distributions. We investigated the inhibition by cimetidine of alcohol oxidation by recombinant human ADH1A, ADH1B1, ADH1B2, ADH1B3, ADH1C1, ADH1C2, ADH2, and ADH4, and aldehyde oxidation by ALDH1A1 and ALDH2 at pH 7.5 and a cytosolic NAD(+) concentration. Cimetidine acted as competitive or noncompetitive inhibitors for the ADH and ALDH isozymes/allozymes with near mM inhibition constants. The metabolic interactions between cimetidine and ethanol/acetaldehyde were assessed by computer simulation using the inhibition equations and the determined kinetic constants. At therapeutic drug levels (0.015 mM) and physiologically relevant concentrations of ethanol (10 mM) and acetaldehyde (10 μM) in target tissues, cimetidine could weakly inhibit (<5%) the activities of ADH1B2 and ADH1B3 in liver, ADH2 in liver and small intestine, ADH4 in stomach, and ALDH1A1 in the three tissues, but not significantly affect ADH1A, ADH1B1, ADH1C1/2, or ALDH2. At higher drug levels, which may accumulate in cells (0.2 mM), the activities of the weakly-inhibited enzymes may be decreased more significantly. The quantitative effects of cimetidine on metabolism of ethanol and other physiological substrates of ADHs need further investigation.

Overview of medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

There appears to be a hierarchy in the efficacy of therapies that are directed against GERD. A summary of this hierarchy, including therapies [table: see text] not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, is presented in Table 4. The individual practitioner must evaluate the appropriate point at which to place each patient on this hierarchy. Whether it is best to begin with the drug with the highest efficacy and step-down as possible for maintenance, never to step down, or to start with a less efficacious therapy and step up must also be individualized because there are no clear data to support a universal approach to all or even most GERD patients.

Effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists on blood alcohol levels: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect, if any, of histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on serum alcohol levels under various conditions including type of H2RA receptor antagonist, alcohol dose, and fed status of the subject.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of the published literature.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by MEDLINE (January 1982 through December 1997) using the key words H2 receptor antagonists and alcohol. Other studies were identified by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles and by discussion with colleagues.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they involved the coadministration of H2RAs and alcohol in healthy, human volunteers. Studies that may have addressed this goal but were performed in another context, for instance the measurement of ulcer healing, were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted on the design, number of participants, participant characteristics, type and dose of H2RA administered, serum alcohol levels (measured as Cmax) along with standard deviations, dose of alcohol received, and fed or fasted status of participants. Alcohol dose was arbitrarily divided into low dose (< or = 0.5 g/kg body weight) versus high dose (> 0.5 g/kg body weight). In addition, studies involving ranitidine and cimetidine were stratified by sample size into small (n < or = 10) versus not small (n > 10).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four trials met selection criteria. Small elevations in Cmax were noted when cimetidine (2.71 mg/DL; 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.60, 3.83) or ranitidine (6.95 mg/DL; 95% CI 5.83, 8.08) were coadministered with alcohol. No such differences were noted for famotidine (0.28 mg/DL; 95% CI -1.24, 1.80) or nizatidine (2.33 mg/DL;, 95% CI -0.06, 4.72). The elevation detected with cimetidine and ranitidine was most pronounced in smaller studies (n < 10). Separate analyses investigating the effect of alcohol dose and fed or fasted status of participants revealed no clinically important differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Cimetidine and ranitidine, but not the other H2RAs, can cause small elevations of serum alcohol level when alcohol and drug are administered concurrently. Studies with larger numbers of participants were less likely to demonstrate this effect. Relative to accepted, legal definitions of intoxication, the effect of any H2RA on blood alcohol level is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Metabolism of ethanol and some associated adverse effects on the liver and the stomach

Current knowledge of alcohol oxidation and its effects on hepatic metabolism and its toxicity are summarized. This includes an evaluation of the relationship of the level of consumption to its interaction with nutrients (especially retinoids, carotenoids, and folate) and the development of various stages of liver disease. Ethanol metabolism in the stomach and its link to pathology and Helicobacter pylori is reviewed. Promising therapeutic approaches evolving from newly gained insight in the pathogenesis of medical complications of alcoholism are outlined. At present, the established approach for the prevention and treatment of alcoholism are outlined. At present, the established approach for the prevention and treatment of alcoholic liver injury is to control alcohol abuse, with the judicial application of selective antioxidant therapy, instituted at early stages, prior to the social or medical disintegration of the patient, and associated with antiinflammatory agents at the acute phase of alcoholic hepatitis. In addition, effective antifibrotic therapy may soon become available.

Gastric ethanol metabolism and gastritis: interactions with other drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and antibiotic therapy (1957-1997)--a review

The stomach provides some protection against the penetration of ethanol into the body by contributing to the metabolism of ethanol. The latter is attenuated by various drugs and, although the magnitude of this effect is still the subject of debate, patients should be warned of the corresponding possible increase in blood alcohol levels. Furthermore, oxidation of ethanol generates acetaldehyde, a toxic metabolite. In addition, chronic alcohol abuse seems to favor colonization by Helicobacter pylori, which produces ammonia that also contributes to the commonly associated chronic gastritis. Because antibiotics were shown over the last 4 decades to effectively eliminate gastric ammonia, they should be considered for the routine treatment of such chronic gastritis in the way they are now being used for ulcer therapy.

The effect of cimetidine on ethanol concentrations in fasting women and men after two different doses of alcohol

BACKGROUND

Serum ethanol concentrations may become higher when alcohol is consumed during treatment with histamine receptor antagonists, especially if ethanol is ingested postprandially. Only a few studies have investigated fasting subjects, and women have only been investigated sporadically.

METHODS

The present study compared serum ethanol concentrations after a 4-h fast followed by a low (0.15 g/kg) and a high (0.45 g/kg) dose of ethanol, on two separate occasions in six women and six men. The study was carried out before and after treatment with 400 mg cimetidine twice daily.

RESULTS

Cimetidine administration did not change the area under the concentration-time curve or the maximal serum ethanol concentration in either women or men, irrespective of ethanol dose. Ethanol elimination rate was unchanged by cimetidine.

CONCLUSION

Cimetidine does not influence the ethanol concentration-time curve when ethanol is ingested on an empty stomach.

The safety of ranitidine in over a decade of use

BACKGROUND

Ranitidine hydrochloride (Zantac) is one of the most extensively studied and widely used drugs of all time. This has provided an excellent opportunity to define its safety profile.

METHODS

Data from 189 controlled clinical trials in which more than 26,000 patients received daily doses of ranitidine for 4 weeks or more were reviewed. More than 80% of patients were treated with up to 300 mg ranitidine daily; the remaining patients received doses of up to 1200 mg daily. Eighty-seven trials were placebo controlled. Analyses of post-marketing surveillance and a database of all spontaneously reported adverse events were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall in the clinical trial programme adverse events were reported by 20% of those receiving ranitidine compared with 27% of those receiving placebo. The pattern of events was similar in all treatment groups with no evidence of dose-related toxicity in regimens encompassing an eightfold range of therapeutic doses. Similarly in a programme of studies designed to evaluate a dose of ranitidine of 75 mg for non-prescription (over-the-counter) use in the treatment of heartburn, ranitidine was not associated with an adverse event profile distinct from that of placebo. Analysis of spontaneously reported adverse event data allowed identification of rare idiosyncratic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of data from a large population of controlled clinical trials with analyses of postmarketing surveillance studies and spontaneously reported adverse events confirmed the excellent safety profile of ranitidine.

Metabolism of ethanol in rat gastric cells and its inhibition by cimetidine

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several studies have shown that the stomach has sufficient alcohol dehydrogenase activity to metabolize a significant amount of alcohol and that cimetidine depresses this alcohol dehydrogenase activity. However, both gastric metabolism of ethanol and its inhibition by cimetidine remain controversial. Given the difficulty in assessing gastric metabolism of ethanol in vivo, this subject was investigated in vitro.

METHODS

Cultured rat gastric epithelial cells were incubated with 200 mmol/L [1-14C]ethanol for 90 minutes with and without cimetidine (0.1-1 mmol/L) or omeprazole (1 mmol/L). The quantity of ethanol oxidized by gastric cells was measured by the amount of acetate produced using ion exchange chromatography.

RESULTS

The majority of cells at confluency had typical features of mucous cells. The gastric cells metabolized significant amounts of ethanol, sufficient to account for in vivo first-pass metabolism of ethanol in rats. Cimetidine, but not omeprazole, reduced ethanol metabolism by 39.9% +/- 4.9% (P < 0.01), an inhibition comparable with that previously reported for first-pass metabolism in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cells in tissue culture are capable of significant ethanol oxidation, the in vitro rates are sufficient to account for first-pass metabolism of ethanol in vivo, and cimetidine inhibits ethanol metabolism in tissue culture, an effect that parallels its decrease of first-pass metabolism in vivo.

Safety of acid-suppressing drugs

There is an extensive literature on the adverse effects of drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion. This study presents a critical examination of interactions between antisecretory drugs and other compounds, the frequency of serious adverse effects relating to various body systems, the safety of antisecretory drugs in pregnancy, and longer-term safety data from postmarketing surveillance studies. While interactions with some other drugs, alcohol, and certain carcinogens are of potential concern, in practice clinically significant reactions appear to be rare if they occur at all. A small number of major side-effects have been documented, but they occur rarely, and postmarketing surveillance has not detected other longer-term sequelae. Safety of these drugs in pregnancy is not established, as data are so few. It is concluded that antisecretory agents, by comparison with most other classes of drugs, are remarkably well tolerated.

Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastritis on gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity

Sex and age differences in gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity in relation to abnormalities of gastric histology and Helicobacter pylori infection were determined in 63 patients (32 men and 31 women) undergoing upper endoscopy for gastrointestinal symptoms. No sex difference was found in gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity. Males older than 50 years had lower enzyme activity than younger males. Patients with H. pylori and/or moderate to severe chronic and acute inflammation and epithelial mucin depletion had lower alcohol dehydrogenase activity in the antrum, but not in the fundus. H. pylori was found more frequently in the older male patients. Antral alcohol dehydrogenase was most decreased in older patients of both sexes with H. pylori infection. In conclusion, H. pylori infection and/or chronic active gastritis are important causes of low gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity.

H2-antagonists and alcohol. Do they interact?

There are conflicting data on the existence of significant first-pass metabolism of alcohol (ethanol) in the human stomach and its inhibition by histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Alcohol is predominantly metabolised in the liver by the microsomal alcohol oxidising system, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and a catalase enzyme. Histochemical and kinetic studies have revealed several ADH isoenzymes in the gastric mucosa with different kinetic properties. After small oral doses of alcohol first-pass metabolism in the stomach occurs, as shown by reduced area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with intravenous or intraduodenal administration. The activity of gastric ADH is reduced in women, the elderly, Asian individuals, the fasting state, chronic alcoholism and after gastrectomy. The effect is only present with small (< or = 0.3 g/kg) alcohol doses and with a high alcohol concentration. In a number of studies, cimetidine in therapeutic doses over 7 days produced a significant increase in the AUC and in the peak plasma concentration after administration of alcohol 0.15 and 0.30 g/kg. This was related to an inhibition of gastric ADH activity, as shown by in vitro studies. Ranitidine inhibited gastric ADH to a similar extent on a molar basis, but its effect on alcohol levels in vivo was less constant in various studies. Nizatidine also reduced gastric alcohol first-pass metabolism, but famotidine and roxatidine did not show this effect. In other studies, H2-receptor antagonists did not change AUC and peak alcohol concentration. The controversy is not easy to resolve, since a number of the positive studies did not use a placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover design, while some of the negative studies did not exclude habitual alcohol consumers and included Oriental volunteers, although both groups have been shown to lack significant gastric ADH activity. In this case, when first-pass metabolism of alcohol does not exist, this by definition cannot be abolished by H2-antagonists. The inclusion of oral and intravenous dosage data of alcohol is mandatory to positively identify first-pass metabolism in any individuals. The significance of the effect of H2-antagonists on blood alcohol concentrations is minor. It only occurs in young, male, nonalcoholic, non-Asian individuals, and alcohol must be given in a small (social) dose, in a high concentration, and after meals. An increase in alcohol levels in predisposed patients during treatment with some H2-antagonists cannot be excluded, although the likelihood is small. Furthermore, carefully designed studies are needed to clarify fully the significance of this interaction.

Alcohol and the liver: 1994 update

This article reviews current concepts on the pathogenesis and treatment of alcoholic liver disease. It has been known that the hepatotoxicity of ethanol results from alcohol dehydrogenase-mediated excessive generation of hepatic nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced form, and acetaldehyde. It is now recognized that acetaldehyde is also produced by an accessory (but inducible) microsomal pathway that additionally generates oxygen radicals and activates many xenobiotics to toxic metabolites, thereby explaining the increased vulnerability of heavy drinkers to industrial solvents, anesthetics, commonly used drugs, over-the-counter medications, and carcinogens. The contribution of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase to the first-pass metabolism of ethanol and alcohol-drug interactions is discussed. Roles for hepatitis C, cytokines, sex, genetics, and age are now emerging. Alcohol also alters the degradation of key nutrients, thereby promoting deficiencies as well as toxic interactions with vitamin A and beta carotene. Conversely, nutritional deficits may affect the toxicity of ethanol and acetaldehyde, as illustrated by the depletion in glutathione, ameliorated by S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Other "supernutrients" include polyunsaturated lecithin, shown to correct the alcohol-induced hepatic phosphatidylcholine depletion and to prevent alcoholic cirrhosis in nonhuman primates. Thus, a better understanding of the pathology induced by ethanol is now generating improved prospects for therapy.

Mechanisms of ethanol-drug-nutrition interactions

Mechanisms of the toxicologic manifestations of ethanol abuse are reviewed. Hepatotoxicity of ethanol results from alcohol dehydrogenase-mediated excessive hepatic generation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and acetaldehyde. It is now recognized that acetaldehyde is also produced by an accessory (but inducible) pathway, the microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system, which involves a specific cytochrome P450. It generates oxygen radicals and activates many xenobiotics to toxic metabolites, thereby explaining the increased vulnerability of heavy drinkers to industrial solvents, anesthetics, commonly used drugs, over-the-counter medications and carcinogens. The contribution of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase to the first pass metabolism of ethanol and alcohol-drug interactions is now recognized. Alcohol also alters the degradation of key nutrients, thereby promoting deficiencies as well as toxic interactions with vitamin A and beta-carotene. Conversely, nutritional deficits may affect the toxicity of ethanol and acetaldehyde, as illustrated by the depletion in glutathione, ameliorated by S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Other supernutrients include polyenylphosphatidylcholine, shown to correct the alcohol-induced hepatic phosphatidylcholine depletion and to prevent alcoholic cirrhosis in non-human primates. Thus, a better understanding of the pathology induced by ethanol has now generated improved prospects for therapy.

Peptic ulcer disease: an update

Peptic ulcers can develop when there is an imbalance between gastric acid secretion and gastroduodenal mucosal defense. Investigators are looking at the role of Helicobacter pylori in the development of peptic ulcer disease; eradication of the microorganism may reduce recurrence. Approved drug therapy includes H2-receptor antagonists, omeprazole, sucralfate, and antacids. Recommendations for treating and counseling patients are provided.