Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Cancer Recurrence in Swedish Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and recently diagnosed early-stage colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors could impair tumoural immunity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. We aimed to investigate the association between survival and TNF inhibitor treatment during the first 3 years after a diagnosis of colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we conducted a secondary data analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked dataset. We included patients aged 66 years and older with rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed with colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2019, using ICD-O-3 site and histology codes. We limited the cohort to patients who had early-stage cancer (localised or regional). We only included patients who received TNF inhibitors, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), or no DMARDs in the first year after cancer diagnosis. The primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Exposures were use of TNF inhibitors, conventional synthetic DMARDs, or no DMARDs within 3 years after cancer diagnosis. Other covariates included demographics and comorbidities. We conducted landmark analyses at years 1, 2, and 3, with Cox regression adjusted by propensity scores. People with lived experience of rheumatoid arthritis and cancer were not involved in the design or conduct of this study.

FINDINGS

We identified three cohorts of patients diagnosed with early-stage colorectal cancer (n=514), lung cancer (n=864), or prostate cancer (n=603) between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2019. In the colorectal cancer cohort, the mean age was 76·1 years (SD 6·4), 385 (75%) of 514 patients were female, 129 (25%) were male, and 405 (79%) were White and non-Hispanic. In the lung cancer cohort, the mean age was 74·8 years (SD 5·9), 632 (73%) of 864 patients were female, 232 (27%) were male, and 743 (86%) were White and non-Hispanic. In the prostate cancer cohort, the mean age was 73·1 years (SD 5·1), 603 (100%) patients were male, and 492 (82%) were White and non-Hispanic. 80 (16%) of 514 patients with colorectal cancer, 102 (12%) of 864 patients with lung cancer, and 120 (20%) of 603 patients with prostate cancer received TNF inhibitors with or without conventional synthetic DMARDs at any time during the first year after cancer diagnosis. No significant deleterious association was observed for overall survival or cancer-specific survival for any of the cancers at any of the three landmark points. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs for overall survival for year 1 comparing TNF inhibitors with conventional synthetic DMARDs in the three cohorts were 0·72 (0·43-1·21) for colorectal cancer, 0·70 (0·49-1·00) for lung cancer, and 0·80 (0·44-1·44) for prostate cancer. Patients who received glucocorticoids in the first year had significantly worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival than those who did not in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models for the three cancers.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with TNF inhibitors during the first 3 years after diagnosis of colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer was not associated with poorer survival compared with those who received conventional synthetic DMARDs or those who did not receive any DMARDs. However, these findings might not be generalisable to other populations or types of cancer.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and NIH/National Cancer Institute through MD Andeson's Cancer Center Support Grant and Komen.

Cancer recurrence risk with bDMARD treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a history of cancer: a nationwide Danish register-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of cancer recurrence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a prior solid cancer in remission treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with those who received only conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).

METHODS

Nationwide registry-based cohort study of Danish patients with RA and one of the six algorithm-specific solid cancers in remission (breast, colorectal, melanoma, bladder, endometrial and lung) who initiated treatment with a bDMARD or a csDMARD. Three bDMARD exposure groups were defined according to the type(s) of bDMARD initiated: (1) any bDMARD, (2) tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and (3) rituximab. Patients were identified in Danish Rheumatology Quality Register and followed for cancer recurrence from 2002 to 2021 using validated cancer-specific recurrence algorithms. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate HRs for cancer recurrence in each bDMARD exposure group compared with a csDMARD-treated group.

RESULTS

Among 720 unique patients with RA and an algorithm-specific solid cancer in remission, 170 any bDMARD, 81 TNFi, 99 rituximab and 651 csDMARD initiators were identified. No statistically significant increased HRs for cancer recurrence were found with any type of bDMARD 0.92 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.73), TNFi 1.10 (95% CI 0.21 to 3.16) or rituximab 0.94 (95% CI 0.32 to 2.11). Also, no increased HRs were shown for breast cancer recurrence specifically.

CONCLUSION

No indications of increased cancer recurrence risk were found for bDMARDs as used in clinical practice in patients with RA and a solid cancer in remission when compared with csDMARD treatment.

Inflammatory Pathways to Carcinogenesis: Deciphering the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Lung Cancer Connection

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common chronic autoimmune arthropathy. If the disease is aggressive or left untreated, it becomes debilitating, affects a patient's functionality, and reduces the quality of life. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), both conventional, targeted, and biological, decrease the disease progression and are key components of effective treatment. Recently, there has been a continuous debate about the possible carcinogenicity of various DMARDs. Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The available data show an increased risk of lung cancer in RA patients, but the link between RA and cancer is poorly understood. Carcinogenesis in RA seems to be related to chronic inflammation, familial predisposition, risky behaviors (e.g., smoking), and iatrogenic complications. The main mechanisms of carcinogenic processes in patients with RA are the up-regulation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) cytokine production and wingless/integrated WNT signaling. Up-regulation of WNT5A is an important mechanism that links chronic inflammatory pathways to carcinogenesis observed in RA patients. Concomitant up-regulation of transcription factor STAT3 promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis. Conversely, suppressed inflammatory processes by DMARDs may decrease the risk of lung cancer. In this article, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of lung cancer in RA and the role of DMARDs in this process. Furthermore, we analyze the molecular effect of drug-induced cancer, which affects transcription factors and thus modulates carcinogenic processes. Finally, we describe risk factors and present preventive and therapeutic approaches.

North American clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of hidradenitis suppurativa in special patient populations

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) affects different patient populations that require unique considerations in their management. However, no HS guidelines for these populations exist.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based consensus recommendations for patients with HS in 7 special patient populations: (i) pregnancy, (ii) breastfeeding, (iii) pediatrics, (iv) malignancy, (v) tuberculosis infection, (vi) hepatitis B or C infection, and (vii) HIV disease.

METHODS

Recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to ascertain level of evidence and selected through a modified Delphi consensus process.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen expert consensus statements are provided for the management of patients with HS across these 7 special patient populations.

Cancer Incidence and Outcome for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Long-term Population Study in Western Australia

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the incidence of malignancy and its effect on mortality between hospitalized patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and controls.

METHODS

We conducted a population-level observational study of patients with RA (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 714 and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, Australian Modification [ICD-10-AM] codes M05-M06) in the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection (HMDC) in Western Australia (WA) between 1985 and 2015, as well as nonexposed hospitalized controls matched on sex, age, and year of index admission. HMDC data were linked to the WA Cancer Registry and the WA Death Registry data, and cancer incidence rates (CIRs) per 1000 person-years, incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CIs, and Kaplan Meier survival were estimated.

RESULTS

Among 14,041 patients with RA (67.56% female, median age 65.1 years) and 33,785 controls (65.16% female, median age 65.3 years), preexisting cancer in patients with RA was less prevalent than in controls (7.6% vs 14.2%; P < 0.01). In participants without prior cancer, the overall post index CIR was lower in those with RA (CIR 19.68 vs 24.77; IRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.83) and stable over 3 study decades. CIR was higher in patients with RA for lung (CIR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.34) and hematological cancer (CIR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.43) but lower for most other cancer types. Overall median survival was lower for patients with RA than controls (3.3 vs 5.3 years; P < 0.001) with increased mortality rates observed for most cancer subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Overall CIR in patients with RA was consistently lower over time than in matched controls. CIR was only increased for lung and hematological cancer. Despite the overall lower CIR, post cancer mortality was higher for patients with RA in most cancer subtypes.

Survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and early breast cancer treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

BACKGROUND

There have been concerns about the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for autoimmune disease in patients with recently diagnosed cancer. We assessed the survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and newly diagnosed early breast cancer (BC) treated with TNFi in the first two years after BC diagnosis.

METHODS

We identified patients in two datasets: (1) Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM), (2) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) and Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) Medicare-linked cohort. We grouped patients according to whether they received TNFi, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) only, or no DMARDs within 2 years after BC. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and BC-specific survival (BCSS). We conducted landmark analyses at years 1 and 2, with multivariable Cox regressions using propensity scores for adjustment.

RESULTS

In the first year after BC, 165/970 (17.0%) and 201/1246 (16.1%) patients received TNFi in CDM and SEER/TCR-Medicare respectively. In the 1 year landmark, no significant differences in OS were observed between patients treated with TNFi and patients treated with csDMARDs only in CDM (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.40) or SEER/TCR-Medicare (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31). BCSS (SEER/TCR-Medicare) was better in patients receiving TNFi than in those receiving csDMARDs only (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.98). In CDM, glucocorticoid therapy had worse OS than those without glucocorticoids (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.13-4.18). This was also observed in SEER/TCR-Medicare (not statistically significant). Similar results were observed for the 2 year landmark.

CONCLUSIONS

TNFi treatment during the first two years after early BC was not associated with worse survival.

Trends in the use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and recently diagnosed colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) are often discontinued when a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is diagnosed with cancer. Our aim was to determine trends in bDMARD utilization in patients with RA and recently diagnosed cancer.

METHOD

We examined two national claims databases to identify adults with RA and recently diagnosed colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database 2008-2022, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) Medicare-linked 2008-2017). We determined time trends in bDMARD and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) prescriptions during the first 3 years after cancer with Cochram-Armitage tests and multivariable logistic regression. Cancer cohorts were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

We included 3595 patients in all six cohorts (in Clinformatics® 503 with colorectal, 468 with lung, and 440 with prostate cancer; in SEER-Medicare 580 with colorectal, 1010 with lung, and 594 with prostate cancer). No significant increase was observed in bDMARD or TNFi utilization over time. Overall, use of bDMARD within the first 3 years of follow-up ranged from 16.7% (Clinformatics® lung cohort) to 29.7% (SEER-Medicare colorectal cohort). The major predictor of bDMARD utilization was prior use in the 3 months before cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001 for all cancers) and earlier cancer stage (p < 0.001 in colorectal and lung cancer and p = 0.05 in prostate cancer).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of bDMARD in patients with RA and recently diagnosed common cancers has not increased since 2008. Additional evidence on the safety of bDMARD in patients with early cancer is needed to ensure appropriate management of their RA. Key Points • Use of bDMARD and TNFi in patients with RA and early colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer has been stable since 2008, with no significant increases over time. • The major determinant of receiving bDMARD after cancer diagnosis was prior treatment with bDMARD in the prior 3 months before cancer. • Patients with advanced cancer stage and distant metastases were less likely to receive bDMARD and TNFi than those at early stages of disease.

Update of the Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological and synthetic targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To update the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) regarding the use of targeted biological and synthetic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the aim of assisting clinicians in their therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

A panel of 13 experts was assembled through an open call by SER. We employed a mixed adaptation-elaboration-update methodology starting from the 2015 Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in RA. Starting with systematic reviews (SR) of recommendations from EULAR 2019, American College of Rheumatology 2021, and GUIPCAR 2017, we updated the search strategies for the PICO questions of GUIPCAR. An additional SR was conducted on demyelinating disease in relation to targeted biological and synthetic therapies. Following the analysis of evidence by different panelists, consensus on the wording and level of agreement for each recommendation was reached in a face-to-face meeting.

RESULTS

The panel established 5 general principles and 15 recommendations on the management of RA. These encompassed crucial aspects such as the importance of early treatment, therapeutic goals in RA, monitoring frequency, the use of glucocorticoids, the application of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Additionally, recommendations on dose reduction of these drugs in stable patients were included. This update also features recommendations on the use of bDMARDs and Janus Kinase inhibitors in some specific clinical situations, such as patients with lung disease, a history of cancer, heart failure, or demyelinating disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This update provides recommendations on key aspects in the management of RA using targeted biological and synthetic therapies.

Mendelian randomization identifies causal associations between GWAS-associated bacteria and their metabolites and rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Accumulating evidence suggests that an imbalance of gut microbiota is commonly observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it remains unclear whether gut microbiota dysbiosis is a cause or consequence of RA, and the mechanisms by which gut dysbiosis contributes to RA have not been fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and metabolites with RA.

Methods

A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was performed to estimate the causality of gut microbiota and metabolites on RA. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 211 gut microbiota and 217 metabolites was used as the exposure, whereas RA was treated as the outcome. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) was regarded as the primary approach for calculating causal estimates. MR Egger method, Weighted median method, Simple mode method, and weighted mode method were used for sensitive analysis. Metabolic pathway analysis was performed via the web-based Metaconflict 5.0. Additionally, an animal study was undertaken to evaluate the results inferred by Mendelian randomization.

Result

This study indicated that six gut microbiota taxa (RuminococcaceaeUCG013, Erysipelotrichia, Erysipelotrichaceae, Erysipelotrichales, Clostridia, and Veillonellaceae) were estimated to exert a positive impact on RA. Conversely, seven gut microbiota taxa (Oxalobacter, Cyanobacteria, RuminococcaceaeUCG002, LachnospiraceaeUCG010, Christensenellaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, Anaerostipes) were estimated to exert a negative impact on RA. Three metabolites, namely indole-3-propionate (IPA), glycine and sphingomyelin (SM 16:1), were found to be linked to lower RA risk, while five metabolites (argininosuccinate, CE 20_4, TAG 58_8, PC 40_6, and LPC 20_4) were linked to higher RA risk. Additionally, four metabolic pathways were identified by metabolic pathway analysis. The collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats exhibited a higher relative abundance of Class_Clostridia and a lower abundance of Genus_Lachnospiraceae (p < 0.05) than the healthy controls.

Conclusion

This study identified causal associations between specific gut microbiota, metabolites, and RA. These findings support the significant role of gut microbiota and metabolites in RA pathogenesis.

American College of Rheumatology and Food and Drug Administration Summit: Summary of the Meeting, May 17-18, 2022

The American College of Rheumatology and the US Food and Drug Administration co-sponsored a public meeting in May 2022 about challenges in the clinical development of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), focusing on innovative clinical trial designs, outcome measures, and data collection methods. Recommendations include early dose-ranging studies and use of active comparators. Challenges and opportunities in assessing long-term safety by leveraging real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data are discussed, along with insights from European registries and the evolving role of real-world evidence and artificial intelligence in regulatory evaluations. Endpoints for assessing disease activity and outcome measures used in RA and PsA trials are explored, emphasizing challenges in defining remission, assessing clinical response, and evaluating structural progression. The need for outcome measures that better reflect treatment targets and the potential of advanced imaging in future trials are highlighted. Challenges with placebo-controlled trials in RA are discussed and use of non-inferiority clinical trial design, in which new drugs are evaluated with active comparators, is proposed. Pragmatic trials in RA and PsA, employing decentralized approaches, are highlighted for their real-world relevance and administrative efficiencies. Strategies for identifying at-risk populations for RA and the challenges of using EHRs and insurance claims data in drug development are discussed. Registry data and digital health technologies show promise in bridging the gap between clinical trials and real-world effectiveness.

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis following use of dostarlimab for endometrial cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) after use of dostarlimab have not been reported. We present a woman who received dostarlimab for endometrial cancer and subsequently developed rash and polyarthralgia, diagnosed as overlapping palmoplantar pustular and plaque psoriasis with PsA. She was treated with discontinuation of dostarlimab, topical steroids, oral methylprednisolone and methotrexate. This case highlights phenotypic heterogeneity in cutaneous irAEs influenced by malignancy and ICI type and underscores the need for multidisciplinary care in treating irAEs. We review three current professional society guidelines for managing irAEs, highlighting their emphasis on management based on severity grading, early initiation of systemic corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents and discontinuation of ICI for severe events. Certain recommendations deviate from typical approaches to idiopathic rheumatologic disease. Further research is needed to support the ongoing development of approaches to irAE management.

Changes in Characteristics of Patients Initiating and Discontinuing Advanced Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis Following the Release of Safety Data

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of emerging safety data on practice patterns by describing the characteristics of patients initiating and discontinuing advanced therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before and after January 2021.

METHODS

This cohort study evaluated US veterans with RA between April 2019 and September 2022. This period was divided into two 664-day periods before and after January 2021. Eligible patients had ≥1 diagnosis code for RA and initiated a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), non-TNFi biologic, or JAK inhibitor (JAKi). We tested for interaction within regression models to determine whether changes in patient characteristics for tofacitinib recipients were different from changes observed for other therapies. We also evaluated factors associated with therapy discontinuation in Cox models adjusted for age, sex, and duration on therapy, including assessment for effect modification.

RESULTS

When comparing patients with RA initiating tofacitinib before (n = 2,111) with those initiating tofacitinib after (n = 1,664) January 2021, there was a decrease in mean age (64.1 vs 63.0 years) and in the proportion with cardiovascular comorbidities (all P < 0.01). These changes were significantly different from those observed for patients initiating TNFi or non-TNFi biologics. Among active advanced therapy recipients, the likelihood of discontinuation was higher for tofacitinib than TNFi (hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.26, P < 0.001). The higher rate of tofacitinib discontinuation was more pronounced in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Recent safety data significantly affected prescribing practices for advanced therapies, with a reduction in JAKi initiation and an increase in JAKi discontinuation among older patients and those at high cardiovascular risk.

Risk of Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Immune-Mediated Diseases With Use of Immunosuppressive Therapies: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are limited data on the safety of immunosuppressive therapy use in individuals with immune-mediated diseases with a history of malignancy, particularly with newer biologic and small-molecule treatments.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies examining the impact of immunosuppressive therapies on cancer recurrence across several immune-mediated diseases. Studies were pooled together using random-effects meta-analysis and stratified by type of treatment. Primary outcome was occurrence of incident cancers, defined as new or recurrent.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 31 studies (17 inflammatory bowel disease, 14 rheumatoid arthritis, 2 psoriasis, and 1 ankylosing spondylitis) contributing 24,328 persons and 85,784 person-years (p-y) of follow-up evaluation. Rates of cancer recurrence were similar among individuals not on immunosuppression (IS) (1627 incident cancers, 43,765 p-y; 35 per 1000 p-y; 95% CI, 27-43), receiving an anti-tumor necrosis factor (571 incident cancers, 17,772 p-y; 32 per 1000 p-y; 95% CI, 25-38), immunomodulators (1104 incident cancers, 17,018 p-y; 46 per 1000 p-y; 95% CI, 31-61), combination immunosuppression (179 incident cancers, 2659 p-y; 56 per 1000 p-y; 95% CI, 31-81). Patients receiving ustekinumab (5 incident cancers, 213 p-y; 21 per 1000 p-y; 95% CI, 0-44) and vedolizumab (37 incident cancers, 1951 p-y; 16 per 1000 p-y; 95% CI, 5-26) had numerically lower rates of cancer. There were no studies on Janus kinase inhibitors. Stratification of studies by timing of immunosuppression initiation did not reveal a medication effect based on early (<5 years) or delayed treatment initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with immune-mediated diseases and a history of malignancy, we observed similar rates of cancer recurrence in those on no immunosuppression compared with different immunosuppressive treatments.

Cancer risk with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in patients with rheumatic diseases and previous malignancies: Results from the BIOBADASER register

OBJECTIVE

to investigate the occurrence and relative risk of incident malignancy in patients with rheumatic diseases and previous malignancies treated with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs).

METHODS

Cohort study of patients included in BIOBADASER 3.0 up to 2021, treated with b/tsDMARDs and history of a previous malignancy. Incident cancer was defined as any cancer (new primary, local recurrence or metastases) during the drug exposure. Incidence rate ratios of cancer per 1,000 patients-year (PY) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Rates of incident cancer in tsDMARDs and other bDMARDs versus TNFi were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients from over 9,129 patients recorded in BIOBADASER 3.0 had a history of a previous malignancy. Overall, there were 47 incident malignancies (28 solid cancers, 18 non-melanoma skin cancers and 1 melanoma). The overall rate of incident malignancy was 47.4 (95 % CI 35.6-63.1) events/1,000 PY, ranging between 24.5 events/1000 PY in the anti-CD20 group to 93 events/1000 PY in the anti-CTLA-4 group. We did not find differences in the adjusted rate of incident cancer in patients exposed to JAKi [0.5 (95 % CI 0.2-1.7)], anti-CD20 [0.4(95 % CI 0.1-1)], or anti-IL6 [1.1(95 % CI 0.5-2.4)], anti-CTLA-4 [1.5 (95 % CI 0.7-3.1) or anti-IL17 [0.7 (95 % CI 0.2-2.4) versus TNFi therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find differences in the risk of incident cancer in patients with rheumatic diseases and a previous malignancy between TNFi and other b/tsDMARDs. While incident cancers in our cohort were limited, our data is reassuring, awaiting validation in future studies.

Multimorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis: common mechanistic links and impact and challenges in routine clinical practice

Early identification and management of multimorbidity in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), such as RA, is an integral, but often neglected, aspect of care. The prevalence and incidence of conditions such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease and malignancies, often co-existing with RA, continues to have significant implications for the management of this patient group. Multimorbidity in RMDs can be associated with inflammatory disease activity and target organ damage. Lifestyle factors, such as smoking and inactivity, further contribute to the burden of disease. Inflammation is the underlying factor, not just in RA but also many comorbidities. The current framework of a treat-to-target approach focuses on achieving early remission and inflammatory activity suppression. We describe how the comorbidity burden in people with RMDs impacts on disease outcome and treatment response. The importance of addressing comorbidity at an early stage and adopting a patient centred approach is critical in modern practice.

Malignancies and rheumatoid arthritis, csDMARDs, biological DMARDs, and JAK inhibitors: challenge and outlook

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder necessitating immunosuppressive therapy. Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of RA over recent decades, particularly with the development of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Nonetheless, the development of new drugs has been accompanied by concerns regarding the association between these novel therapies and the risk of malignancy.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to discuss the understanding of RA, conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, bDMARDs, JAKi, and their association with malignancy. Furthermore, the review discusses the management of malignancy in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs.

EXPERT OPINION

Although recent studies suggest that the potential risk of malignancy of methotrexate and a JAKi tofacitinib, it is essential to avoid indiscriminate withholding of treatment by those agents, as this may lead functional impairment and increased mortality. Therefore, the adoption of a Treat-to-Target (T2T) approach considering individual patient characteristics, becomes of utmost importance. Rheumatologists should maintain a vigilant stance regarding malignancy in this context, recognizing the importance of early detection and management. Implementing a screening program for malignancies is indispensable, and the use of computed tomography screening may enhance the effectiveness of management strategies.

Cancer screening in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Cancer is a major public health concern, and screening for cancer is a on-going issue in our practice. The risk of cancer in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases varies according to their personal medical history, underlying rheumatic disease and its treatment. However, to date, no rheumatology learned society has established specific recommendations for cancer screening in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. In this review, we provide an overview of the risk of cancer in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (related to the disease itself or its treatment), cancer screening in the general population and in immunocompromised subjects, and cancer screening in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Use of Systemic Therapies for Treatment of Psoriasis in Patients with a History of Treated Solid Tumours: Inference-Based Guidance from a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel

BACKGROUND

Patients with treated solid tumours (TSTs) are a highly heterogeneous population at an increased risk for malignancy compared with the general population. When treating psoriasis in patients with a history of TSTs, clinicians are concerned about the immunosuppressive nature of psoriasis therapies, the possibility of augmenting cancer recurrence/progression, and infectious complications. No direct, high-level evidence exists to address these concerns.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to provide a structured framework supporting healthcare professional and patient discussions on the risks and benefits of systemic psoriasis therapy in patients with previously TSTs. Our goal was to address the clinically important question, "In patients with TSTs, does therapy with systemic agents used for psoriasis increase the risk of malignancy or malignancy recurrence?"

METHODS

We implemented an inference-based approach relying on indirect evidence when direct clinical trial and real-world data were absent. We reviewed indirect evidence supporting inferences on the status of immune function in patients with TSTs. Recommendations on systemic psoriasis therapies in patients with TSTs were derived using an inferential heuristic.

RESULTS

We identified five indirect indicators of iatrogenic immunosuppression informed by largely independent bodies of evidence: (1) overall survival, (2) rate of malignancies with psoriasis and systemic psoriasis therapies, (3) rate of infections with psoriasis and systemic psoriasis therapies, (4) common disease biochemical pathways for solid tumours and systemic psoriasis therapies, and (5) solid organ transplant outcomes. On the basis of review of the totality of this data, we provided inference-based conclusions and ascribed level of support for each statement.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior to considering new therapies for psoriasis, an understanding of cancer prognosis should be addressed. Patients with TSTs and a good cancer prognosis will have similar outcomes to non-TST patients when treated with systemic psoriasis therapies. For patients with TSTs and a poor cancer prognosis, the quality-of-life benefits of treating psoriasis may outweigh the theoretical risks.

The genetic liability to rheumatoid arthritis may decrease hepatocellular carcinoma risk in East Asian population: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a rising possibility of acquiring certain kinds of cancers than the general public. The causal risk association between RA and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown.

METHODS

Genetic summary data from genome-wide association study (GWAS), including RA (n = 19,190) and HCC (n = 197,611), was analyzed. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach was used as the principal analysis, complemented with weighted median, weighted mode, simple median method, and MR-Egger analyses. The genetic data of RA (n = 212,453) was used to verify the results in eastern Asia populations.

RESULTS

The results from the IVW methods indicated that genetically predicted RA was significantly linked with a declined possibility of HCC for East Asians (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.95; p = 0.003). The weighted median and the weighted mode also supported similar results (all p < 0.05). Additionally, neither the funnel plots nor the MR-Egger intercepts revealed any directional pleiotropic effects between RA and HCC. Moreover, the other set of RA data validated the results.

CONCLUSION

The RA may decrease the risk of being susceptible to the HCC in eastern Asia populations, which was beyond expectation. In the future, additional investigations should be made into potential biomedical mechanisms.

Risk of Cancer After Initiation of Targeted Therapies in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Prior Cancer: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of recurrent or new malignancy with exposure to targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and a history of cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the literature for articles published up to June 2019 that investigated adults with RA, axial SpA, or PsA who had a history of cancer and received biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARDs or tsDMARDs). We compared the risk of relapse or occurrence of new cancer between patients with and without bDMARDs. Rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated by the Cochran Q test and the I² statistic.

RESULTS

We included 24 observational studies of chronic inflammatory arthritis; of those, 12 were included in the meta-analysis of RA patients receiving bDMARDs. As compared with RA patients with a history of cancer and not receiving bDMARDs, for those receiving any bDMARD, the overall RR for risk of neoplasia was 1.09 (95% CI 0.92-1.32; P = 0.31, I²  = 8%); with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, it was 1.11 (95% CI 0.85-1.46; P = 0.45, I²  = 48%); and with rituximab, it was 0.79 (95% CI 0.41-1.53; P = 0.49, I²  = 0%). The RR for risk of recurrence for skin cancer was 1.32 (95% CI 1.02-1.72; P = 0.04, I²  = 0%) and for breast neoplasia 1.21 (95% CI 0.84-1.72; P = 0.31, I²  = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Apart from skin cancers including melanoma, the risk of recurrent or new cancer is not increased with the initiation of bDMARDs for RA as compared with no bDMARDs.

Therapeutic Utility and Adverse Effects of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Inflammatory Arthritis

Targeting specific pathologic pro-inflammatory cytokines or related molecules leads to excellent therapeutic effects in inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. Most of these agents, known as biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), are produced in live cell lines and are usually monoclonal antibodies. Several types of monoclonal antibodies target different pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-6, and IL-23/12. Some bDMARDs, such as rituximab and abatacept, target specific cell-surface molecules to control the inflammatory response. The therapeutic effects of these bDMARDs differ in different forms of inflammatory arthritis and are associated with different adverse events. In this article, we summarize the therapeutic utility and adverse effects of bDMARDs and suggest future research directions for developing bDMARDs.

Tumor Necrosis Factor: What Is in a Name?

Tumor Necrosis Factor was one of the first cytokines described in the literature as a soluble mediator of cytotoxicity to tumors. Over the years, more extensive research that tried to employ Tumor Necrosis Factor in cancer treatments showed nevertheless that it mainly functioned as a proinflammatory cytokine. However, this did not stop the search for the holy grail of cancer research: A cytokine that could act as a one-stop treatment for solid tumors and lymphomas. This review will summarize the long experimental history of Tumor Necrosis Factor that caused the initial observations of a tumor necrotizing cytokine that could serve as a potential cancer treatment and discuss the current state of research into this side of the activities of Tumor Necrosis Factor.

The effects of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants on cancer outcomes in checkpoint inhibitor therapy

The emergence of checkpoint inhibitors has created a paradigm shift for the treatment of various malignancies. However, although these therapies are associated with improved survival rates, they also carry the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Moderate to severe irAEs are typically treated with glucocorticoids, sometimes with the addition of immunosuppressants as steroid-sparing therapy. However, it is unclear how glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants may impact cancer survival and the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy on cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the effects of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants including methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, tumor-necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors, interleukin-6 inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors, abatacept, rituximab, and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) on cancer-specific outcomes in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitor use.

Primary central nervous system malignant lymphoma in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tocilizumab: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Although the risk of developing malignant lymphoma is higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) than in the general population, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in patients with RA is extremely rare. In recent years, there has been concern that biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), widely administered to patients with RA, might increase the risk of cancer development. The authors report the first case of PCNSL in a patient with RA receiving the bDMARD tocilizumab.

OBSERVATIONS

A 70-year-old man who was diagnosed with RA in 2010 was treated with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) from 2010 to 2015. Tocilizumab was commenced in 2012. In 2018, he developed gait disturbances, and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple contrast-enhanced lesions in the basal ganglia and brain stem. Stereotactic brain biopsy led to the diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and finally PCNSL was diagnosed. He was treated with five courses of MTX 3.5 g/m2, and his disease has been in remission for 34 months.

LESSONS

Low-dose MTX and bDMARDs are associated with the concern of increased cancer risk in patients with RA. Because tocilizumab has been in use for a relatively short time, further accumulation of cases and careful follow-up are necessary.

[Management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases during and after malignancies]

The management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in patients with a simultaneous or previous malignant disease is associated with complex questions. Difficulties and possible solutions in the interpretation of meaningful studies are presented. Recommendations in guidelines on this topic are discussed. National registries and health insurance databases were examined with respect to the risk of tumor recurrence under disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; however, these analyses mainly refer to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and rituximab. Data on tumor incidence and, if available, risk of tumor recurrence are summarized for commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Finally, an attempt is made to formulate proposals for rheumatological treatment in patients with a history of malignancy.

Use of Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs After Cancer Diagnosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Objective

There is no recommendation for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who developed cancer. We examined changes in the DMARDs prescription patterns associated with cancer diagnosis in RA patients.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 2,161 RA patients who visited rheumatology clinic between January 2008 and February 2017 and found 40 patients who developed cancer during RA treatment. In these patients, we examined DMARDs prescription patterns before and right after cancer diagnosis and at recent outpatient clinic visits.

Results

Before cancer diagnosis, methotrexate (MTX)-combined conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were most commonly prescribed (22, 55.0%) and biological DMARDs (biologics) in nine patients (22.5%). For cancer treatment, 19 patients received chemotherapy (including adjuvant chemotherapy) and 21 patients had surgery only. Right after cancer diagnosis, changes in the DMARDs prescription patterns were similar in discontinuation (13, 32.5%), switching (14, 35.0%), and maintenance (13, 32.5%). DMARDs were discontinued more frequently in the chemotherapy group (9/19, 47.4%) than the surgery only group (4/2, 19.0%) (p<0.05). Among the 13 patients who discontinued DMARDs, nine (69.2%) resumed DMARDs after a median of 5.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.9, 18.3) due to arthritis flare. At a median of 4.6 years (IQR 3.3, 6.7) after cancer diagnosis, 25 patients were evaluated at recent outpatient clinic visits. Four patients received no DMARD, three MTX monotherapies, 11 csDMARDs combination therapies, and seven biologics.

Conclusion

A significant number of RA patients who developed cancer during RA treatment were still receiving DMARDs including biologics after cancer diagnosis.

Immunosuppression in Rheumatologic and Auto-immune Disease

Many rheumatologic diseases are thought to originate in dysregulation of the immune system; lupus nephritis, for example, involves humoral immunity, while autoinflammatory diseases such as familial Mediterranean fever are caused by defects in innate immunity. Of note, this dysregulation may involve both upregulation of immune system components and aspects of immunodeficiency. Treatment of rheumatologic diseases thus requires a familiarity with a variety of immunosuppressive medications and their effects on immune system function.In many rheumatologic conditions, due to an incompletely elucidated mechanism of disease, immunosuppression is relatively broad in contrast to agents used, for example, in treatment of transplant rejection. Multiple immunosuppressive drugs may also be used in succession or in combination. As such, an understanding of the mechanisms and targets of immunosuppressive drugs is essential to appreciating their utility and potential adverse effects. Because of the overlap between therapies used in rheumatologic as well as other inflammatory disorders, some of these medications are discussed in other disease processes (e.g., Immunosuppression for inflammatory bowel disease) or in greater detail in other chapters of this textbook (corticosteroids, mTOR inhibitors, antiproliferative agents).

Meta-Analysis illustrates possible role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tissue injury in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) pathogenesis

Background

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a cancer of epithelial origin with a high incidence in certain populations. While NPC has a high remission rate with concomitant chemoradiation, recurrences are frequent, and the downstream morbidity of treatment is significant. Thus, it is imperative to find alternative therapies.

Methods

We employed a Search Tag Analyze Resource (STARGEO) platform to conduct a meta-analysis using the National Center for Biotechnology’s (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to define NPC pathogenesis. We identified 111 tumor samples and 43 healthy nasopharyngeal epithelium samples from NPC public patient data. We analyzed associated signatures in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), restricting genes that showed statistical significance (p<0.05) and an absolute experimental log ratio greater than 0.15 between disease and control samples.

Results

Our meta-analysis identified activation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tissue injury in NPC tissue. Additionally, interleukin-1 (IL-1) and SB203580 were the top upstream regulators. Tumorigenesis-related genes such as homeobox A10 (HOXA10) and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2 or COX-2) as well as those associated with extracellular matrix degradation, such as matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3 (MMP-1, MMP-3) were also upregulated. Decreased expression of genes that encode proteins associated with maintaining healthy nasal respiratory epithelium structural integrity, including sentan-cilia apical structure protein (SNTN) and lactotransferrin (LTF) was documented. Importantly, we found that etanercept inhibits targets upregulated in NPC and LPS induction, such as MMP-1, PTGS2, and possibly MMP-3.

Conclusions

Our analysis illustrates that nasal epithelial barrier dysregulation and maladaptive immune responses are key components of NPC pathogenesis along with LPS-induced tissue damage.

Targeting Probiotics in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a progressive inflammatory disorder characterized by swollen joints, discomfort, tightness, bone degeneration and frailty. Genetic, agamogenetic and sex-specific variables, Prevotella, diet, oral health and gut microbiota imbalance are all likely causes of the onset or development of RA, perhaps the specific pathways remain unknown. Lactobacillus spp. probiotics are often utilized as relief or dietary supplements to treat bowel diseases, build a strong immune system and sustain the immune system. At present, the action mechanism of Lactobacillus spp. towards RA remains unknown. Therefore, researchers conclude the latest analysis to effectively comprehend the ultimate pathogenicity of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as the functions of probiotics, specifically Lactobacillus casei or Lactobacillus acidophilus, in the treatment of RA in therapeutic and diagnostic reports. RA is a chronic inflammation immunological illness wherein the gut microbiota is affected. Probiotics are organisms that can regulate gut microbiota, which may assist to relieve RA manifestations. Over the last two decades, there has been a surge in the use of probiotics. However, just a few research have considered the effect of probiotic administration on the treatment and prevention of arthritis. Randomized regulated experimental trials have shown that particular probiotics supplement has anti-inflammatory benefits, helps people with RA enhance daily activities and alleviates symptoms. As a result, utilizing probiotic microorganisms as therapeutics could be a potential possibility for arthritis treatment. This review highlights the known data on the therapeutic and preventative effects of probiotics in RA, as well as their interactions.

Probiotics and Amelioration of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Significant Roles of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that can lead to disability conditions with swollen joints, pain, stiffness, cartilage degradation, and osteoporosis. Genetic, epigenetic, sex-specific factors, smoking, air pollution, food, oral hygiene, periodontitis, Prevotella, and imbalance in the gastrointestinal microbiota are possible sources of the initiation or progression of rheumatoid arthritis, although the detailed mechanisms still need to be elucidated. Probiotics containing Lactobacillus spp. are commonly used as alleviating agents or food supplements to manage diarrhea, dysentery, develop immunity, and maintain general health. The mechanism of action of Lactobacillus spp. against rheumatoid arthritis is still not clearly known to date. In this narrative review, we recapitulate the findings of recent studies to understand the overall pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and the roles of probiotics, particularly L. casei or L. acidophilus, in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical and preclinical studies.

TNF in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: friend or foe?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer and have emerged as a pillar of standard cancer care. However, their use is complicated by adverse effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis. ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis is distinguished from other irAEs by its persistence and requirement for long-term treatment. TNF inhibitors are commonly used to treat inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies and inflammatory bowel disease, and have also been adopted as second-line agents to treat irAEs refractory to glucocorticoid treatment. Experiencing an irAE is associated with a better antitumour response after ICI treatment. However, whether TNF inhibition can be safely used to treat irAEs without promoting cancer progression, either by compromising ICI therapy efficacy or via another route, remains an open question. In this Review, we discuss clinical and preclinical studies that address the relationship between TNF, TNF inhibition and cancer. The bulk of the evidence suggests that at least short courses of TNF inhibitors are safe for the treatment of irAEs in patients with cancer undergoing ICI therapy. Data from preclinical studies hint that TNF inhibition might augment the antitumour effect of ICI therapy while simultaneously ameliorating irAEs.

Inflammation-targeted therapies and cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze the current knowledge on the risk of malignancy associated with inflammation-targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We performed a non-systematic literature review on PubMEd MEDLINE by screening randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, reviews, and observational studies focusing on malignancies and inflammation-targeted therapies including TNF inhibitors, other biologics and JAK inhibitors in rheumatic diseases.

RESULTS

Data from literature are reassuring regarding the overall risk of incident and recurrent cancer with TNF inhibitors. The risk of lymphoma is more difficult to analyze and data are controversial; however, in most of the studies, this risk does not seem to be significanlty increased. By contrast, there is probably an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer associated with TNF inhibitors, as with other immunosuppressants. There is no signal for an increased risk of malignancies with other biological DMARDs, but additional data are needed. A recent post-marketing surveillance study found out an increased risk of malignancies for tofacitinib compared with TNFi; additional data are, therefore, urgently needed to confirm or not these results.

CONCLUSION

Data are presently reassuring regarding the overall risk of cancer, whatever the inflammation-targeted treatment. However, additional data are needed for non-TNF biologics and JAK-inhibitors.

Impact of rheumatoid arthritis and biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic agents on cancer risk and recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several new therapeutic drugs are now available for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Given that RA has been associated with an increased risk of certain cancers like lymphoma and lung cancer, concern remains about the safety of (newer) immunosuppressants used in RA management as it relates to the risk of cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have not observed an association between TNFi and risk of incident cancer. Studies of non-TNFi biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs and cancer are also reassuring but limited and of short-term follow-up. Regarding the use of DMARDs in patients with RA and a prior malignancy, retrospective studies have shown that TNFi use is not associated with recurrence.

SUMMARY

There is a need for ongoing studies on the safety of non-TNFi bDMARDs and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and recurrent cancer. Further research is also needed to guide the patients, rheumatologists, and oncologists regarding the safest DMARDs to choose for patients with RA and a recent diagnosis of cancer.

Rheumatologische medikamentöse Therapie bei Malignomanamnese

Rheumatologische Therapie bei Patienten mit Malignomanamnese ist mit komplexen Fragestellungen verbunden. Schwierigkeiten und Lösungsmöglichkeiten bei der Interpretation aussagekräftiger Studien werden dargestellt. Empfehlungen in Leitlinien zu diesem Thema werden diskutiert. Nationale Register und Versicherungsdatenbanken wurden mit der Frage nach Tumorrezidivrisiko unter Basistherapeutika untersucht ; diese Analysen beziehen sich aber v. a. auf TNF-Inhibitoren und Rituximab. Zu den gängigen Substanzen der Basistherapie werden Daten zur Tumorinzidenz und wenn vorhanden zum Tumorrezidivrisiko zusammengefasst. Abschließend wird der Versuch unternommen Vorschläge zur rheumatolgischen Therapie bei Malignomanamnese zu formulieren.

Overall survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and solid malignancies receiving biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

The effects of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cancer are largely unknown. We examined overall survival (OS) in patients with RA and solid malignancies receiving bDMARDs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with RA and solid malignancies seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2014. Cox proportional hazard regression models, stratified by tumor type and stage, were fit evaluating use of bDMARDs as a time fixed and time varying covariate.

RESULTS

We identified 431 RA patients with solid malignancies: 111 (26%) received bDMARDs after their cancer diagnosis. Median OS from cancer diagnosis was 16.1 years. Of the patients receiving bDMARDs, most had localized disease, and only 14 (13%) had advanced cancer. In the stratified Cox models no statistically significant differences were observed between patients who received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or patients who received nonTNFi, compared with those who did not receive bDMARDs (hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31, 1.44; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.26, 4.60 respectively). In breast cancer patients, those receiving TNFi or nonTNFi had a numerically higher but statistically nonsignificant HR compared with those who did not receive bDMARD: HR, 1.40 (95% CI, 0.42, 4.73), and HR, 1.37 (95% CI, 0.22, 8.42) respectively.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in OS were observed between patients who received bDMARDs and those who did not. Additional data is needed to evaluate other cancer outcomes such as recurrence and progression, and patients with advanced cancer. Key Points •We found no statistically significant differences in OS between patients with RA and concomitant solid malignancies who received bDMARDs and those who did not. •Most patients who received bDMARDs had been diagnosed with early stage cancer •As few patients with advanced cancer received bDMARDs safety for this group cannot be established •No significant differences were observed between TNFi and nonTNFi, but the sample size was small.

Rituximab as a treatment option in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and a history of malignancy-intracranial chondrosarcoma/osteochondroma-case based review

When compared to general population, patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk of some malignancies (especially lymphomas and lung cancer). Genetic predisposition, chronic inflammatory stimuli and viral infections are some of the reasons untreated patients are at higher risk. Clinical studies and national/international registries collect the data about the malignancies with higher incidence (such as lung, skin and breast cancer) but on the other hand, malignancies with lower incidence (such as sarcomas) are rarely reported. We report a case of a 47-year-old male with a history of a malignant intracranial chondrosarcoma/osteochondroma who developed seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Due to progression of erosions, the patient was initialy treated with conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) and later on with rituximab. The patient's rheumatoid arthritis went and remained in remission on maintenance therapy with rituximab (every 6-8 months) and low-dose methotrexate with no relapse of malignant intracranial chondrosarcoma/osteochondroma. Rituximab should be considered as a treatment option in patients with rare and agressive malignancies, such as sarcomas.

Eight pillars of oncorheumatology: Crossroads between malignancies and musculoskeletal diseases

ONCORHEUMATOLOGY

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALIGNANCIES AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES: Oncorheumatology is the meeting point of tumor formation and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD). Multiple interactions exist between these two medical specialties. One major field is the topic of malignancies associated with rheumatic diseases, while the other topic covers the development of musculoskeletal disease in cancer patients. Within the first group, secondary malignancies may be associated with rheumatic diseases. Mostly sustained inflammation is responsible for transition into cancer. Tumor-associated antigens (TAA) with adhesive properties are present on tumor cells. These molecules may also be expressed by inflammatory leukocytes and soluble TAA levels may be elevated in RMDs. There has been continuous debate with respect to the possible carcinogenicity of conventional and targeted antirheumatic drugs. Very recent data from registries suggest that neither biologics, nor JAK inhibitors increase cancer risk in arthritis patients. The issue of physiotherapy in rheumatic patients with recent or current cancer has also been controversial. Some modalities, primarily exercise, may be safely applied to patients with RMD and cancer. The second large topic includes paraneoplastic syndromes. Musculoskeletal paraneoplasias are triggered by tumor-derived mediators. These syndromes are sometimes slightly different from the classical RMDs. Various chemotherapies may also be associated with autoimmune side effects. Recently, these immune-related complications have also been observed in cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Sex hormone-deprivation therapies, such as aromatase inhibitors and anti-androgens are widely used for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer, respectively. These compounds may induce bone loss and lead to osteoporosis. Finally, primary and secondary malignancies of the musculoskeletal system may also interest rheumatologists. In this review, the clinical, practical aspects of these eight pillars of oncorheumatology will be discussed.

Overview of the Associations Between Cancer and Rheumatic Disease

People living with rheumatic diseases frequently encounter cancer, either as a potential harm of antirheumatic therapies or as a comorbidity that alters the conversation about management. This article provides a general overview of the issues related to cancer and rheumatic disease and serves as a springboard for the remaining chapters in this issue. Several topics are reviewed, including epidemiology, bidirectional causal pathways, and issues related to medications. Although uncertainties remain, the issue of cancer is of great importance to patients with rheumatic diseases, and an individualized, person-centered approach to assessment and management is necessary.

Methodological considerations when analysing and interpreting real-world data

In the absence of relevant data from randomized trials, nonexperimental studies are needed to estimate treatment effects on clinically meaningful outcomes. State-of-the-art study design is imperative for minimizing the potential for bias when using large healthcare databases (e.g. claims data, electronic health records, and product/disease registries). Critical design elements include new-users (begin follow-up at treatment initiation) reflecting hypothetical interventions and clear timelines, active-comparators (comparing treatment alternatives for the same indication), and consideration of induction and latent periods. Propensity scores can be used to balance measured covariates between treatment regimens and thus control for measured confounding. Immortal-time bias can be avoided by defining initiation of therapy and follow-up consistently between treatment groups. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a non-technical overview of study design issues and solutions and to highlight the importance of study design to minimize bias in nonexperimental studies using real-world data.

Utilization of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cancer

INTRODUCTION

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) interfere with the immune system and could theoretically increase risk of malignancies. However, recent evidence has not substantiated such concerns and physicians are less reluctant in treating patients with underlying cancer with such bDMARDs. We aimed to understand the current utilization patterns of bDMARDs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in cancer patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with prevalent RA and cancer initially seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2014. A cohort of cancer patients was identified from the tumor registry, and patients with RA were identified through ICD-9 codes, followed by review of electronic medical records. We included patients 18 years and older, with a cancer diagnosis, and a diagnosis of RA by a rheumatologist. Patients were followed until 2016.

RESULTS

We identified 431 patients with RA and cancer that met our inclusion criteria. Overall, 111 (26%) received bDMARDs after their cancer diagnosis; of these, 60 (54%) had received bDMARDs prior to their cancer diagnosis and continued to receive this therapy following their diagnosis. Thirteen (22%) switched to a different bDMARD, and the rest continued to receive the same agent after their cancer diagnosis. Of all patients on a bDMARD, 91 (82%) received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment landscape of patients with a history of cancer and RA is changing. Future studies evaluating the safety of bDMARDs in patients with a recent history of cancer or with active cancer are needed. Part of the data of this project was presented as a poster at the 2016 American College of Rheumatology annual meeting. Zamora NV, Siddhanamatha H, Barbo A, Tayar J, Lin H, Suarez-Almazor M. Utilization of Biologic Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cancer [abstract].Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-biologic-therapy-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-cancer/. Accessed September 30, 2019. Key Points • One in four patients with RA and concomitant cancer received bDMARDs, including TNFi, after their cancer diagnosis, at our institution. • Half of the patients with RA and cancer who received bDMARDs had initiated therapy prior to the cancer diagnosis, continuing thereafter.

The Complex Interplay Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Both the chronic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and its treatment, can increase the risk of malignancy. There is also an increasing number of patients with current and prior cancer who require IBD treatment. Thus, there is a complex interplay between immunosuppressive treatment and monitoring for new and recurrent cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab have not been shown to increase the risk of malignancy. Transplant data shows a potential risk with tofacitinib although rheumatoid arthritis data does not. IBD patients have been shown to tolerate chemotherapy, specifically with cytotoxic compared with hormonal chemotherapy. Patients with prior cancer are at increased risk of new or recurrent cancers; however, immunosuppression appears to be safe. Emerging treatments for IBD have demonstrated acceptable safety profiles for malignancy risk, and immunosuppression appears to be safe for use in patients with current and prior malignancy. More data is still needed to assess long-term risk of malignancy in these patients, especially with newer treatments.

Anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy and recurrent or new primary cancers in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, or psoriasis and previous cancer in Denmark: a nationwide, population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) therapy in people with a history of cancer and with an immune-mediated disease is unknown. We aimed to assess the risk of recurrence of initial cancer or development of a new primary cancer after treatment with anti-TNFα therapy.

METHODS

In this Danish, population-based cohort study we recruited adults (≥18 years) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis, or psoriasis and a primary cancer diagnosed between Jan 1, 1999 and Dec 31, 2016. Patients were recruited from the prospectively recorded Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Cancer Registry. Participants were matched 1:10 between the treatment group who received anti-TNFα therapy and the control group (no anti-TNFα therapy) and we excluded individuals with a cancer diagnosed before their first anti-TNFα treatment (or before matching date for controls), individuals diagnosed with IBD, rheumatoid arthritis, or psoriasis after anti-TNFα initiation (or respective match date for controls), and individuals who received anti-TNFα with fewer than five matched controls. Using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, we estimated the primary outcome of development of recurrent or new primary cancer in patients who received anti-TNFα therapy compared with patients who did not receive this therapy, matched by sex, immune-mediated disease type, cancer type, and time from initial cancer diagnosis to first anti-TNFα registration.

FINDINGS

Overall, 25 738 patients with immune-mediated disease and a history of cancer were identified. 434 patients who received anti-TNFα therapy after their initial cancer were matched to 4328 patients in the control group. During 18 752 person-years (median 5·6 years [IQR 2·8-7·9]) of follow up, 635 individuals developed recurrent or new primary cancer, 72 of whom had received anti-TNFα therapy and 563 of whom were in the control group. The median time between anti-TNFα treatment and recurrent or new primary cancer diagnosis was 2·8 years (IQR 1·7-5·4). The incidence of recurrent or new primary cancer development was 30·3 cases (95% CI 24·0-38·2) per 1000 person-years in the anti-TNFα treatment group and 34·4 cases (31·7-37·3) per 1000 person-years in the control group, yielding an adjusted hazard ratio of 0·82 (95% CI 0·61-1·11).

INTERPRETATION

Use of anti-TNFα therapy was not associated with recurrent or new primary cancer development in patients with previous cancer. Timing of anti-TNFα therapy after an initial cancer diagnosis did not influence recurrent or new primary cancer development. This observation might guide clinical decision making among providers treating immune-mediated diseases with anti-TNFα medications.

FUNDING

None.

Toronto Workshop on Late Recurrence in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Part 2: Approaches to Predict and Identify Late Recurrence, Research Directions

Late disease recurrence (more than 5 years after initial diagnosis) represents a clinical challenge in the treatment and management of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). An international workshop was convened in Toronto, Canada, in February 2018 to review the current understanding of late recurrence and to identify critical issues that require future study. The underlying biological causes of late recurrence are complex, with the processes governing cancer cell dormancy, including immunosurveillance, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and cellular stemness, being integral to disease progression. These critical processes are described herein as well as their role in influencing risk of recurrence. Moreover, observational and interventional clinical trials are proposed, with a focus on methods to identify patients at risk of recurrence and possible strategies to combat this in patients with estrogen receptor-positive BC. Because the problem of late BC recurrence of great importance, recent advances in disease detection and patient monitoring should be incorporated into novel clinical trials to evaluate approaches to enhance patient management. Indeed, future research on these issues is planned and will offer new options for effective late recurrence treatment and prevention strategies.

A meta-analysis of biologic therapies on risk of new or recurrent cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy

Objectives

To explore the risk of new and recurrent cancer in adult RA patients with prior malignancy and subsequently exposed to biologic therapies.

Methods

Separate searches were performed of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library and conference proceedings for observational studies reporting cancer incidence or recurrence in patients with RA and prior malignancy treated with biologics and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects method was conducted to calculate relative risk and 95% CI.

Results

A total of 12 studies involving 13 598 patients and 32 473 patient-years of follow-up were included (10, 3 and 1 studies for TNF inhibitors [TNFi], rituximab and anakinra, respectively). The crude incidence of new and recurrent cancer per 1000 patient-years were 34.4 for TNFi, 32.3 for rituximab, 32.3 for anakinra and 31.8 for csDMARDs. In the quantitative meta-analysis, biologics were not associated with an increased risk of new or recurrent cancer compared with csDMARDs in patients with RA and prior cancer (TNFi: relative risk = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.83, 1.09; rituximab: relative risk = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.52, 1.53). Secondary analyses of stratification of cancer types, the interval between initiation of TNFi and prior cancer diagnosis, and duration of TNFi exposure, found similar results.

Conclusion

Compared with csDMARDs, there is no increased risk of developing cancer overall or some specific subtypes in RA patients with a prior cancer receiving biologics. More investigations are warranted to explore the risk of cancer development in individual cancer as well as to determine optimal time to initiate biologic therapy after the diagnosis of cancer or completion of cancer treatment.

A paradigm shift in studies based on rheumatoid arthritis clinical registries

Clinical research is the study of aspects of patient health or illness that are closely related to clinical practice. In the late 20th and early 21th century, outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved dramatically due to breakthroughs in new drugs. Patient-reported outcome measures now play a significant role in the drug development process as study endpoints in clinical trials of new therapies, and this has led to increased interest in the patient's perspective, drug safety and treatment outcomes in clinical practice. In accordance with these needs, many prospective cohorts for RA patients and registries of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been actively conducted in the United States and European and Asian countries. A gradual shift is taking place in the major outcomes of clinical research using these prospective cohorts and registries. This article will introduce representative registries for RA in each country set up in the early 2000s and will discuss future perspectives in clinical research on RA patients using such clinical registries.

The role of registries in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

Registries characterize the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic interventions in daily clinical practice. Data from registries enable mining the records of tens of thousands of patients towards determining the effectiveness, safety, and cost-benefit of any given therapeutic. The strengths of registries include real-life settings, greater power than clinical trials to detect rare events, and the study of multiple outcomes and several research questions. Registries also have their weaknesses. They are expensive, less accurate than clinical trials, affected by channelling bias, often require links to external sources or use historic and selected control cohorts or combine datasets to increase power, and have the risk of multiple confounders. Since the beginning of biological era, registries were developed to profile emerging treatments. This article reviews the role of registries in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Cancer incidence in familial Mediterranean fever patients: a retrospective analysis from central Anatolia

Although chronic inflammation has been associated with increased cancer risk in various disease including hepatitis or inflammatory bowel disease, a lower incidence of cancer has been reported recently in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) which is an auto-inflammatory disease with persistent inflammation. We have assessed cancer incidence among FMF patients with or without amyloidosis to investigate this hypothesis. We performed a retrospective review of FMF patients, diagnosed and treated in Hacettepe University hospitals between 2001 and 2018. We identified patients from the hospital medical records using the ICD-10 code for FMF. We collected data on demographic and clinical features, drug history, the presence of amyloidosis and subsequent diagnosis of cancer. The expected cancer incidence was estimated using age- and gender-specific standardized incidence rates (SIRs) in comparison with the general Turkish population according to Turkish National Cancer Registry data at 2014. Total of 3899 FMF patients (120 patients had also amyloidosis) were included. Median age was 22 and 56% were females. Thirty-eight patients were diagnosed with cancer during 100,283 person-years of follow-up. The most common cancer was breast cancer in females (7/28 patients) and leukemia (2/10 patients) in males. The overall cancer incidence among patients with FMF was significantly lower in both males {SIR 0.42 [95% confidence interval; (CI) 0.21-0.75], p = 0.019} and females [SIR 065 (95% CI 0.44-0.93), p = 0.002]. The overall cancer incidence among patients with FMF and amyloidosis was [SIR 1.21 (95% CI 0.49-2.52), p = 0.73] without gender difference. Cancer incidence was significantly lower in FMF patients compared with the general Turkish population. We found no increased cancer incidence in FMF patients having amyloidosis. Possible underlying mechanisms need to be explained.