Making inference from wildlife collision data: inferring predator absence from prey strikes

The effectiveness of citizen surveillance for detecting exotic vertebrates

Citizen observations of the natural world are increasing in detail, growing in volume and increasingly being shared on web-based platforms for the purpose of sharing information and/or the crowd-sourcing of species identification. From a biosecurity perspective, such citizen data streams are important as they are responsible for the majority of post-border reports and most detections of exotic pest species of concern. The sharing of sightings amongst what are effectively communities of practice is a key driver of having the sighting of an exotic pest species recognized and reported. Whilst it is clear that the eyes, ears, cameras, and microphones of citizens are a major component of biosecurity surveillance, it is unclear what level of surveillance this provides in the prospective sense. As an example, what confidence does citizen science provide about “proof of absence” for exotic pests of concern? The taxonomy of surveillance used within the field of biosecurity would classify such citizen activities as contributing to “general surveillance,” for which non-detections are typically not recorded and methods of quantitative analysis are still under development. We argue that while not recorded, there is considerable information about citizens activities that routinely underpins peoples mental inference about the level of surveillance provided by citizen activities. Furthermore, we show that it is possible to make such inference from general surveillance transparent by describing and characterizing the activities that potentially generate sightings in a way that is amenable to quantitative analysis. In the context of evaluating surveillance provided by citizens for incursions of exotic vertebrates, we provide examples of citizen observations providing early warning and hence preventing the establishment of species from a range of animal groups. Historically, analysis of the power of general surveillance has been restricted to being conceptual, based on qualitative arguments. We provide this, but also provide a quantitative model framework and provide examples of how different forms of general surveillance data may be analyzed, particularly in supporting inference of eradication/extinction.

Detecting rare carnivores using scats: Implications for monitoring a fox incursion into Tasmania

The ability to detect the incursion of an invasive species or destroy the last individuals during an eradication program are some of the most difficult aspects of invasive species management. The presence of foxes in Tasmania is a contentious issue with recent structured monitoring efforts, involving collection of carnivore scats and testing for fox DNA, failing to detect any evidence of foxes. Understanding the likelihood that monitoring efforts would detect fox presence, given at least one is present, is therefore critical for understanding the role of scat monitoring for informing the response to an incursion. We undertook trials to estimate the probability of fox scat detection through monitoring by scat‐detector dogs and person searches and used this information to critically evaluate the power of scat monitoring efforts for detecting foxes in the Tasmanian landscape. The probability of detecting a single scat present in a 1‐km² survey unit was highest for scat‐detector dogs searches (0.053) compared with person searches (x¯≅0.015) for each 10 km of search effort. Simulation of the power of recent scat monitoring efforts undertaken in Tasmania from 2011 to 2015 suggested that single foxes would have to be present in at least 20 different locations or fox breeding groups present in at least six different locations, in order to be detected with a high level of confidence (>0.80). We have shown that highly structured detection trials can provide managers with the quantitative tools needed to make judgments about the power of large‐scale scat monitoring programs. Results suggest that a fox population, if present in Tasmania, could remain undetected by a large‐scale, structured scat monitoring program. Therefore, it is likely that other forms of surveillance, in conjunction with scat monitoring, will be necessary to demonstrate that foxes are absent from Tasmania with high confidence.