Applying critical thinking to nursing

How to design and deliver a small group teaching session

RATIONALE AND KEY POINTS

Small group teaching sessions are commonly used in healthcare to deliver education, provide practice updates and support continuing professional development. Such sessions can provide opportunities for participants to acquire new knowledge, foster peer relationships, consolidate learning and develop skills. This article provides a step-by-step guide for nurses and other healthcare professionals on designing and delivering a small group teaching session. • A small group teaching session requires considered, detailed and methodical preparation. • When designing a small group teaching session, it is important to determine its aims, learning outcomes, group characteristics, location and timeframe. • A well-planned small teaching session includes learning activities that are constructively aligned to the aims and intended learning outcomes. • Assessing participant learning and addressing gaps in their understanding is essential during the delivery of small group teaching. REFLECTIVE ACTIVITY: 'How to' articles can help to update your practice and ensure it remains evidence based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of: • How this article could improve your practice when designing and delivering a small group teaching session. • How you could use this information to educate your colleagues on small group teaching methods.

The experiences of nursing master's students with dialogic case-based learning in an evidence-based nursing course: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based nursing (EBN) is a complex subject for teachers and students due to the abstract concepts involved. It requires combining theory with practice and is included in the major courses required for a master's education in many countries. Case-based learning (CBL), which is a student-centred teaching method, has been widely used in numerous disciplines because it can bridge the gap between theory and practice and foster critical thinking and communication skills. However, to adapt CBL to EBN coursework for a Master of Nursing degree, improve evidence-based practice (EBP) and enhance core competencies, the case design and operational procedures of CBL need to be further examined.

OBJECTIVES

To explore nursing master's students' experiences of dialogic CBL and case design and operational procedures regarding dialogic CBL.

DESIGN

A descriptive-qualitative study design was used.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study was carried out in the nursing master's programme at a university in China. Twenty first-year nursing master's students who completed a 10-week EBN course were recruited using purposive sampling.

METHODS

Data were collected between September and December 2020 via in-depth semistructured interviews. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: (1) 'learning theoretical EBN knowledge'; (2) 'improving clinical nursing ability'; (3) 'enhancing core competencies'; and (4) 'barriers to implementing dialogic CBL'.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provided a standardised CBL procedure based on students' experiences, which included preparation, group discussions, presentations, and teachers' feedback following the presentations, and these operational procedures were shown to be indispensable. The student experiences in this study should be referenced by nursing educators who apply this teaching method in other graduate and undergraduate nursing courses such as surgical nursing and nursing research.

Levels, antecedents, and consequences of critical thinking among clinical nurses: a quantitative literature review

The purpose of this study was to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of critical thinking within the clinical nursing context. In this review, we addressed the following specific research questions: what are the levels of critical thinking among clinical nurses?; what are the antecedents of critical thinking?; and what are the consequences of critical thinking? A narrative literature review was applied in this study. Thirteen articles published from July 2013 to December 2019 were appraised since the most recent scoping review on critical thinking among nurses was conducted from January 1999 to June 2013. The levels of critical thinking among clinical nurses were moderate or high. Regarding the antecedents of critical thinking, the influence of sociodemographic variables on critical thinking was inconsistent, with the exception that levels of critical thinking differed according to years of work experience. Finally, little research has been conducted on the consequences of critical thinking and related factors. The above findings highlight the levels, antecedents, and consequences of critical thinking among clinical nurses in various settings. Considering the significant association between years of work experience and critical thinking capability, it may be effective for organizations to deliver tailored education programs on critical thinking for nurses according to their years of work experience.

The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review was designed to assess the importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice. It aimed to explore the link between academic literacy and writing in an undergraduate nursing degree and the development of critical thinking skills for their future professional clinical practice.

DESIGN

A systematic review of qualitative studies and expert opinion publications.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was undertaken of the following databases: ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Scopus. All papers reviewed were from 2000 to 2016 and were written in English.

REVIEW METHODS

We identified 981 studies and expert opinion papers from the selected databases. After reviewing key words and abstracts for the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 48 papers were selected for review. These were read and reread, with 22 papers, including one thesis, selected for quality appraisal. One paper was discarded due to the exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Three major themes were evident from this study. First, students need assistance to develop tertiary level academic literacy skills when they commence their undergraduate nursing degree. Second, that teaching practices need to be consistent in both designing assessments and in giving feedback to students, in order to assist improvement of academic literacy skills. And finally, academic literacy can facilitate critical thinking when students are assessed using discipline specific genres that relate to their future professional nursing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the importance of critical thinking in clinical nursing practice and its strong relationship with academic writing skills. It has shown critical thinking is discipline specific and nursing students need to be taught discipline specific literacy genres in undergraduate nursing degrees. Nursing has a diverse educational and cultural mix of students, and educators should not assume academic literacy skills upon commencement of an undergraduate nursing programme.