Tethered Cord Syndrome After Myelomeningocele Repair: A Literature Update

Walking recovery after tethered cord release

After myelomeningocele (MMC) repair, a secondary tethered spinal cord occurs in almost all patients. The tethered spinal cord may result in progressive neurological deterioration and walking disability. This retrospective cohort study aimed to highlight the walking recovery one year after tethered cord release and its relation to the preoperative conus level. We reviewed the medical records at our university hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. The patients who underwent spinal cord untethering following lumbosacral MMC repair were included. We assessed the walking recovery one year after cord release using the modified Benzel scale. Thirty-seven patients met our selection criteria. There were 19 girls (51.4%) and 18 boys (48.6%). Their mean age at presentation was 8.6 years. The preoperative conus vertebral levels ranged between L4 and S3. One year after spinal cord release, 37.8% of the patients regained their walking ability. All the patients whose preoperative conus level was at S2 or S3 regained their walking ability. In contrast, all the patients with preoperative conus levels at L4 or L5 didn't regain their ability to walk. One-third (33.3%) of patients whose conus was at the S1 level regained their walking ability one year after cord release. One year after tethered cord release, 37.8% of the patients regained their walking ability. We found that the walking recovery was statistically associated with the preoperative conus level. A multicenter prospective study is required to support the results of this study.

Arnold-Chiari Malformations in Pregnancy and Labor: Challenges and Management Strategies

Arnold-Chiari malformations (ACMs) present unique challenges in pregnancy and labor, requiring a comprehensive understanding and multidisciplinary approach to care. This review article provides an overview of ACMs, including their definition, classification, and prevalence. The challenges in diagnosing ACMs during pregnancy, the available imaging modalities, and screening recommendations are discussed. The impact of ACMs on maternal health, fetal development, and the management strategies employed during pregnancy and labor are explored. Emphasis is placed on the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving neurologists, obstetricians, and other specialists. Medical management options for symptom relief, surgical interventions, and anesthetic considerations during labor and delivery are also addressed. The importance of postpartum care, breastfeeding considerations, and long-term follow-up for women with ACMs who desire future pregnancies are highlighted. Finally, areas for further research and advancements in ACM management are identified. By improving our understanding and management of ACMs in pregnancy and labor, healthcare professionals can optimize care and improve outcomes for mothers and babies affected by this condition.

A comparison of MRI appearance and surgical detethering rates between intrauterine and postnatal myelomeningocele closures: a single-center pilot matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair (IUMR) and postnatal myelomeningocele repair (PNMR) differ in terms of both setting and surgical technique. A simplified technique in IUMR, in which a dural onlay is used followed by skin closure, has been adopted at our institution. The goal of this study was to compare the rates of clinical tethering in IUMR and PNMR patients, as well as to evaluate the appearance on MRI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 36 patients with MMC repaired at our institution, with 2:1 PNMR to IUMR matching based on lesion level. A pediatric neuroradiologist blinded to the clinical details reviewed the patients' lumbar spine MRIs for the distance from neural tissue to skin and the presence or absence of a syrinx. An EMR review was then done to evaluate for detethering procedures and need for CSF diversion.

RESULTS

Mean age at MRI was 4.0 years and mean age at last follow-up was 6.1 years, with no significant difference between the PNMR and IUMR groups. There was no significant difference between groups in the distance from neural tissue to skin (PNMR 13.5 mm vs IUMR 17.6 mm; p = 0.5). There was no difference in need for detethering operations between groups (PNMR 12.5% vs IUMR 16.7%; RR 0.75; CI 0.1-5.1).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between postnatal- and intrauterine-repaired myelomeningocele on MRI or in need for detethering operations. These results imply that a more straightforward and time-efficient IUMR closure technique does not lead to an increased rate of tethering when compared to the multilayered PNMR.

Dural substitutes for spina bifida repair: past, present, and future

PURPOSE

The use of materials to facilitate dural closure during spina bifida (SB) repair has been a highly studied aspect of the surgical procedure. The overall objective of this review is to present key findings pertaining to the success of the materials used in clinical and pre-clinical studies. Additionally, this review aims to aid fetal surgeons as they prepare for open or fetoscopic prenatal SB repairs.

METHODS

Relevant publications centered on dural substitutes used during SB repair were identified. Important information from each article was extracted including year of publication, material class and sub-class, animal model used in pre-clinical studies, whether the repair was conducted pre-or postnatally, the bioactive agent delivered, and key findings from the study.

RESULTS

Out of 1,121 publications, 71 were selected for full review. We identified the investigation of 33 different patches where 20 and 63 publications studied synthetic and natural materials, respectively. From this library, 43.6% focused on clinical results, 36.6% focused on pre-clinical results, and 19.8% focused on tissue engineering approaches. Overall, the use of patches, irrespective of material, have shown to successfully protect the spinal cord and most have shown promising survival and neurological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While most have shown significant promise as a therapeutic strategy in both clinical and pre-clinical studies, none of the patches developed so far are deemed perfect for SB repair. Therefore, there is an opportunity to develop new materials and strategies that aim to overcome these challenges and further improve the outcomes of SB patients.