Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Improving Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Major Colorectal Surgery

The impact of ERAS-based nursing interventions on postoperative complication management and prognosis in early gastrointestinal tumor endoscopic resection: a prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-based nursing interventions in improving postoperative recovery, reducing complications, and enhancing patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing endoscopic resection for early gastrointestinal tumors.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized, single-blind controlled trial was conducted from October 2023 to October 2024 at a tertiary hospital. A total of 120 patients with early-stage gastrointestinal tumors scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were randomly assigned to the ERAS group (n = 60) or the control group (NC, n = 60). Data collection included Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square tests, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Compared to the NC group, the ERAS group demonstrated significantly lower CCI scores and fewer Clavien-Dindo ≥ III complications at 3 days, 2 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The ERAS group also reported shorter hospital stays (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 6.3 ± 1.8 days, P < 0.001). VAS scores in the ERAS group were significantly lower at 24 h and 3 days postoperatively (P < 0.001), with differences diminishing over time. Functional recovery, measured by 6MWT, was significantly better in the ERAS group at all time points except 12 months. HRQoL scores in the ERAS group were significantly higher at 3 months, particularly in functional and symptom dimensions (P < 0.05), and have higher patient satisfaction rates across all follow-up time points (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ERAS-based nursing interventions significantly improved postoperative recovery, reduced complications, shortened hospital stays, and enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic resection for early gastrointestinal tumors. These findings support the integration of ERAS principles into nursing care protocols to optimize surgical outcomes.

The use of preoperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare adult patients receiving enteral immunonutrition prior to elective colorectal surgery with those receiving conventional preoperative nutrition.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to March 2024. Articles were included if they were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies evaluating adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery comparing preoperative enteral immunonutrition with conventional preoperative nutrition protocols. Main outcomes of interest included surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, overall postoperative morbidity and postoperative length of stay. An inverse variance random effects meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools. The GRADE approach was conducted to assess quality of evidence.

RESULTS

After reviewing 2508 relevant citations, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, 1521 patients (mean age 64.9 ± 10.0 years, 49.4% women) received preoperative immunonutrition and 1816 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 11.0 years, 52.1% women) received conventional preoperative nutrition. Across seven studies, there was a non-significant 30% relative risk reduction of surgical site infection (risk ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.11, P = 0.13, I2 = 33%) and a non-significant 44% relative risk reduction of anastomotic leak (risk ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.28-1.10, P = 0.09, I2 = 0%) in the immunonutrition group. Across eight studies, postoperative length of stay was 0.48 days shorter in the immunonutrition group (mean difference -0.48, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.12, P = 0.01, I2 = 53%). GRADE certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While point estimates suggest a likely benefit associated with preoperative enteral immunonutrition, wide corresponding 95% CIs suggest uncertainty remains. Further prospective study is warranted.

Evidence-based control of stress response on intraoperative physiological indexes and recovery of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Although the 2021 Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) provide recommendations for ERAS in gastrointestinal surgery, the clinical application of standard ERAS nursing models is challenging due to the variety of diseases involved in gastrointestinal surgery and the complex factors contributing to patient stress responses. Moreover, stress responses are more severe in older adult patients. Therefore, precision medicine is required to improve the quality of nursing care and promote postoperative recovery in gastrointestinal surgery.

AIM

To establish an evidence-based ERAS model based on stress response nursing care and demonstrate nursing benefits through clinical practice.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial first established an evidence-based nursing ERAS protocol in older adult patients based on literature related to perioperative nursing measures for gastrointestinal surgery stress response. Next, 392 older adult patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery and were admitted to our hospital between December 2021 and June 2023 were categorized into two groups to receive evidence-based (study group) or conventional (control group) ERAS nursing models, respectively. Intraoperative physiological parameters during surgery and postoperative recovery indicators were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Among 64 domestic and international studies, the stress responses of older adult patients mainly included emotional anxiety, sleep disorders, gastrointestinal discomfort, physical weakness, pain, and swelling. The appropriate nursing interventions included comprehensive psychological counseling, pre- and postoperative nutritional support, temperature control, pain management, and rehabilitation training. Compared with the control group, the study group showed lower heart rate, mean arterial pressure, blood glucose level, and adrenaline level; shorter duration of drainage tube placement, time to first flatus, time to first ambulation, and postoperative hospital stay; lower anxiety scores on postoperative day 3; and lower incidences of postoperative infection, obstruction, poor wound healing, and gastrointestinal reactions were lower in the study group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The evidence-based nursing measures targeting stress responses based on the conventional ERAS nursing model resulted in stable intraoperative physiological parameters during surgery, promoted postoperative recovery, and reduced the incidence of complications.

Optimizing Postoperative Outcomes in Abdominal Surgery: The Role of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols

BACKGROUND

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to reduce surgical stress, enhance recovery, and minimize the length of hospital stays, thereby improving both clinical outcomes and the overall patient experience. The main objective of the study was to find the postoperative outcomes of abdominal surgery with respect to the role of ERAS protocols.

METHODOLOGY

Data was collected retrospectively from three governmental hospitals in Egypt between 2018 and 2020. A total of 1473 patients were enrolled according to the criteria of the study, 780 in the ERAS group and 693 in the non-ERAS group.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in both groups was similar, with 55.4 (±10.2) years for the ERAS group and 54.8 (±9.8) years for the non-ERAS group. The gender distribution showed a slightly higher number of female patients in both groups. The average BMI was comparable between groups, with 26.3±4.5 kg/m² in the ERAS group and 26.5±4.7 kg/m² in the non-ERAS group. The time to first flatus was reduced from 52.3 (±10.4) hours in the non-ERAS group to 36.2±8.1 hours in the ERAS group (P < 0.001). Similarly, the time to first defecation was shorter in the ERAS group at 48.5±9.2 hours compared to 66.4±12.5 hours in the non-ERAS group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocols significantly improve postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgeries by reducing recovery times, complications, and hospital stays.

Impact of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols vs. traditional perioperative care on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications, including technical complications, surgical site infections, and other adverse events affecting patient safety and overall patient experience. "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) is considered a new standard of care for streamlining the perioperative care of surgical patients with the goal of minimizing complications and optimizing timely patient recovery after surgery. This systematic review was designed to investigate the evidence-based literature pertinent to comparing patient outcomes after ERAS versus conventional perioperative care.

METHODS

This systematic review evaluates the performance of ERAS protocols against conventional care in colorectal surgery, focusing on various postoperative outcome measures. An extensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases and registers from July 2 to July 5, 2024, complemented by citation searching on November 30, 2024. This approach led to the identification of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the past decade, involving 1,476 adult participants. To ensure methodological rigor and transparency, the review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024583074).

RESULTS

The implementation of ERAS protocols resulted in a notable decrease in hospital stay duration compared to conventional care, with reductions varying between 3 and 8 days across studies. ERAS patients also had faster gastrointestinal recovery, including quicker times to bowel movement, defecation, and resumption of normal diet. Furthermore, patients in ERAS groups showed notably reduced postoperative complications and opioid consumption, with patients experiencing lower pain scores on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and reduced reliance on opioids. Additionally, nutritional recovery in ERAS patients was enhanced, with elevated albumin and total protein levels, alongside decreased inflammatory markers and improved immune function.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides compelling evidence supporting the integration of ERAS protocols into standard colorectal surgical practices. Future studies should aim to explore the variations in ERAS implementation, pinpoint the most impactful elements of ERAS, and work towards personalizing and standardizing these protocols across clinical settings. Additionally, evaluating long-term outcomes will help refine ERAS strategies, ensuring their enduring impact on patient recovery.

Investigating the Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Improving Postoperative Outcomes and Reducing Hospital Readmission Rates in Patients Undergoing abdominal Surgery

Objectives

The main objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in improving postoperative outcomes and reducing hospital readmission rates in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Materials and Methods

This study involves a total of 650 patients who were divided into two groups: the intervention group, which received care according to ERAS protocols, and the control group, which received standard postoperative care. Patients aged >18 years and scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were included in the study.

Results

The mean age of patients in ERAS group were 56.4 ± 12.3 years, while in the standard care group 57.1 ± 11.8 years. Out of 650 patients, there were 339 male and 311 female. Patients were selected from different surgery departments. The ERAS group had lower 30-day readmission rates (6.2% vs. 15.4%), quicker mobilization (12.5 vs. 24.8 hours), and faster resumption of oral intake (8.6 vs. 18.2 hours). Pain levels were lower (VAS 3.1 vs. 5.8), and patient satisfaction was higher (89% vs. 74%) in the ERAS group, with all differences being statistically significant.

Conclusion

It is concluded that ERAS protocols significantly improve postoperative outcomes, including reducing complications, shortening hospital stays, and lowering readmission rates for patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.

Enhancing patient outcomes through nursing care in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; a randomized control trail

BACKGROUND

When compared to open surgery, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is known to cause less discomfort and a faster recovery. This study examines the effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) strategy on LCBDE outcomes.

METHODS

In March 2021 to May 2024, 400 patients with LCBDE participated in randomized research. The six patient groups were: Multimodal Pain Management (n = 50), Standard Pain Management (n = 50), ERAS (n = 50), Preoperative Assessment (n = 100), Standard Preoperative Assessment (n = 100), and Standard Care (n = 50). The patient's satisfaction, long-term recovery, pain, anxiety, and complication rates were among the outcomes that were measured.

RESULTS

After the intervention, the mean anxiety level of the ERAS group was significantly lower (P < 0.05), and their rates of complications were also decreased. Reduced postoperative pain scores, which were 5 on day 1 and decreased to 3 by day 3, were the consequence of the multimodal pain management strategy inside ERAS. A 90% satisfaction rating and an average recovery period of five days were reported by the ERAS group. Long-term results in ERAS showed that the average time to return to work was only 25 days, and there was a decreased incidence of chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

The ERAS protocol enhances the short- and long-term course of recovery for patients with LCBDE, leading to increased satisfaction and better clinical outcomes. These results suggest that the ERAS method should be used as the gold standard for postoperative care for patients with LCBDE.

Impact of fast-track surgery on perioperative care in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery

BACKGROUND

Fast-track surgery (FTS) is a modern nursing approach that has gained popularity in the perioperative phase of surgery.

AIM

To investigate the impact of FTS on perioperative care for hepatobiliary surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery and were admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to October 2023. They were divided into an observation group and a control group with 49 patients in each group according to different nursing directions. The control group was treated with standard nursing and the observation group was treated with FTS concept nursing. The length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, wound complications, nursing satisfaction, self-rating scale (SAS) score, and SF-36 quality of life (QoL) score were compared between the two groups before and after care.

RESULTS

The duration of hospitalization, hospitalization cost, operation time, first implantation time, exhaust time, and first defecation time were shorter than the observation group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group showed a significant difference between the VAS and SAS scores on days 1, 3, and 7 (P < 0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was 4.05% was significantly lower than the 18.36% in the control group, and the comparison groups were statistically significant (χ 2 = 5.018, P = 0.025). The observation group had a significantly higher level of nurse satisfaction (94.92%) than the control group (79.59%; χ 2 = 6.078, P = 0.014). Both groups showed higher QoL scores after nursing care, with higher scores in the observation group than in the control group (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

FTS in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery can effectively improve negative mood, QoL, and nursing satisfaction; reduce wound complications; and accelerate patient rehabilitation.

Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analytical Comparison With Conventional Care in Terms of Outcomes and Complications

The "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) strategy, a patient-centered, evidence-based approach, aims to reduce surgical stress, maintain physiological function, and expedite recovery. Initially developed for elective surgeries, particularly colorectal procedures, ERAS protocols are now being explored for their potential benefits in the more challenging context of emergency surgeries. The current investigation aims to identify the most useful ERAS components in emergency surgery scenarios by comparing postoperative recovery times, possible health outcomes of patients, and complication rates. Through August 2023, extensive searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Data were taken from nine RCTs, which were prospective and retrospective cohort studies and were used to derive important outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was employed to measure the caliber of research. Effect pooling estimates were estimated using random-effects models. For the investigations, STATA version 16.0 and Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4 were used. Nine studies that addressed the range of ERAS components and outcomes were included. Compared to standard treatment, ERAS procedures generally showed faster postoperative recovery durations. Studies' success or adherence rates differed. Subgroup analyses were necessary due to significant heterogeneity in order to determine potential sources. For emergency colorectal procedures, ERAS methods shorten postoperative recovery periods when appropriately modified and put into practice. However, varying success rates throughout studies showed that, in order to maximize and standardize ERAS protocols for comprehensive advantages, significant thought and further study are required. The meta-analysis suggests that ERAS protocols offer substantial benefits in emergency colorectal surgeries, particularly in reducing postoperative recovery times and complication rates.

A scoping review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), protocol implementation, and its impact on surgical outcomes and healthcare systems in Africa

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centered approach to surgery designed to reduce stress responses and facilitate faster recovery. ERAS protocols have been widely adopted in high-income countries, supported by robust research demonstrating improved patient outcomes. However, in Africa, there is limited evidence regarding its implementation. This review aims to identify the existing literature on the implementation of ERAS principles in Africa, the reported clinical outcomes, and the challenges and recommendations for successful implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a librarian-assisted literature search of electronic research databases between October and November 2023. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility, and duplicates were then removed, followed by full-text assessment of potentially eligible studies. We utilized the summative content analysis method to synthesize and group the data into fewer categories based on agreed-upon criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results.

RESULTS

The search identified 342 potential studies resulting in 15 eligible studies for inclusion in the review. The publication years ranged from 2016 to 2023. The studies originated from three countries: Egypt (n = 10), South Africa (n = 4), and Uganda (n = 1). Successful implementation was associated with reduced hospital length of stay (n = 12), lower mortality rates (n = 3), and improved pain outcomes (n = 7). Challenges included protocol adherence (n = 5) and limitations of the research design to generate strong evidence (n = 3). Recommendations included formal adoption of ERAS principles (n = 5), the need for sustained research commitment, and exploration of the applicability of ERAS in diverse surgical contexts (n = 8). Large-scale implementation beyond individual institutions was encouraged to further validate its impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited number of studies on ERAS implementation in Africa, the available evidence suggests that it reduces the length of hospital stays and mortality rates. This is crucial for the region, given its higher mortality rates, necessitating more collaborative, methodically well-designed studies to establish stronger evidence for ERAS in lower-resource environments.

Influence of Anesthetic Techniques on Colorectal Cancer Recurrence: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant risk of recurrence following surgical treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that perioperative factors, particularly anesthetic techniques, may influence cancer recurrence rates. This comprehensive review aims to critically analyze the impact of various anesthetic techniques on colorectal cancer recurrence. We explore the distinct immunomodulatory and inflammatory effects of general, regional, and combined anesthetic approaches and their potential influence on tumor biology. The review synthesizes findings from clinical studies, experimental research, and theoretical models, highlighting the differential impact of anesthetic choices on long-term oncological outcomes. By examining recurrence rates, immune responses, and inflammatory markers associated with different anesthetic techniques, this review provides a holistic understanding of the role of anesthetic management in colorectal cancer surgery. Our findings suggest that anesthetic techniques can modulate the immune and inflammatory responses in ways that may affect tumor recurrence, underscoring the need for further research to optimize anesthetic protocols. The review offers clinical recommendations based on current evidence and identifies gaps in knowledge, proposing directions for future investigations. This comprehensive analysis aims to inform clinical practice and guide future research, ultimately improving long-term outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

Initial Results of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program in Patients Undergoing Lobectomy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer: An Experience From the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy is a standard surgical method in the treatment of early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program aims to reduce the postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) in major surgeries. This study evaluated the impact of the ERAS program on PLOS and identified related factors in patients undergoing lobectomy for NSCLC.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from February 2022 to December 2023. We included patients diagnosed with NSCLC scheduled for lobectomy. The ERAS protocol was applied according to guidelines from the ERAS Society and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. We collected data on patient demographics, surgical details, adherence to the ERAS protocol, and postoperative outcomes, including the PLOS.

RESULTS

Among the 98 patients enrolled, the median PLOS after ERAS intervention was 4.1 days (interquartile range: 3.7 to 5.2 days). Adherence to ERAS protocols significantly correlated with reduced PLOS (p<0.001). Notably, smoking status was identified as a related factor of PLOS (p=0.002). Complications (p<0.001), surgical method (p=0.007), operation time (p<0.001), duration of postanesthesia care unit (p=0.006), duration of thoracic drainage (p<0.001), and urinary catheter retention time (p=0.023) were also associated with PLOS variations.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the ERAS program in patients undergoing lobectomy for NSCLC at our center reduced PLOS and highlighted the importance of protocol adherence for optimizing surgical outcomes. These findings supported the broader adoption of ERAS protocols in thoracic surgery to enhance patient recovery. Future research should focus on multi-center studies to generalize these results and further dissect the impact of individual ERAS components.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS® ) Society abdominal and thoracic surgery recommendations: A systematic review and comparison of guidelines for perioperative and pharmacotherapy core items

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, ERAS® Society guidelines have ushered in a new era of perioperative care. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare published core elements and pharmacotherapy recommendations embedded within ERAS® Society abdominal and thoracic surgery (ATS) guidelines. Determining whether a consensus exists for pharmacological core items would make future guideline preparation for similar surgeries more standardized and could improve patient care by reducing unnecessary protocol variations.

METHODS

From the ERAS® Society website as of May 2023, 16 current ERAS® published ATS guidelines were included in the analysis to determine consensus and differing statements regarding each ERAS® perioperative and pharmacotherapy-related item. The aims were to (a) determine whether a consensus for each item could be derived, (b) identify gaps in ERAS® protocol development, and (c) propose potential research directions for addressing the identified gaps in the literature.

RESULTS

Core items with consensus included: preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation; avoiding bowel reparation and fasting; multimodal preanesthetic, perioperative analgesia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting regimens; low molecular weight heparins for in-hospital and at-home venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; antibiotic prophylaxis; skin preparation; goal-directed perioperative fluid management with balanced crystalloids; perioperative nutrition care; ileus prevention with peripherally-acting mu receptor antagonists; and glucose control.

CONCLUSION

While consensus was found for aspects of 21 current ERAS® guideline core items related to pharmacotherapy choice, details related to doses, regimen, timing of administration as well as unique aspects pertaining to specific surgeries remain to be researched and harmonized to promote guideline consistency and further optimize patient outcomes.

Patient and Provider Experiences With a Digital App to Improve Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Canadian Experience

BACKGROUND

Of all the care provided in health care systems, major surgical interventions are the costliest and can carry significant risks. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a bundle of interventions that help improve patient outcomes and experience along their surgical journey. However, given that patients can be overwhelmed by the multiple tasks that they are expected to follow, a digital application, the ERAS app, was developed to help improve the implementation of ERAS.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to conduct a thorough assessment of patient and provider experiences using the ERAS app.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colorectal or gynecological oncology surgery at 2 different hospitals in the province of Alberta, Canada, were invited to use the ERAS app and report on their experiences using it. Likewise, care providers were recruited to participate in this study to provide feedback on the performance of this app. Data were collected by an online survey and using qualitative interviews with participants. NVivo was used to analyze qualitative interview data, while quantitative data were analyzed using Excel and SPSS.

RESULTS

Overall, patients found the app to be helpful in preparation for and recovery after surgery. Patients reported having access to reliable unbiased information regarding their surgery, and the app provided them with clarity of actions needed along their surgical journey and enhanced the self-management of their care. Clinicians found that the ERAS app was easy to navigate, was simple for older adults, and has the potential to decrease unnecessary visits and phone calls to care providers. Overall, this proof-of-concept study on the use of a digital health app to accompany patients during their health care journey has shown positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an important finding considering the massive investment and interest in promoting digital health in health care systems around the world.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Approach: A Medical Complex Experience

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach aimed at reducing organ failure and mitigating stress reactions in surgery patients. This investigation sought to assess available data concerning the benefits of ERAS protocols in improving patient outcomes for individuals undergoing significant colorectal surgery.

METHODS

The study involved 65 patients who underwent colectomy and lower anterior resection for rectal cancers. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 comprised 22 patients enrolled retrospectively who received the traditional protocol; Group 2 consisted of 20 patients enrolled prospectively who received the ERAS protocol; and Group 3 included 23 patients enrolled retrospectively who received the ERAS protocol. Each patient underwent a comprehensive history, physical examination, laboratory testing, computed tomography, MRI, and chest radiography.

RESULTS

Hospital stay durations were significantly shorter in both ERAS groups during the first and second cycles compared to the non-ERAS group (P<0.001, <0.001), with no significant difference between ERAS groups in either cycle. Delayed intestinal motility was significantly more pronounced in the non-ERAS group compared to ERAS groups in both cycles (P=0.005), with only five (22.7%) cases reported in the non-ERAS group.

CONCLUSION

ERAS implementation in the perioperative management of colorectal surgery patients is associated with improved outcomes and shorter recovery times. Implementation of ERAS in hospitals is feasible and beneficial.