The Effect of Statins on Serum Vitamin D Concentrations Among Older Adults

Cholesterol-modifying strategies for Alzheimer disease: promise or fallacy?

INTRODUCTION

As the world population ages, Alzheimer disease (AD) prevalence increases. However, understanding of AD etiology continues to evolve, and the pathophysiological processes involved are only partially elucidated. One compound suspected to play a role in the development and progression of AD is cholesterol. Several lines of evidence support this connection, yet it remains unclear whether cholesterol-modifying strategies have potential applications in the clinical management of AD.

AREAS COVERED

A deep literature search using PubMed was performed to prepare this narrative review. The literature search, performed in early 2024, was inclusive of literature from 1990 to 2024. After providing an overview of cholesterol metabolism, this study summarizes key preclinical studies that have investigated cholesterol-modifying therapies in laboratory models of AD. It also summarizes past and current clinical trials testing specific targets modulated by anti-cholesterol therapies in AD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on current epidemiological and mechanistic studies, cholesterol likely plays a role in AD etiology. The use of cholesterol-modifying therapies could be a promising treatment approach if administered at presymptomatic to early AD phases, but it is unlikely to be efficient in mild, moderate, and late AD stages. Several recommendations are provided for hypercholesterolemia management in AD patients.

Calcium Blood Level Elevation After Atorvastatin Initiation in a Patient With Hyperparathyroidism

Atorvastatin is a very common medication used for lowering blood cholesterol levels. The drug has known adverse effects, but an elevation in calcium levels is not listed as one of them. We report a 52-year-old man with hyperparathyroidism and hypercholesterolemia, who, under treatment with atorvastatin, developed an additional rise in calcium levels. He was asymptomatic, and during the investigation of his hypercalcemia, a drug adverse effect was suspected. Therefore, atorvastatin therapy was stopped, and calcium levels dropped as a result. Subsequent readministration of atorvastatin and its cessation produced similar results. While hypercalcemia is not listed as a common adverse effect of atorvastatin, we introduce such a phenomenon along with possible underlying mechanisms. Although our patient was asymptomatic, hypercalcemia can be a dangerous condition, especially in a population where the initial calcium levels are already elevated.

Genetically instrumented LDL-cholesterol lowering and multiple disease outcomes: A Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study in the UK Biobank

AIMS

Lipid-lowering medications are widely used to control blood cholesterol levels and manage a range of cardiovascular and lipid disorders. We aimed to explore the possible associations between LDL lowering and multiple disease outcomes or biomarkers.

METHODS

We performed a Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study (MR-PheWAS) in 337 475 UK Biobank participants to test for associations between four proposed LDL-C-lowering genetic risk scores (PCSK9, HMGCR, NPC1L1 and LDLR) and 1135 disease outcomes, with follow-up MR analyses in 52 serum, urine, imaging and clinical biomarkers. We used inverse-variance weighted MR in the main analyses and complementary MR methods (weighted median, weighted mode, MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO) as sensitivity analyses. We accounted for multiple testing with false discovery rate correction (P < 2.0 × 10-4 for phecodes, P < 1.3 × 10-2 for biomarkers).

RESULTS

We found evidence for an association between genetically instrumented LDL lowering and 10 distinct disease outcomes, suggesting potential causality. All genetic instruments were associated with hyperlipidaemias and cardiovascular diseases in the expected directions. Biomarker analyses supported an effect of LDL-C lowering through PCSK9 on lung function (FEV [beta per 1 mg/dL lower LDL-C -1.49, 95% CI -2.21, -0.78]; FVC [-1.42, 95% CI -2.29, -0.54]) and through HMGCR on hippocampal volume (beta per 1 mg/dL lower LDL-C 6.09, 95% CI 1.74, 10.44).

CONCLUSIONS

We found genetic evidence to support both positive and negative effects of LDL-C lowering through all four LDL-C-lowering pathways. Future studies should further explore the effects of LDL-C lowering on lung function and changes in brain volume.

Evaluating the effect of atorvastatin exposure and vitamin D levels on lipid outcomes in people with HIV-1 with suppressed HIV-1 RNA and LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people with HIV. Atorvastatin is known to reduce cardiovascular risk. We (1) compared atorvastatin concentrations between different boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) and with lipid outcomes and (2) compared pre-atorvastatin 25-OH vitamin D levels with atorvastatin concentrations and with lipid outcomes, in people with HIV with suppressed HIV-1 RNA and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL.

METHODS

A5275 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of atorvastatin in virally suppressed people with HIV with fasting LDL-C <130 mg/dL. We analyzed results over the 20 weeks of active atorvastatin treatment. Atorvastatin was initiated at 10 mg daily and increased to 20 mg daily after 4 weeks if there were no findings of toxicity. Atorvastatin trough concentrations were measured at week 20. Participants took combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) that included a boosted PI throughout.

RESULTS

Overall (n = 67), 70% of participants were male, and the median age was 51 years. There was no apparent association between atorvastatin trough concentrations and pre-atorvastatin vitamin D levels (r = 0.01, p = 0.9) or by boosted PI (p = 0.20). Median pre- to post-atorvastatin change was -39.0 mg/dL in fasting total cholesterol, -40.4 ng/mL in lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LP-PLA2), and -13.8 U/L in oxidized LDL, with all changes negatively correlated with atorvastatin trough concentrations (r = -0.19, -0.09, -0.21; p ≥ 0.096).

CONCLUSIONS

No apparent associations between pre-atorvastatin vitamin D levels and outcomes were observed (all p > 0.70). In virologically suppressed people with HIV, higher atorvastatin concentrations were marginally associated with greater decreases in lipid outcomes.

Low dose hydrophilic statins are the preferred agents for females at risk of osteoporosis

Objectives

The correlation between atherosclerosis and osteoporosis, independent of age, is clear. Multifactorial co-dependence between bone mineral density (BMD) and statin dose has been proposed. It is hypothesised that inhibition of the synthesis of cholesterol will also inhibit the synthesis of sex hormones and Vitamin D, negatively affecting BMD. This study aims to evaluate hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic statins effect on osteoporosis and analyse any possible superiority of one agent over the other within the group.

Methods

We identified 538 caucasian females who had a DEXA scan performed between 2002 and 2016 (age 60-89) in one DEXA center in Mid-West Ireland. A DEXA T-score results were analysed in the current study. Two hundred fifty females were not on statin therapy, and 323 females were on statin therapy. Females on therapy were separated into the atorvastatin group (N = 190), rosuvastatin group (N = 97), and pravastatin group (N = 36), comprising low dose and high dose groups. All anonymised data were analysed with SPSS statistical. To test the hypothesis that lower bone density is associated with high dose statins, an independent sample t-test was performed. The one-way between-groups ANOVA test was used to test the hypothesis that the BMD level depended on the statin's potency.

Results

Statin-naïve females have a statistically higher bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, t (538) = 3.42, p < 0.05 and in hip t (538) = 4.99, p < 0.05 than females on statin therapy. There was a significant difference in patient's age between the group, and no significant correlation was found between the patient's age and type of statin or bone density. In the atorvastatin group statistically, significant results were obtained both for spine and hip bone mineral density, t (188) = -5.61, p < 0.05 and t (188) = -3.62, p < 0.05, respectively. In the rosuvastatin group, statistically, a significant result was noted for bone mineral density of hip t (95) = -3.52, p < 0.05. This demonstrates a dose-dependency between bone mineral density and the dose of the statin. The independent between-group ANOVA yielded a statistically significant effect, F (2, 59) = 6.69, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.21 in the spine. Thus, patients on lipophilic statins had statistically lower BMD than females on hydrophilic statins. Multilinear regression analysis identified that age is not a statistically significant contributor in our analysis; however, the trend of decrease in bone mineral density with women's age is acknowledged by authors.

Conclusions

The study results support the theory that bone mineral density decreases with an increase in a statin dose, and hydrophilic statins, like pravastatin, have a better metabolic profile in the lumbar spine than lipophilic agents.