1
|
Silvina Y, Renata C, Gastón R, Compagnucci Malena F, Lorena T, Laura D, Valeria D, Gabriel G, Guillermo D, Martin R, Virginia Gentilini M. Seroconversion in liver and intestine transplant patients after one, two or three doses of adenoviral vector vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Single center experience in Argentina. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:111091. [PMID: 39265411 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.111091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The capacity of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to elicit immune response is not equivalent in the healthy population compared to chronically immunosuppressed patients. Most of the reports available to assess the effects of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) were performed using mRNA-based vaccines. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the seroconversion rate in a cohort of liver and liver- intestinal transplant patients after vaccination with the non-replicative vector-based vaccines after transplantation used in our country, Argentina (rAd26-rAd5 (Sputnik V) and ChAdOx11 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) (Astra Zeneca-Oxford). METHODS One hundred and three (103) liver and liver-intestinal transplant recipients were enrolled. Patients with previous PCR-confirmed COVID19 were excluded, therefore 77 were finally included for analysis; 75 were liver transplant recipients, 1 was a combined liver-intestine and 1 a multivisceral transplant. All received their first vaccine dose between March and June 2021; 66,2% males, and the mean age was 56,3 years. All patients have a post-transplant follow up longer than 1 year (mean 6.6 years, median 5 years, range 1-23 years). Immune response after first, second and third doses were determined using three different spike (S)-S commercial ELISA kits and an in-house made anti nucleocapsid-protein (N) ELISA. RESULTS Following the three doses, 57.1 % (44/77) of the patients seroconverted, while 33/77 (42.9 %) did not present anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The seroconversion rate was different for each dose. We found that 5/27 (18.5 %) of transplant patients seroconverted after a single dose; 18/29 pts (62.0 %) had anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies after the second doses; and 18/21 pts (85.7 %) reached the seroconversion after the third doses. The proportion of seroconversion was significantly increased in the second doses regardless the response observed after the first doses (p = 0.012, Fisher's exact test), particularly when two doses of ChAdOx11 vaccine was administrated (p = 0.040, Chi-square). However, the comparisons of seroconversion rate between Sputnik V and ChAdOx11 vaccines showed no differences after the different vaccination doses. No significant statistical difference in patient́s gender, age, comorbidities, type of vaccine, post-transplant, or maintenance immunosuppressive therapy was found between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION Despite having a lower seroconversion rate compared to the general population, viral-vector vaccines benefit SOTR patients increasing the seroconversion rate using at least two doses of vaccine. These results support the concept of developing tailor-made vaccination guidelines for this specific population. This analysis provides further support to safety and efficacy of viral-vector vaccines in liver and liver-intestine transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yantorno Silvina
- Unidad de Hepatología, Cirugía Hepatobiliar Y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Curciarello Renata
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Rizzo Gastón
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Ferreyra Compagnucci Malena
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Tau Lorena
- Laboratorio de Salud Pública. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
| | - Delaplace Laura
- Laboratorio de Salud Pública. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
| | - Descalzi Valeria
- Unidad de Hepatología, Cirugía Hepatobiliar Y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gondolesi Gabriel
- Unidad de Hepatología, Cirugía Hepatobiliar Y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Rehabilitación y Trasplante Intestinal, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Argentina; Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMETTYB), CONICET, Universidad Favaloro, Argentina
| | - Docena Guillermo
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Rumbo Martin
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - María Virginia Gentilini
- Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMETTYB), CONICET, Universidad Favaloro, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yildiz Y, Yasar E, Ozturk E, Karakan MS, Helvaci O, Ozger HS, Cemre Araz Z, Yildiz PA, Dikmen AU, Caglar K, Dizbay M, Derici U, Guz G. Heterologous Versus Homologous COVID-19 Boosters: Immune Response Outcomes in Renal Transplant Recipients. J Med Virol 2024; 96:e70030. [PMID: 39465901 PMCID: PMC11600475 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.70030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the immune responses to homologous and heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccinations in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and to identify factors affecting these responses. In this prospective multicenter observational study, we measured the antibody kinetics of 90 RTRs using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay method. The mean age of participants was 45.2 ± 11.4 years, with 35.6% being female. On the 42nd day after the first vaccine dose, the median antibody level was 16.7 (IQR 2.5-249.5) AU/mL, and the seropositivity rate was 60% (n = 36). Mycophenolic acid (MFA) (OR: 0.087, 95% CI: 0.024-0.311) and ACE inhibitor use (OR: 0.203, 95% CI: 0.052-0.794) were identified as independent factors affecting seropositivity. Patients who received the Pfizer/BioNTech booster had significantly higher antibody levels compared to those who received the CoronaVac/Sinovac booster (p = 0.021). Additionally, a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 positivity was observed among patients who received the CoronaVac/Sinovac booster (p = 0.031). Heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccination is significantly more effective than homologous inactivated booster vaccination in enhancing immune responses and preventing new infections in RTRs. MFA and ACE inhibitor usage were independent factors affecting seropositivity. Additional COVID-19 vaccine doses are needed in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesim Yildiz
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Emre Yasar
- Department of NephrologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Erensu Ozturk
- Department of Medical MicrobiologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Mine Sebnem Karakan
- Department of Nephrology, Bilkent City HospitalAnkara Yildirim Beyazit UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Ozant Helvaci
- Department of NephrologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Hasan Selcuk Ozger
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Z. Cemre Araz
- Institute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Neuroscience Interdisciplinary Program, UNAM‐National Nanotechnology Research CenterBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Pinar Aysert Yildiz
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Asiye Ugras Dikmen
- Department of Public HealthGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Kayhan Caglar
- Department of Medical MicrobiologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Murat Dizbay
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Ulver Derici
- Department of NephrologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Galip Guz
- Department of NephrologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Foudrat E, Caillard S. Living During COVID-19 While Immunocompromised: A Patient and Physician Perspective from France. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:439-445. [PMID: 38457110 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00941-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
This article is co-authored by a kidney transplant recipient and her nephrologist. By sharing her personal experience of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the patient illustrates the concerns of immunocompromised patients during this unprecedented health crisis. She describes the difficulties encountered at work, the omnipresent protective measures, and the need for appropriate information. The nephrologist, who follows a cohort of over 1700 kidney transplant recipients, recounts the medical team's struggle to protect their vulnerable patients against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as a veritable succession of hopes and disappointments. She describes the management of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients, the deployment of the COVID-19 vaccination program with the finding of poor immune responses in many patients including those receiving immunosuppressant drugs after kidney transplant, and the first use of prophylactic monoclonal antibodies. From both the patient's and the physician's perspectives, the COVID-19 pandemic has required continuous adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, INSERM U 1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX, Strasbourg University Hospital-Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 Place de l'hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamaya T, Hatakeyama S, Yoneyama T, Tobisawa Y, Kodama H, Fujita T, Murakami R, Mori K, Okamoto T, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Saitoh H, Narumi S, Tomita H, Ohyama C. Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine on in ABO blood type incompatible kidney transplant recipients treated with low-dose rituximab. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15098. [PMID: 37699969 PMCID: PMC10497504 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42406-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the humoral response after the second and third doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in ABO blood type incompatible kidney transplant (KT) recipients treated with rituximab. This retrospective study conducted between June 2021 and June 2022 included 131 KT recipients and 154 nontransplant controls who had received mRNA vaccines. We compared the seropositivity (anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titer ≥ 0.8 U/mL) after the second and third vaccinations. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of pretransplant vaccination for seropositivity. Of the 131 KT recipients, 50 had received the third dose of mRNA vaccine. The antibody titer was significantly increased after the third dose of mRNA vaccine. The seropositivity rate after the third dose of mRNA vaccine increased from 36 to 70%. We observed no significant difference in seropositivity after the third dose of mRNA vaccine in ABO incompatibility, rituximab use, mycophenolate mofetil use, and age at KT. Of the nine recipients who had received the second or third dose of the mRNA vaccine prior to the KT, eight of the recipients were seropositive both before and after the KT. Our results suggest that ABO incompatibility or rituximab use was not significantly associated with seropositivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoko Hamaya
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Glycotechnology, Center for Advanced Medical Research, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hirotake Kodama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Takeshi Fujita
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Reiichi Murakami
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hisao Saitoh
- Department of Urology, Oyokyo Kidney Research Institute, 90 Kozawayamazaki, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8243, Japan
| | - Shunji Narumi
- Department of Transplant Nephrology and Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Tomita
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| |
Collapse
|