Cardiopulmonary function in rats with lung hemorrhage induced by pulsed ultrasound exposure

Mechanical and Biological Effects of Ultrasound: A Review of Present Knowledge

Ultrasound is widely used for medical diagnosis and increasingly for therapeutic purposes. An understanding of the bio-effects of sonography is important for clinicians and scientists working in the field because permanent damage to biological tissues can occur at high levels of exposure. Here the underlying principles of thermal mechanisms and the physical interactions of ultrasound with biological tissues are reviewed. Adverse health effects derived from cellular studies, animal studies and clinical reports are reviewed to provide insight into the in vitro and in vivo bio-effects of ultrasound.

Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations

Modern ultrasound imaging for diagnostic purposes has a wide range of applications. It is used in obstetrics to monitor the progress of pregnancy, in oncology to visualize tumours and their response to treatment, and, in cardiology, contrast-enhanced studies are used to investigate heart function and physiology. An increasing use of diagnostic ultrasound is to provide the first photograph for baby's album-in the form of a souvenir or keepsake scan that might be taken as part of a routine investigation, or during a visit to an independent high-street 'boutique'. It is therefore important to ensure that any benefit accrued from these applications outweighs any accompanying risk, and to evaluate the existing ultrasound bio-effect and epidemiology literature with this in mind. This review considers the existing laboratory and epidemiological evidence about the safety of diagnostic ultrasound and puts it in the context of current clinical usage.

The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: nonthermal mechanisms

This review examines the nonthermal physical mechanisms by which ultrasound can harm tissue in postnatal patients. First the physical nature of the more significant interactions between ultrasound and tissue is described, followed by an examination of the existing literature with particular emphasis on the pressure thresholds for potential adverse effects. The interaction of ultrasonic fields with tissue depends in a fundamental way on whether the tissue naturally contains undissolved gas under normal physiologic conditions. Examples of gas-containing tissues are lung and intestine. Considerable effort has been devoted to investigating the acoustic parameters relevant to the threshold and extent of lung hemorrhage. Thresholds as low as 0.4 MPa at 1 MHz have been reported. The situation for intestinal damage is similar, although the threshold appears to be somewhat higher. For other tissues, auditory stimulation or tactile perception may occur, if rarely, during exposure to diagnostic ultrasound; ultrasound at similar or lower intensities is used therapeutically to accelerate the healing of bone fractures. At the exposure levels used in diagnostic ultrasound, there is no consistent evidence for adverse effects in tissues that are not known to contain stabilized gas bodies. Although modest tissue damage may occur in certain identifiable applications, the risk for induction of an adverse biological effect by a nonthermal mechanism due to exposure to diagnostic ultrasound is extremely small.

Evaluation of the threshold for lung hemorrhage by diagnostic ultrasound and a proposed new safety index

In a recent report (O'Brien et al. (2006b), it was suggested that the current expression for the mechanical index (MI) was not well suited to its function of quantifying the likelihood of an adverse biological effect after exposure of the gas-filled lung to diagnostic ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relatively large database of experimental thresholds for the induction of lung hemorrhage to: (i) determine which variable(s) best describe the data and (ii) use the resulting equation to obtain a new formulation for the MI for lung exposures. Data from 14 studies of lung hemorrhage in four common laboratory animals (mouse, rat, rabbit and pig) were tabulated with regard to five common acoustic variables: center frequency (f(c)), pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse duration (PD), exposure duration (ED) and the threshold in situ peak rarefactional pressure (p(r)). The 34 threshold data points were fit by linear regression to: (i) a multiplicative model of the other variables, p(r) = Af(c)(B)PRF(C)PD(D)ED(E), where A is a constant; (ii) 14 "reduced" models in which one or more variables were not included in the analysis; (iii) four models in which a multiplicative combination of variables has a common name e.g., duty factor; and (iv) the general form of the current expression for the MI. The MI was shown to provide a poor fit to the threshold data (r(2) = 0.382), as were three of the four named models. The best fits were found for the complete model and for three reduced models, all of which contain the exposure duration. Because the implementation of a time-dependent safety parameter would present significant practical difficulties, a different model, p(r) = Af(c)(B)PRF(C)PD(D), was chosen as the basis for the new MI. Thus, the expression for the lung-specific mechanical index, MI(Lung), includes several, rather than only one, of the relevant acoustic variables. This is the first potential safety index developed as a direct result of experimental measurements rather than theoretical analysis.

Threshold estimation of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage in adult rabbits and comparison of thresholds in mice, rats, rabbits and pigs

The objective of this study was to assess the threshold and superthreshold behavior of ultrasound (US)-induced lung hemorrhage in adult rabbits to gain greater understanding about species dependency. A total of 99 76 +/- 7.6-d-old 2.4 +/- 0.14-kg New Zealand White rabbits were used. Exposure conditions were 5.6-MHz, 10-s exposure duration, 1-kHz PRF and 1.1-micros pulse duration. The in situ (at the pleural surface) peak rarefactional pressure, p(r(in situ)), ranged between 1.5 and 8.4 MPa, with nine acoustic US exposure groups plus a sham exposure group. Rabbits were assigned randomly to the 10 groups, each with 10 rabbits, except for one group that had nine rabbits. Rabbits were exposed bilaterally with the order of exposure (left then right lung, or right then left lung) and acoustic pressure both randomized. Individuals involved in animal handling, exposure and lesion scoring were blinded to the exposure condition. Probit regression analysis was used to examine the dependence of the lesion occurrence on in situ peak rarefactional pressure and order of exposure (first vs. second). Likewise, lesion depth and lesion root surface area were analyzed using Gaussian tobit regression analysis. Neither probability of a lesion nor lesion size measurements was found to be statistically dependent on the order of exposure after the effect of p(r(in situ)) was considered. Also, a significant correlation was not detected between the two exposed lung sides on the same rabbit in either lesion occurrence or size measures. The p(r(in situ)) threshold estimates (in MPa) were similar to each other across occurrence (3.54 +/- 0.78), depth (3.36 +/- 0.73) and surface area (3.43 +/- 0.77) of lesions. Using the same experimental techniques and statistical approach, great consistency of thresholds was demonstrated across three species (mouse, rat and rabbit). Further, there were no differences in the biologic mechanism of injury induced by US and US-induced lesions were similar in morphology in all species and age groups studied. The extent of US-induced lung damage and the ability of the lung to heal led to the conclusion that, although US can produce lung damage at clinical levels, the degree of damage does not appear to be a significant medical problem.

Superthreshold behavior of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage in adult rats: role of pulse repetition frequency and pulse duration

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to enhance the findings of an earlier ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage study (Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:1625-1634) that estimated pressure thresholds as a function of pulse duration (PD: 1.3, 4.4, 8.2, and 11.6 micros; 2.8 MHz; 10-s exposure duration [ED]; 1-kHz pulse repetition frequency [PRF]). In this study, the roles of PRF and PD were evaluated at 5.9 MPa, the peak rarefactional pressure threshold near that of the ED50 estimate previously determined.

METHODS

A 4 x 4 factorial design study (PRF: 50, 170, 500, and 1700 Hz; PD: 1.3, 4.4, 8.2, and 11.6 mus) was conducted (2.8 MHz; 10-s ED). Sprague Dawley rats (n = 175) were divided into 16 exposure groups (10 rats per group) and 1 sham group (15 rats); no lesions were produced in the sham group. Logistic regression analysis evaluated significance of effects for lesion occurrence, and Gaussian tobit analysis evaluated significance for lesion depth and surface area.

RESULTS

For lesion occurrence and sizes, the main effect of PRF was not significant. The interaction term, PRF x PD, was highly significant, indicating a strong positive dependence of lesion occurrence on the duty factor. The main effect of PD was almost significant (P = .052) and thus was included in the analysis model for a better fit.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the findings from a PRF x ED factorial study (J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:339-348), a function that considers PRF, PD, and ED might yield a sensitive indicator for consideration of a modified mechanical index, at least for the lung.

Threshold estimates and superthreshold behavior of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage in adult rats: role of pulse duration

The study objective was to estimate the pressure threshold (ED(05), effective dose, or in situ peak rarefactional pressure associated with 5% probability of lesions) of ultrasound (US)-induced lung hemorrhage as a function of pulse duration (PD) in adult rats. A total of 220 10- to 11-week-old 250-g female Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan) were randomly divided into 20 ultrasonic exposure groups (10 rats/group) and one sham group (20 rats). The 20 ultrasonic exposure groups (2.8-MHz; 10-s exposure duration; 1-kHz PRF; -6-dB pulse-echo focal beam width of 470 microm) were divided into four PD groups (1.3, 4.4, 8.2 and 11.6 micros) and, for each PD group, there were five in situ peak rarefactional pressures (range between 4 and 9 MPa). Rats were weighed, anesthetized, depilated, exposed, and euthanized under anesthesia. The left lung was removed and scored for the occurrence of hemorrhage. If hemorrhage was present, the lesion surface area and depth were measured. Individuals involved in animal handling, exposure and lesion scoring were "blinded" to the exposure conditions. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the dependence of the lesion occurrences, and Gaussian tobit regression analysis was used to examine the dependence of the lesion surface areas and depths on in situ peak rarefactional pressure and PD. Threshold results are reported in terms of ED(05). For PDs of 1.3, 4.4, 8.2 and 11.6 micros, respectively, lesion occurrence ED(05)s were 3.1, 2.8, 2.3 and 2.0 MPa with standard errors around 0.6 MPa. Lesion size ED(05)s showed similar values. A mechanical index (MI) of 1.9, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory limit of diagnostic US equipment, is equivalent to the adult rat's in situ peak rarefactional pressure of 4.0 MPa. PDs of 8.2 and 11.6 micros had ED(05)s more than 2 standard errors below 4.0 MPa, indicating that the ED(05)s of these two PDs are statistically significantly different from 4.0 MPa. The ED(05) threshold levels for a PD of 1.3 micros are consistent with previous US-induced lung hemorrhage studies. As the PD increases, the ED(05) levels decrease, suggesting greater likelihood of lung damage as the PD increases. All of the ED(05)s are less than the FDA limit.

Ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage: role of acoustic boundary conditions at the pleural surface

In a previous study [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1290 (2000)] the acoustic impedance difference between intercostal tissue and lung was evaluated as a possible explanation for the enhanced lung damage with increased hydrostatic pressure, but the hydrostatic-pressure-dependent impedance difference alone could not explain the enhanced occurrence of hemorrhage. In that study, it was hypothesized that the animal's breathing pattern might be altered as a function of hydrostatic pressure, which in turn might affect the volume of air inspired and expired. The acoustic impedance difference between intercostal tissue and lung would be affected with altered lung inflation, thus altering the acoustic boundary conditions. In this study, 12 rats were exposed to 3 volumes of lung inflation (inflated: approximately tidal volume; half-deflated: half-tidal volume; deflated: lung volume at functional residual capacity), 6 rats at 8.6-MPa in situ peak rarefactional pressure (MI of 3.1) and 6 rats at 16-MPa in situ peak rarefactional pressure (MI of 5.8). Respiration was chemically inhibited and a ventilator was used to control lung volume and respiratory frequency. Superthreshold ultrasound exposures of the lungs were used (3.1-MHz, 1000-Hz PRF, 1.3-micros pulse duration, 10-s exposure duration) to produce lesions. Deflated lungs were more easily damaged than half-deflated lungs, and half-deflated lungs were more easily damaged than inflated lungs. In fact, there were no lesions observed in inflated lungs in any of the rats. The acoustic impedance difference between intercostal tissue and lung is much less for the deflated lung condition, suggesting that the extent of lung damage is related to the amount of acoustic energy that is propagated across the pleural surface boundary.