Second-trimester biparietal diameter/nasal bone length ratio is an independent predictor of trisomy 21

Comparison of the ratio of second trimester fetal biometric measurements to fetal nasal bone length in fetuses with normal karyotype and trisomy 21

AIM

In this study, we compared the ratio of second trimester fetal biometric measurements to nasal bone length (NBL) in fetuses with normal karyotype and trisomy 21 to determine their diagnostic prognostic value.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 148 pregnant women who obtained second-trimester ultrasonographic fetal anatomy and had amniocentesis (AS) for fetal karyotyping. The fetal karyotype results divided the groups into normal and trisomy 21 fetuses. Age, obstetric history, first and/or second trimester screening test risk ratios, fetal biometric measurements, and NBL mm, median (MoM) multiples, and percentile values were recorded and compared between groups.

RESULTS

BPD/NBL ratios above 9.26 predict trisomy 21 in fetuses with 77.6% sensitivity and 86.1% specificity (p = 0.001). HC/NBL ratios above 34.50 predict trisomy 21 in fetuses with 77.8% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity (p = 0.001). FL/NBL ratios above 6.02 predict trisomy 21 in fetuses with 69.6% sensitivity and 72.2% specificity (p = 0.001). HL/NB ratios above 6.56 predict trisomy 21 in fetuses with 95.5% sensitivity and 47.2% specificity (p = 0.001). The NBL MoM value demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy for normal-karyotype fetuses (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

We found that BPD/NBL, HC/NBL, FL/NBL, and HL/NBL ratios differed between fetuses with a normal karyotype and those with trisomy 21, specifically the HC/NBL ratio, which predicted trisomy 21 with good diagnostic accuracy. In identifying normal-karyotype fetuses, the NBL MoM was highly accurate.

Fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in the second trimester: Comparison of diagnostic methods for predicting trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective observational study was to identify the best method for use in diagnosing fetal nasal bone (NB) hypoplasia in the second trimester as a means of predicting trisomy 21 (Down syndrome).

METHODS

The NB length (NBL), NBL percentiles, and NBL multiple-of-median (MoM) values and the biparietal diameter-to-NBL ratios were calculated and compared in an attempt to identify the best predictive method and most appropriate cutoff value. Predictive values for several cutoff points were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves at a fixed 5% false-positive rate were used to compare the four methods.

RESULTS

NBL measurements were obtained from 2,211 (95.6%) of a total of 2,314 fetuses. Data from 1,689 of those 2,211 fetuses were used to obtain reference ranges, derive a linear regression equation, and calculate NBL percentiles and MoM values. Using a fixed 5% false-positive rate, we found 25.5% sensitivity for NBL (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-39.1) and 23.5% sensitivity for NBL percentiles (95% CI, 13.4-37), NBL MoM values (95% CI, 13.4-37), and biparietal diameter-to-NBL ratios (95% CI, 13.4-37).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that all four methods can be used in the second trimester for diagnosing fetal NB hypoplasia as a means of predicting trisomy 21 because their predictive values are similar at a fixed 5% false-positive rate. For simplicity of use, we recommend using 3 mm as the NBL cutoff value.

Screening performance of different methods defining fetal nasal bone hypoplasia as a single and combined marker for the detection of trisomy 21 in the second trimester

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate different methods of defining fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in the second trimester for the detection of trisomy 21.

METHODS

Prospective study in Greek women undergoing anomaly scan between 18 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks. The following methods of defining nasal bone hypoplasia were evaluated, either as a single marker or in combination with others: (1) BPD to nasal bone length (NBL) ratio; (2) multiples of the median (MoM) of NBL, according to normal curves from a Greek population; (3-4) NBL < 2.5 percentile according to normal curves (3) commonly used internationally curves and (4) curves from a Greek population.

RESULTS

In total, 1301 singleton fetuses were evaluated - 10 with trisomy 21. The best detection rate of trisomy 21 was achieved when the applied method was nasal bone percentiles adjusted to maternal ethnicity, in combination with other markers (<2.5 percentile according to normal curves from a Greek population; p < 0.001; sensitivity 50%; specificity 94.8%; false-positive rate 5.2%; positive likelihood ratio 9.6).

CONCLUSION

Screening performance of fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in detecting trisomy 21 varies according to the method applied. The best screening performance is achieved by using percentiles adjusted to maternal ethnicity in combination with other markers of aneuploidy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of second-trimester nasal bone assessment in detection of fetuses with Down syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review systematically the literature on diagnostic tests and performance of second-trimester sonographic assessment of nasal bone (NB) in identifying fetuses affected by Down syndrome.

METHODS

A search of studies involving screening tests for NB evaluation and measurements was carried out in the main international bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL). Those considered to be relevant were then subjected to critical reading, following Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) criteria, by at least three independent observers. All data were extracted and tabulated by two independent investigators. A statistical synthesis of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios was performed using specific software (Meta-DiSc).

RESULTS

From an initial list of 852 articles referring to ultrasound markers for Down syndrome, 207 relevant papers were selected. Following exclusions, 21 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled estimates of positive and negative likelihood ratios were 40.08 (95% CI, 18.10-88.76) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.79), respectively, for absent NB and 15.15 (95% CI, 8.15-28.16) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.64), respectively, for hypoplastic NB. No relevant differences were found between the various means of defining nasal hypoplasia (multiples of the median (MoM) or percentiles). The biparietal diameter/nasal bone length (BPD/NBL) ratio showed somewhat higher sensitivity but lower specificity with a threshold effect.

CONCLUSIONS

NB absence or hypoplasia show high specificity and low but acceptable sensitivity in identifying fetuses with Down syndrome. Screening performance is better with NB measurements as a function of MoM or percentiles rather than as the BPD/NBL ratio. Classification of women into various risk groups for Down syndrome does not affect diagnostic performance.

Three-dimensional ultrasonography measurement of fetal nasal bone length during the midtrimester in Taiwanese women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the normal range of the fetal nasal bone length (NBL) in Taiwanese women using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound, and compare the NBL of normal fetuses with Down syndrome to determine its significance in screening for trisomy 21.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 102 consecutive fetuses and another 7 fetuses with trisomy 21, determined by karyotyping at 15-22 weeks' gestation, were evaluated with 3D ultrasound before amniocentesis at Changhua Christian Hospital between November 2003 and April 2004.

RESULTS

The normal range for NBL in the second trimester in the Taiwanese population was investigated, and a linear relationship with gestational age was noted. The NBL increased with advancing gestational age (NBL in cm=0.0264×gestational age in weeks -0.042 (R(2)=0.2416). The median of the biparietal diameter/nasal bone length ratio had a stable value which tended to change minimally between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation. Chromosomally normal fetuses had statistically longer nasal bones than fetuses with Down syndrome (p=0.014).

CONCLUSION

We present a reference range for 3D ultrasound measurement of the fetal NBL. A short nasal bone at 15 to 22 weeks is associated with a high risk of trisomy 21.

Normal ranges for fetal nasal bone length determined by ultrasound at 18-20 weeks of gestation in a multiethnic Australian population

OBJECTIVE

Absence or hypoplasia of the nasal bone is commonly reported in Down syndrome fetuses. We define normal ranges and the 2.5th centile for fetal nasal bone length (NBL) in a multiethnic Australian population at 18-20 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of women attending for a routine anomaly scan. Ethnicity of the patient and their partner was recorded, and the nasal bone was measured three times. Two methods of nasal bone assessment were used to define normal ranges: a single (first) measurement and the mean value of three measurements. Mixed-effects regression models were employed to account for interoperator differences treating sonographers as random effects. Nonparametric methods were used to define the 2.5th centile for gestational age.

RESULTS

A total of 1199 women were included with a mean gestational age 19.1 (SD 0.4; range 18-20) weeks. There is significant linear relationship between NBL and gestational age (P<0.001). The mean of three nasal bone measurements had a smaller standard deviation than single nasal bone measurements. Nonparametric assessment was used to define the 2.5th centile, which is 4.4 mm at 18 weeks and 5.0 mm at 20 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a reference range for fetal NBL at 18-20 weeks of gestation in an unselected multiethnic Australian population. Whilst NBL increases linearly from 18 to 20 weeks, the data are not normally distributed and nonparametric techniques are required to define the 2.5th centile. The mixed-effects model also accounts for variation in sonographer measurements.

Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Use of soft ultrasonographic markers during routine prenatal ultrasonography (USG) may be used for the screening of aneuploidy in the low-risk population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of an invasive test for prenatal diagnosis and to assess the role of various factors in the decision-making regarding an invasive test when confronted with risk for aneuploidy after a soft marker is detected on routine antenatal ultrasonogram.

STUDY DESIGN

Women were referred for USG in our department by primary obstetricians for indications such as a previous child with a congenital malformation, genetic disorder, stillbirth or in women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Some of the women were referred after prenatal detection of a soft marker on USG. They were screened for soft markers associated with chromosomal abnormality. They were counseled regarding the age-specific risk and the risk of aneuploidy after detection of a marker in comparison to the general population's risk of Down's syndrome. They were also counseled regarding the risk of a procedure-related abortion (0.5%) following an invasive procedure before their decision regarding the use of amniocentesis was made.

RESULT

Twenty women out of 50 (40%) opted for amniocentesis. Except in one case of trisomy 21 in a fetus with short femur and humerus, all others had normal karyotype. The uptake of the test was comparable between primigravida (33%), women with poor obstetric history (46%) and women with at least one normal live child (45%). There was no statistical difference in the uptake of invasive test based on gestational age as well. Uptake of amniocentesis was higher (78%) in cases with nuchal thickening as compared to other markers (35%).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonographic detection of soft markers is associated with a high frequency of uptake for invasive prenatal testing. Increased nuchal thickening is associated with a higher acceptance of amniocentesis. Maternal age, gestational age or previous obstetric history were not associated with the decision to undergo amniocentesis.

Absent or shortened nasal bone length and the detection of Down Syndrome in second-trimester fetuses

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the accuracy of evaluating nasal bone length, expressed as multiples of the median (MoM), for the detection of Down syndrome in second- trimester fetuses.

METHODS

Expected normal median nasal bone measurements were established for an initial cohort of women receiving fetal ultrasound examinations at 15-24 weeks of gestation. Nasal bone lengths were converted to MoM with adjustment for maternal race and ethnicity using whites as the referent group. Nasal bone MoM were compared in euploid and Down syndrome fetuses. The sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in this initial cohort and in a second cohort in which all ultrasound measurements were carried out prospectively.

RESULTS

For the combined data set, 10 of 21 affected pregnancies had an absence of the nasal bone (sensitivity 47.6%), but absence was noted in only 1 of 2,515 unaffected pregnancies (false-positive rate 0.04%). Using less than 0.80 MoM as a cutoff, the sensitivity was 20 of 21 (95.2%), and the false-positive rate was 185 of 2,515 (7.4%). Changing the cutoff to 0.75 MoM resulted in 18 of 21 (85.7%) sensitivity and 74 of 2,515 (2.9%) false-positive rate. Using medians derived from whites to calculate MoM for the entire population resulted in higher false-positive rates.

CONCLUSION

Nasal bone length expressed as MoM seems to be an useful ultrasound marker for Down syndrome in second-trimester fetuses with a high sensitivity and a low false-positive rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Nasal bone assessment in prenatal screening for trisomy 21

A small nose is a common facial feature of individuals with trisomy 21. Evidence based on radiologic, histomorphologic, and sonographic studies shows that nasal bone abnormalities are significantly more common in trisomy 21 fetuses than in euploid fetuses. These abnormalities, which include both nasal bone absence and short nasal bone length, can be detected by prenatal ultrasound. In this article we review the evidence and discuss the potential value of assessment of the fetal nasal bone in screening for trisomy 21.