Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-up of Primary Vaginal Cancer

Primary vaginal cancer is rare, comprising 1% to 2% of gynecologic malignancies and 20% of all malignancies involving the vagina. More frequently, the vagina is involved secondarily by direct invasion from malignancies originating in adjacent organs or by metastases from other pelvic or extrapelvic primary malignancies. Data on the use of imaging in vaginal cancer are sparse. Insights are derived from the study of imaging in cervical cancer and have reasonable generalizability to vaginal cancer due to similar tumor biology. Given the trend toward definitive chemoradiation for both cancers in all but early stage lesions, principles of postchemoradiation tumor response evaluation are largely analogous. Accordingly, many of the recommendations outlined here are informed by principles translated from the literature on cervical cancer. For pretreatment assessment of local tumor burden and in the case of recurrent vaginal cancer, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. PET/CT has demonstrated utility for the detection of nodal metastatic and unexpected distant metastatic disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Cancer-Analysis of Patients from the Prospective Study on Total Mesometrial Resection

We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography with gynecologic examination performed by a gynecological oncologist and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpreted by a radiologist for the local and regional staging of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The study was a single-site sub-analysis of the multi-institutional prospective, observational Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR) Register Study, which included all consecutive study patients from Gdynia Oncology Center. Imaging results were compared with pathology findings. A total of 58 consecutive patients were enrolled, and 50 underwent both ultrasonography and MRI. The accuracy of tumor detection and measurement errors was comparable across ultrasonography and MRI. There were no significant differences between ultrasonography and MRI in the accuracy of detecting parametrial involvement (92%, confidence interval (CI) 84–100% vs. 76%, CI 64–88%, p = 0.3), uterine corpus infiltration (94%, CI 87–100% vs. 86%, CI 76–96%, p = 0.3), and vaginal fornix involvement (96%, CI 91–100% vs. 76%, CI 64–88%, p = 0.3). The importance of uterine corpus involvement for the first-line lymph node metastases was presented in few cases. The accuracy of ultrasonography was higher than MRI for correctly predicting tumor stage: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)–2018: 69%, CI 57–81% vs. 42%, CI 28–56%, p = 0.002, T (from TNM system): 79%, CI 69–90% vs. 52%, CI 38–66%, p = 0.0005, and ontogenetic tumor staging: 88%, CI 80–96% vs. 70%, CI 57–83%, p = 0.005. For patients with cervical cancer who are eligible for TMMR and therapeutic lymphadenectomy, the accuracy of ultrasonography performed by gynecological oncologists is not inferior to that of MRI interpreted by a radiologist for assessing specific local parameters, and is more accurate for local staging of the disease and is thus more clinically useful for planning adequate surgical treatment.

Updated applications of Ultrasound in Uterine Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is a common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. It is the fourth for both incidence and mortality. For cervical cancer, imaging and pathology assessments are incorporated in the revised 2018 Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Uses of imaging techniques for the pre-treatment work-up of cervical cancer have been increasing. Among imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer, ultrasound is cheaper, faster and widely available than other imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Advanced technique in ultrasound, such as three-dimension (3D) ultrasound and color Doppler, have improved the clinical application of ultrasound in cervical cancer. Ultrasound may provide highly accurate information on detecting tumor presence and evaluating local tumor extent if performed by ultrasound-trained gynecologists; the experience of readers is also critical for correct pretreatment staging and assessment of response to treatment. Sonographic images could be useful to predict response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. This review article attempted to present the most updated specific applications of ultrasound in cervical cancer.

The Role of 2D/3D Ultrasound to Assess the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Different imaging techniques were introduced to improve preoperative clinical staging of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) with transvaginal ultrasound (TV-US) or transrectal ultrasound (TR-US) representing a promising staging technique in the evaluation of the local extension of the disease for invasive tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in LACC by 2D/3D ultrasound examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients affected by histologically and clinically confirmed LACC. All patients were scheduled for 3 cycles of platinum-based NACT followed by radical surgery. The ultrasound examination was performed at every cycle and within 10 days before surgery. The parameters evaluated were: the volume (automatically computed by the VOCAL software) and the mass vascularization.

RESULTS

From March 2010 to March 2019, 157 women were recruited. Among these patients, 12 of them were excluded: 6 for the presence of distant metastases, 4 for rare histology, and 2 for severe comorbidities not allowing the protocol treatment. Seventeen patients after NACT were excluded because they were not amenable to radical surgery. Thus, 128 were considered for the final analysis of whom 106 (83%) were considered responders to NACT by histology. The sensibility and specificity of ultrasound with regard to the response to chemotherapy compared to histological specimen were 94 and 82%, respectively, with an accuracy of 92%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 96 and 75%, respectively. Finally, we found that nonetheless there was a trend towards a continuous response to chemotherapy among patients who were considered responders to NACT at pathological examination; the major volume and vascularization index (VI) reduction were observed during the first 2 cycles (74, 71% and 47, 63%, respectively). On the contrary, non-responders showed an initial reduction of the VI (4.86 consisting of 33%, 95% CI 0.79-8.92, p = 0.013), but no significant modification in tumour volume along NACT.

CONCLUSION

2D/3D ultrasound is useful in assessing early response to NACT in patients with LACC.

Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D TV-US) for evaluation of parametrial status in locally advanced cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), using histology as the gold standard.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer were staged according to FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) criteria. All IB2-IIIB FIGO stage patients were examined by 2D and 3D TV-US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the diagnosis time (T0) and after NACT. At T0, the US evaluation of parametrial involvement was compared to MRI before treatment. The results of US and MRI examinations of parametrial status after NACT were compared with the histological specimen.

RESULTS

We enroled 51 consecutive patients in the study. Before chemotherapy, clinical examination under anaesthesia identified parametrial involvement in 48 patients, ultrasonography in 46 patients, and MRI in 49 patients. The agreement between US and MRI was 94%. The sensitivity of US for parametrial status was 93.8%, with a positive predictive value of 97.8%, using MRI as the standard. The correlation between US and MRI was statistically significant (p = 0). After chemotherapy, histological examination of surgical specimens identified parametrial involvement in 3 patients. Ultrasonography correctly identified those cases with parametrial infiltration, recording a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 90.9%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 100%. The MRI had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 45.5%, positive predictive value of 14.3%, and negative predictive value of 100%, respectively. The concordance in the identification of the presence/absence of infiltration between US and MRI with histology was 90% (p = 0.001) and 61%, respectively, after chemotherapy treatment. Particularly, in defining the degree of infiltration, the agreement between US and MRI with histology was 90 and 58%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In locally advanced cervical cancer patients, 2D/3D TV-US can be considered accurate in the evaluation of parametrial infiltration to assess the response to NACT. It could be included as a diagnostic method in the preoperative work-up of cervical cancer.

Preoperatively Assessable Clinical and Pathological Risk Factors for Parametrial Involvement in Surgically Treated FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Determining the risk factors associated with parametrial involvement (PMI) is of paramount importance to decrease the multimodality treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. We investigated the preoperatively assessable clinical and pathological risk factors associated with PMI in surgically treated stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women underwent Querleu-Morrow type C hysterectomy for cervical cancer stage IB1-IIA2 from 2001 to 2015. All patients underwent clinical staging examination under anesthesia by the same gynecological oncologists during the study period. Evaluated variables were age, menopausal status, body mass index, smoking status, FIGO (International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology) stage, clinically measured maximal tumor diameter, clinical presentation (exophytic or endophytic tumor), histological type, tumor grade, lymphovascular space invasion, clinical and pathological vaginal invasion, and uterine body involvement. Endophytic clinical presentation was defined for ulcerative tumors and barrel-shaped morphology. Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography was used to measure tumor dimensions.

RESULTS

Of 127 eligible women, 37 (29.1%) had PMI. On univariate analysis, endophytic clinical presentation (P = 0.01), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), lymphovascular space invasion (P < 0.001), pathological vaginal invasion (P = 0.001), and uterine body involvement (P < 0.001) were significantly different among the groups with and without PMI. In multivariate analysis endophytic clinical presentation (odds ratio, 11.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-95.85; P = 0.02) and larger tumor size (odds ratio, 32.31; 95% confidence interval, 2.46-423.83; P = 0.008) were the independent risk factors for PMI. Threshold of 31 mm in tumor size predicted PMI with 71% sensitivity and 75% specificity. We identified 18 patients with tumor size of more than 30 mm and endophytic presentation; 14 (77.7%) of these had PMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Endophytic clinical presentation and larger clinical tumor size (>3 cm) are independent risk factors for PMI in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. Approximately 78% of the patients with a tumor size of more than 3 cm and endophytic presentation will require adjuvant chemoradiation for PMI following radical surgery. Considering clinical tumor presentation along with tumor size can enhance the physician's prediction of PMI in early-stage cervical cancer.