1
|
Toriguchi K, Kaihara S, Narita M, Ishikawa T, Saji M, Oshima N, Kondo M, Kobayashi H, Uryuhara K. Safety Evaluation of Surgical Staple Line Reinforcement in Glissonean Stapling: A Preliminary Study in Porcine Liver. Asian J Endosc Surg 2025; 18:e70070. [PMID: 40312869 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2025] [Revised: 04/08/2025] [Accepted: 04/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic liver resection is an established surgical technique utilizing automatic staplers; however, the safety of extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle transection in this context remains unclear. This study evaluated the safety and pressure resistance of surgical staple line reinforcement in Glissonean stapling using a porcine liver model. METHODS The Glissonean sheath was stapled with either Tri-Staple or staple line reinforcement, and artificial blood was infused into the hepatic artery. Pressures were gradually increased up to 1000 mmHg to assess leakage from the resection margin. RESULTS No leakage was observed in staple line reinforcement-treated sheaths, even at pressures exceeding 1000 mmHg, whereas Tri-Staple-treated sheaths leaked at a median pressure of 428.5 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that staple line reinforcement provides superior sealing performance, reducing intraoperative bleeding risks and eliminating the need for additional reinforcement. Further studies involving live models are necessary to confirm these results and establish clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kan Toriguchi
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kaihara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masatoh Narita
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Ishikawa
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masashi Saji
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobu Oshima
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masato Kondo
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kenji Uryuhara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerbasi LS, Tustumi F, Seid VE, Araujo SEA. Does Tri-Staple™ technology reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery? A propensity score matching analysis. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38630905 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study evaluates the Tri-Staple™ technology in colorectal anastomosis. METHODS Patients who underwent rectosigmoidectomy between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups: EEA™ (EEA) or Tri-Staple™ (Tri-EEA). The groups were matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and neoadjuvant radiotherapy using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULT Three hundred and thirty-six patients were included (228 EEA; 108 Tri-EEA). The groups were similar in sex, age, and neoadjuvant therapy. The Tri-EEA group had fewer patients with ASA III/IV scores (7% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). The Tri-EEA group had a lower incidence of leakage (4% vs. 11%; p = 0.023), reoperations (4% vs. 12%; p = 0.016), and severe complications (6% vs. 14%; p = 0.026). There was no difference in complications, mortality, readmission, and length of stay. After PSM, 108 patients in the EEA group were compared with 108 in the Tri-EEA group. The covariates sex, age, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and ASA were balanced, and the risk of leakage (4% vs. 12%; p = 0.04), reoperation (4% vs. 14%; p = 0.014), and severe complications (6% vs. 15%; p = 0.041) remained lower in the Tri-EEA group. CONCLUSION Tri-Staple™ reduces the risk of leakage in colorectal anastomosis. However, this study provides only insights, and further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Soares Gerbasi
- Department of Health Sciences, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Francisco Tustumi
- Department of Health Sciences, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Victor Edmond Seid
- Department of Health Sciences, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Toriguchi K, Kaihara S, Kitamura K, Ishikawa T, Oshima N, Kondo M, Kobayashi H, Hashida H, Uryuhara K. Efficacy of surgical staple line reinforcement in Glissonean stapling: A single-center pilot study. Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13293. [PMID: 38452773 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Vascular staplers are routinely used in laparoscopic liver resection, which has become a standard procedure in advanced medical facilities. Although previous reports have outlined the benefits of staple line reinforcement (SLR), its application in Glissonean pedicle transection during hepatic resection remains poorly studied. This study investigated surgical SLR as a tool to enhance staple line strength and improve perioperative hemostasis. Here, 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection using the Tri-StapleTM2.0 Reinforced Reload were included. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and outcomes were assessed. The results demonstrated successful outcomes with no complications related to bile leakage or injuries during staple insertion. Overall, our findings suggest that SLR can be safely utilized in Glissonean pedicle transection during laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies are required to comprehensively evaluate its benefits compared with conventional surgical staplers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kan Toriguchi
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kaihara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koji Kitamura
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Ishikawa
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nobu Oshima
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masato Kondo
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Hashida
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kenji Uryuhara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe city, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ioffe OY, Nevmerzhytskyi VO, Kryvopustov MS, Tsiura YP, Galyga TM, Kindzer SL, Perepadya VM. Improving the management of morbidly obese patients with postoperative bleeding undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. WIADOMOSCI LEKARSKIE (WARSAW, POLAND : 1960) 2024; 77:1127-1133. [PMID: 39106370 DOI: 10.36740/wlek202406103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aim: To improve the management of morbidly obese patients who undergo gastric bypass surgery to reduce the number of postoperative complications, in particular, bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS Materials and Methods: From 2011 to 2022, a total of 348 patients with morbid obesity (MO) underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass treatment at the clinical base of the Department of General Surgery №2 of Bogomolets National Medical University. The retrospective group included 178 patients who received treatment between 2011 and 2019. 170 patients were enrolled in the prospective group for the period from 2019 to 2022. RESULTS Results: Retrospective group had 8 episodes of postoperative bleeding, representing a rate of 4.49%, prospective group - 3 episodes of postoperative bleeding, representing a rate of 1.76% Four factor characteristics associated with the probability of bleeding were identified: "number of comorbid conditions", "arterial hypertension", "chronic liver diseases" and "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease". CONCLUSION Conclusions: The factors responsible for the occurrence of postoperative bleeding in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery were the number of comorbid conditions, the presence of arterial hypertension, the presence of chronic liver diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A new strategy for the management of morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic gastric bypass was developed. This strategy involves changing cassettes to create gastroentero- and enteroenteroanastomoses, reducing the period of use of the nasogastric tube, drains, and urinary catheter from 3-4 days to 1 day, and resuming the drinking regimen 6 hours after extubation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao J, Dang YL. When should endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis transection Glissonean pedicle not be used in hepatectomy? A case report. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:8742-8748. [PMID: 36157823 PMCID: PMC9453381 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature on post-hepatectomy bile duct injury (PHBDI) is limited, lacking large sample retrospective studies and high-quality experience summaries. Therefore, we reported a special case of iatrogenic bile duct injury caused by Glissonean pedicle transection with endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (endo-GIA) during a right hepatectomy, analyzed the causes of this injury, and summarized the experience with this patient.
CASE SUMMARY We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with recurrent abdominal pain and cholangitis due to intrahepatic cholangiectasis (Caroli's disease). Preoperative evaluation revealed that the lesion and dilated bile ducts were confined to the right liver, with right hepatic atrophy, left hepatic hypertrophy, and hilar translocation. This problem can be resolved by performing a standard right hepatectomy. Although the operation went well, jaundice occurred soon after the operation. Iatrogenic bile duct injury was considered after magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography review, and the second operation were performed 10 d later. During the second operation, it was found that the endo-GIA had damaged the lateral wall of the hepatic duct and multiple titanium nails remained in the bile duct wall. This led to severe stenosis of the duct wall, and could not be repaired. Therefore, the injured bile duct was transected, and a hepatic-jejunal-lateral Roux-Y anastomosis was performed at the healthy part of the left hepatic duct. After this surgery, the patient had a smooth postoperative recovery, and the total bilirubin gradually decreased to normal. The patient was discharged 41 d after operation. No anastomotic stenosis was found at the 6 mo of follow-up.
CONCLUSION Not all cases are suitable for endo-GIA transection of Glissonean pedicle, especially in cases of intrahepatic bile duct lesions. PHBDI caused by endo-GIA is very difficult to repair due to extensive ischemia, which requires special attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China
| | - Yan-Li Dang
- Department of Obstetrics, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Short-Term Outcomes of Tri-Staple Versus Universal Staple in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal and Distal Sigmoid Colonic Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis. World J Surg 2022; 46:2817-2824. [PMID: 35978157 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06704-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries. To resolve this problem, a new stapling technology (Tri-staple) is developed. In this study, we aim to compare the short-term outcomes of Tri-staple versus Universal staple in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal and distal sigmoid colonic cancer. METHODS A total of 446 patients were admitted to our hospital and received laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal and distal sigmoid colonic cancer between January 2016 and December 2020. Among them, Tri-staples were used in 202 patients, and the Universal staples were used in 244 patients. Propensity score matching was performed, followed by a comparison between the two groups (Tri-staple vs. Universal staple) in the incidences of anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and reoperation. RESULTS In total, 270 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study by the propensity score matching, with each group having 135 patients. Tri-staple group had a significant lower incidence of anastomotic leakage compared with the Universal staple group (4.44% vs. 11.11%, P < 0.05). The reoperation rate was also lower in Tri-staple group than the Universal staple group (3.70% vs. 8.15%, P < 0.05). The anastomotic bleeding rates, average postoperative hospital stay, average drain indwelling period, and average fasting period had no statistical differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION The usage of Tri-staple in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal and distal sigmoid colonic cancer is associated with lower postoperative complications compared with Universal staple. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
|
7
|
Madhok B, Nanayakkara K, Mahawar K. Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:1-16. [PMID: 35116095 PMCID: PMC8788169 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over open surgery. At the same time, it is not without its risks. In this review, we discuss steps that could enhance the safety of laparoscopic surgery. Some of the important safety considerations are ruling out pregnancy in women of the childbearing age group; advanced discussion with the patient regarding unexpected intraoperative situations, and ensuring appropriate equipment is available. Important perioperative safety considerations include thromboprophylaxis; antibiotic prophylaxis; patient allergies; proper positioning of the patient, stack, and monitor(s); patient appropriate pneumoperitoneum; ergonomic port placement; use of lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure; use of additional five-millimetre (mm) ports as needed; safe use of energy devices and laparoscopic staplers; low threshold for a second opinion; backing out if unsafe to proceed; avoiding hand-over in the middle of the procedure; ensuring all planned procedures have been performed; inclusion of laparoscopic retrieval bags and specimens in the operating count; avoiding 10-15 mm ports for placement of drains; appropriate port closures; and use of long-acting local anaesthetic agents for analgesia. Important postoperative considerations include adequate analgesia; early ambulation; careful attention to early warning scores; and appropriate discharge advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brij Madhok
- Upper GI Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
| | - Kushan Nanayakkara
- Upper GI Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Department of General Surgery, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland SR4 7TP, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rocca A, Cipriani F, Belli G, Berti S, Boggi U, Bottino V, Cillo U, Cescon M, Cimino M, Corcione F, De Carlis L, Degiuli M, De Paolis P, De Rose AM, D'Ugo D, Di Benedetto F, Elmore U, Ercolani G, Ettorre GM, Ferrero A, Filauro M, Giuliante F, Gruttadauria S, Guglielmi A, Izzo F, Jovine E, Laurenzi A, Marchegiani F, Marini P, Massani M, Mazzaferro V, Mineccia M, Minni F, Muratore A, Nicosia S, Pellicci R, Rosati R, Russolillo N, Spinelli A, Spolverato G, Torzilli G, Vennarecci G, Viganò L, Vincenti L, Delrio P, Calise F, Aldrighetti L. The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1247-1265. [PMID: 34089501 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01100-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
At the time of diagnosis synchronous colorectal cancer, liver metastases (SCRLM) account for 15-25% of patients. If primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases are resectable, good results may be achieved performing surgical treatment incorporated into the chemotherapy regimen. So far, the possibility of simultaneous minimally invasive (MI) surgery for SCRLM has not been extensively investigated. The Italian surgical community has captured the need and undertaken the effort to establish a National Consensus on this topic. Four main areas of interest have been analysed: patients' selection, procedures, techniques, and implementations. To establish consensus, an adapted Delphi method was used through as many reiterative rounds were needed. Systematic literature reviews were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses instructions. The Consensus took place between February 2019 and July 2020. Twenty-six Italian centres participated. Eighteen clinically relevant items were identified. After a total of three Delphi rounds, 30-tree recommendations reached expert consensus establishing the herein presented guidelines. The Italian Consensus on MI surgery for SCRLM indicates possible pathways to optimise the treatment for these patients as consensus papers express a trend that is likely to become shortly a standard procedure for clinical pictures still on debate. As matter of fact, no RCT or relevant case series on simultaneous treatment of SCRLM are available in the literature to suggest guidelines. It remains to be investigated whether the MI technique for the simultaneous treatment of SCRLM maintain the already documented benefit of the two separate surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
- Center for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy.
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Belli
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Berti
- Department of Surgery, Hospital S Andrea La Spezia, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bottino
- Department of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS AOU Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cimino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Division of General Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Degiuli
- Department of Oncology, Digestive and Surgical Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, University of Torino, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Paolo De Paolis
- General Surgery Department, Ospedale Gradenigo, Turin, Italy
| | - Agostino Maria De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ettorre
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, San Camillo-Forlanini General Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Filauro
- General and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Abdominal Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Unit of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, GB Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Divisions of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Laurenzi
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Marini
- The Department of General and Emergency Surgery, San Camillo-Forlanini Regional Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, San Camillo-Forlanini General Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Minni
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Muratore
- General Surgery Unit, E. Agnelli Hospital, Pinerolo, TO, Italy
| | - Simone Nicosia
- Department of Surgery, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Pellicci
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastroenterology Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Giovanni Vennarecci
- Laparoscopic, Hepatic, and Liver Transplant Unit, AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Leonardo Vincenti
- Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology-Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Center for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang EL, Huang ZY, Chen XP. Rationality and necessity of vascular stapler application during liver resection (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021; 21:498. [PMID: 33791007 PMCID: PMC8005682 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.9929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver resection (LR) is the primary treatment method for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Improving surgical safety and reducing surgical morbidity and mortality is important for patients receiving LR. Various devices have been developed to facilitate vascular transection to reduce intraoperative blood loss, which is considered to be a predictor of poor surgical outcomes in patients undergoing LR. Vascular staplers have been widely applied for the division of major vascular and biliary structures in the process of LR; however, when and how to use these tools remains controversial. This review aims to report the rationality and necessity of using vascular staplers in vessel transection during liver surgery. Due to the risk of intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage and biliary fistula, the process of transection of the portal pedicle and hepatic vein is a crucial step during LR. Stapling represents a vascular dissection technique that is widely used in laparoscopic LR and has then been popularized in open LR. Advocates argue that stapler transection methods provide several advantages, including diminished blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements and shorter operative times. However, other studies have failed to demonstrate those benefits when using these tools compared with the simple clamp-crushing technique. Using the stapler vascular transection method resulted in smaller surgical margins and similar surgical outcomes compared with those of the clamp-crushing vascular transection method. However, the intraoperative use of vascular staplers may significantly increase the financial burden of liver resection for patients with HCC, while not improving short- and long-term outcomes. Therefore, it has been suggested that vascular staplers should not be routinely used in LR. The current review discussed the above points and recommended that the stapling transection of the portal pedicle and hepatic vein should be applied during laparoscopic LR in a rational manner. However, the suturing ligation method should be routinely used in open LR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Er-Lei Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Yong Huang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy in small dogs: an easy and effective new technique. ACTA VET BRNO 2021. [DOI: 10.2754/avb202089040367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The present report describes a novel approach to and presents the surgical results for laparoscopic hepatectomy of the left lobes in small dogs. A purely laparoscopic four-port approach was used in seven beagles. The left triangular ligament was cut first, then the base of the left medial lobe (LMB) was ligated with silk thread using a needle, and the liver parenchyma of the LMB approximately 0.5 cm above the ligation site was removed with LigaSure. The left lateral lobe (LLB) was removed in the same manner. Blood was collected on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 14 for laboratory testing. Left hepatic lobe resection was successfully completed in all dogs, with an average operation time of 102.53 ± 9.07 min and an average blood loss of 32.10 ± 6.43 ml. Serious postoperative complications were not observed. The white blood cell (WBC) count and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level were significantly increased in experimental dogs 1 day after surgery (P< 0.05); aspartate transferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) were significantly different before and after surgery (P< 0.01); and all the indicators were basically normal seven days after the operation. Exploratory laparoscopy at 28 days revealed adhesion of the surface of the liver section to the omentum or the gastric wall, but there were no other abnormal findings. The combined application of liver pedicle ligation and LigaSure for liver lobectomy provides a simple and effective method for generating liver lobectomy models for research on liver disease and regeneration and a feasible laparoscopic liver lobectomy operation scheme for small dogs (10–15 kg).
Collapse
|
11
|
Okami J, Tokunaga T, Kanou T, Kunou H, Ishida D, Fujiwara A, Ito Y, Higashiyama M. Randomized Study Comparing Equal Height Staples With Graduated Height Staples in Bronchial Closure. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104:1012-1019. [PMID: 28551048 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are two forms of staple cartridge available for lung cancer operations, the flat face with equal height staples and the stepped face with graduated height staples. The objective of the study was to evaluate their stapling ability in lobectomy. METHODS A randomized prospective study was conducted to compare two types of stapling reloads for bronchial closure. Stapling ability was evaluated by the staple formation on the resected bronchial stump. The stumps were sliced along the staple line, and the shapes of the staples were recorded by roentgenogram. Then, the staple formation was scored as 0 to 4 points with 4 approximating a perfect B-shaped staple. RESULTS A total of 61 patients were randomly assigned to the equal height staples (n = 30) or the graduated height staples (n = 31). From 61 patients, 183 staple lines, which included 1,144 staples, were evaluated. The case scores were significantly lower in the equal height staples than in the graduated height staples (2.17 versus 2.88, p = 0.0003), respectively. The percentage of staples that formed a complete "B" shape was significantly higher in the graduated height staples than in the equal height staples (25.3% versus 10.0%, p = 0.000). No considerable difference was found between the two groups concerning postoperative complications. No bronchopleural fistula was observed. CONCLUSIONS The graduated height staples had significantly higher scores of the staple formation on the bronchia stump than the equal height staples. From the clinical point of view, both the equal height staples and the graduated height staples showed acceptable performance in the stapling ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiro Okami
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Toshiteru Tokunaga
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Kanou
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidenori Kunou
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ishida
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ayako Fujiwara
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuri Ito
- Center for Cancer Control and Statistics, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiko Higashiyama
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yao DB, Wu SD. Application of stapling devices in liver surgery: Current status and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:7091-7098. [PMID: 27610019 PMCID: PMC4988303 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i31.7091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is a vascular-rich solid organ. Safe and effective dissection of the vessels and liver parenchyma, and control of intraoperative bleeding are the main concerns when performing liver resection. Several studies have confirmed that intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion are predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver surgery. Various methods and instruments have been developed during hepatectomy. Stapling devices are crucial for safe and rapid anastomosis. They are used to divide hepatic veins and portal branches, and to transect liver parenchyma in open liver resection. In recent years, laparoscopic liver surgery has developed rapidly, and is now preferred by many surgeons. Stapling devices have also been gradually introduced in laparoscopic liver surgery, from dividing vascular and biliary structures to parenchymal transection. This may be because staplers make manipulation more simple, rapid and safe. Even in single incision laparoscopic surgery, which is recognized as a new minimally invasive technique, staplers are also utilized, especially in left lateral hepatectomy. For safe application of stapling devices in liver surgery, more related designs and modifications, such as application of a suitable laparoscopic articulating liver tissue crushing device, a staple line reinforcement technique with the absorbable polymer membrane or radiofrequency ablation assistance, are still needed. More randomized studies are needed to demonstrate the benefits and find broader indications for the use of stapling devices, to help expand their application in liver surgery.
Collapse
|
13
|
Troisi RI, Elsheikh YM, Shagrani MA, Broering D. First fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy for pediatric liver transplantation using the indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence imaging in the Middle East: a case report. Ann Saudi Med 2014; 34:354-357. [PMID: 25811211 PMCID: PMC6152557 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a well-established treatment modality for several pediatric end-stage liver diseases owning excellent long-term results. Left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) through an open approach is a well-standardized procedure. This technique has been modified for a fully laparoscopic approach and gaining more and more interest worldwide. We report herein the first fully laparoscopic LLS for pediatric LDLT in the Middle East with the use of indocyanine green dye and near-infrared fluorescence imaging to identify the biliary ducts intraoperatively. The recipient was a 2-year-old girl affected by glycogen storage disease type IV. The mother, aged 21 years, was her donor. The surgical technique, key-points of this procedure, and outcome are hereby discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dieter Broering
- Prof. Dieter Broering, Organ Transplant Center, MBC 96 King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, PO Box 3354 Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia, T: +966115576162, F: +966114427772,
| |
Collapse
|