Association of Maternal Gastric Bypass Surgery With Offspring Birth Defects

Results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry: A narrative review

In 2007, the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) was started by the profession to monitor the results of bariatric surgery and to provide a high-quality database for research. In the end of August 2023, SOReg contains 88,379 patients (body mass index [BMI] 41.7 kg/m2 , 41.2 years, 77.1% females, gastric bypass 76.8%). In this narrative review, we demonstrate that preoperative weight loss is of value and that the laparoscopic double omega-loop technique is highly suitable for gastric bypass. Closing the mesenteric openings is, however, important. Swedish bariatric surgery has low mortality, and our results are comparative to those of other countries. Significant long-term improvements are found in common obesity-related diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea. Furthermore, the risk for cardiac failure and major adverse cardiovascular events is significantly reduced. Pregnancy-related outcomes are also improved. Gastric bypass results in significant improvements in quality of life and seems to be cost saving. We have revealed that low socioeconomic status is associated with reduced chance of undergoing bariatric surgery and inferior outcomes. Of note, we have performed several randomized clinical trials within the registry database. In conclusion, high-quality national registry databases, such as SOReg, are important for maintaining high-quality care and present a platform for extensive research.

Benefits and Risks of Bariatric Surgery on Women's Reproductive Health: a Narrative Review

Bariatric surgery (BS) is escalating as the most efficient and endurable therapy for severe obesity. Women's reproductive health is essential to women's quality of life and is receiving increasing attention. However, despite the high prevalence of BS among women, the effect of BS on reproductive health remains underemphasis. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of BS on women's reproductive health, including their reproductive health before, during, and after pregnancy. Although limited attention has been given, current evidence highlights the substantial implications of bariatric surgery on reproductive health and reminds us of the importance of adopting decision-making conversations about reproductive health before bariatric surgery.

Reproductive outcomes after bariatric surgery in women

The presence of obesity may significantly influence female fertility through various mechanisms. Impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis in obese women may induce anovulation and infertility. Obesity may have an effect on women’s spontaneous and assisted conception rates, increased miscarriage rates, premature labor, stillbirth and perinatal risks, and menstrual irregularity. It has been suggested that weight loss improves reproductive outcomes due to fertility amelioration and an improvement in menstrual irregularity and ovulation. It is still not known which weight reduction procedures (changes in lifestyle, pharmacological management or bariatric intervention) result in optimal outcome on infertility. Currently, bariatric surgery is defined as the best available method for the management of obesity and its associated diseases.

We have analyzed literature facts about effects of bariatric surgery on the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and sexual dysfunction in obesity and pregnancy in obesity. Immediate positive effects of bariatric surgery are evident at the moment, while for long-term outcomes more prolonged follow-up investigations should be done.

Risk of pre-eclampsia after gastric bypass: a matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether gastric bypass before pregnancy is associated with reduced risk of pre-eclampsia.

DESIGN

Nationwide matched cohort study.

SETTING

Swedish national health care.

POPULATION

A total of 843 667 singleton pregnancies without pre-pregnancy hypertension were identified in the Swedish Medical Birth Register between 2007 and 2014, of which 2930 had a history of gastric bypass and a pre-surgery weight available from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Two matched control groups (pre-surgery and early-pregnancy body mass index [BMI]) were propensity score matched separately for nulliparous and parous births, to post-gastric bypass pregnancies (n_{pre-surgery-BMI}  = 2634:2634/n_{early-pregnancy-BMI}  = 2766:2766) on pre-surgery/early-pregnancy BMI, diabetes status (pre-surgery/pre-conception), maternal age, early-pregnancy smoking status, educational level, height, country of birth, delivery year and history of pre-eclampsia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre-eclampsia categorised into any, preterm onset (<37⁺⁰  weeks) and term onset (≥37⁺⁰  weeks).

RESULTS

In post-gastric bypass pregnancies, mean pre-surgery BMI was 42.9 kg/m² and mean BMI loss between surgery and early pregnancy was 14.0 kg/m² (39 kg). Post-gastric bypass pregnancies had lower risk of pre-eclampsia compared with pre-surgery BMI-matched controls (1.7 versus 9.7 per 100 pregnancies; hazard ratio [HR] 0.21, 95% CI 0.15-0.28) and early-pregnancy BMI-matched controls (1.9 versus 5.0 per 100 pregnancies; HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.60). Although relative risks for pre-eclampsia for post-gastric bypass pregnancies versus pre-surgery matched controls was similar, absolute risk differences (RD) were significantly greater for nulliparous women (RD -13.6 per 100 pregnancies, 95% CI -16.1 to -11.2) versus parous women (RD -4.4 per 100 pregnancies, 95% CI -5.7 to -3.1).

CONCLUSION

We found that gastric bypass was associated with lower risk of pre-eclampsia, with the largest absolute risk reduction among nulliparous women.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

In this large study including two comparison groups matched for pre-surgery or early-pregnancy BMI, gastric bypass was associated with lower risk of pre-eclampsia.

The effects of bariatric surgery on periconception maternal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, the prevalence of obesity in women of reproductive age is increasing. Bariatric surgery is currently viewed as the most effective, long-term solution for this problem. Preconception bariatric surgery can reduce the prevalence of obesity-related subfertility and adverse maternal, pregnancy and birth outcomes. Maternal health during the periconception period is crucial for optimal gametogenesis and for embryonic and fetal development which also affects health in the later lives of both mother and offspring. Although preconception bariatric surgery improves several pregnancy outcomes, it can also increase the prevalence of pregnancy complications due to excessive and rapid weight loss. This can lead to iatrogenic malnutrition with vitamin deficiencies and derangements in metabolic and endocrine homeostasis. Thus, bariatric surgery can greatly influence periconception maternal health with consequences for reproduction, pregnancy and health in later life. However, its influence on periconception maternal health itself has never been reviewed systematically.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this review was to investigate associations between bariatric surgery and determinants of periconception maternal health such as endocrine changes, fertility, vitamin status, irregular menstrual cycles, miscarriages and congenital malformations.

SEARCH METHODS

Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane databases were used for the literature search until 1 November 2020. The search strategy terms included, among others, bariatric surgery, hormones, fertility, malformations, miscarriages and vitamin status. We searched for human studies that were written in English. Abstracts, reviews, meta-analyses and conference papers were excluded. The ErasmusAGE score was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

OUTCOMES

A total of 51 articles were analysed. The mean quality score was 5 (range 2-8). After bariatric surgery, hormonal axes normalized and menstrual cycle regularity was restored, resulting in increased fertility. Overall, there were no short-term risks for reproductive outcomes such as the increased risk of miscarriages or congenital malformations. However, the risk of vitamin deficiencies was generally increased after bariatric surgery. A meta-analysis of 20 studies showed a significant decrease in infertility (risk difference (RD) -0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.42, -0.05) and menstrual cycle irregularities (RD -0.24, 95% CI -0.34, -0.15) with no difference in rates of miscarriage (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.09, 0.10) and congenital malformations (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.02, 0.03).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The current systematic review and meta-analysis show associations between bariatric surgery and periconception maternal health and underlines the need for providing and personalizing preconception care for women after bariatric surgery. We recommend preconception care including the recommendation of postponing pregnancy until weight loss has stabilized, irrespective of the surgery-to-pregnancy interval, and until vitamin status is normalized. Therefore, regular monitoring of vitamin status and vitamin supplementation to restore deficiencies is recommended. Furthermore, this systematic review emphasizes the need for a long-term follow-up research of these women from the periconception period onwards as well as their pregnancies and offspring, to further improve care and outcomes of these mothers and children.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To summarize evidence of benefits and risks of maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid and Cochrane Library until 24th May 2021. Inclusion criteria were randomized trails or observational studies including at least one of maternal or neonatal outcomes from pregnant women who had a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery with a control group of pregnant women with no history of bariatric surgery. Non-English studies were excluded. Both fixed-effect and random-effect models were used in the meta-analyses. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality of studies.

RESULTS

Nine retrospective articles were eligible including 13 848  pregnant women with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery and 255 008 pregnant women without a history of bariatric surgery. The results of meta-analysis showed a lower incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.47, 0.60], p < 0.00001), large gestational age infants (OR 0.28, 95%CI [0.22, 0.37], p < 0.00001) or macrosomia (OR 0.26, 95%CI [0.23, 0.30], p < 0.00001) in women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. On the other hand, infants born to mothers with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery had an increased risk of small gestational age (OR 2.24, 95% CI [1.55, 3.24], p ＜ 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery reduces significantly of risks of preterm premature rupture of membranes and large for gestational age/ macrosomia, but increase the risk of small for gestational age.

Diabetes und Schwangerschaft – Update 2020

In einer kurzen Übersicht werden die aktuellen Erkenntnisse zur Coronaviruserkrankung 2019 (COVID-19) bei Schwangeren dargestellt. Selbstmonitoring der kapillaren Blutglukosewerte ist derzeit noch der Goldstandard bei Schwangeren. Bei Verwendung subkutaner Glukosesensoren sollte die „time in range“ (TIR) >70 % in dem Bereich 63–140 mg/dl (3,5–7,8 mmol/l) so früh wie möglich erreicht werden. Bei präexistentem Diabetes besteht bei Kindern mit einer Wachstumsrestriktion ein hohes Risiko für Totgeburten. Mangels nachgewiesener Verbesserung relevanter Endpunkte sollten pharmakologische Therapien bei Schwangeren mit frühem Gestationsdiabetes <24 + 0 Schwangerschaftswochen besonders kritisch abgewogen werden. Präkonzeptionell adipöse Frauen sollten bis zur Geburt nicht mehr als 6 kg zunehmen. Nach bariatrisch-metabolischer Chirurgie bestehen neben Vorteilen für die Mütter erhöhte Risiken für Neugeborene, z. B. eine erhöhte Rate an „small for gestational age“ nach Roux-en-Y-Magenbypass.

A randomized controlled trial comparing intensive non-surgical treatment with bariatric surgery in adolescents aged 13-16 years (AMOS2): Rationale, study design, and patient recruitment

Background

Previous non-randomized studies show similar outcomes in adolescents and adults after bariatric surgery. We describe the study protocol, recruitment, and selected baseline data of patients in a randomized multi-center study, the Adolescent Morbid Obesity Surgery 2 (AMOS2).

Methods

Three clinics in Sweden collaborated in designing the study and recruitment of patients from August 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017. Patients were selected among adolescents 13–16 years of age attending third-level obesity care for at least one year. Patients were randomized 1:1 to bariatric surgery (predominantly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) or intensive non-surgical treatment starting with an eight-week low-calorie-diet.

Results

Fifty adolescents (37 girls) were randomized, 25 (19 girls) to bariatric surgery. Mean age was 15.7 years (range 13.3–16.9), weight 122.6 kg (range 95–183.3), Body Mass Index (BMI) 42.6 kg/m² (range 35.7–54.9) and BMI-SDS 3.45 (range 2.9–4.1). One patient had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 12/45 (27%) had elevated liver enzymes. There were no significant differences between the groups. For the 39 eligible patients who were offered but declined inclusion, BMI was not different from included patients. However, patients who declined were younger, 15.2 years (p = 0.021). A sex difference was also noted with more of eligible girls, 37/53 (69.8%), than boys, 13/36 (36.1%), wanting to participate in the study (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

This clinical trial, randomizing adolescents with severe obesity to bariatric surgery or intensive non-surgical treatment, aims at informing about whether it is beneficial to undergo bariatric surgery in early adolescence. It will also enlighten the outcome of comprehensive non-surgical treatment. The study was registered at www.clinicalTrials.gov number NCT02378259.

•

Bariatric surgery is already a treatment option for adolescents with severe obesity in many countries.

•

We recruited 50 patients 13-16 years of age to a randomized controlled trial.

•

We aimed at investigating the optimal time point for bariatric surgery.

•

Adolescents and their families seemed to make well considered decisions to participate in the study.