1
|
Marley G, Annis IE, Ostrach B, Egan K, Delamater PL, Bell R, Dasgupta N, Carpenter DM. Naloxone Accessibility by Standing Order in North Carolina Community Pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024; 64:102021. [PMID: 38307248 PMCID: PMC11081860 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to a standing order in North Carolina (NC), naloxone can be purchased without a provider prescription. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to examine whether same-day naloxone accessibility and cost vary by pharmacy type and rurality in NC. METHODS A cross-sectional telephone audit of 202 NC community pharmacies stratified by pharmacy type and county of origin was conducted in March and April 2023. Trained "secret shoppers" enacted a standardized script and recorded whether naloxone was available and its cost. We examined the relationship between out-of-pocket naloxone cost, pharmacy type, and rurality. RESULTS Naloxone could be purchased in 53% of the pharmacies contacted; 26% incorrectly noting that naloxone could be filled only with a provider prescription and 21% did not sell naloxone. Naloxone availability by standing order was statistically different by pharmacy type (chain/independent) (χ2 = 20.58, df = 4, P value < 0.001), with a higher frequency of willingness to dispense according to the standing order by chain pharmacies in comparison to independent pharmacies. The average quoted cost for naloxone nasal spray at chain pharmacies was $84.69; the cost was significantly more ($113.54; P < 0.001) at independent pharmacies. Naloxone cost did not significantly differ by pharmacy rurality (F2,136 = 2.38, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION Approximately half of NC community pharmacies audited dispense naloxone according to the statewide standing order, limiting same-day access to this life-saving medication. Costs were higher at independent pharmacies, which could be due to store-level policies. Future studies should further investigate these cost differences, especially as intranasal naloxone transitions from a prescription only to over-the-counter product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Marley
- Grace T. Marley, PharmD, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy 201 Pharmacy Lane, CB 7355, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7355, USA
| | - Izabela E Annis
- Izabela E Annis, MS, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Bayla Ostrach
- Bayla Ostrach PhD, MA CIP, Medical Anthropology & Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine; Fruit of Labor Action Research & Technical Assistance, LLC, 608 Emmas Grove Rd., Fletcher, NC 28732
| | - Kathleen Egan
- Kathleen L Egan PhD, MS, Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
| | - Paul L. Delamater
- Paul Delamater PhD, Department of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Ronny Bell
- Ronny Bell, PhD, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta, MPH, PhD, Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 MLK Jr. Blvd, CB 7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Delesha M. Carpenter
- Delesha M. Carpenter MSPH, PhD, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy 220 Campus Drive CPO 2125 Asheville, NC 28804
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kesich Z, Ibragimov U, Komro K, Lane K, Livingston M, Young A, Cooper HLF. "I'm not going to lay back and watch somebody die": a qualitative study of how people who use drugs' naloxone experiences are shaped by rural risk environment and overdose education/naloxone distribution intervention. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:166. [PMID: 37946233 PMCID: PMC10636969 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00900-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overdoses have surged in rural areas in the U.S. and globally for years, but harm reduction interventions have lagged. Overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs reduce overdose mortality, but little is known about people who use drugs' (PWUD) experience with these interventions in rural areas. Here, we analyze qualitative data with rural PWUD to learn about participants' experiences with an OEND intervention, and about how participants' perceptions of their rural risk environments influenced the interventions' effects. METHODS Twenty-nine one-on-one, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with rural PWUD engaged in the CARE2HOPE OEND intervention in Appalachian Kentucky. Interviews were conducted via Zoom, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted, guided by the Rural Risk Environment Framework. RESULTS Participants' naloxone experiences were shaped by all domains of their rural risk environments. The OEND intervention transformed participants' roles locally, so they became an essential component of the local rural healthcare environment. The intervention provided access to naloxone and information, thereby increasing PWUDs' confidence in naloxone administration. Through the intervention, over half of participants gained knowledge on naloxone (access points, administration technique) and on the criminal-legal environment as it pertained to naloxone. Most participants opted to accept and carry naloxone, citing factors related to the social environment (responsibility to their community) and physical/healthcare environments (overdose prevalence, suboptimal emergency response systems). Over half of participants described recent experiences administering intervention-provided naloxone. These experiences were shaped by features of the local rural social environment (anticipated negative reaction from recipients, prior naloxone conversations). CONCLUSIONS By providing naloxone paired with non-stigmatizing health and policy information, the OEND intervention offered support that allowed participants to become a part of the healthcare environment. Findings highlight need for more OEND interventions; outreach to rural PWUD on local policy that impacts them; tailored strategies to help rural PWUD engage in productive dialogue with peers about naloxone and navigate interpersonal conflict associated with overdose reversal; and opportunities for rural PWUD to formally participate in emergency response systems as peer overdose responders. Trial registration The ClinicalTrials.gov ID for the CARE2HOPE intervention is NCT04134767. The registration date was October 19th, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zora Kesich
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Umedjon Ibragimov
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Kelli Komro
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Kenneth Lane
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | - Melvin Livingston
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - April Young
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hill LG, Loera LJ, Torrez SB, Puzantian T, Evoy KE, Ventricelli DJ, Eukel HN, Peckham AM, Chen C, Ganetsky VS, Yeung MS, Zagorski CM, Reveles KR. Availability of buprenorphine/naloxone films and naloxone nasal spray in community pharmacies in 11 U.S. states. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 237:109518. [PMID: 35691255 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prompt access to prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone films (BUP/NX) and naloxone nasal spray (NNS) is vital for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), but multiple studies have documented pharmacy-level barriers. METHODS A cross-sectional secret shopper telephone audit was conducted in a sample of 5734 actively licensed pharmacies in 11 U.S. states from May 2020-April 2021. Primary outcomes included availability of 14 generic BUP/NX 8/2 mg and one unit of NNS 4 mg. Outcomes were compared by pharmacy type, county metropolitan status, state Medicaid expansion status, and state drug overdose death rate. RESULTS Data from 4984 pharmacies (3402 chain and 1582 independent) were analyzed. Both medications were available in 41.2 % of pharmacies, BUP/NX was available in 48.3%, and NNS was available in 69.5%. Chain pharmacies were significantly more likely than independent pharmacies to have both medications available, to have each medication available individually, and to be willing to order BUP/NX. Pharmacies in metropolitan counties were more likely to have BUP/NX available than pharmacies in non-metropolitan counties, pharmacies in Medicaid expansion states were more likely to have both medications available and to have NNS available than pharmacies in non-expansion states, and pharmacies in states with high drug overdose death rates were more likely to have NNS available than pharmacies in states with low drug overdose death rates. CONCLUSIONS BUP/NX and NNS are not readily accessible in many U.S. pharmacies. Deficits in access are most pronounced in independent pharmacies, though county- and state-level factors may also influence availability of these essential medications.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lai RK, Friedson KE, Reveles KR, Bhakta K, Gonzales G, Hill LG, Evoy KE. Naloxone Accessibility Without an Outside Prescription from U.S. Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2022; 62:1725-1740. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
5
|
Grant S, Smart R. Expert views on state-level naloxone access laws: a qualitative analysis of an online modified-Delphi process. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:64. [PMID: 35676719 PMCID: PMC9175531 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00645-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Expanding availability to naloxone is a core harm reduction strategy in efforts to address the opioid epidemic. In the US, state-level legislation is a prominent mechanism to expand naloxone availability through various venues, such as community pharmacies. This qualitative study aimed to identify and summarize the views of experts on state-level naloxone access laws. Methods We conducted a three-round modified-Delphi process using the online ExpertLens platform. Participants included 46 key stakeholders representing various groups (advocates, healthcare providers, human/social service practitioners, policymakers, and researchers) with expertise naloxone access laws. Participants commented on the effectiveness and implementability of 15 state-level naloxone access laws (NALs). We thematically analyzed participant comments to summarize views on NALs overall and specific types of NAL. Results Participants commented that the effectiveness of NALs in reducing opioid-related mortality depends on their ability to make sustained, significant impacts on population-level naloxone availability. Participants generally believed that increased naloxone availability does not have appreciable negative impacts on the prevalence of opioid misuse, opioid use disorder (OUD), and non-fatal opioid overdoses. Implementation barriers include stigma among the general public, affordability of naloxone, and reliance on an inequitable healthcare system. Conclusions Experts believe NALs that significantly increase naloxone access are associated with less overdose mortality without risking substantial unintended public health outcomes. To maximize impacts, high-value NALs should explicitly counter existing healthcare system inequities, address stigmatization of opioid use and naloxone, maintain reasonable prices for purchasing naloxone, and target settings beyond community pharmacies to distribute naloxone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Grant
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, RG 6046, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Rosanna Smart
- Economics, Sociology, and Statistics Department, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Griner T, Strasser S. A qualitative examination of responses from a survey of pharmacy staff in Georgia regarding access to Narcan®. Health Educ Res 2022; 36:467-477. [PMID: 34160048 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyab024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Georgia state lawmakers enacted legislation designed to reduce opioid overdose deaths by increasing public access to rescue products, such as Narcan®. This article explores whether pharmacy employees have effectively adopted such changes into pharmacy practice. We analyzed unsolicited remarks noted during a parent telephone survey of 120 Georgia pharmacy staff regarding price, availability and barriers to layperson purchase of Narcan®. Comments regarding dispensing requirements and challenges in obtaining inventory and changes in communication style were recorded. Around 15% were unfamiliar with Narcan® as an opioid overdose reversal agent or were unaware of their pharmacy's policies governing its sale. Nearly half of those contacted did not have Narcan® in stock with some reporting that receiving Narcan® would take several days after placing an order. Over half specified requirements for purchasing Narcan® not required by law. Fewer than 15% had Narcan® available and imposed no unnecessary requirements for its purchase. During approximately 10% of the survey calls, respondents used a tone of voice or made comments suggestive of bias. We conclude that non-compliance with current laws, lack of familiarity with Narcan® and negative communication tendencies that suggest implicit bias and stigmatizing behaviors could ultimately inhibit access to opioid overdose treatment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Green TC, Bratberga J, Irwin AN, Boggisb J, Gray M, Leichtling G, Bolivar D, Floyd A, Al-Jammali Z, Arnold J, Hansen R, Hartung D. Study protocol for the Respond to Prevent Study: a multi-state randomized controlled trial to improve provision of naloxone, buprenorphine and nonprescription syringes in community pharmacies. Subst Abus 2022; 43:901-905. [PMID: 35213293 PMCID: PMC9720900 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2010162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Access to the opioid antidote naloxone is a critical component of addressing the opioid crisis. Naloxone is a population-level prevention intervention associated with substantial reductions in overdose mortality and reduction of nonfatal overdose. Pharmacies' pivotal role in dispensing medications like buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder and selling nonprescription syringes places them at the crossroads of opioid access and risk mitigation methods like naloxone provision. Testing ways to optimize pharmacy-based naloxone provision will be key as the country expands the implementation of naloxone through the medical system. In the Respond to Prevent Study, we conducted a large, practical study of a pharmacy-focused intervention in a sample of Washington, Oregon, Massachusetts and New Hampshire community chain pharmacies to increase naloxone dispensing and improve opioid safety. The intervention integrated two evidence-based educational toolkits and streamlined materials to enhance the focus on naloxone policy, stigma reduction, and patient communications around naloxone, nonprescription syringes and buprenorphine access. The real-world study implemented a stepped wedge, clustered randomized trial design across 175 community chain pharmacies to evaluate the effectiveness of the Respond to Prevent intervention in increasing: (a) pharmacy based naloxone distribution rates, naloxone-related patient engagement, and pharmacist and technicians' attitudes, knowledge, perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy toward naloxone; and (b) pharmacy nonprescription syringe sales, and pharmacist and technicians' attitudes, knowledge, perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy toward dispensing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (secondary outcomes). This commentary provides a brief narrative about the study and presents insights on the design and adaptations to our study protocol, including those adopted during the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic further compounded by Western wildfires in 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traci C Green
- Brandeis University, Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberga
- University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
| | - Adriane N Irwin
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 1601 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| | - Jesse Boggisb
- Brandeis University, Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Mary Gray
- Comagine Health, 650 NE Holladay St # 1700, Portland, OR 97232 USA
| | | | - Derek Bolivar
- Brandeis University, Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Anthony Floyd
- University of Washington, University of Washington, Box 357631, H364 Health Sciences Building, Seattle WA 98195-7631 USA
| | - Zain Al-Jammali
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 1601 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| | - Jenny Arnold
- Washington State Pharmacy Association, 411 Williams Ave S, Renton, WA 98057 USA
| | - Ryan Hansen
- University of Washington, University of Washington, Box 357631, H364 Health Sciences Building, Seattle WA 98195-7631 USA
| | - Daniel Hartung
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 1601 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smart R, Grant S. Effectiveness and implementability of state-level naloxone access policies: Expert consensus from an online modified-Delphi process. Int J Drug Policy 2021; 98:103383. [PMID: 34340167 PMCID: PMC8671224 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Naloxone distribution, a key global strategy to prevent fatal opioid overdose, has been a recent target of legislation in the U.S., but there is insufficient empirical evidence from causal inference methods to identify which components of these policies successfully reduce opioid-related harms. This study aimed to examine expert consensus on the effectiveness and implementability of various state-level naloxone policies. METHODS We used the online ExpertLens platform to conduct a three-round modified-Delphi process with a purposive sample of 46 key stakeholders (advocates, healthcare providers, human/social service practitioners, policymakers, and researchers) with naloxone policy expertise. The Effectiveness Panel (n = 24) rated average effects of 15 types of policies on naloxone pharmacy distribution, opioid use disorder (OUD) prevalence, nonfatal opioid-related overdoses, and opioid-related overdose mortality. The Implementation Panel (n = 22) rated the same policies on acceptability, feasibility, affordability, and equitability. We compared ratings across policies using medians and inter-percentile ranges, with consensus measured using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Inter-Percentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry technique. RESULTS Experts reached consensus on all items. Except for liability protections and required provision of education or training, experts perceived all policies to generate moderate-to-large increases in naloxone pharmacy distribution. However, only three policies were expected to yield substantive decreases on fatal overdose: statewide standing/protocol order, over-the-counter supply, and statewide "free naloxone." Of these, experts rated only statewide standing/protocol orders as highly affordable and equitable, and unlikely to generate meaningful population-level effects on OUD or nonfatal opioid-related overdose. Across all policies, experts rated naloxone prescribing mandates relatively lower in acceptability, feasibility, affordability, and equitability. CONCLUSION Experts believe statewide standing/protocol orders are an effective, implementable, and equitable policy for addressing opioid-related overdose mortality. While experts believe many other broad policies are effective in reducing opioid-related harms, they also believe these policies face implementation challenges related to cost and reaching vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Smart
- Economics, Sociology, and Statistics Department, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA.
| | - Sean Grant
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, RG 6046, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gilbert L, Elliott J, Beasley L, Oranu E, Roth K, Nguyễn J. Naloxone availability in independent community pharmacies in Georgia, 2019. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2021; 16:63. [PMID: 34419089 PMCID: PMC8379837 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00402-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing the availability of naloxone among people who use opioids, and friends and family of past and present people who use opioids is a vitally important mission to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related overdose deaths. The purpose of this study was to determine the availability of naloxone in independent community pharmacies in Georgia. Secondary objectives include determining pharmacists' knowledge regarding the standing order and ability to counsel regarding naloxone. METHODS A cross-sectional study using a secret shopper approach with phone contact was conducted over a period of 10 months. The study was population based and was conducted at all independent pharmacies in the state of Georgia. All independent community pharmacies in the state of Georgia were contacted and asked the naloxone questions with a 96% response rate (n = 520). RESULTS Five hundred fifty-eight independent community pharmacies were called, with a 96% response rate (n = 520 pharmacies). Two hundred-twenty pharmacies reported having naloxone in stock. Of the 335 pharmacists asked, 174 (51.9%) incorrectly said that a prescription was required. The mean (SD) cash price was $148.02 (27.40), with a range of $0 to $300. Of 237 pharmacists asked who had naloxone in stock or who stated they could get naloxone in stock, 212 stated that they could demonstrate how to use it, 8 stated they could not, and 17 said that they possibly could or were unsure how to use it. CONCLUSIONS This study provided insight into the limited availability of naloxone at independent community pharmacies in Georgia after the standing order was issued. The majority of pharmacists at independent pharmacies in Georgia were not using the publicly available state naloxone standing order. Additionally, the low availability of naloxone and its high cost for uninsured individuals are significant structural barriers for reducing opioid-related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Gilbert
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Elliott
- Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lauren Beasley
- Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ekene Oranu
- Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kimberly Roth
- Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA
| | - Jennifer Nguyễn
- Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tofighi B, Lekas HM, Williams SZ, Martino D, Blau C, Lewis CF. Rural and small metro area naloxone-dispensing pharmacists' attitudes, experiences, and support for a frontline public health pharmacy role to increase naloxone uptake in New York State, 2019. J Subst Abuse Treat 2021; 129:108372. [PMID: 34080543 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to assess community pharmacists' attitudes and experiences related to naloxone dispensation and counseling in non-urban areas in New York State to better understand individual and structural factors that influence pharmacy provision of naloxone. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study conducted interviewer-administered semistructured surveys among community pharmacists in retail, independent, and supermarket pharmacies between October 2019 and December 2019. The 29-item survey ascertained pharmacists' demographic and practice characteristics; experiences and beliefs related to naloxone dispensation; and attitudes toward expansion of pharmacy services to include on-site public health services for persons who use opioids. The study used Chi square tests to determine associations between each characteristic and self-reported naloxone dispensation (any vs. none). RESULTS A total of 60 of the 80 community pharmacists that the study team had approached agreed to participate. A majority were supportive of expanding pharmacy-based access to vaccinations (93.3%), on-site HIV testing, or referrals (75% and 96.7%, respectively), providing information on safe syringe use (93.3%) and disposal (98.3%), and referrals to medical/social services (88.3%), specifically substance use treatment (90%). A majority of pharmacist respondents denied negative impacts on business with over half reporting active naloxone dispensation (58.3%). Pharmacists dispensing naloxone were more likely to be multilingual (p < 0.03), and to specifically support on-site HIV testing (p < 0.02) than those who were not dispensing naloxone. DISCUSSION Community pharmacists were highly favorable of naloxone dispensation in rural and small metro area pharmacies in NY, and those fluent in additional language(s) and supportive of on-site HIV testing were associated with active naloxone dispensation. While active naloxone dispensation was low, pharmacists appear supportive of a "frontline public health provider" model, which could facilitate naloxone uptake and warrants large-scale investigation. CONCLUSION Rural and small metro area pharmacists are generally favorable of naloxone dispensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babak Tofighi
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Center for Research on Cultural & Structural Equity in Behavioral Health, United States of America; New York University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, United States of America; Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, NYU College of Global Public Health, United States of America.
| | - Helen-Maria Lekas
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Center for Research on Cultural & Structural Equity in Behavioral Health, United States of America; New York University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States of America
| | - Sharifa Z Williams
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Center for Research on Cultural & Structural Equity in Behavioral Health, United States of America
| | - Daniele Martino
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Center for Research on Cultural & Structural Equity in Behavioral Health, United States of America
| | - Chloe Blau
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Center for Research on Cultural & Structural Equity in Behavioral Health, United States of America
| | - Crystal F Lewis
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Center for Research on Cultural & Structural Equity in Behavioral Health, United States of America; New York University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Santa HM, Amirova SG, Ventricelli DJ, Downs GE, Nowalk AA, Pringle JL, Aruru M. Preparing pharmacists to increase naloxone dispensing within community pharmacies under the Pennsylvania standing order. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 78:327-335. [PMID: 33336254 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Opioid misuse and overdose deaths remain a public health concern in the United States. Pennsylvania has one of the highest rates of opioid overdose deaths in the country, with Philadelphia County's being 3 times higher than the national average. Despite several multimodal interventions, including use of SBIRT (screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment) methods and naloxone distribution, the rate of overdose deaths remains high. METHODS To gain insights on strategies for improving access to naloxone and naloxone distribution by pharmacists in Philadelphia County, a study was conducted in 11 community pharmacies (chain and independent) in Philadelphia. Twenty-four pharmacists were recruited and completed SBIRT and naloxone trainings. Each pharmacy elected to have at least 1 pharmacy champion who received additional training on and helped develop pharmacy site-specific naloxone dispensing protocols. RESULTS Pre-post survey results showed a reduction in stigmatizing attitudes regarding naloxone dispensing and an increase in pharmacists' understanding of the standing order and appropriate naloxone use. There was an increase in pharmacists' self-reported confidence in their ability to appropriately identify, discuss, and dispense naloxone to patients. All pharmacies increased their average monthly dispensing rate following protocol implementation. CONCLUSION Pharmacists who received both trainings were more likely to change naloxone dispensing practices, leading to an overall increase in naloxone dispensing by community pharmacists. The study addressed overall gaps in pharmacists' knowledge, reduced stigma, and prepared pharmacists to address opioid use and overdose prevention with their patients. The described pharmacist-led patient counseling and intervention service for overdose prevention may be explored as a model for other community pharmacies to adopt to improve naloxone dispensing and similar interventions to reduce overdose deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M Santa
- Program Evaluation and Research Unit (PERU), University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Samira G Amirova
- Program Evaluation and Research Unit (PERU), University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - George E Downs
- Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexandra A Nowalk
- Program Evaluation and Research Unit (PERU), University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Janice L Pringle
- Program Evaluation and Research Unit (PERU), University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Meghana Aruru
- Program Evaluation and Research Unit (PERU), University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gilbert L, Warren J, Smalley K, Elliott J, Nguyen J. A qualitative analysis of pharmacists' responses to naloxone inquiries in rural Georgia. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20:101198. [PMID: 33101884 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Given their critical gatekeeper function regarding naloxone access in rural areas, the purpose of the current study was to examine rural pharmacists’ knowledge and attitudes regarding naloxone use and access (Georgia, 2019), all 364 rural community pharmacies in Georgia were contacted using “secret shopper” methodology and asked about the availability, accessibility, and use of naloxone. A script provided specific questions for data collection. Callers recorded general notes about the call, including the dispositions and impressions of the pharmacists. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes. Rural pharmacists exhibited two classes of attributes: Active Facilitators and Passive Hindrances. Active facilitators supported callers in their search for naloxone, but passive hindrances discouraged callers in a way that was not perceived to be malicious or intentional. Three types of active facilitators emerged: positive approach, helpful suggestions, and knowledgeable and informed. Two types of passive hindrances emerged: negative attitudes and insufficient knowledge. Community pharmacies are sometimes the only formal healthcare access point in rural communities. It is vital for pharmacists to be active facilitators of naloxone access for maximized public health impact. Specific interventions are needed to increase the ability of rural pharmacists to support access to naloxone.
Collapse
|
13
|
Eswaran V, Allen KC, Cruz DS, Lank PM, Mccarthy DM, Kim HS. Development of a take-home naloxone program at an urban academic emergency department. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2020; 60:e324-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|