1
|
Lipof JJ, Abdallah N, Lipe B. Personalized Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Frail Patients. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01545-2. [PMID: 38761302 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01545-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to expand at a rapid pace, management of older adults and frail patients becomes increasingly challenging. As these patients have traditionally been underrepresented on clinical trials, there is limited guidance on the optimal approach to frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). RECENT FINDINGS Frailty is an independent predictor of tolerability and response to antineoplastic treatment. Stringent eligibility criteria have often excluded these patients, but recently some large trials have included frailty sub-analyses to help guide management. In general, triplet regimens are preferred to doublet regimens in this population and enrollment on a clinical trial should be prioritized when possible. In this review, we summarize the MM frailty scoring tools that have been developed to identify and assess this vulnerable population. We present the clinical trials over the past decade that have enrolled frail patients and/or have included subgroup analyses to help elucidate the response and tolerability of different regimens in this underrepresented group. We provide practical advice regarding assessment and management of frail patients NDMM and RRMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi J Lipof
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Nadine Abdallah
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brea Lipe
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyen TN, Ahmad F, Lindley RI. Frailty in clinical drug trials: Frailty assessments, subgroup analyses and outcomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 38509766 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
With population ageing, drug trials are increasingly turning their attention to including older, frailer people. This review aimed to provide an overview of how frailty was assessed in published studies related to clinical pharmacological trials, and on the interaction of frailty on the efficacy of the treatments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane for clinical drug trials in older people. A total of 4031 abstracts were screened and 17 relevant studies were included in this review. We summarized the findings of these 17 trials into five main clinical areas: cardiovascular (eight studies), cognition (one study), vaccination (two studies), cancer (four studies) and other (two studies). Frailty was assessed retrospectively in most of the studies. Frailty was treated as an ordinal variable (with different levels of frailty) or binary variable (frail/non-frail) using cut-offs in some studies, and as a continuous in some other studies. The effect of frailty on the treatment efficacy was not consistent among the studies. While several trials, such as the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease-Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation trials, the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly trial, showed some reduced effects of the treatment in frail patients, most of the trials showed that the benefits of the treatment are not affected by frailty. Some trials even showed that the benefits of the treatment were more significant in frailer patients (the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure and the Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure trials). The results of this review suggest that routine measurement of frailty in participants in clinical drug trials would improve our knowledge of the effect of treatment in the frail and identify those who have more or least to gain from treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tu N Nguyen
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fahed Ahmad
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard I Lindley
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oriol A, Dimopoulos M, Schjesvold F, Beksac M, Facon T, Dhanasiri S, Guo S, Mu Y, Hong K, Gentili C, Galli M, Yagci M, Larocca A, Richardson P, Weisel K. Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Lenalidomide-Pretreated Multiple Myeloma: A Subanalysis of OPTIMISMM by Frailty and Bortezomib Dose Adjustment. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2024; 24:165-176.e4. [PMID: 38072743 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A proportion of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are older and/or have comorbidities, requiring dose adjustments. Data from OPTIMISMM (NCT01734928) supported the use of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) for treating relapsed/refractory MM. This subanalysis of OPTIMISMM assessed outcome by frailty and/or bortezomib dose adjustment. METHODS Patient frailty (nonfrail vs. frail) was classified using age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Data from patients requiring a bortezomib dose reduction, interruption, and/or withdrawal during PVd treatment were assessed. RESULTS Among 559 patients, 93 of 281 (33.1%) and 93 of 278 (33.5%) patients who received PVd and bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd), respectively, were frail. Overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were higher in nonfrail vs. frail with PVd treatment (ORR, 82.8% vs. 79.6%; PFS, 14.7 vs. 9.7 months); significantly higher than with Vd regardless of frailty. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were higher with PVd vs. Vd, regardless of frailty. Discontinuations of PVd were lower in nonfrail vs. frail patients (19.2% vs. 30.1%); the median duration of treatment was similar (DoT; 8.8 vs. 8.9 months, respectively). Patients who received PVd with a bortezomib dose adjustment (n = 240) had a longer median DoT (9.3 vs. 4.5 months) and PFS (12.1 vs. 8.4 months) vs. those without. CONCLUSION Frail patients treated with PVd demonstrated a higher ORR and a longer PFS and DoT vs. Vd, despite a higher frequency of grade ≥ 3 TEAEs leading to pomalidomide, bortezomib, and/or dexamethasone discontinuation. Therefore, PVd treatment may improve patient outcomes, regardless of frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Oriol
- Institut Català d'Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital and KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Meral Beksac
- Ankara Üniversitesi Tip Fakültes, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Sujith Dhanasiri
- Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Munci Yagci
- Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Katja Weisel
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mo CC, Yee AJ, Midha S, Hartley‐Brown MA, Nadeem O, O'Donnell EK, Bianchi G, Sperling AS, Laubach JP, Richardson PG. Selinexor: Targeting a novel pathway in multiple myeloma. EJHaem 2023; 4:792-810. [PMID: 37601856 PMCID: PMC10435704 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Selinexor is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound that inhibits exportin-1 (XPO1), a novel therapeutic target that is overexpressed in multiple myeloma (MM) and is responsible for the transport of ∼220 nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm, including tumour suppressor proteins. Inhibition of this process has demonstrated substantial antimyeloma activity in preclinical studies, both alone and in combination with established MM therapeutics. Based on a clinical trial programme encompassing multiple combination regimens, selinexor-based therapy has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), with selinexor-dexamethasone approved in the later-relapse setting for penta-refractory patients and selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone approved for patients who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the clinical data on selinexor-based regimens, including recent updates from the 2022 American Society of Hematology annual meeting, and summarise ongoing studies of this novel targeted agent in newly diagnosed MM and RRMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clifton C. Mo
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Andrew J. Yee
- Massachusetts General Cancer CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Shonali Midha
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Division of HematologyBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Monique A. Hartley‐Brown
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Division of HematologyBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Omar Nadeem
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elizabeth K. O'Donnell
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Division of HematologyBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Giada Bianchi
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Division of HematologyBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Adam S. Sperling
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Division of HematologyBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jacob P. Laubach
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Paul G. Richardson
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteJerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma ResearchHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Midha S, Hartley-Brown MA, Mo CC, Hossain S, Nadeem O, O'Donnell EK, Bianchi G, Sperling AS, Laubach JP, Richardson PG. A safety review of recently approved and emerging drugs for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:1049-1071. [PMID: 37906232 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2274420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple new drugs have been approved over the past 5 years for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and these are being increasingly widely used. Clinicians need to familiarize themselves with common toxicities associated with these drugs and with novel toxicities requiring specific management and supportive care. AREAS COVERED We review common toxicities associated with agents approved for RRMM in the past 5 years, including the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab, the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin, the bispecific antibody teclistamab, the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, the selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound selinexor, and the drug-peptide conjugate melflufen, as well as toxicities associated with emerging agents for RRMM including additional bispecific antibodies, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, and the cereblon E3 ligase modulators iberdomide and mezigdomide. We searched the published literature using PubMed, plus congress abstracts, for the above list of drug names or classes and 'myeloma.' EXPERT OPINION Optimal management of toxicities associated with these recently approved and emerging therapies will be critical in maximizing clinical benefit and aiding widespread adoption in routine clinical practice. We summarize current recommendations and guidelines and provide expert insights into supportive care requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shonali Midha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Monique A Hartley-Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clifton C Mo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shahrier Hossain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omar Nadeem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth K O'Donnell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giada Bianchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S Sperling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacob P Laubach
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul G Richardson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elbezanti WO, Challagundla KB, Jonnalagadda SC, Budak-alpdogan T, Pandey MK. Past, Present, and a Glance into the Future of Multiple Myeloma Treatment. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:415. [PMID: 36986514 PMCID: PMC10056051 DOI: 10.3390/ph16030415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a challenging hematological cancer which typically grows in bone marrow. MM accounts for 10% of hematological malignancies and 1.8% of cancers. The recent treatment strategies have significantly improved progression-free survival for MM patients in the last decade; however, a relapse for most MM patients is inevitable. In this review we discuss current treatment, important pathways for proliferation, survival, immune suppression, and resistance that could be targeted for future treatments.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abramson HN. Recent Advances in the Applications of Small Molecules in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24. [PMID: 36768967 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), a hematologic neoplasm of plasma cells, has undergone remarkable changes over the past 25 years. Small molecules (molecular weight of less than one kDa), together with newer immunotherapies that include monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and most recently, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, have combined to double the disease's five-year survival rate to over 50% during the past few decades. Despite these advances, the disease is still considered incurable, and its treatment continues to pose substantial challenges, since therapeutic refractoriness and patient relapse are exceedingly common. This review focuses on the current pipeline, along with the contemporary roles and future prospects for small molecules in MM therapy. While small molecules offer prospective benefits in terms of oral bioavailability, cellular penetration, simplicity of preparation, and improved cost-benefit considerations, they also pose problems of toxicity due to off-target effects. Highlighted in the discussion are recent developments in the applications of alkylating agents, immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, apoptosis inducers, kinesin spindle protein inhibitors, blockers of nuclear transport, and drugs that affect various kinases involved in intracellular signaling pathways. Molecular and cellular targets are described for each class of agents in relation to their roles as drivers of MM.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mian H, McCurdy A, Giri S, Grant S, Rochwerg B, Winks E, Rosko AE, Engelhardt M, Pawlyn C, Cook G, Jackson G, Bringhen S, Facon T, Larocca A, Zweegman S, Wildes TM. The prevalence and outcomes of frail older adults in clinical trials in multiple myeloma: A systematic review. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:6. [PMID: 36599867 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00779-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable blood cancer that primarily affects older adults. Several frailty tools have been developed to address the heterogeneity of aging in this population. Uptake of these measures has been variable, leading to a gap in knowledge regarding the proportion of enrolled trial participants considered frail and uncertainty in the treatment-related effects and outcomes among this high-risk population. We performed a systematic review of therapeutic interventional MM clinical trials reporting on frailty. We included 43 clinical trials (24 randomized controlled trials and 19 non-randomized trials) which met eligibility criteria. Frailty was increasingly incorporated in studies in more recent years with 41.9% of included studies being reported in the last two years. Commonly used frailty tools included the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty index (41.8%), and the simplified frailty score (39.5%). Frailty status was categorized with 3 levels as (frail, intermediate fit, or fit) in 51.2% of the studies and dichotomized (frail, non-frail) in 18.6% of studies. Frailty prevalence greatly varied across trials ranging from 17.2% to 73.6% of the cohort. Of the included studies, 72.0% conducted subgroup analysis (planned or post-hoc) based on frailty status. Most studies demonstrated a consistent benefit of MM interventions among the frail and non-frail populations, however in general, frail patients had worse outcomes compared to the fit. Although frailty is increasingly being incorporated in MM clinical trials, due to the variation in both the definition and categorization of frailty, there remains heterogeneity in the prevalence of frailty and its potential associated impact on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hira Mian
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Arleigh McCurdy
- Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Smith Giri
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Shakira Grant
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Erica Winks
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ashley E Rosko
- Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Monika Engelhardt
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Interdisciplinary Cancer Center (ITZ) and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg (CCCF), Faculty of Freidburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 53, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, LICTR, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Graham Jackson
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sara Bringhen
- SSD Clinical Trial in Onco-hematology and Multiple Myeloma, AOU City of Health and Science of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Thierry Facon
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille, France
- French Academy of Medicine, Paris, France
| | - Alessandra Larocca
- SSD Clinical trials in onco-ematologia e mieloma multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya M Wildes
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
As the aging population grows, so too does the number of well-tolerated antimyeloma therapies. Physicians will see an increasing volume of patients for subsequent lines of therapy, which could now extend this relationship for over a decade. For younger patients, treatment choices are infrequently impacted by concerns of fitness, but instead about effecting the deepest, most durable response. Older adults, in contrast, are more likely to experience under- than overtreatment, and therefore more objective (and ideally straightforward) ways to evaluate their fitness and ability to tolerate therapy will increasingly assist in decision-making. Post hoc analyses categorizing the fitness of trial patients in the modern treatment era globally demonstrate that even in highly selected populations, those that are recategorized as less fit or frail are consistently at higher risk of inferior outcomes and increased toxicities. Real-world data are comparatively lacking but do demonstrate that most patients with myeloma are not representative of those enrolled on clinical trials, generally more heavily burdened by comorbidities and more likely to be categorized as "less than fit." Simultaneously, the number of therapeutic options open to patients in the relapsed setting continues to grow, now including T-cell engagers and cellular therapies, with their unique toxicity profiles. The aim of this review is to summarize the available data, highlight some of the approaches possible to easily assess fitness and how results might inform treatment selection, and illustrate ways that patients' condition can be optimized rather than lead to exclusion from the more complex therapies newly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Abdullah M Khan
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ciara L Freeman
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Centre & Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sellin M, Berg S, Hagen P, Zhang J. The molecular mechanism and challenge of targeting XPO1 in treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloma. Transl Oncol 2022; 22:101448. [PMID: 35660848 PMCID: PMC9166471 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant progress has been made on the treatment of MM during past two decades. Acquired drug-resistance continues to drive early relapse in primary refractory MM. XPO1 over-expression and cargo mislocalization are associated with drug-resistance. XPO1 inhibitor selinexor restores drug sensitivity to subsets of RR-MM cells.
Multiple myeloma (MM) treatment regimens have vastly improved since the introduction of immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies; however, MM is considered an incurable disease due to inevitable relapse and acquired drug resistance. Understanding the molecular mechanism by which drug resistance is acquired will help create novel strategies to prevent relapse and help develop novel therapeutics to treat relapsed/refractory (RR)-MM patients. Currently, only homozygous deletion/mutation of TP53 gene due to “double-hits” on Chromosome 17p region is consistently associated with a poor prognosis. The exciting discovery of XPO1 overexpression and mislocalization of its cargos in the RR-MM cells has led to a novel treatment options. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor can restore sensitivity of RR-MM to PIs and dexamethasone. We will elaborate on the problems of MM treatment strategies and discuss the mechanism and challenges of using XPO1 inhibitors in RR-MM therapies while deliberating potential solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Sellin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Oncology Institute, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Loyola University Chicago, USA
| | - Stephanie Berg
- Loyola University Chicago, Department of Cancer Biology and Internal Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
| | - Patrick Hagen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL USA
| | - Jiwang Zhang
- Department of Cancer Biology, Oncology Institute, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Medical Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Auner HW, Brown SR, Walker K, Kendall J, Dawkins B, Meads D, Morgan GJ, Kaiser MF, Cook M, Roberts S, Parrish C, Cook G. Ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:52. [PMID: 35365598 PMCID: PMC8972903 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00626-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The all-oral combination of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (ICD) is well tolerated and effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We carried out MUKeight, a randomised, controlled, open, parallel group, multi-centre phase II trial in patients with relapsed MM after prior treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and a proteasome inhibitor (ISRCTN58227268), with the primary objective to test whether ICD has improved clinical activity compared to cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CD) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Between January 2016 and December 2018, 112 participants were randomised between ICD (n = 58) and CD (n = 54) in 33 UK centres. Patients had a median age of 70 years and had received a median of four prior lines of therapy. 74% were classed as frail. Median PFS in the ICD arm was 5.6 months, compared to 6.7 months with CD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21, 80% CI 0.9–1.6, p = 0.3634). Response rates and overall survival were not significantly different between ICD and CD. Dose modifications or omissions, and serious adverse events (SAEs), occurred more often in the ICD arm. In summary, the addition of ixazomib to cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone did not improve outcomes in the comparatively frail patients enroled in the MUKeight trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger W Auner
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation and The Hugh and Josseline Langmuir Centre for Myeloma Research, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah R Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Katrina Walker
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jessica Kendall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Bryony Dawkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Cook
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sadie Roberts
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher Parrish
- Department of Clinical Haematology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. .,Department of Clinical Haematology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leonardo-sousa C, Carvalho AN, Guedes RA, Fernandes PMP, Aniceto N, Salvador JAR, Gama MJ, Guedes RC. Revisiting Proteasome Inhibitors: Molecular Underpinnings of Their Development, Mechanisms of Resistance and Strategies to Overcome Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance. Molecules 2022; 27:2201. [PMID: 35408601 PMCID: PMC9000344 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Proteasome inhibitors have shown relevant clinical activity in several hematological malignancies, namely in multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, improving patient outcomes such as survival and quality of life, when compared with other therapies. However, initial response to the therapy is a challenge as most patients show an innate resistance to proteasome inhibitors, and those that respond to the therapy usually develop late relapses suggesting the development of acquired resistance. The mechanisms of resistance to proteasome inhibition are still controversial and scarce in the literature. In this review, we discuss the development of proteasome inhibitors and the mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to their activity—a major challenge in preclinical and clinical therapeutics. An improved understanding of these mechanisms is crucial to guiding the design of new and more effective drugs to tackle these devastating diseases. In addition, we provide a comprehensive overview of proteasome inhibitors used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, as this is a key strategy to combat resistance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Delimpasi S, Mateos MV, Auner HW, Gavriatopoulou M, Dimopoulos MA, Quach H, Pylypenko H, Hájek R, Leleu X, Dolai TK, Sinha DK, Venner CP, Benjamin R, Garg MK, Doronin V, Levy Y, Moreau P, Chai Y, Arazy M, Shah J, Shacham S, Kauffman MG, Richardson PG, Grosicki S. Efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in comparison with standard twice-weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma with renal impairment: Subgroup analysis from the BOSTON study. Am J Hematol 2022; 97:E83-E86. [PMID: 34882831 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Holger W. Auner
- The Hugh and Josseline Langmuir Centre for Myeloma Research Imperial College London London UK
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | | | - Hang Quach
- St. Vincent's Hospital University of Melbourne Fitzroy Victoria Australia
| | - Halyna Pylypenko
- Department of Hematology Cherkassy Regional Oncological Center Cherkassy Ukraine
| | - Roman Hájek
- Department of Hemato‐oncology, University Hospital Ostrava University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
| | - Xavier Leleu
- Department of Hematology CHU la Miletrie and Inserm CIC 1402 Poitiers France
| | | | - Dinesh Kumar Sinha
- State Cancer Institute Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Patna India
| | | | | | | | - Vadim Doronin
- City Clinical Hospital #40 Moscow Russian Federation
| | - Yair Levy
- Baylor University Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
| | | | - Yi Chai
- Karyopharm Therapeutics Newton Massachusetts USA
| | - Melina Arazy
- Karyopharm Therapeutics Newton Massachusetts USA
| | - Jatin Shah
- Karyopharm Therapeutics Newton Massachusetts USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Möller MD, Gengenbach L, Graziani G, Greil C, Wäsch R, Engelhardt M. Geriatric assessments and frailty scores in multiple myeloma patients: a needed tool for individualized treatment? Curr Opin Oncol 2021; 33:648-657. [PMID: 34534141 PMCID: PMC8528138 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multiple myeloma is a disease of elderly adults. Improvement in survival has occurred because of biological insights and novel agents. Therapeutic options involve choices today, thus have become more complex. Demographics have led to an increased number of elderly patients and age may be associated with a poorer outcome but is not the only prognostic predictor today. RECENT FINDINGS To evaluate patients' health status rather than their chronological age alone, frailty scores and functional geriatric assessments are used to identify prognostic groups, avoid adverse events, compare clinical trials and tailor treatment. As most clinical trials exclude frail elderly patients, those enrolled therein are often younger and healthier than the typical multiple myeloma patient. This represents a challenge for frail cohorts because of their increased risk of adverse events, overtreatment and undertreatment and/or therapy discontinuation, which may lead to poorer survival and quality of life (QoL). Reassessing patients' status via geriatric assessments is also relevant during treatment to adjust interventions appropriately. SUMMARY Integrating geriatric assessments may lead to individual treatment decisions, dose adjustments, better clinical outcome and QoL. Prospective clinical trials that enroll elderly multiple myeloma patients with comorbidities, incorporate frailty scores/geriatric assessments and help with prognostication, adverse event avoidance and QoL maintenance, remain warranted.
Collapse
|