Specialized heart failure centers--a success or an indicator of the failure of our health care delivery system

Effect of a heart failure clinic on survival and hospital readmission in patients discharged from acute hospital care

Ambulatory care by physicians especially devoted to the management of heart failure (HF) has been reported to have beneficial effects. The aim of this work was to assess the effect of outpatient management at a HF clinic, as compared with care by the usual assistant physician, on prognosis of HF patients. In this non-randomised study, we prospectively followed 339 patients after a hospitalisation index for HF, in order to compare prognosis between two groups of HF patients according to the ambulatory assistance setting: either a specific outpatient clinic (n=157) or the usual assistant physician (n=182). The outcomes assessed were all-cause death or cardiac-cause rehospitalisation during the first month after discharge and survival over the longer term. The risk of dying or being readmitted during the first month after discharge was significantly lower in patients followed at the HF clinic (adjusted odds ratio 0.23; 95% CI 0.12-0.46). Patients followed in the HF clinic also had an independent significantly lower hazard of dying during a longer-term follow up of average length 373 days (adjusted hazard ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.34-0.81). The results support the fact that a multidisciplinary and permanently available medical staff might be of relevance in improving outcomes in HF patients.

Potential contributing factors to noncompliance with dietary sodium restriction in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Although sodium restriction is considered essential in the management of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), there are no data available regarding patients awareness of and ability to comply with the sodium restriction guideline.

METHODS

Between May 1999 and August 2000, 50 patients referred to the Parkland Memorial Hospital CHF clinic were assessed by a registered dietitian for (1) awareness of the sodium restriction guideline, (2) ability to read the sodium content from a Nutrition Facts label, and (3) ability to sort 12 food containers, all bearing a Nutrition Facts label, into high- and low-sodium groups. A global measure of dietary sodium knowledge was calculated ("sodium knowledge score," range 0-10). These tests were repeated after the patient completed one or more educational sessions (mean 2.8 +/- 1.5) with the dietitian.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients aware of the sodium restriction guideline was 14% at baseline and 42% at follow-up (P <.01). The proportion of patients able to read the sodium content from the Nutrition Facts label was 58% at baseline and 92% at follow-up (P <.01). The sodium knowledge score was 3.8 +/- 3.4 at baseline and 5.8 +/- 3.2 at follow-up (P <.01). The proportion of subjects who achieved a perfect sodium knowledge score of 10 was 8% at baseline and 26% at follow-up (P <.05). The number of food containers sorted accurately was 10.6 +/- 1.5 at baseline and 11.3 +/- 1.1 at follow-up, P =.09.

CONCLUSIONS

On referral to a specialty CHF clinic, many patients had severe deficiencies in their knowledge base regarding dietary sodium intake that would preclude compliance with the sodium restriction guideline. Directed education focusing on sodium intake corrected many of these deficiencies.

Guidelines and Algorithms: Perceptions of Why and When They Are Successful and How to Improve Them

Medicine is increasingly complex, a reality created by the explosion of knowledge during the last 50 years. The cost of applying this knowledge creates a daunting economic challenge. As a result, there has been a profusion of guidelines intended to influence medical practice. This report explores the interrelated issues and concepts that impact the value and success of guidelines. These include medical quality and error, compliance, and the impact on outcomes in an evidence-based medicine context. Lessons learned from previous guidelines must be understood in relation to human behavior. Legal implications of the guidelines must be considered because both an increase and a decrease in liability can be anticipated. Many products have been labeled “advocacy guidelines” with a negative context. They are believed to express motivation rather than optimizing care. The ideal of professionalism is challenged, and there is potential for the growing use of guidelines in enforcing punitive actions. Constructive experience has emphasized the appropriate required elements for practice guidelines: a systematic review of the literature, an assessment of the volume and level of the evidence, and development of a review process by an appropriate multidisciplinary group for consistency, clinical impact, and resource implications leading to clearly stated and reasonable recommendations. The dissemination of guidelines, beyond conventional publication in a journal, will impact the success of the intended outcomes. The exploitation of electronic avenues, including the Internet and the evolving interactive electronic medical record, seems to be essential for future success in these endeavors.