Solid-pseudopapillary tumor: A report of three cases in adult males diagnosed utilizing three different modalities

Clinical presentation and comparison of surgical outcome for segmental resection vs. Whipple's procedure for solid pseudopapillary tumor: Report of six new cases & literature review of 321 cases

AIM

Report 6 new cases of solid-pseudopapillary-pancreatic-tumor, comprehensively review 321 cases reported in American literature, and compare outcomes for segmental resection vs.. Whipple's procedure.

METHODS

Cases of solid-pseudopapillary-tumor at William Beaumont Hospital, 1999-2011, identified by computerized analysis of pathology reports. Comprehensive review of all American cases identified by computerized literature review. Segmental resection includes open/laparoscopic central pancreatectomy and anatomic distal pancreatectomy, but excludes enucleation.

RESULTS

Six cases of solid-pseudopapillary-pancreatic-tumors (0.5% of all solid pancreatic lesions), occurred during 1999-2011 at the hospital. Mean age at diagnosis = 27.7 years. All 6 were female. All patients had abdominal pain. Mean symptom duration = 10.0 days. All patients had normal routine blood tests. Mean APACHE II score at diagnosis = 1.8. All six patients had single heterogeneous lesions, with cystic/solid components. All patients underwent surgery: segmental resection-4, Whipple's procedure-2. Tumors were uniformly diagnosed by surgically resected tissue. Mean tumor size = 5.7 cm. Mean postoperative length of stay = 4.0 days for segmental resection (N = 4) vs. 14.0 days for Whipple's procedure (N = 2). All 6 patients are alive and well to-date, without evident local recurrence or metastasis. In a literature review, 45 patients undergoing Whipple's procedure versus 34 patients undergoing segmental resection, had significantly longer mean postoperative hospitalization (16.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.01), and had increased unadjusted mortality (20.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.018). However, this mortality difference became insignificant when adjusting for longer mean follow-up of Whipple's procedure patients (Kaplan-Meier-survival-curve, p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

This work suggests segmental resection of these pancreatic tumors localized to the body/tail may have a better surgical outcome than Whipple's procedure for tumors localized to the pancreatic head. Further studies are necessary.

Cercariform cells: another cytologic feature distinguishing solid pseudopapillary neoplasms from pancreatic endocrine neoplasms and acinar cell carcinomas in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPPN) is a rare tumor of unknown origin that occurs predominantly in the body or tail of the pancreas in young women. The authors recently identified cercariform (Greek: tailed) cells, similar to those described in urothelial carcinomas, as a consistent cytologic feature in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) samples from SPPNs. The objective of the current multi-institutional study was to define the value of these cells in the differential diagnosis of SPPN with other neoplasms characterized cytologically by the presence of monotonous, uniform cells in pancreatic aspirates: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NETs) and acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs).

METHODS

The files of 4 academic hospitals were searched for SPPNs, Pan-NETs, and ACCs that were diagnosed by EUS-FNA. The slides were reviewed, and several cytologic features were recorded semiquantitatively to identify discriminating features between SPPNs, Pan-NETs, and ACCs.

RESULTS

From the analysis of 18 SPPNs, 4 ACCs, and 20 Pan-NETs, the following cytologic features were identified as common to all 3 neoplasms: single cells and rosettes/acinar cell groups, round-to-plasmacytoid cells, pale-to-granular cytoplasm, fine vacuoles, and binucleated cells. Papillary structures, cercariform cells, large cytoplasmic vacuoles, reniform nuclei, hyaline globules/magenta-colored material, and degenerative features (cholesterol crystals, calcifications, foam cells, or giant cells) were significantly more common in SPPNs. Prominent nuclear grooves were encountered in only 4 of 18 SPPNs.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that the presence of cercariform cells is another useful clue for the cytologic diagnosis of SPPN in challenging cases.