PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing: A review with reference to cytology specimens

Minimally Invasive, Maximally Effective: The Power of Precision Cytoanalysis on Effusion Samples-A Comprehensive Exploration from Traditional Methods to Innovative Approaches

Precision medicine translates through molecular assays and in minimally invasive diagnosis, evident in analyses of effusions that serve therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. This cost-effective and low-risk approach provides advantages, playing a pivotal role in late-stage oncology and frequently standing as the primary resource for cancer diagnosis and treatment pathways. This article outlines the workflow for managing serous fluid and explores how cytology effusion analysis extends beyond immunocytological diagnosis. Combined with current molecular tests it showcases the potential to be a skillful tool in precision cytopathology.

The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women, however mortality in the US and EU are recently declining in parallel with the gradual cut of smoking prevalence. Consequently, the relative frequency of adenocarcinoma increased while that of squamous and small cell carcinomas declined. During the last two decades a plethora of targeted drug therapies have appeared for the treatment of metastasizing non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Personalized oncology aims to precisely match patients to treatments with the highest potential of success. Extensive research is done to introduce biomarkers which can predict the effectiveness of a specific targeted therapeutic approach. The EGFR signaling pathway includes several sufficient targets for the treatment of human cancers including NSCLC. Lung adenocarcinoma may harbor both activating and resistance mutations of the EGFR gene, and further, mutations of KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. Less frequent but targetable genetic alterations include ALK, ROS1, RET gene rearrangements, and various alterations of MET proto-oncogene. In addition, the importance of anti-tumor immunity and of tumor microenvironment has become evident recently. Accumulation of mutations generally trigger tumor specific immune defense, but immune protection may be upregulated as an aggressive feature. The blockade of immune checkpoints results in potential reactivation of tumor cell killing and induces significant tumor regression in various tumor types, such as lung carcinoma. Therapeutic responses to anti PD1-PD-L1 treatment may correlate with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells. Due to the wide range of diagnostic and predictive features in lung cancer a plenty of tests are required from a single small biopsy or cytology specimen, which is challenged by major issues of sample quantity and quality. Thus, the efficacy of biomarker testing should be warranted by standardized policy and optimal material usage. In this review we aim to discuss major targeted therapy-related biomarkers in NSCLC and testing possibilities comprehensively.

The detection of PD-L1 expression on liquid-based cytology in pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma and its prognostic evaluation: Between paired liquid-based cytology and cell block samples

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels measured by immunohistochemistry have been proven to predict the outcome of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, data on PD-L1 expression on liquid-based cytology (LBC) in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is scarce.

METHODS

This study cohort included 60 cases with MPE suffering from LUAD. PD-L1 SP263 assay was used for immunocytochemistry (ICC) on LBC and matched cell block (CB) to validate ICC protocols on LBC slides. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on immunotherapy and PD-L1 tumor proportion scores (TPS) on LBC slides and CBs.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression with TPS ≥1% was lower in LBCs than in CBs (33 of 60 [55.0%] vs. 35 of 60 [58.3%]; p = .687). Even with the TPS ≥50% threshold, PD-L1 expression was lower in LBCs (10 of 60 [16.7%] vs. 15 of 60 [25%]; p = .125). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 mutation, tumor cell proportion, and pleural fluid neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were related to PD-L1 expression on CBs (p = .013, p = 0.022, and p = .011), respectively. Patients with subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy remained a better prognostic in subgroups of PD-L1 positive expression on LBC slides (TPS ≥1%, p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

LBC specimens had comparable performance to CBs in PD-L1 assessment and predicting treatment response to PD-L1-defined therapy.

SARS-CoV-2 as an Oncolytic Virus Following Reactivation of the Immune System: A Review

The effects SARS-CoV-2 inflicts on human physiology, especially in patients who developed COVID-19, can range from flu-like symptoms to death, and although many lives have been lost during the pandemic, others have faced the resolution of aggressive neoplasms that once proclaimed a poor prognosis following traditional treatments. The purpose of this review was to analyze several fortunate case reports and their associated biomolecular pathways to further explore new avenues that might provide oncological treatments in the future of medicine. We included papers that discussed cases in which patients affected by COVID-19 suffered beneficial changes in their cancer status. Multiple mechanisms which elicited a reactivation of the host's immune system included cross-reactivity with viral antigens and downregulation of neoplastic cells. We were able to identify important cases presenting the resolution/remission of different aggressive neoplasms, for which most of the time, standard-of-care treatments offered little to no prospect towards a cure. The intricacy of the defense mechanisms humans have adopted against cancer cells through the millennia are still not well understood, but SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated that the same ruinous cytokine storm which has taken so many lives can paradoxically be the answer we have been looking for to recalibrate the immunological system to retarget and vanquish malignancies.

Molecular testing in cytology

In the era of personalized medicine, molecular testing plays a critical role in patient care. The rapid advance of molecular techniques, especially next-generation sequencing, makes molecular diagnosis feasible in daily practice. Molecular testing can be used as a valuable ancillary test to increase diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, especially in small biopsy or cytology samples. In addition, molecular testing plays an important role in selecting patients for appropriate treatment by detecting therapeutic and predictive biomarkers in tissue or cytology samples. Molecular studies can be applied in all cytology samples, sometimes with better results than histology. As molecular testing has become essential for patient care and is often requested to be performed in cytology samples, it is critical for cytopathologists to understand the basics of molecular diagnostic methods, indications for molecular testing, and how to best utilize different cytologic samples for this purpose. In this special issue, experts in various areas of cytopathology and molecular pathology review the literature and discuss the basics of molecular techniques and the application of molecular testing in various types of cytology samples. It is our hope that after reading the articles in this special issue, the readers can know better about the possibilities of molecular cytology, a very exciting field of pathology.