1
|
Tzeng HM, Franks HE, Passy E. Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing the 4Ms Framework of Age-Friendly Health Systems: A Scoping Review. Nurs Rep 2024; 14:913-930. [PMID: 38651482 PMCID: PMC11036203 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14020070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This scoping review explored the evidence in the peer-reviewed published journal literature to identify the facilitators and barriers to implementing the 4Ms Framework of Age-Friendly Health Systems in inpatient and outpatient clinical settings. METHODS Our search strategy focused on primary and secondary data sources that described the barriers and facilitators of incorporating the 4Ms Framework in clinical settings. We focused on older adults 65 years and older and followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR). RESULTS The evidence analyses of the 19 identified articles revealed six facilitator themes and five barrier themes to implementing the 4Ms Framework of Age-Friendly Health Systems in inpatient and outpatient clinical settings. The most recurring facilitator theme was embedding the 4Ms Framework into routine clinical practice with clinical pathways and designated personnel. The most frequently reported barrier theme was the lack of clinicians' buy-in. CONCLUSIONS Future research may translate the findings of this scoping review into a facilitator and barrier checklist or a "reality-check" measure to monitor the progress of the journey of embracing the 4Ms Framework in outpatient or inpatient clinical settings. This study was not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huey-Ming Tzeng
- School of Nursing, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-1132, USA
| | - Hannah E. Franks
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-1132, USA;
| | - Elise Passy
- Alzheimer’s Health Systems Director-Texas, National Division of Health Systems, Alzheimer’s Association, Houston, TX 77087, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arbaje AI, Hsu YJ, Zhou Z, Greyson S, Gurses AP, Keller S, Marsteller J, Bowles KH, McDonald MV, Vergez S, Harbison K, Hohl D, Carl K, Leff B. Characterizing changes to older adults' care transition patterns from hospital to home care in the initial year of COVID-19. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:1079-1087. [PMID: 38441330 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skilled home healthcare (HH) provided in-person care to older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet little is known about the pandemic's impact on HH care transition patterns. We investigated pandemic impact on (1) HH service volume; (2) population characteristics; and (3) care transition patterns for older adults receiving HH services after hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge. METHODS Retrospective, cohort, comparative study of recently hospitalized older adults (≥ 65 years) receiving HH services after hospital or SNF discharge at two large HH agencies in Baltimore and New York City (NYC) 1-year pre- and 1-year post-pandemic onset. We used the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) and service use records to examine HH utilization, patient characteristics, visit timeliness, medication issues, and 30-day emergency department (ED) visit and rehospitalization. RESULTS Across sites, admissions to HH declined by 23% in the pandemic's first year. Compared to the year prior, older adults receiving HH services during the first year of the pandemic were more likely to be younger, have worse mental, respiratory, and functional status in some areas, and be assessed by HH providers as having higher risk of rehospitalization. Thirty-day rehospitalization rates were lower during the first year of the pandemic. COVID-positive HH patients had lower odds of 30-day ED visit or rehospitalization. At the NYC site, extended duration between discharge and first HH visit was associated with reduced 30-day ED visit or rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS HH patient characteristics and utilization were distinct in Baltimore versus NYC in the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Study findings suggest some older adults who needed HH may not have received it, since the decrease in HH services occurred as SNF use decreased nationally. Findings demonstrate the importance of understanding HH agency responsiveness during public health emergencies to ensure older adults' access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia I Arbaje
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Armstrong Institute Center for Health Care Human Factors, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yea-Jen Hsu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Zehui Zhou
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sylvan Greyson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ayse P Gurses
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Armstrong Institute Center for Health Care Human Factors, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sara Keller
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jill Marsteller
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathryn H Bowles
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Margaret V McDonald
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Sasha Vergez
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Katie Harbison
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dawn Hohl
- Johns Hopkins Home Care Group, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kimberly Carl
- Johns Hopkins Home Care Group, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bruce Leff
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Community and Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kattouw CE, Aase K, Viksveen P. How do the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home? A qualitative interview study with multiple stakeholders. Front Health Serv 2024; 4:1294320. [PMID: 38577152 PMCID: PMC10991764 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1294320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Often, homecare services are task-focused rather than person-based and fragmented instead of integrated. Consequently, several stakeholders have requested a transformation of the service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home. This transformation may be facilitated by an idealized design approach. However, few studies have applied such an approach. Moreover, previous research did not assess the ways in which the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of how the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home, according to different stakeholders. Methods Four stakeholder groups (n = 57) from a Norwegian municipality participated in an interview study (2019-2020): senior citizens, carers, healthcare professionals and managers. A directed qualitative content analysis was applied, guided by a four-category framework for the preferred service ecosystem. Results All stakeholder groups highlighted several limitations that hindered continuity of the services. There was also agreement on deficiencies in professionals' competence, yet professionals themselves did not focus on this as a significant aspect. Managers emphasised the importance of professionals' reablement competence, which was also considered to be deficient in the current homecare services. Contrary to the other stakeholder groups, most senior citizens seemed satisfied with the practical and social support they received. Together with carers, they also explained why they thought some professionals lack compassion. Their dependency on professionals may limit them in sharing honestly their opinions and preferences during care provision. Involvement of senior citizens in improvement of the current services was limited. Insufficient time and resources, as well as a complex organisation impacted the existing homecare services, and therefore served as barriers to the preferred service ecosystem. Discussion In this study there were different degrees of correspondence between the existing homecare services and the preferred service ecosystem according to four stakeholder groups. To develop the preferred service ecosystem, aspects such as predictability, adaptivity, and relationships are key, as well as continuous involvement of senior citizens and other stakeholders. The four-category framework applied in this study served as a tool to assess the existing homecare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Eward Kattouw
- SHARE—Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gan DRY, Mann J, Chaudhury H. Dementia care and prevention in community settings: a built environment framework for cognitive health promotion. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2024; 37:107-122. [PMID: 38226537 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Most people with dementia live in the community. As lifespan increases, one in three persons aged 85+ are expected to live with dementia. We conduct a systematic search to identify frameworks for dementia care and prevention in community settings. This is important to ensure quality of life for people living with cognitive decline (PLCD). RECENT FINDINGS 61 frameworks are synthesized into the dementia care and prevention in community (DCPC) framework. It highlights three levels of provision: built environment and policy supports, access and innovation, and inclusion across stages of decline. Domains of intervention include: basic needs; built environment health and accessibility; service access and use; community health infrastructure; community engagement; mental health and wellbeing; technology; end-of-life care; cultural considerations; policy, education, and resources. Personhood is not adequately represented in current built environment frameworks. This is supplemented with 14 articles on lived experiences at home and social practices that contribute to PLCD's social identity and psychological safety. SUMMARY Policy makers, health and built environment professionals must work together to promote "personhood in community" with PLCD. Clinicians and community staff may focus on inclusion, social identity and a sense of at-homeness as attainable outcomes despite diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Y Gan
- Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University
- EQUIGENESIS UrbanLab, Vancouver
| | - Jim Mann
- Person living with dementia, University of British Columbia
| | - Habib Chaudhury
- Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Health Care, Canada
| |
Collapse
|