On-treatment changes of serum Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein are associated with the regression of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients on interferon α add-on therapy

Diagnostic accuracy of mac-2-binding protein glycosylation isomer for diagnosing hepatitis B-related fibrosis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Mac-2-binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) is a novel biomarker for liver fibrosis. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of M2BPGi for predicting hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver fibrosis.

METHODS

EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMED, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals databases were searched comprehensively for articles published up to March 2022. Quality assessment was carried out in accordance with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled diagnostic estimates including sensitivity, specificity, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated. Before pooling the estimates, the threshold effect was assessed. Subgroup analysis was performed as well.

RESULTS

In all, 11 studies including 1836 patients were included. None of the 11 studies met all the criteria of QUADAS-2. The threshold effect was found (r = 0.757, P = 0.011) for predicting HBV-related severe fibrosis. The sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of M2BPGi for the prediction of significant fibrosis were 0.68 (0.65-0.71), 0.67 (0.64-0.70) and 0.741, respectively, while those for predicting cirrhosis were 0.65 (0.57-0.72), 0.79 (0.77-0.81) and 0.792. Additionally, the AUROC of M2BPGi for predicting severe fibrosis reached 0.766. No publication bias was observed. The results of subgroup analyses were similar to the overall results.

CONCLUSIONS

M2BPGi has moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Further studies stratified by etiology, liver inflammation, treatment, etc, are urgently needed.

Regression of liver fibrosis: evidence and challenges

It has been reported that liver fibrosis could be reversed after eliminating liver injuries. This article systematically summarizes the evidence of fibrosis regression based on histology, liver stiffness, and serum biomarkers, and discusses several clinically relevant challenges. Evidence from liver biopsy has been regarded as the gold standard in the assessment of fibrosis regression. Semi-quantitative staging and grading systems are traditionally and routinely used to define regression. Recently, the predominantly regressive, indeterminate, and predominantly progressive score was proposed, based on the regressive features from "hepatic repair complex", to provide additional information regarding the quality of fibrosis. For non-invasive assessment, although liver stiffness and serum biomarkers could be applied to reflect the dynamic changes of liver fibrosis, other confounding factors such as liver inflammation have to be considered. In conclusion, both histology and non-invasive methods can provide evidence regarding fibrosis regression. The predictive value of fibrosis regression in long-term prognosis warrants further investigation.