Predictors of long-term survival in patients with hepatic resection of colorectal metastases: Analysis of a Brazilian Cancer Center Cohort

Have we improved postoperative and long-term outcomes of liver surgery for colorectal cancer metastasis? Analysis of 1736 hepatectomies performed over 3 decades in a single center

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and its indication and results have varied in the last 30 years.

METHODS

All patients operated on for CRLM in our centre from 1990 to 2021 were prospectively collected, establishing 3 subgroups based on the year of the first surgery: group A 1990-1999, group B 2000-2010, group C 2011-2021. Clinical characteristics and the results of survival, recurrence and prognostic factors were compared.

RESULTS

1736 hepatectomies were included (Group A n = 208; Group B n = 770; Group C n = 758). Patients in group C had better survival at 5 and 10 years (A 40.5%/28.2%; B 45.9%/32.2%; C 51.6%/33.1%, p = 0.013), although there were no differences between groups in overall recurrence at 5 and 10 years (A 73%/75.7%; B 67.6%/69.2%, and C 63.9%/66%, p = 0.524), nor in liver recurrence (A 46.4%/48.2%; B 45.8%/48.2%; and C 44.4%/48.4%, p = 0.899). An improvement was observed in median survival after recurrence, being 19 months, 23 months, and 31 months (groups A, B and C respectively). Prognostic factors of long-term survival changed over the 3 study periods. The only ones that remained relevant in the last decade were the presence of >4 liver metastasis, extrahepatic disease at the time of hepatectomy, and intraoperative blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after surgery for CRLM has improved significantly, although this cannot be explained by a reduction in overall and hepatic recurrence, but rather by an improvement in post-recurrence survival. Involvement of the resection margin has lost prognostic value in the last decade.

Relationship between hepatic surgical margins of colorectal cancer liver metastases and prognosis: A review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health concern, as characterized by its high mortality rate ranking second among all the leading causes of death. The liver serves as the primary site of CRC metastasis, and the occurrence of liver metastasis is a significant contributor to mortality among patients diagnosed with CRC. The survival rate of patients with colorectal liver metastasis has significantly increased with the advancement of comprehensive tumor therapy. However, radical surgery remains the key factor. Since there are frequently multiple liver metastases, which are prone to recurrence after surgery, it is crucial to preserve as much liver parenchyma as possible without affecting the prognosis. The issue of surgical margins plays a crucial role in this regard. In this review, we begin by examining the occurrence of positive surgical margins in liver metastases of patients diagnosed with CRC. We aim to define positive margins in hepatic surgery, examine the relationship between margins and prognosis and establish a foundation for future research in this field.

Analysis of survival factors after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases: Does the R1 margin matter?

Introduction

The effect of liver margin on colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatectomy has been controversial. In this study, we conducted a postoperative follow-up study of 205 patients with CRLM to clarify whether a positive margin is significant and to define the risk factors affecting CRLM survival.

Methods

The data of 205 patients with CRLM who underwent surgical treatment at the Third Hospital of Peking University in the Department of General Surgery from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The general data, surgical data and postoperative follow-up of the patients were statistically analyzed.

Results

There were 130 cases (63.4%) of R0 resection and 75 cases (36.6%) of R1 resection. There were 136 males and 69 females, age 61 ± 11 years, and body mass index (BMI 24.5 ± 3.3 kg/m²). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the entire cohort were 93.4%, 68.4%, and 45.5% in the R0 resection group vs. 93.2%, 53.7%, and 42% in the R1 resection group, respectively, which were not statistically significant (P = 0.520). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates of 63.2%, 33.3%, and 29.7% were significantly better in the R0 resection group than in the R1 resection group of 47.9%, 22.7%, and 17.7% (P = 0.016), respectively. After multivariable analysis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) > 39 U/ml (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.39-3.79, P = 0.001), primary tumor perineural invasion (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-3.13, P = 0.047), and BMI > 24 kg/m2 (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-2.93, P = 0.033) were independently associated with poorer overall patient survival. The number of liver metastases >2 (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.10-2.47, P = 0.016), the maximum diameter of metastases ≥50 mm (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64, P = 0.026), and vascular invasion of the primary tumor (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03-2.64, P = 0.038) were also independently associated with poorer disease-free survival.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM, the negative effect of the R1 margin should be downplayed, and although the disease-free survival of the R1 margin is shorter than that of the R0 margin, it has no impact on overall survival. To improve overall survival, extra attention should be given to the factors of preoperative BMI, preoperative CA19-9, and the presence of perineural invasion of the primary tumor.

Pros and Cons of Portal Vein Embolization With Hematopoietic Stem Cells Application in Colorectal Liver Metastases Surgery

BACKGROUND/AIM

Portal vein embolization (PVE) with autologous stem cells application (aHSC) is a method for future liver remnant volume (FLRV) increase. The aim of the study was to evaluate the positivite and negativite aspects of the method in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PVE with aHSC application was used in 32 patients with colorectal liver metastases and insufficient FLRV. Preoperative number of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) was 5.2±3.6, CLMs volume 70.1±102.3 mm³ Results: FLRV growth occurred after 2-3 weeks in 31 (96.9%) patients, with volume increase from 528.2±170.5 to 715.4±143.3 ml (p=0.0001). Postoperative thirty days mortality, morbidity was 0% and 3.1%, respectively. Insufficient FLRV growth occurred in one patient. R0 liver resection was performed in 27(87.1%) patients. CLMs volume progression was in 5 (15.6%) patients from 680.0±59.4 to 723.1±57.1 ml (p=0.01). One and two-year overall survival were 88% and 62.9% respectively. Six and twelve-month recurrence-free survival rates were 50.7% and 39.6% respectively.

CONCLUSION

PVE with aHSC application is a safe and useful method for FLRV growth. It significantly increases secondary CLMs resectability. However, it can cause CLMs progression. Liver resection should, therefore, be performed as soon as possible after achieving optimal increase of FLRV.