Characterization and correction of cardiovascular motion artifacts in diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas

Precision of liver and pancreas apparent diffusion coefficients using motion-compensated gradient waveforms in DWI

BACKGROUND

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with optimized motion-compensated gradient waveforms reduces signal dropouts in the liver and pancreas caused by cardiovascular-associated motion, however its precision is unknown. We hypothesized that DWI with motion-compensated DW gradient waveforms would improve apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-repeatability and inter-reader reproducibility compared to conventional DWI in these organs.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, prospective, single center study, subjects recruited between October 2019 and March 2020 were scanned twice on a 3 T scanner, with repositioning between test and retest. Each scan included two respiratory-triggered DWI series with comparable acquisition time: 1) conventional (monopolar) 2) motion- compensated diffusion gradients. Three readers measured ADC values. One-way ANOVA, Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eight healthy participants (4 male/4 female), with a mean age of 29 ± 4 years, underwent the liver and pancreas MRI protocol. Four patients with liver metastases (2 male/2 female) with a mean age of 58 ± 5 years underwent the liver MRI protocol. In healthy participants, motion-compensated DWI outperformed conventional DWI with mean repeatability coefficient of 0.14 × 10-3 (CI:0.12-0.17) vs. 0.31 × 10-3 (CI:0.27-0.37) mm2/s for liver, and 0.11 × 10-3 (CI:0.08-0.15) vs. 0.34 × 10-3 (CI:0.27-0.49) mm2/s for pancreas; and with mean reproducibility coefficient of 0.20 × 10-3 (CI:0.18-0.23) vs. 0.51 × 10-3 (CI:0.46-0.58) mm2/s for liver, and 0.16 × 10-3 (CI:0.13-0.20) vs. 0.42 × 10-3 (CI:0.34-0.52) mm2/s for pancreas. In patients, improved repeatability was observed for motion-compensated DWI in comparison to conventional with repeatability coefficient of 0.51 × 10- 3 mm2/s (CI:0.35-0.89) vs. 0.70 × 10-3 mm2/s (CI:0.49-1.20).

CONCLUSION

Motion-compensated DWI enhances the precision of ADC measurements in the liver and pancreas compared to conventional DWI.

Partial Fourier in the presence of respiratory motion in prostate diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of respiratory motion in terms of signal loss in prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and to evaluate the usage of partial Fourier in a free-breathing protocol in a clinically relevant b-value range using both single-shot and multi-shot acquisitions.

METHODS

A controlled breathing DWI acquisition was first employed at 3 T to measure signal loss from deep breathing patterns. Single-shot and multi-shot (2-shot) acquisitions without partial Fourier (no pF) and with partial Fourier (pF) factors of 0.75 and 0.65 were employed in a free-breathing protocol. The apparent SNR and ADC values were evaluated in 10 healthy subjects to measure if low pF factors caused low apparent SNR or overestimated ADC.

RESULTS

Controlled breathing experiments showed a difference in signal coefficient of variation between shallow and deep breathing. In free-breathing single-shot acquisitions, the pF 0.65 scan showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher apparent SNR than pF 0.75 and no pF in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate. In the multi-shot acquisitions in the PZ, pF 0.75 had a significantly higher apparent SNR than 0.65 pF and no pF. The single-shot pF 0.65 scan had a significantly lower ADC than single-shot no pF.

CONCLUSION

Deep breathing patterns can cause intravoxel dephasing in prostate DWI. For single-shot acquisitions at a b-value of 800 s/mm2, any potential risks of motion-related artefacts at low pF factors (pF 0.65) were outweighed by the increase in signal from a lower TE, as shown by the increase in apparent SNR. In multi-shot acquisitions however, the minimum pF factor should be larger, as shown by the lower apparent SNR at low pF factors.

Distortionless, free-breathing, and respiratory resolved 3D diffusion weighted imaging of the abdomen

PURPOSE

Abdominal imaging is frequently performed with breath holds or respiratory triggering to reduce the effects of respiratory motion. Diffusion weighted sequences provide a useful clinical contrast but have prolonged scan times due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and cannot be completed in a single breath hold. Echo-planar imaging (EPI) is the most commonly used trajectory for diffusion weighted imaging but it is susceptible to off-resonance artifacts. A respiratory resolved, three-dimensional (3D) diffusion prepared sequence that obtains distortionless diffusion weighted images during free-breathing is presented. Techniques to address the myriad of challenges including: 3D shot-to-shot phase correction, respiratory binning, diffusion encoding during free-breathing, and robustness to off-resonance are described.

METHODS

A twice-refocused, M1-nulled diffusion preparation was combined with an RF-spoiled gradient echo readout and respiratory resolved reconstruction to obtain free-breathing diffusion weighted images in the abdomen. Cartesian sampling permits a sampling density that enables 3D shot-to-shot phase navigation and reduction of transient fat artifacts. Theoretical properties of a region-based shot rejection are described. The region-based shot rejection method was evaluated with free-breathing (normal and exaggerated breathing), and respiratory triggering. The proposed sequence was compared in vivo with multishot DW-EPI.

RESULTS

The proposed sequence exhibits no evident distortion in vivo when compared to multishot DW-EPI, robustness to B0 and B1 field inhomogeneities, and robustness to motion from different respiratory patterns.

CONCLUSION

Acquisition of distortionless, diffusion weighted images is feasible during free-breathing with a b-value of 500 s/mm2, scan time of 6 min, and a clinically viable reconstruction time.

Robust multishot diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen with region-based shot rejection

PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging provides a useful clinical contrast, but is susceptible to motion-induced dephasing caused by the application of strong diffusion gradients. Phase navigators are commonly used to resolve shot-to-shot motion-induced phase in multishot reconstructions, but poor phase estimates result in signal dropout and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) overestimation. These artifacts are prominent in the abdomen, a region prone to involuntary cardiac and respiratory motion. To improve the robustness of DW imaging in the abdomen, region-based shot rejection schemes that selectively weight regions where the shot-to-shot phase is poorly estimated were evaluated.

METHODS

Spatially varying weights for each shot, reflecting both the accuracy of the estimated phase and the degree of subvoxel dephasing, were estimated from the phase navigator magnitude images. The weighting was integrated into a multishot reconstruction using different formulations and phase navigator resolutions and tested with different phase navigator resolutions in multishot DW-echo Planar Imaging acquisitions of the liver and pancreas, using conventional monopolar and velocity-compensated diffusion encoding. Reconstructed images and ADC estimates were compared qualitatively.

RESULTS

The proposed region-based shot rejection reduces banding and signal dropout artifacts caused by physiological motion in the liver and pancreas. Shot rejection allows conventional monopolar diffusion encoding to achieve median ADCs in the pancreas comparable to motion-compensated diffusion encoding, albeit with a greater spread of ADCs.

CONCLUSION

Region-based shot rejection is a linear reconstruction that improves the motion robustness of multi-shot DWI and requires no sequence modifications.

Probing Renal Microstructure and Function with Advanced Diffusion MRI: Concepts, Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Diffusion measurements in the kidney are affected not only by renal microstructure but also by physiological processes (i.e., glomerular filtration, water reabsorption, and urine formation). Because of the superposition of passive tissue diffusion, blood perfusion, and tubular pre-urine flow, the limitations of the monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model in assessing pathophysiological changes in renal tissue are becoming apparent and motivate the development of more advanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) variants. These approaches take advantage of the fact that the length scale probed in DWI measurements can be adjusted by experimental parameters, including diffusion-weighting, diffusion gradient directions and diffusion time. This forms the basis by which advanced DWI models can be used to capture not only passive diffusion effects, but also microcirculation, compartmentalization, tissue anisotropy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of renal DWI. Following a short introduction on renal structure and physiology, we present the key methodological approaches for the acquisition and analysis of renal DWI data, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), non-Gaussian diffusion, and hybrid IVIM-DTI. We then briefly summarize the applications of these methods in chronic kidney disease and renal allograft dysfunction. Finally, we discuss the challenges and potential avenues for further development of renal DWI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Diffusion-weighted imaging for determining response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to assess response to NAT. Data extracted included ADC pre- and post-NAT, for predicting response as defined by imaging, histopathology, or clinical reference standards. ADC values were compared with standardized mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

Of 337 studies, 7 were included in the analysis (161 patients). ADC values reported for the pre- and post-NAT assessments overlapped between responders and non-responders. One study reported inability of ADC increase after NAT for distinguishing responders and non-responders. A correlation with histopathological response was reported for pre- and post-NAT ADC in 4 studies. DWI's diagnostic performance was reported to be high in three studies, with a 91.6-100% sensitivity and 62.5-94.7% specificity. Finally, heterogeneity and high risk of bias were identified across studies, affecting the domains of patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing.

CONCLUSION

DWI might be useful for determining response to NAT in pancreatic cancer. However, there are still too few studies on this matter, which are also heterogeneous and at high risk for bias. Further studies with standardized procedures for data acquisition and accurate reference standards are needed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Diffusion-weighted MRI might be useful for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. However, further studies with robust data are needed to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

•The role of DWI with ADC measurements for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer is still unclear. •Pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy ADC values overlap between responders and non-responders. •DWI has a reported high diagnostic performance for determining response when using histopathological or clinical reference standards; however, studies are still few and at high risk for bias.

Motion-robust, blood-suppressed, reduced-distortion diffusion MRI of the liver

PURPOSE

To evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of liver diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI using cardiac-motion-robust, blood-suppressed, reduced-distortion techniques.

METHODS

DW-MRI data were acquired at 3T in an anatomically accurate liver phantom including controlled pulsatile motion, in eight healthy volunteers and four patients with known or suspected liver metastases. Standard monopolar and motion-robust (M1-nulled, and M1-optimized) DW gradient waveforms were each acquired with single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) and multishot EPI (msEPI). In the motion phantom, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in the motion-affected volume. In healthy volunteers, ADC was measured in the left and right liver lobes separately to evaluate ADC reproducibility between the two lobes. Image distortions were quantified using the normalized cross-correlation coefficient, with an undistorted T2-weighted reference.

RESULTS

In the motion phantom, ADC mean and SD in motion-affected volumes substantially increased with increasing motion for monopolar waveforms. ADC remained stable in the presence of increasing motion when using motion-robust waveforms. M1-optimized waveforms suppressed slow flow signal present with M1-nulled waveforms. In healthy volunteers, monopolar waveforms generated significantly different ADC measurements between left and right liver lobes ( p = 0 . 0078 $$ p=0.0078 $$ , reproducibility coefficients (RPC) =  470 × 1 0 - 6 $$ 470\times 1{0}^{-6} $$ mm 2 $$ {}^2 $$ /s for monopolar-msEPI), while M1-optimized waveforms showed more reproducible ADC values ( p = 0 . 29 $$ p=0.29 $$ , RPC = 220 × 1 0 - 6 $$ \mathrm{RPC}=220\times 1{0}^{-6} $$ mm 2 $$ {}^2 $$ /s for M1-optimized-msEPI). In phantom and healthy volunteer studies, motion-robust acquisitions with msEPI showed significantly reduced image distortion ( p < 0 . 001 $$ p<0.001 $$ ) compared to ssEPI. Patient scans showed reduction of wormhole artifacts when combining M1-optimized waveforms with msEPI.

CONCLUSION

Synergistic effects of combined M1-optimized diffusion waveforms and msEPI acquisitions enable reproducible liver DWI with motion robustness, blood signal suppression, and reduced distortion.

Diffusion Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen and Pelvis: Recent Technical Advances and Clinical Applications

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) serves as one of the most important functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques in abdominal and pelvic imaging. It is designed to reflect the diffusion of water molecules and is particularly sensitive to the malignancies. Yet, the limitations of image distortion and artifacts in single-shot DWI may hamper its widespread use in clinical practice. With recent technical advances in DWI, such as simultaneous multi-slice excitation, computed or reduced field-of-view techniques, as well as advanced shimming methods, it is possible to achieve shorter acquisition time, better image quality, and higher robustness in abdominopelvic DWI. This review discussed the recent advances of each DWI approach, and highlighted its future perspectives in abdominal and pelvic imaging, hoping to familiarize physicians and radiologists with the technical improvements in this field and provide future research directions.

Motion compensated renal diffusion weighted imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of respiratory motion and cardiac driven pulsation in renal DWI and to examine asymmetrical velocity-compensated diffusion encoding waveforms for robust ADC mapping in the kidneys.

METHODS

The standard monopolar Stejskal-Tanner pulsed gradient spin echo (pgse) and the asymmetric bipolar velocity-compensated (asym-vc) diffusion encoding waveforms were used for coronal renal DWI at 3T. The robustness of the ADC quantification in the kidneys was tested with the aforementioned waveforms in respiratory-triggered and breath-held cardiac-triggered scans at different trigger delays in 10 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

The pgse waveform showed higher ADC values in the right kidney at short trigger delays in comparison to longer trigger delays in the respiratory triggered scans when the diffusion gradient was applied in the feet-head (FH) direction. The coefficient of variation over all respiratory trigger delays, averaged over all subjects was 0.15 for the pgse waveform in the right kidney when diffusion was measured in the FH direction; the corresponding coefficient of variation for the asym-vc waveform was 0.06. The effect of cardiac driven pulsation was found to be small in comparison to the effect of respiratory motion.

CONCLUSION

Short trigger delays in respiratory-triggered scans can cause higher ADC values in comparison to longer trigger delays in renal DWI, especially in the right kidney when diffusion is measured in the FH direction. The asym-vc waveform can reduce ADC variation due to respiratory motion in respiratory-triggered scans at the cost of reduced SNR compared to the pgse waveform.

Pancreatic imaging using diffusivity mapping - Influence of sequence technique on qualitative and quantitative analysis

PURPOSE

To compare image quality of an optimized diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequence with advanced post-processing and motion correction (advanced-EPI) to a standard DWI protocol (standard-EPI) in pancreatic imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

62 consecutive patients underwent abdominal MRI at 1.5 T were included in this retrospective analysis of data collected as part of an IRB approved study. All patients received a standard-EPI and an advanced-EPI DWI with advanced post-processing and motion correction. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the parameters image quality, detail of parenchyma, sharpness of boundaries and discernibility from adjacent structures on b = 900 s/mm² images using a Likert-like scale. Segmentation of pancreatic head, body and tail were obtained and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated separately for each region. Apparent tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated at b = 50 s/mm² and at b = 900 s/mm².

RESULTS

The advanced-EPI yielded significantly higher scores for pancreatic parameters of image quality, detail level of parenchyma, sharpness of boundaries and discernibility from adjacent structures in comparison to standard-EPI (p < 0.001 for all, kappa = [0.46,0.71]) and was preferred in 96% of the cases when directly compared. ADC of the pancreas was 7% lower in advanced-EPI (1.236 ± 0.152 vs. 1.146 ± 0.126 μm²/ms, p < 0.001). ADC in the pancreatic tail was significantly lower for both sequences compared to head and body (all p < 0.001). There was comparable TBR for both sequences at b = 50 s/mm² (standard-EPI: 19.0 ± 5.9 vs. advanced-EPI: 19.0 ± 6.4, p = 0.96), whereas at b = 900 s/mm², TBR was 51% higher for advanced-EPI (standard-EPI: 7.1 ± 2.5 vs. advanced-EPI: 10.8 ± 5.1, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

An advanced DWI sequence might increase image quality for focused imaging of the pancreas and providing improved parenchymal detail levels compared to a standard DWI.