Repeatability of tools to assist in the follow up and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation patients using the sensory response

Sensing in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Feasibility Study in Subjects With Urinary Incontinence and Retention

OBJECTIVES

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) therapy standard of care relies on visual-motor responses and patient-reported sensory responses in deciding optimized lead placement and programming. Automatic detection of stimulation responses could offer a simple, consistent indicator for optimizing SNM. The purpose of this study was to measure and characterize sacral evoked responses (SERs) resulting from sacral nerve stimulation using a commercial, tined SNM lead.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A custom external research system with stimulation and sensing hardware was connected to the percutaneous extension of an implanted lead during a staged (tined lead) evaluation for SNM. The system collected SER recordings across a range of prespecified stimulation settings (electrode configuration combinations for bipolar stimulation and bipolar sensing) during intraoperative and postoperative sessions in 21 subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) and nonobstructive urinary retention (NOUR). Motor and sensory thresholds were collected during the same sessions.

RESULTS

SERs were detected in all 21 subjects. SER morphology (number of peaks, magnitude, and timing) varied across electrode configurations within and across subjects. Among subjects and electrode configurations tested, recordings contained SERs at motor threshold and/or sensory threshold in 75% to 80% of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that implanted SNM leads can be used to directly record SERs elicited by stimulation in subjects with OAB and NOUR. SERs were readily detectable at typical SNM stimulation settings and procedural time points. Using these SERs as possible objective measures of SNM response has the capability to automate patient-specific SNM therapy, potentially providing consistent lead placement, programming, and/or closed-loop therapy.

Data Gap in Sacral Neuromodulation Documentation: Call to Improve Documentation Protocols

Purpose: We quantified patient record documentation of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) threshold testing and programming parameters at our institution to identify opportunities to improve therapy outcomes and future SNM technologies.Methods: A retrospective review was conducted using 127 records from 40 SNM patients. Records were screened for SNM documentation including qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative covered indirect references to threshold testing and the quantitative included efficacy descriptions and device programming used by the patient. Findings were categorized by visit type: percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE), stage 1 (S1), permanent lead implantation, stage 2 (S2) permanent impulse generator implantation, device-related follow-up, or surgical removal.Results: Documentation of threshold testing was more complete during initial implant visits (PNE and S1), less complete for S2 visits, and infrequent for follow-up clinical visits. Surgical motor thresholds were most often referred to using only qualitative comments such as “good response” (88%, 100% for PNE, S1) and less commonly included quantitative values (68%, 84%), locations of response (84%, 83%) or specific contacts used for testing (0%). S2 motor thresholds were less well documented with qualitative, quantitative, and anatomical location outcomes at 70%, 48%, and 36% respectively. Surgical notes did not include specific stimulation parameters or contacts used for tests. Postoperative sensory tests were often only qualitative (80%, 67% for PNE, S1) with quantitative values documented much less frequently (39%, 9%) and typically lacked sensory locations or electrode-specific results. For follow-up visits, <10% included quantitative sensory test outcomes. Few records (<7%) included device program settings recommended for therapy delivery and none included therapy-use logs.Conclusions: While evidence suggests contact and parameter-specific programming can improve SNM therapy outcomes, there is a major gap in the documentation of this data. More detailed testing and documentation could improve therapeutic options for parameter titration and provide design inputs for future technologies.

The Influence of Electrode Configuration Changes on the Sensory and Motor Response During (Re)Programming in Sacral Neuromodulation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the neurophysiological basis behind troubleshooting in sacral neuromodulation (SNM). Close follow-up of SNM patients with program parameter optimization has proven to be paramount by restoring clinical efficacy and avoiding surgical revision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 34 successful SNM patients (28 overactive bladder wet, six nonobstructive urinary retention) with an implantable pulse generator were included. All possible bipolar and monopolar electrode settings were tested at sensory threshold (ST) to evaluate sensory (mapped on a perineal grid with 1 cm² coordinates) and motor (peak-to-peak amplitude and latency of muscle action potential) responses of the pelvic floor. Pelvic floor muscle electromyography was recorded using a multiple array probe, placed intravaginally. Parametric tests were used for paired data: repeated-measures ANOVA or t-test. A nonparametric test was used for paired data: Friedman ANOVA or Wilcoxon signed rank (WSR) test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. If significant, ANOVA was followed by Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Monopolar configurations showed significantly lower STs-1.38 ± 0.73 V vs 1.76 ± 0.89 V (paired t-test: p < 0.0001)-and presented with significantly higher peak-to-peak amplitudes-115.67 ± 79.03 μV vs 90.77 ± 80.55 μV (WSR: p = 0.005)-than bipolar configurations. When polarity was swapped, configurations with the cathode distal to the anode showed significantly lower STs, 1.73 ± 0.91 V vs 1.85 ± 0.87 V (paired t-test: p = 0.003), and mean peak-to-peak amplitudes, 81.32 ± 72.82 μV vs 100.21 ± 90.22 μV (WSR: p = 0.0001). Cathodal changes resulted in more changes in sensory responses than anodal changes (χ² test: p = 0.044). In cathodal changes only, peak-to-peak amplitudes were significantly higher when the distance between electrodes was maximally spread (WSR: p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

From a neurophysiological point of view, monopolar configurations stimulated more motor nerve fibers at lower STs, therefore providing more therapeutic efficiency. Swapping polarity or changing the position of the cathode led to different sensory and motor responses, serving as potential reprogramming options.

Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Objectives

In some patients treated for urinary or fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) persistence of symptoms, a reduction in efficacy or adverse effects of stimulation can occur. In such situations, further programming of the SNM device can help resolve problems. Infrequently hardware failure is detected. This article aims to provide practical guidance to solve sub‐optimal outcomes (troubleshooting) occurring in the course of SNM therapy.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review was performed. Collective clinical experience from an expert multidisciplinary group was used to form opinion where evidence was lacking.

Results

Circumstances in which reprogramming is required are described. Actions to undertake include changes of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency, and pulse width. Guidance in case of loss of efficacy and adverse effects of stimulation, developed by a group of European experts, is presented. In addition, various hardware failure scenarios and their management are described.

Conclusions

Reprogramming aims to further improve patient symptoms or ensure a comfortable delivery of the therapy. Initial changes of electrode configuration and adjustment of stimulation parameters can be performed at home to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. A logical and stepwise approach to reprogramming can improve the outcome of therapy and restore patient satisfaction.

Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice

Background

In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure.

Objective

Standardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed.

Methods

Systematic literature review and collective clinical experience report.

Results

The basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step‐by‐step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented.

Conclusions

Programming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow‐up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients.