Severe life threatening neurotoxicity in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving posaconazole and vincristine

Vincristine Side Effects With Concomitant Fluconazole Use During Induction Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

As a mainstay of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), vincristine's side effect profile is well known. Parallel administration of the antifungal fluconazole has been shown to interfere with the metabolism of vincristine, potentially resulting in increased side effects. We conducted a retrospective chart review to determine whether concomitant administration of vincristine and fluconazole during pediatric ALL induction therapy impacted the frequency of vincristine side effects, namely, hyponatremia and peripheral neuropathy. We also evaluated whether the incidence of opportunistic fungal infections was impacted by fluconazole prophylaxis. Medical charts of all pediatric ALL patients treated with induction chemotherapy at Children's Hospital and Medical Center in Omaha, NE, from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Fluconazole prophylaxis did not significantly impact the rate of fungal infections. We found no correlation between fluconazole use and increased incidence of hyponatremia or peripheral neuropathy, which supports the safety of fungal prophylaxis with fluconazole during pediatric ALL induction therapy.

Posaconazole aggravates vincristine-related hypertension in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case report

Vincristine-related secondary hypertension is rare. This study reports two children who were treated with vincristine for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and posaconazole for fungal infections who experienced vincristine-related secondary hypertension. Blood pressure normalized in both children after halting the drugs and providing antihypertensive treatment. Thus, posaconazole can interact with vincristine and induce secondary hypertension in children with ALL. As an adverse event, this interaction is a rare occurrence.

Toxicity of Vincristine Combined With Posaconazole in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Vincristine (VCR) is one of the main drugs of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment. Azole antifungal medications are used for treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in acute leukemia. Coadministration of these drugs increases the risk of VCR toxicity.

OBSERVATIONS

We presented a girl with ALL using posaconazole prophylaxis. She developed VCR toxicity that included tubulopathy, high blood pressure, neuropathic pain, difficulty walking, diffuse muscular weakness, constipation, abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited data in children with ALL for posaconazole prophylaxis. We recommend that VCR side effects should be evaluated by careful monitoring of the patients who are on this combination therapy.

Vincristine toxicity with co-administration of fluconazole during induction therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Antifungal prophylaxis is recommended for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) during high-risk periods such as induction; however, increased vincristine toxicities have been reported with the co-administration of triazole antifungals. We sought to determine whether vincristine-associated toxicities are higher among children with ALL concurrently given fluconazole prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis.

PROCEDURE

Using a retrospective cohort design, we reviewed records of pediatric patients treated for newly diagnosed ALL from 2003 to 2013. Patients were classified by fluconazole exposure during induction. The development of vincristine-associated toxicity and vincristine dose adjustment were the primary outcomes evaluated. The adjusted risk difference (RD) for vincristine-related toxicity associated with triazole exposure was determined.

RESULTS

We identified 197 patients meeting inclusion criteria for evaluation, 160 (81%) of whom received fluconazole prophylaxis. Among patients receiving fluconazole, 36/160 (22%) developed vincristine toxicity compared to 7/37 (19%) among those not receiving prophylaxis (RD: 3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11 to 18%). Adjusting for patient age and race, no statistically significant increased risk for vincristine-associated toxicity with fluconazole exposure was observed (RD 5%, 95% CI -8 to 17%). An increased risk for vincristine-associated toxicity was independently associated with age 10 years or older (RD 19%, 95% CI 4-34%).

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of fluconazole during induction therapy for pediatric ALL does not significantly increase the risk for vincristine-associated toxicities; however, patients 10 years or older are at an increased risk for toxicity independent of fluconazole exposure. Prophylaxis with fluconazole during induction therapy for pediatric ALL, if warranted, appears to be a safe clinical practice.

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion from concomitant use of itraconazole and vindesine

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Several studies have reported that itraconazole-induced inhibition of vincristine (VCR) metabolism might result in neurological impairment and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). However, there are few reports concerning adverse drug reactions (ADRs) resulting from concomitant use of vindesine (VDS) and itraconazole. Here, we report the first case of adverse drug interactions (ADIs) between itraconazole and VDS in a Chinese child with acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL).

CASE SUMMARY

A 4-year-old boy was diagnosed with standard-risk ALL and was receiving VDS (3 mg/m² ) for maintenance therapy and itraconazole for IFI recurrence. Severe neurotoxicity, consisting mainly of trismus and SIADH, was noticed after 7 days of VDS administration. After discontinuation of itraconazole and its replacement with caspofungin, the patient recovered from neurological signs and symptoms. The ADIs can be explained by VDS accumulation owing to inherent loss of CYP3A5 (*3/*3) function, and inhibition of CYP3A4 activity by itraconazole.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone from co-administration of itraconazole and VDS has not previously been reported to our knowledge. We suggest that the concomitant use of these drugs should be avoided if possible. The use of alternative antifungal drugs (AFDs) should be considered, and ADRs should be closely monitored when the combination of itraconazole and VDS is unavoidable.

Evaluation of the implementation rate of primary antifungal prophylaxis and the prognosis of invasive fungal disease in acute leukemia patients in China

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a major complication of acute leukemia, thus primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) is recommended by guidelines. Nevertheless, guidelines might not be commonly followed in developing countries due to economic factors. The primary objectives were to evaluate the implementation rate of PAP in acute leukemia patients in China and to compare the prognosis of IFD with and without PAP. The secondary objectives were to investigate the safety of PAP, clinical characteristics of IFDs and risk factors of breakthrough.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational single-center study, including non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving uniform induction or salvage chemotherapy between 2012 and 2016.

RESULTS

There were 29.4% of patients without PAP among a total of 248 cases. The incidence of breakthrough proven/probable/possible IFDs was 24.7%, 6.5%, 5.5%, 5.4% and 5.3% in control (no prophylaxis), fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole group respectively (P = 0.007), while the percentage of patients requiring empirical or pre-emptive therapy was 54.8%, 45.7%, 23.3%, 18.9%, 10.5% respectively (P < 0.001). PAP could also significantly improve IFD-free survival (P < 0.001) and reduce 90-day overall mortality in patients on AML salvage regimen (P = 0.021). There were no statistical differences in PAP-related adverse events. Past history of IFD (OR 9.5, P = 0.006) was confirmed to be independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a considerable number of acute leukemia patients without PAP in China, who have higher IFD incidence, increased empiric/pre-emptive antifungal drug use and worse IFD-free survival.

Posaconazole-vincristine coadministration triggers seizure in a young female adult: a case report

Coadministration of azoles and vincristine has been shown to increase vincristine neurotoxic effects due to the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform 3A4, for which vincristine is a substrate. Despite the absence of any casual relationship between seizure and coadministration of azoles, few case reports of vincristine-induced seizure have been documented after coadministration of fluconazole or posaconazole in children. In this paper we are reporting the first young female adult who experienced generalized seizure after coadministration of posaconazole and vincristine. The 19-year-old female was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. She started induction phase of Berlin Frankfurt Muenster protocol along with posaconazole 200 mg three times daily as prophylactic antifungal therapy. Five days after the third vincristine dose, she developed generalized seizure accompanied by high blood pressure and SIADH. Her neurological exam/CT scan did not show any abnormality. In conclusion, this study reports a novel finding in the sense that all previous case reports pertaining to posaconazole-vincristine-induced seizure in literature involved children. Physicians should be made aware of this rare possible outcome to closely monitor their patients and take appropriate measures to prevent such possible adverse effect.

Adverse interactions between antifungal azoles and vincristine: review and analysis of cases

Triazole and imidazole antifungal agents inhibit metabolism of vincristine, leading to excess vinca alkaloid exposure and severe neurotoxicity. Recent reports of debilitating interactions between vincristine and itraconazole, as well as posaconazole, voriconazole and ketoconazole underscore the need to improve medical awareness of this adverse combination. We, therefore, undertook a comprehensive analysis of reports of adverse drug interactions (ADIs) with the combination of vincristine and azole antifungal agents, established a new classification, and provided a detailed summary of these toxicities. In patients who had sufficient data for analysis, 47 individuals were identified who had an ADI with the combination of vincristine and antifungal azoles. Median age was 8 years (1.3-68 years) with 33(70%) having a diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Median time to ADI with vincristine was 9.5 days with itraconazole, 13.5 days posaconazole and 30 days voriconazole. The median number of vincristine doses preceding the ADI was 2 doses with itraconazole, 3 doses posaconazole and 2 doses voriconazole. The most common severe ADIs included gastrointestinal toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, hyponatremia/SIADH, autonomic neuropathy and seizures. Recovery from these ADIs occurred in 80.6% of patients. We recommend using alternative antifungal agents if possible in patients receiving vincristine to avoid this serious and potentially life-threatening drug interaction.

Risk of azole-enhanced vincristine neurotoxicity in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies: old problem - new dilemma

One of the most well-known drug interactions in pediatric oncology concerns the co-administration of itraconazole, an antifungal triazole, and vincristine, an antileukemic agent, which seems to enhance the risk of neurotoxicity of the latter, mediated through the cytochrome CYP450 enzyme system. The aim of this article is to review the metabolism of these two drugs, to analyze the published cases with severe triazole-enhanced vincristine neurotoxicity, to discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms of this adverse effect, and to contribute in understanding the differences in triazole-vincristine interaction severity.

Itraconazole associated quadriparesis and edema: a case report

Introduction

Itraconazole is an anti-fungal agent widely used to treat various forms of mycosis. It is particularly useful in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and severe asthma with fungal sensitization. Side effects are uncommon and usually mild. Mild neuropathy is noted to occur very rarely. We present an unusual and, to the best of our knowledge, as yet unreported case of severe neuropathy and peripheral edema due to itraconazole in the absence of a concomitant risk factor.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old Caucasian man was started on itraconazole following diagnosis of severe asthma with fungal sensitization. One month later he presented with severe bilateral ankle edema with an elevated serum itraconazole level. The itraconazole dose was reduced but his ankle edema persisted and he developed weakness of all four limbs. Itraconazole was completely stopped leading to improvement in his leg edema but he became bed bound due to weakness. He gradually improved with supportive care and neurorehabilitation. On review at six months, our patient was able to mobilize with the aid of two elbow crutches and power had returned to 5/5 in distal extremities and 4+/5 in proximal extremities. The diagnosis was established based on the classical presentation of drug-induced neuropathy and negative investigatory findings for any alternative diagnoses.

Conclusion

We report the case of a patient presenting with an unusual complication of severe neuropathy and peripheral edema due to itraconazole. Clinicians should be alert to this association when encountered with neuropathy and/or edema in an itraconazole therapy recipient.