Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations with a short cervix: an updated individual patient data meta-analysis

Study protocol for two randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of Cerclage in the reduction of extreme preterm birth and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies with a short cervix or dilatation: the TWIN Cerclage studies

INTRODUCTION

Twin pregnancies have a high risk of extreme preterm birth (PTB) at less than 28 weeks of gestation, which is associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Currently there is a lack of effective treatments for women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix or cervical dilatation. A possible effective surgical method to reduce extreme PTB in twin pregnancies with an asymptomatic short cervix or dilatation at midpregnancy is the placement of a vaginal cerclage.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed two multicentre randomised trials involving eight hospitals in the Netherlands (sites in other countries may be added at a later date). Women older than 16 years with a twin pregnancy at <24 weeks of gestation and an asymptomatic short cervix of ≤25 mm or cervical dilatation will be randomly allocated (1:1) to both trials on vaginal cerclage and standard treatment according to the current Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology guideline (no cerclage). Permuted blocks sized 2 and 4 will be used to minimise the risk of disbalance. The primary outcome measure is PTB of <28 weeks. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The first trial is to demonstrate a risk reduction from 25% to 10% in the short cervix group, for which 194 patients need to be recruited. The second trial is to demonstrate a risk reduction from 80% to 35% in the dilatation group and will recruit 44 women. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands on 3/30/2023. Participants will be required to sign an informed consent form. The results will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participants will be informed about the results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05968794.

The effectiveness of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with a mid-trimester short cervix: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness of cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervix.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study performed in two University Institutions in Valencia (Spain) with two different protocols for the management of asymptomatic dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with mid-trimester cervical length ≤ 25 mm: treatment with indomethacin, antibiotics and cerclage (cerclage group) (N = 43) versus expectant management (control group) (N = 37).

RESULTS

The initial cervical length was similar in both groups but detection of a short cervix was performed earlier in the cerclage group (21.6 vs 24.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Women with cerclage had a greater pregnancy latency (12.5 vs. 7.7 weeks, p < 0.001); higher gestational age at delivery (34.1 vs. 31.8 weeks, p < 0.04); less spontaneous preterm birth (SPB) < 28 weeks (11.6 % vs 37.8 %, p < 0.009); higher birthweight (2145 vs 1733 g, p < 0.001); lower birthweight < 1500 g (12.5 % vs 40.0 %, p < 0.001); less admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (24.1 % vs 43.3 %, p < 0.03); shorter stay at NICU (25.6 vs 49.4 days, p < 0.02); lower respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation (14.9 % vs 36.5 %, p < 0.02); fewer patent ductus arteriosus (8.9 % vs 26.9 %, p < 0.008); and lower composite adverse neonatal outcome (26.6 % vs. 44.8 %, p < 0.03). Cerclage and gestational age at diagnosis were the only independent predictors of SPB < 32 and < 28 weeks by multivariate analysis. The cumulative data in the literature show promising beneficial effects of cerclage.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix may reduce the earliest SPB and may improve neonatal outcome.

Use and Impact of Pessary, Cerclage, and Progesterone for the Secondary Prevention of Preterm Birth: Data from the German Neonatal Network

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the use and effect of cervical stitch cerclage, pessary, and progesterone on pregnancy outcome in mothers of very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) born<32 weeks of gestation in the German Neonatal Network (GNN).

METHODS

The GNN is a population-based cohort study enrolling VLBWI since 2009. We included 575 neonates from 424 mothers into our analysis, who were born between 2015 and 2019, after prenatal intervention with cerclage, pessary, progesterone or a combination between 20/0 to 25/0 weeks of gestation to prevent preterm birth. Median intervention-to-birth interval was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

231 of 424 pregnant women had a cerclage only (54.5%), 76 women a pessary only (17.9%), and 27 were prescribed progesterone only (15.3%). The most common combination treatment (>1 intervention group) was cerclage plus progesterone (n=27), followed by cerclage plus pessary (n=13). The median intervention-to-birth interval for the whole cohort was 24 days (IQR 19.0 days). The earlier the intervention was started, the longer the intervention-to-birth interval lasted: When started at 20 weeks, the interval was 34 days in contrast to 11.5 days, when started at 25 weeks. The >1 group was born at a significantly higher median GA with 27.0 weeks (IQR 2.9 weeks) and a higher median birth weight of 980 g (IQR 394 g) accordingly.

CONCLUSION

We propose that the earliest possible start of intervention leads to the most efficient pregnancy prolongation.

Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to January 31, 2023), Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, bibliographies, and conference proceedings.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that compared vaginal progesterone to placebo or no treatment in asymptomatic women with a twin gestation.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome was preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We assessed the risk of bias in each included study, heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality of evidence, and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (3401 women and 6802 fetuses/infants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among all twin gestations, there were no significant differences between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in the risk of preterm birth <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.17; high-quality evidence), <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.06; high-quality evidence), and <28 weeks (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.55; moderate-quality evidence), and spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.18; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone had no significant effect on any of the perinatal outcomes evaluated. Subgroup analyses showed that there was no evidence of a different effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation related to chorionicity, type of conception, history of spontaneous preterm birth, daily dose of vaginal progesterone, and gestational age at initiation of treatment. The frequencies of preterm birth <37, <34, <32, <30, and <28 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in unselected twin gestations (8 studies; 3274 women and 6548 fetuses/infants). Among twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length <30 mm (6 studies; 306 women and 612 fetuses/infants), vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <32 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.48-0.65; moderate- to high-quality evidence), neonatal death (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.92; moderate-quality evidence), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.88; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <34 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.41-0.68), composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.98), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.94) in twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length ≤25 mm (6 studies; 95 women and 190 fetuses/infants). The quality of evidence was moderate for all these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal progesterone does not prevent preterm birth, nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations, but it appears to reduce the risk of preterm birth occurring at early gestational ages and of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations with a sonographic short cervix. However, more evidence is needed before recommending this intervention to this subset of patients.

National and international guidelines on the management of twin pregnancies: a comparative review

Twin gestations are associated with increased risk of pregnancy complications. However, high-quality evidence regarding the management of twin pregnancies is limited, often resulting in inconsistencies in the recommendations of various national and international professional societies. In addition, some recommendations related to the management of twin gestations are often missing from the clinical guidelines dedicated to twin pregnancies and are instead included in the practice guidelines on specific pregnancy complications (eg, preterm birth) of the same professional society. This can make it challenging for care providers to easily identify and compare recommendations for the management of twin pregnancies. This study aimed to identify, summarize, and compare the recommendations of selected professional societies from high-income countries on the management of twin pregnancies, highlighting areas of both consensus and controversy. We reviewed clinical practice guidelines of selected major professional societies that were either specific to twin pregnancies or were focused on pregnancy complications or aspects of antenatal care that may be relevant for twin pregnancies. We decided a priori to include clinical guidelines from 7 high-income countries (United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Australia and New Zealand grouped together) and from 2 international societies (International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics). We identified recommendations regarding the following care areas: first-trimester care, antenatal surveillance, preterm birth and other pregnancy complications (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and gestational diabetes mellitus), and timing and mode of delivery. We identified 28 guidelines published by 11 professional societies from the 7 countries and 2 international societies. Thirteen of these guidelines focus on twin pregnancies, whereas the other 16 focus on specific pregnancy complications predominantly in singletons but also include some recommendations for twin pregnancies. Most of the guidelines are recent, with 15 of the 29 guidelines published over the past 3 years. We identified considerable disagreement among guidelines, primarily in 4 key areas: screening and prevention of preterm birth, using aspirin to prevent preeclampsia, defining fetal growth restriction, and the timing of delivery. In addition, there is limited guidance on several important areas, including the implications of the "vanishing twin" phenomenon, technical aspects and risks of invasive procedures, nutrition and weight gain, physical and sexual activity, the optimal growth chart to be used in twin pregnancies, the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrapartum care.This consolidation of key recommendations across several clinical practice guidelines can assist healthcare providers in accessing and comparing recommendations on the management of twin pregnancies and identifies high-priority areas for future research based on either continued disagreement among societies or limited current evidence to guide care.

Screening and Prevention of Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies

Twins represent 3.2% of all live births. However, they account for 20% of all preterm deliveries, 60% delivering <37 weeks, 10.7% <32 weeks, and 5 times higher risk of infant death. Risk factors for preterm birth (PTB) include the history of preterm delivery, monochorionic twins, short cervical length, and cervical surgery. Transvaginal cervical length <24 weeks is the best tool to predict PTB. Only vaginal progesterone in women with transvaginal cervical length <25 mm and physical exam indicated cerclage in women with cervical dilation >1 cm have shown a significant decrease in PTB and improvement in neonatal outcomes.

Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth

After the United States Food and Drug Administration pulled 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate from the market for its use in prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth, national societies have had mixed recommendations regarding the management of patients with a singleton pregnancy and previous spontaneous preterm birth. Herein we highlight the randomized trial data and translational evidence supporting the use of vaginal progesterone for prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Prophylactic vaginal progesterone starting at 16 weeks and 0 days every night should be offered to patients with singletons and previous singleton spontaneous preterm birth regardless of cervical length, and continued along with placement of cerclage if a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length ≤25 mm is detected at <24 weeks.

Cervical sliding sign at second trimester in the prediction of early preterm birth in twin pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cervical sliding sign (CSS) alongside cervical length (CL) in twin pregnancies to predict preterm birth (PB).

METHODS

Twin pregnancies (n = 37) with no known risk factor for PB were included in this prospective study. CSS was defined as the ultrasonographic finding in which the anterior lip of the cervix slides over the posterior lip with gentle and continuous pressure application. The CSS and CL measurements were held in the second trimester. Early PB was defined as the birth of the fetus before 32 weeks of gestation. The patients were divided into two groups as CSS-positive and CSS-negative.

RESULTS

Whereas 11 (29.7%) of the twin pregnancies were CSS-positive, 26 (70.3%) were CSS-negative. CSS positivity had a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 82.2%, a positive predictive value of 54.5%, and a negative predictive value of 92.3% to predict early PB. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that CSS positivity was the only significant independent factor related to early PB.

CONCLUSION

CSS was shown to be superior to CL in providing a better insight to predict early PB. CSS evaluation should be performed in twin pregnancies.

The use of cervical cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervical shortening or dilation: a twelve-year retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To identify the effect and optimal time of cervical cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervical shortening or dilation.

METHODS

This observational retrospective study enrolled all women with asymptomatic twin pregnancies who were diagnosed with asymptomatic cervical shortening or dilation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between 2010 and 2022. Women included were allocated into the cerclage group (n = 36) and the no cerclage group (n = 22). The cerclage group was further divided into the cerclage group (< 24 weeks group) and the cerclage group (24-28 weeks group) according to the time of cerclage. The no cerclage group was further divided into no cerclage group (< 24 weeks group) and no cerclage group (24-28 weeks group) according to the time of ultrasound-indicated or physical exam indicated cerclage. The rates of PTB < 24, 28, 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

The gestational age (GA) at delivery was higher (P = 0.005) and the interval time between the presentation of the indicated cerclage and delivery was longer in the cerclage group (P < 0.001). The rates of PTB before 28, 32, and 34 weeks of gestation, caesarean section and stillbirth were lower in the cerclage group (P < 0.05). The birthweight of the twins was higher in the cerclage group (P = 0.012). Admissions to the NICU were more frequent in pregnancies with no cerclage (P = 0.008). Subgroup analysis showed that the interval time between the presentation and delivery was longer in the cerclage group (< 24 weeks) (P < 0.001). The GA at delivery and the birthweight of the twins were significantly higher in the cerclage group (< 24 weeks) (P < 0.001). No differences were found in the GA at presentation, the GA at delivery, the interval time between the presentation to delivery and birthweight between the cerclage group (24-28 weeks group) and the control group (24-28 weeks group) (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cerclage appears to prolong the GA at delivery and the interval time between the presentation to delivery, and may reduce the incidence of PTB before 28, 32 and 34 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervical shortening or dilation. Cerclage before 24 weeks of gestation showed longer GA at delivery, longer interval time between the presentation to delivery and higher birthweight of the twins. The GA at presentation, the GA at delivery, the interval time between the presentation to delivery and birthweight in women with cerclage at 24-28 weeks were similar to those in women without cerclage at 24-28 weeks.

Reassessing Preterm Birth Prevention After the Withdrawal of 17-α Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently withdrawn approval for 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth, and recent studies have called into question benefits of the pessary in the setting of a short cervix. Obstetric health care professionals are once again left with limited remaining options for preterm birth prevention. This narrative review summarizes the best current evidence on the use of vaginal progesterone, low-dose aspirin, and cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth; attempts to distill possible lessons learned from studies of progesterone and pessary, as well as their implementation into practice; and highlights areas where inroads into preterm birth prevention may be possible outside of the progesterone-aspirin-cerclage paradigm.

How to screen the cervix and reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women without a prior preterm birth

Preterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality globally. PTB rates have increased in South Korea despite reduction in birth rates. A history of PTB is a strong predictor of subsequent PTB and screening of cervical length between 16 0/7 weeks and 24 0/7 weeks of gestation is recommended in women with a singleton pregnancy and a prior spontaneous PTB. However, the prediction and prevention of spontaneous PTBs in women without a prior PTB remain a matter of debate. The scope of this review article comprises cervical screening and prevention strategies for PTB in asymptomatic women without a prior PTB, based on recent evidence and guidelines.

A new care pathway to optimize gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Maternal gestational weight gain is an important determinant of pregnancy outcomes and may have an even greater role in twin pregnancies because of their higher rate of pregnancy complications and greater nutritional demands. However, data on the optimal week-specific gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies and on interventions that should be applied in cases of inadequate gestational weight gain are limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether a new care pathway that involves monitoring gestational weight gain using a week-specific chart, along with a standardized protocol for managing cases with inadequate gestational weight gain, can optimize maternal gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

In this study, patients with twin pregnancies followed in a single tertiary center between February 2021 and May 2022 were exposed to the new care pathway (postintervention group). Gestational weight gain and clinical outcomes were compared with those of a previously described cohort of patients with twins followed in our clinic before the implementation of the new care pathway (preintervention group). The new care pathway targeted patients and care providers and included educational material, a newly developed body mass index group-specific gestational weight gain chart, and a stepwise management algorithm in cases of inadequate gestational weight gain. The body mass index group-specific gestational weight gain charts were divided into 3 zones: (1) green zone (optimal gestational weight gain at 25th-75th centiles); (2) yellow zone (suboptimal gestational weight gain at 5th-24th or 76th-95th centiles); and (3) gray zone (abnormal gestational weight gain, at <5th or >95th centile). The primary outcome was the overall proportion of patients achieving optimal gestational weight gain at birth.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were exposed to the new care pathway and were compared with 1079 patients from the preintervention period. Patients in the postintervention group were more likely to achieve optimal gestational weight gain at birth (60.2% vs 47.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.86) and were less likely to achieve low-suboptimal gestational weight gain (7.3% vs 14.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.85) or any suboptimal gestational weight gain (26.8% vs 34.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.93) at birth. In addition, patients in the postintervention group were less likely to have low-abnormal gestational weight gain anytime during gestation (18.9% vs 29.1%; P=.017) and were more likely to have normal gestational weight gain throughout pregnancy (21.3% vs 14.0%; P=.031) or high-abnormal gestational weight gain anytime during gestation (18.0% vs 11.1%; P=.025), suggesting that in comparison with standard care, the new care pathway is more effective in preventing patients from moving into the low-abnormal zone than the high-abnormal zone. Furthermore, the new care pathway was more effective than standard care in correcting high-suboptimal gestational weight gain and high-abnormal gestational weight gain.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the new care pathway may be effective in optimizing maternal gestational weight gain in twin gestations, which may in turn contribute to better clinical outcomes. This is a simple, low-cost intervention that can be easily disseminated among providers caring for patients with twin pregnancies.

PROMPT: Prospective Meta-analysis for Pessary Trials Study Protocol

OBJECTIVE

 Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, is a leading cause of perinatal and infant mortality throughout the world. Preterm birth is also associated with long-term neurological disabilities and other significant health issues in children. A short cervix in the second trimester has been noted to be one of the strongest predictors of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth in both singleton and multiple pregnancies. Some studies have shown that cervical support in the form of an Arabin pessary lowers the risk of preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation and short cervical length; however, other studies have conflicting results. Our objective was to form an international collaborative of planned or ongoing randomized trials of pessary in singleton and twin gestations with a short cervix.

STUDY DESIGN

 In November 2014, an international group of investigators, who had initiated or were planning randomized trials of pessary for pregnant people with a short cervix and singleton or twin gestation to prevent preterm birth, formed a collaboration to plan a prospective individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized trials (PROspective Meta-analysis of Pessary Trials [PROMPT]). The PROMPT investigators agreed on meta-analysis IPD hypotheses for singletons and twins, eligibility criteria, and a set of core baseline and outcome measures. The primary outcome is a composite of fetal death or preterm delivery before 32 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidities. The PROMPT protocol may be viewed as a written agreement among the study investigators who make up the PROMPT consortium (PROSPERO ID# CRD42018067740).

RESULTS

 Results will be published in phases as the individual participating studies are concluded and published. Results of the first phase of singleton and twin pessary trials are expected to be available in late 2022. Updates are planned as participating trials are completed and published.

KEY POINTS

· Short cervical length predicts preterm birth.. · Results of prior cervical pessary trials are mixed.. · Meta-analysis of pessary trials protocol..

Nanomedicine strategies to improve therapeutic agents for the prevention and treatment of preterm birth and future directions

The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates 15 million babies worldwide are born preterm each year, with 1 million infant mortalities and long-term morbidity in survivors. Whilst the past 40 years have provided some understanding in the causes of preterm birth, along with development of a range of therapeutic options, notably prophylactic use of progesterone or uterine contraction suppressants (tocolytics), the number of preterm births continues to rise. Existing therapeutics used to control uterine contractions are restricted in their clinical use due to pharmacological drawbacks such as poor potency, transfer of drugs to the fetus across the placenta and maternal side effects from activity in other maternal systems. This review focuses on addressing the urgent need for the development of alternative therapeutic systems with improved efficacy and safety for the treatment of preterm birth. We discuss the application of nanomedicine as a viable opportunity to engineer pre-existing tocolytic agents and progestogens into nanoformulations, to improve their efficacy and address current drawbacks to their use. We review different nanomedicines including liposomes, lipid-based carriers, polymers and nanosuspensions highlighting where possible, where these technologies have already been exploited e.g. liposomes, and their significance in improving the properties of pre-existing therapeutic agents within the field of obstetrics. We also highlight where active pharmaceutical agents (APIs) with tocolytic properties have been used for other clinical indications and how these could inform the design of future therapeutics or be repurposed to diversify their application such as for use in preterm birth. Finally we outline and discuss the future challenges.

Management of Pregnancy with Cervical Shortening: Real-Life Clinical Challenges

Background and Objectives: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality worldwide and may be responsible for lifelong morbidities in the survivors. Cervical shortening is one of the common pathways to preterm birth associated with its own diagnostic and management challenges. The preventive modalities that have been tested include progesterone supplementation and cervical cerclage and pessaries. The study aimed to assess the management strategies and outcomes in a group of patients with a short cervix during pregnancy or cervical insufficiency. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients from the Riga Maternity Hospital in Riga, Latvia, were included in the prospective longitudinal cohort study between 2017 and 2021. Patients were treated with progesterone, cerclage, and/or pessaries. The signs of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation were assessed, and antibacterial therapy was given when the signs were positive. Results: The rates of PTB were 43.6% (n = 17), 45.5% (n = 5), 61.1% (n = 11), and 50.0% (n = 1) in progesterone only, cerclage, pessary, and cerclage plus pesssary groups, respectively. The progesterone therapy was associated with a reduced preterm birth risk (x2(1) = 6.937, p = 0.008)), whereas positive signs of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation significantly predicted the risk of preterm birth (p = 0.005, OR = 3.82, 95% [CI 1.31–11.11]). Conclusions: A short cervix and bulging membranes, both indicators of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, are the key risk factors in preterm birth risk predictions. Progesterone supplementation should remain at the forefront of preterm birth prevention. Among patients with a short cervix and especially complex anamnesis, the preterm rates remain high. The successful management of patients with cervical shortening lies between the consensus-based approach for screening, follow-up, and treatment on the one side and personalising medical therapy on the other.

Obstetric Indications for Progestin Therapy

Specifically, meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrate that vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of preterm birth in selected high-risk singleton pregnancies. 17-OHPC may also reduce the risk of recurrent preterm birth in singletons. Finally, one trial suggests that vaginal progesterone may also be beneficial in improving live birth rates in singletons with prior miscarriages and early pregnancy bleeding.

Cervical length screening for predicting preterm birth: A comparative review of guidelines

A cervical length (CL) assessment may predict preterm birth (PTB). This study aimed to analyze and compare the recommendations of guidelines on the role of CL in the prediction of PTB. There is no consensus regarding universal screening of asymptomatic women without a history of prior spontaneous PTB (sPTB), using CL. On the other hand, CL assessment is recommended in cases with a history of sPTB due to the high recurrence rate. Finally, there is discrepancy regarding CL assessment in asymptomatic women with multiple pregnancy. Although far from perfect, CL measurement remains the best available method to predict PTB.

Progesterone, cerclage, pessary, or acetylsalicylic acid for prevention of preterm birth in singleton and multifetal pregnancies - A systematic review and meta-analyses

Background

Preterm birth is the leading cause of childhood mortality and morbidity. We aimed to provide a comprehensive systematic review on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on progesterone, cerclage, pessary, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) to prevent preterm birth in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies defined as risk of preterm birth and multifetal pregnancies.

Methods

Six databases (including PubMed, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library) were searched up to February 2022. RCTs published in English or Scandinavian languages were included through a consensus process. Abstracts and duplicates were excluded. The trials were critically appraised by pairs of reviewers. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Predefined outcomes including preterm birth, perinatal/neonatal/maternal mortality and morbidity, were pooled in meta-analyses using RevMan 5.4, stratified for high and low risk of bias trials. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The systematic review followed the PRISMA guideline.

Results

The search identified 2,309 articles, of which 87 were included in the assessment: 71 original RCTs and 16 secondary publications with 23,886 women and 32,893 offspring. Conclusions were based solely on trials with low risk of bias (n = 50).Singleton pregnancies: Progesterone compared with placebo, reduced the risk of preterm birth <37 gestational weeks: 26.8% vs. 30.2% (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.82 [95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.71 to 0.95]) (high certainty of evidence, 14 trials) thereby reducing neonatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome. Cerclage probably reduced the risk of preterm birth <37 gestational weeks: 29.0% vs. 37.6% (RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.88]) (moderate certainty of evidence, four open trials). In addition, perinatal mortality may be reduced by cerclage. Pessary did not demonstrate any overall effect. ASA did not affect any outcome, but evidence was based on one underpowered study.Multifetal pregnancies: The effect of progesterone, cerclage, or pessary was minimal, if any. No study supported improved long-term outcome of the children.

Conclusion

Progesterone and probably also cerclage have a protective effect against preterm birth in asymptomatic women with a singleton pregnancy at risk of preterm birth. Further trials of ASA are needed. Prevention of preterm birth requires screening programs to identify women at risk of preterm birth.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021234946].

Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: who can benefit and who cannot? Evidence-based recommendations for clinical use

Vaginal progesterone (VP) has been recommended to prevent preterm birth (PTB) in women at high-risk. However, there is controversy as to whether VP is efficacious in some subsets of high-risk women. In this review, we examined the current best evidence on the efficacy of VP to prevent PTB in several subsets of high-risk women and provided recommendations for its clinical use. Compelling evidence indicates that VP reduces the risk of PTB and improves perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix (≤25 mm), both with and without a history of spontaneous PTB. VP appears promising to reduce the risk of PTB in twin gestations with a short cervix (≤25 mm) and in singleton gestations conceived by assisted reproductive technologies, but further research is needed. There is no convincing evidence that supports prescribing VP to prevent PTB in singleton gestations based solely on the history of spontaneous preterm birth. Persuasive evidence shows that VP does not prevent PTB nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations and in singleton gestations with a history of spontaneous PTB and a cervical length >25 mm. There is no evidence supporting the use of VP to prevent PTB in triplet or higher-order multifetal gestations, singleton gestations with a positive fetal fibronectin test and clinical risk factors for PTB, and gestations with congenital uterine anomalies or uterine leiomyoma. In conclusion, current evidence indicates that VP should only be recommended in singleton gestations with a short cervix, regardless of the history of spontaneous PTB.

Pessary or progesterone to prevent preterm birth in women with short cervical length: protocol of the 4-6 year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (Quadruple-P)

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal progesterone and a cervical pessary are both interventions that are investigated for the prevention of preterm birth (PTB). Thus far, beneficial or harmful effects of these interventions on long-term child health and development are described, but evidence is not robust enough to draw firm conclusions. With this follow-up study, we intent to investigate if progesterone or a pessary is superior for the prevention of PTB considering the child's health at 4-6 years of corrected age.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a follow-up study of the Quadruple-P trial; a multicentre, randomised clinical trial (NL42926.018.13, Eudractnumber 2013-002884-24) which randomises women with an asymptomatic midtrimester short cervix to daily progesterone or a pessary for the prevention of PTB. All children born to mothers who participated in the Quadruple-P study (n=628 singletons and n=332 multiples) will be eligible for follow-up at 4-6 years of corrected age. Children will be assessed using parental questionnaires. Main outcomes are child (neuro)development and behaviour. Other outcomes include child mortality, growth and general health. A composite of adverse child outcomes will be compared between the progesterone and pessary groups reporting OR and the corresponding 95% CI. Analyses will be performed separately for singletons and multiples and using the intention-to-treat approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Medical Research Ethics Committee from Amsterdam UMC confirmed that de Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) did not apply to our study (W20_481 #20.531). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with stakeholders and participants. This protocol is published before analysis of the results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch Trial Register (NL9646).

Guideline No. 428: Management of Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence-based recommendations for the management of dichorionic twin pregnancies.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline may improve the management of twin pregnancies and reduce neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., twin, preterm birth). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English- or French-language materials.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, radiologists, and other health care providers who care for women with twin pregnancies.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2022

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of the roles of researchers and clinicians in fostering evidence-based practice, diagnostic test accuracy in suspected preeclampsia, and the effectiveness of decision-making tools in patients with pre-pregnancy morbidities.