• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
  • Find an Author
Download
For: Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:657-662. [PMID: 18816491 DOI: 10.1002/uog.4093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Kamel R, Garcia FSM, Poon LC, Youssef A. The usefulness of ultrasound before induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021;3:100423. [PMID: 34129996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
2
Chan YTV, Lau KW, Hui W, Lau CH, Leung WC, Lau WL. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;35:4905-4909. [PMID: 33455498 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1873264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
3
Li X, Li L, Li Y, Fang S, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Yang Z. USEFULNESS OF TRANSPERINEAL VIRTUAL TOUCH QUANTIFICATION IN THE CERVIX FOR PREDICTING OUTCOME OF LABOR INDUCTION. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020;46:2207-2214. [PMID: 32565129 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
4
Gillor M, Levy R, Barak O, Ben Arie A, Vaisbuch E. Can assessing the angle of progression before labor onset assist to predict vaginal birth after cesarean?: A prospective cohort observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020;35:2046-2053. [PMID: 32519917 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1777269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
5
Songserm V, Komwilaisak R, Saksiriwuttho P, Kongwattanakul K. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. J Clin Ultrasound 2019;47:389-393. [PMID: 31245845 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
6
Usman S, Barton H, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Lees CC. Ultrasound is better tolerated than vaginal examination in and before labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;59:362-366. [PMID: 30024022 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
7
Gillor M, Vaisbuch E, Zaks S, Barak O, Hagay Z, Levy R. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:240-245. [PMID: 27062415 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
8
Wye D, Woo J, Mein B, Magotti R, Martin A, Benzie R. Transperineal use of a pocket-sized ultrasound machine vs conventional transvaginal ultrasound: a blinded comparison of cervical length in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:535-536. [PMID: 26776078 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2015] [Revised: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
9
Navarro-briceño Y, Reyna-villasmil E, Mejia-montilla J, Reyna-villasmil N, Torres-cepeda D, Santos-bolívar J, Fernández-ramírez A. Longitud cervical en el segundo trimestre por ecografía transperineal para la predicción de parto pretérmino. Perinatología y Reproducción Humana 2016;30:63-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rprh.2016.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]  Open
10
O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z. A comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques for the maternal cervix in the second trimester. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015;18:118-123. [PMID: 28191253 PMCID: PMC5024964 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00211.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]  Open
11
O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z, Lee E. The maternal cervix: Why, when and how? Sonography 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/sono.12035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
12
Usman S, Lees C. Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015;18:53-59. [PMID: 28191241 PMCID: PMC5024966 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00042.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]  Open
13
Podrasky AE, Javitt MC, Glanc P, Dubinsky T, Harisinghani MG, Harris RD, Khati NJ, Mitchell DG, Pandharipande PV, Pannu HK, Shipp TD, Siegel CL, Simpson L, Wall DJ, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Zelop CM. ACR appropriateness Criteria® second and third trimester bleeding. Ultrasound Q 2013;29:293-301. [PMID: 24263752 DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
14
Gauthier T, Marin B, Garuchet-bigot A, Kanoun D, Catalan C, Caly H, Eyraud J, Aubard Y. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:465-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3229-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2013] [Accepted: 03/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
15
Lehnert BE, Dighe MK. Second and third trimester bleeding. Ultrasound Q 2013;29:303-5. [PMID: 24263753 DOI: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
16
O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z. Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2013;16:124-134. [PMID: 28191186 PMCID: PMC5029998 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00100.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]  Open
17
Olson-Chen C, Hackney DN. Ultrasound for Cervical Length. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cult.2012.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA