Historical review of the rodent bioassay and future directions

The 2-year rodent bioassay in drug and chemical carcinogenicity testing: Performance, utility, and configuration for cancer hazard identification

For several intended uses of chemicals, the 2-year rodent bioassay (RCB) has been the benchmark method to screen the carcinogenicity to humans of substances, according to the hazard identification sphere. Despite the ongoing controversy around this traditional testing, the RCB is in force and being used by stakeholders. After assembling the RCB's ability to forecast the carcinogenicity to humans of substances, the current review aimed to provide a discussion on the RCB's (1) sensitivity and specificity; (2) utility; (3) configuration, and (4) provisional role in the regulatory policy. In general, RCBs conducted at maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) exhibited a functional ability to (1) not missing the great majority of human carcinogens, and to (2) not responding to the large majority of human non-carcinogens. There is citable evidence supporting the use of MTDs to render RCBs as sensitive as possible, particularly provided the ethically-justified small samples used in RCBs. The literature shows that rodent-specific mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis contribute significant unspecificity to RCBs. Nonetheless, the paradox between a functional sensitivity and a significant unspecificity can be predictively resolved through the application of Bayesian forecasting. In terms of performance to forecast the carcinogenicity to humans of either genotoxic or non-genotoxic substances, 2-species-RCBs added no value over the rat-RCB. Nevertheless, there is preliminary evidence cautioning that 15% of the rodent carcinogens probably carcinogenic to humans could be missed if mouse-RCBs are indiscriminately discontinued. More than thirteen RCB-related issues relevant to regulatory pharmacology and toxicology were discussed and summarized in this review.

The 2-year rodent bioassay in drug and chemical carcinogenesis testing: Sensitivity, according to the framework of carcinogenic action

The long-term rodent bioassay (RCB) has been the gold-standard for the pre-marketing prediction of chemical and drug carcinogenicity to humans. Nonetheless, the validity of this toxicity test has remained elusive for several decades. In the quest to uncover the performance of the RCB, its sensitivity (SEN) was charted as the first step. This appraisal was based on (a) chemicals with sufficient epidemiological evidence of carcinogenicity, and (b) other substances with limited epidemiological evidence, or remarkable classifications of carcinogenicity based on mechanistic or pharmacological data. In the present study, chemicals evaluated for their carcinogenicity to humans in IARC Monographs volumes 1-123, U.S. EPA IRIS Assessments, and U.S. NTP RoC were considered. This investigation gathered additional evidence supporting that, in hazard identification, the RCB is unwarranted for mutagenic or direct-acting genotoxicants. However, for purposes of risk assessment or management, the RCB might be justified whenever there is a lack of reliable and/or comprehensive epidemiological data. The RCB exhibited a significantly different SEN for threshold-based human carcinogens compared to non-threshold-based ones. With threshold-based chemicals, to increase the SEN of the testing from 80% (rat-RCB) to 90%, the 2-species RCB might be warranted. Nevertheless, the resolve would depend on the viewpoint, and on the future analysis of the overall performance of the RCB. In terms of SEN, and cancer hazard identification, the comparison between the RCB and alternative methods (e.g. rasH2 mouse, Tg.AC mouse) is now enabled.

Application of transcriptomic and microRNA profiling in the evaluation of potential liver carcinogens

Hepatocarcinogens are agents that increase the incidence of liver cancer in exposed animals or humans. It is now established that carcinogenic exposures have a widespread impact on the transcriptome, inducing both adaptive and adverse changes in the activities of genes and pathways. Chemical hepatocarcinogens have also been shown to affect expression of microRNA (miRNA), the evolutionarily conserved noncoding RNA that regulates gene expression posttranscriptionally. Considerable effort has been invested into examining the involvement of mRNA in chemical hepatocarcinogenesis and their potential usage for the classification and prediction of new chemical entities. For miRNA, there has been an increasing number of studies reported over the past decade, although not to the same degree as for transcriptomic studies. Current data suggest that it is unlikely that any gene or miRNA signature associated with short-term carcinogen exposure can replace the rodent bioassay. In this review, we discuss the application of transcriptomic and miRNA profiles to increase mechanistic understanding of chemical carcinogens and to aid in their classification.

Goodbye to the bioassay

It is time to say goodbye to the standard two-year rodent bioassay. While a few, primarily genotoxic, compounds which are clearly associated with human cancer test positive in the bioassay, there is no science-based, sound foundation for presuming it provides either a valid broad (across different chemicals) capability for discerning potential human carcinogens or a valid starting point for making human risk assessment decisions. The two basic assumptions underlying the bioassay are: (1) rodent carcinogens are human carcinogens; and (2) results obtained at high doses are indicative of results that will occur at lower, environmentally relevant, doses. Both of these assumptions are not correct. Furthermore, a reevaluation of National Toxicology Program bioassay data has revealed that if the dose group size were increased from 50 to 200 rodents per group the number of bioassays deemed to be positive would increase from approximately 50% to very close to 100%. Thus, under the extreme conditions of the bioassay (e.g., high doses, lifetime exposure and, at times, a non-physiological route of administration) virtually all chemicals tested could be made into rodent carcinogens. In recent years there have been a number of proposals to move away from the standard bioassay. In particular, a recently formulated decision tree (Cohen, 2017), which places an emphasis on dose-response relationships and invites the use of MOA information, provides a sound basis for moving on from the bioassay and towards a rational approach to both identify chemicals which appear to have the potential to cause cancer in humans and take dose-response relationships into consideration in order to place the extent, if any, of the risk they might pose into proper perspective.

High dose selection in general toxicity studies for drug development: A pharmaceutical industry perspective

The choice of an appropriate high dose for nonclinical toxicology studies continues to generate significant discussion and debate. Typically, use of the term "high dose" reflects a consideration of a Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) or a Maximum Feasible Dose (MFD), inexact terms applied to the design of nonclinical studies conducted to support human clinical trials for experimental new drugs. A pharmaceutical industry perspective on appropriate considerations for high doses in nonclinical studies is provided herein, however, the basic principles applied to the design of toxicology studies translate across the areas of Regulatory, Academic, and Industrial toxicology. Dose selection approaches for nonclinical studies of safety assessment for pharmaceuticals should consider the need to demonstrate the full range of the dose-response continuum (e.g., NOAEL through a toxic dose), however, should also take into account relevance to human therapeutic doses and incorporate clinical indication- and phase-specific considerations.

A tiered approach to systemic toxicity testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment

A proposal has been developed by the Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessment (ACSA) Technical Committee of the ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) for an improved approach to assessing the safety of crop protection chemicals. The goal is to ensure that studies are scientifically appropriate and necessary without being redundant, and that tests emphasize toxicological endpoints and exposure durations that are relevant for risk assessment. The ACSA Systemic Toxicity Task Force proposes an approach to systemic toxicity testing as one part of the overall assessment of a compound's potential to cause adverse effects on health. The approach is designed to provide more relevant data for deriving reference doses for shorter time periods of human exposure, and includes fewer studies for deriving longer term reference doses-that is, neither a 12-month dog study nor a mouse carcinogenicity study is recommended. All available data, including toxicokinetics and metabolism data and life stages information, are taken into account. The proposed tiered testing approach has the potential to provide new risk assessment information for shorter human exposure durations while reducing the number of animals used and without compromising the sensitivity of the determination of longer term reference doses.

Studies on the inhalation toxicology of two fiberglasses and amosite asbestos in the syrian golden hamster. Part I. Results of a subchronic study and dose selection for a chronic study

A multidose, subchronic inhalation study was used to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 901 fiberglass (MMVF10.1) for a chronic inhalation study using hamsters. Subchronic study results indicated that 30 mg/m(3) [250-300 WHO fibers (>5 microm long)/cm(3) and 100-130 fibers/cm(3) >20 microm long] meets or exceeds the estimated MTD, and chronic study results confirmed this. For the subchronic study, hamsters were exposed 6 h/day, 5 days/wk, for 13 wk to MMVF10.1 at 3, 16, 30, 45, and 60 mg/m(3) (36, 206, 316, 552, or 714 WHO fibers/cm(3)), then monitored for 10 wk. Results demonstrating MTD were: inflammatory response (all fiber exposures); elevated lung cell proliferation with @ges;16 mg/m(3); lung lavage neutrophil elevations with @ges;16 mg/m(3) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and protein elevations with > or = 30 mg/m(3); and persistent abnormal macrophage/fiber clumps in lungs exposed to 45 and 60 mg/m(3), which suggest overloading of clearance mechanisms. For the chronic study, hamsters were exposed for 78 wk to MMVF10a (901 fiber glass) or MMVF33 (special-application 475 fiberglass) at approximately 300 WHO fibers/cm(3) ( approximately 100 fibers/cm(3) @gt;20 @mu;m long), or to amosite asbestos at an equivalent concentration and 2 lower concentrations. All fiber-exposed animals had pulmonary inflammation, elevated lung lavage cells, and increased lung cell proliferation. Between 52 and 78 wk of exposure, lung burdens of all fibers increased at an accelerated rate, suggesting impairment of clearance mechanisms. MMVF33 and amosite induced fibrosis and pleural mesothelioma. These findings substantiate that exposures in the chronic study adequately tested the toxic potential of fiberglass.

Hypomethylation of DNA: a nongenotoxic mechanism involved in tumor promotion

There is an abundant amount of information on the mechanisms of action of genotoxic chemicals that act as carcinogens and the role that mutations play in carcinogenesis. However, carcinogenesis is more than mutagenesis and many carcinogens are not mutagens. Thus, there is a need to consider nongenotoxic mechanisms that may be involved in carcinogenesis. In this paper, we review our working hypothesis that hypomethylation of DNA is an epigenetic, nongenotoxic mechanism that plays a role in tumor promotion by facilitating aberrant gene expression. The utility of employing experimental models that focus on relevant comparisons between sensitive and resistant strains of mice is emphasized. Additionally, aspects of DNA methylation in rodents and humans are compared and contrasted. We discuss hypomethylation of DNA as a secondary mechanism, that is expected to be threshold-exhibiting, and conclude by describing how this information may facilitate a rational approach towards risk assessment when dealing with nongenotoxic compounds that are carcinogenic in a bioassay.