Immunosuppression and Kidney Transplantation

Dispersive solid phase extraction of tacrolimus from biological samples using curcumin and iron-based metal organic frameworks nanocomposite followed by LC-MS/MS determination

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in the prevention of tissue rejection. It has a narrow therapeutic index. Therefore, the determination of its concentration in biological fluids like plasma and urine is a very crucial issue. In this research, tacrolimus concentrations in plasma and urine samples were determined with a dispersive solid phase extraction procedure coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. For this purpose, a curcumin modified metal-organic framework was synthesized and used in extraction procedure. Tacrolimus was adsorbed onto the sorbent surface with aid of vortexing. Then, the adsorbed tacrolimus was eluted by a suitable solvent. Important parameters in extraction procedure were optimized by "one-variable-at-a-time" approach and reported as below: sorbent amount, 10 mg; sample solution pH, 2; agitation mode, vortexing; adsorption and desorption times, 1 min, and eluent (volume), methanol (200 µL). Under the optimized conditions and according to the International Council for Harmonization guidelines, the validation of the method was performed, and the results showed acceptable accuracy and precision (relative standard deviations ≤14 %), good linearity in a wide range (4-200 ng mL-1), and low limits of detection (1.2 ng mL-1 in plasma and 0.34 ng mL-1 in urine) and quantification (4.7 ng mL-1 in plasma and 1.12 ng mL-1 in urine). Finally, the validated method was successfully applied for the determination of tacrolimus in the plasma samples of the patients.

Preventing Rejection of the Kidney Transplant

With increasing knowledge of immunologic factors and with the advent of potent immunosuppressive agents, the last several decades have seen significantly improved kidney allograft survival. However, despite overall improved short to medium-term allograft survival, long-term allograft outcomes remain unsatisfactory. A large body of literature implicates acute and chronic rejection as independent risk factors for graft loss. In this article, we review measures taken at various stages in the kidney transplant process to minimize the risk of rejection. In the pre-transplant phase, it is imperative to minimize the risk of sensitization, aim for better HLA matching including eplet matching and use desensitization in carefully selected high-risk patients. The peri-transplant phase involves strategies to minimize cold ischemia times, individualize induction immunosuppression and make all efforts for better HLA matching. In the post-transplant phase, the focus should move towards individualizing maintenance immunosuppression and using innovative strategies to increase compliance. Acute rejection episodes are risk factors for significant graft injury and development of chronic rejection thus one should strive for early detection and aggressive treatment. Monitoring for DSA development, especially in high-risk populations, should be made part of transplant follow-up protocols. A host of new biomarkers are now commercially available, and these should be used for early detection of rejection, immunosuppression modulation, prevention of unnecessary biopsies and monitoring response to rejection treatment. There is a strong push needed for the development of new drugs, especially for the management of chronic or resistant rejections, to prolong graft survival. Prevention of rejection is key for the longevity of kidney allografts. This requires a multipronged approach and significant effort on the part of the recipients and transplant centers.

Basiliximab is associated with a lower incidence of De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience

PURPOSE

Induction immunosuppression has improved the long-term outcomes after kidney transplant. This study explores the association of different induction immunosuppression medications (Basiliximab vs. Alemtuzumab vs. rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin) used at the time of kidney transplant with the development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in the first 12 months post-transplant period.

METHODS

A total of 390 consecutive kidney transplant recipients (KTR), between 2016 and 2018, were included in the analysis. A 104 (26.6%) received Basiliximab, 186 (47.6%) received Alemtuzumab, and 100 (25.6%) received rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG) for induction. All recipients had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch before transplant. Serum samples at 4- and 12-months post-transplant were assessed for the presence of de novo HLA DSA. kidney allograft function was compared among the three groups with calculated Creatinine Clearance on 24 h urine collection.

RESULTS

De novo HLA DSA were detected in total of 81 (20.8%) patients within 12 months post-transplant. De novo HLA DSA were detected in 12/104 (11.5%), 43/186 (23.11%), and 26/100 (26%) KTR that received Basiliximab, Alemtuzumab, and rATG respectively (p = 0.006). KTR that received Basiliximab were significantly older, and the last follow-up creatinine clearance was significantly lower at 42 ml/min compared to KTR that received Alemtuzumab or rATG (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Induction immunosuppression utilizing Basiliximab is associated with significant reduction in development of de novo DSA within the first 12-months post kidney transplant but had lower creatinine clearance with long-term follow up.